Case: EEOC v. REGIS CORP., & HAIR MASTERS SERVICES, INC.

3:00-cv-05536 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: Sept. 18, 2000

Closed Date: Sept. 16, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The EEOC's Seattle district office sued Regis Corporation, a national hair salon chain, and Hair Masters Services, Inc. on September 18, 2000 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. The EEOC's complaint is unavailable, however the consent decree, entered on July 16, 2001, specifies the EEOC's causes of action. Accordingly, the EEOC alleged that the defendants violated Title VII when they discriminated against the intervenor employee, who intervened on January 3, 2001; by failing to accommodate her religious practices (unspecified) which lead to her constructive discharge. The consent decree stipulated that the defendant would pay the intervenor $55,000 in damages, provide training for religious sensitivity, amend its EEO policy to accommodate religious practices and post a notice of compliance with Title VII.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (6/8/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

3:00-cv-05536

Docket (PACER)

EEOC v. Regis Corporation, et al

July 16, 2001

July 16, 2001

Docket
20

3:00-cv-05536

Consent Decree and Order Dismissing Action

EEOC and Yong Gatts v. Regis Corporation and Hair Masters Services, Inc.

July 16, 2001

July 16, 2001

Settlement Agreement

3:00-cv-05536

FY 2002 Office of General Counsel Annual Report

EEOC v. Regis Corporation

No Court

June 16, 2003

June 16, 2003

Press Release

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 21, 2024, 3:02 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT (Summons(es) issued) FEE WAIVED (JAB) Modified on 09/21/2000 (Entered: 09/21/2000)

Sept. 18, 2000

Sept. 18, 2000

3

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for dfts by Wayne W Hansen, Kelly Susan Reese (EC) (Entered: 10/03/2000)

Sept. 29, 2000

Sept. 29, 2000

4

ANSWER to complaint [1-1] by defendant (EC) (Entered: 10/11/2000)

Oct. 10, 2000

Oct. 10, 2000

5

ORDER/NOTICE OF JOINT STATUS REPORT Joint Status Report due 12/18/00 (cc: counsel, Judge) (CAR) (Entered: 11/27/2000)

Nov. 27, 2000

Nov. 27, 2000

6

ORDER re: DISCOVERY and DEPOSITIONS by Judge Robert J. Bryan (cc: counsel, Judge) (CAR) (Entered: 11/27/2000)

Nov. 27, 2000

Nov. 27, 2000

7

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL on behalf of EEOC Carmen Flores terminating attorney Kathryn B Olson for EEOC (EC) (Entered: 11/29/2000)

Nov. 29, 2000

Nov. 29, 2000

8

MOTION by Interested Party Yong Gatts to intervene NOTED FOR 12/29/00 (EC) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

Dec. 12, 2000

Dec. 12, 2000

9

MEMORANDUM by Yong Gatts in support of motion to intervene [8-1] (EC) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

Dec. 12, 2000

Dec. 12, 2000

10

DECLARATION of counsel by Yong Gatts re motion to intervene [8-1] (EC) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

Dec. 12, 2000

Dec. 12, 2000

LODGED ORDER: re: motion to intervene [8-1] (EC) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

Dec. 12, 2000

Dec. 12, 2000

PROPOSED Intervenor's Complaint re: motion to intervene [8-1] (EC) (Entered: 12/12/2000)

Dec. 12, 2000

Dec. 12, 2000

11

JOINT STATUS REPORT filed by all parties. Est. Trial Days: 5-7 Attornies: attorney for defendant, attorney for Interested Party (EC) (Entered: 12/18/2000)

Dec. 18, 2000

Dec. 18, 2000

12

ORDER by Judge Robert J. Bryan GRANTING motion to intervene by Yong Gatts [8-1] (cc: counsel, Judge) (EC) (Entered: 01/03/2001)

Jan. 3, 2001

Jan. 3, 2001

13

COMPLAINT: Intervention by intervenor-plaintiff (EC) (Entered: 01/03/2001)

Jan. 3, 2001

Jan. 3, 2001

14

TRIAL NOTICE Discovery cutoff 7/20/01 Motion filing deadline 7/26/01 Deadline to Join Additional Parties is 2/5/01 ; Pretrial order to be submitted by 10/5/01 Pretrial conference set for 10/12/01 jury trial set for 10/22/01 Trial briefs to be submitted by 10/12/01 Voir dire/Jury Inst. to be submitted by 10/12/01 39.1 designation effective 9/21/01 (cc:all counsel) (JAB) (Entered: 01/04/2001)

Jan. 4, 2001

Jan. 4, 2001

15

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE of Yong Gatts' summons and complaint by D' Hair Masters Svc Inc, on 1/24/01 (CAR) (Entered: 02/02/2001)

Feb. 2, 2001

Feb. 2, 2001

16

ANSWER to intervenor complaint [13-1] by defendant (EC) (Entered: 03/26/2001)

March 26, 2001

March 26, 2001

17

ACCEPTANCE/ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF SERVICE of summons and complaint by defendant Regis Corporation on 2/12/01 (EC) (Entered: 03/26/2001)

March 26, 2001

March 26, 2001

18

SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL on behalf of EEOC by John Freeman Stanley. Terminating attorney Carmen Flores. (CAR) (Entered: 06/04/2001)

June 4, 2001

June 4, 2001

PROPOSED Stipulated Motion to Change Case Scheduled; Order (CAR) (Entered: 06/27/2001)

June 26, 2001

June 26, 2001

19

STIPULATION and ORDER by Judge Robert J. Bryan: discovery ddl extended to 8/10/01; dispositive mtn filing ddl extended to 8/16/01 ; dispositive motion noting date extended to 9/7/01 (cc: counsel, Judge) (EC) (Entered: 06/28/2001)

June 28, 2001

June 28, 2001

PROPOSED Stip/Order of Dismissal (EC) (Entered: 07/10/2001)

July 10, 2001

July 10, 2001

PROPOSED Consent Decree (EC) (Entered: 07/13/2001)

July 13, 2001

July 13, 2001

20

CONSENT DECREE by Judge Jack E. Tanner CASE DISMISSED (cc: counsel, Judge, Jgm. Book) Entered on: 7/16/01 (EC) (Entered: 07/16/2001)

July 16, 2001

July 16, 2001

Case Details

State / Territory: Washington

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 18, 2000

Closing Date: Sept. 16, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Hair Masters Services, Inc. (Tacoma, WA), Private Entity/Person

Regis Corporation (Tacoma, WA), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 55000

Order Duration: 2001 - 2003

Content of Injunction:

Expungement of Employment Record

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Reporting

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Accommodation / Leave

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discrimination-basis:

Religion discrimination

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit