Case: EEOC v. Cannon & Wendt

2:02-cv-01907 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Sept. 27, 2002

Closed Date: Oct. 24, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In September 2002, the Phoenix District Office of the EEOC filed this suit against Cannon & Wendt Electric Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. The docket is the only document publicly available regarding this case. Therefore, the exact allegations of the complaint are unknown. After some discovery, the parties participated in a settlement conference in July 2003 where it appears the case was settled. However, the EEOC filed a motion to reinstate the suit in August 2003. The motion was granted in September 2003, reinstating the case. Then after some scheduling orders, the parties settled through a consent decree in October 2003, the contents of which are unknown.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (6/4/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:02-cv-01907

Docket

EEOC v. Cannon and Wendt Electric Company

Oct. 24, 2003

Oct. 24, 2003

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 25, 2024, 3:03 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT FILED (Entered: 09/30/2002)

Sept. 27, 2002

Sept. 27, 2002

2

RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED summons/complaint upon Stat Agent for dft Cannon & Wendt Elec on 10/1/02 (MAP) (Entered: 10/11/2002)

Oct. 7, 2002

Oct. 7, 2002

3

ANSWER to complaint [1-1] by dft (SAT) (Entered: 10/25/2002)

Oct. 21, 2002

Oct. 21, 2002

4

ORDER Setting Scheduling Conference by Judge Roslyn O. Silver that pursuant to Rule 16, Fed.R.Civ.P., a Scheduling Conference is set for 1/10/03 at 9:00 AM ; prel scheduling conf set for 9:00 1/10/03 (cc: all counsel) (SAT) (Entered: 11/18/2002)

Nov. 18, 2002

Nov. 18, 2002

5

PROPOSED CASE MGT PLAN/REPORT: joint pretrial order ddl 45 days after decision on dispositive motions; discovery cutoff 11/14/03; dispositive motions filing ddl is 1/16/04 (LAD) (Entered: 12/31/2002)

Dec. 23, 2002

Dec. 23, 2002

6

MINUTE ENTRY before Judge Roslyn O. Silver . Crt Rptr: David Lee. Appearances: P. David Lopez for Plaintiff with the charging party Larry Walker and Teresa Foster for Defendant. Preliminary scheduling conf held. IT IS ORDERED that counsel file the proposed Rule 16 Scheduling Order by no later than January 17, 2003. [cc: ROS] [6-2] (SJF) (Entered: 01/10/2003)

Jan. 10, 2003

Jan. 10, 2003

7

NOTICE of compliance of initial disclosure statement pursuant to FRCivP 26(a) by dft Cannon & Wendt Elec (LAD) (Entered: 01/22/2003)

Jan. 21, 2003

Jan. 21, 2003

9

NOTICE of Service of Initial Rule 26(a) Disclosure Statement pursuant to FRCivP 26(a) by pla (SAT) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

Jan. 23, 2003

Jan. 23, 2003

10

NOTICE of service of discovery by pla. (SAT) (Entered: 03/19/2003)

March 18, 2003

March 18, 2003

11

Joint MOTION/Request for Settlement Conference by pla, dft [11-1] (SAT) (Entered: 04/04/2003)

April 3, 2003

April 3, 2003

12

NOTICE of service of discovery by pla. (SAT) (Entered: 04/28/2003)

April 28, 2003

April 28, 2003

13

NOTICE of service of discovery by pla. (SAT) (Entered: 05/06/2003)

May 5, 2003

May 5, 2003

14

ORDER by Judge Roslyn O. Silver granting Joint Motion/Request for Settlement Conference by pla, dft [11-1]; FURTHER ORDERED that this matter is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Morton Sitver for a settlement conference; Counsel is directed to place a conference call to Judge Sitver's office at (602) 322-7600 to schedule a date and time for the settlement conference (cc: all counsel) (SAT) (Entered: 05/12/2003)

May 12, 2003

May 12, 2003

15

NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE STATEMENT ORDER by Mag Judge Morton Sitver ; settlement conference set for 9:30 7/15/03 , before Mag Judge Morton Sitver (cc: all counsel) (SAT) (Entered: 05/16/2003)

May 16, 2003

May 16, 2003

16

NOTICE of Service of discovery by dft. (SAT) (Entered: 06/03/2003)

May 30, 2003

May 30, 2003

17

NOTICE of service of discovery by dft. (SAT) (Entered: 06/05/2003)

June 5, 2003

June 5, 2003

18

NOTICE of Service of First Supplemental Rule 26(a)(1) Disclosure Statement by pla (SAT) (Entered: 06/19/2003)

June 18, 2003

June 18, 2003

19

MINUTE ENTRY before Mag Judge Morton Sitver . . ; settlement conference held ; case settled [19-2] (SAT) (Entered: 07/17/2003)

July 15, 2003

July 15, 2003

20

ORDER by Judge Roslyn O. Silver that this action will be dismissed by the Clerk's Office without further notice on 8/22/03 unless prior thereto a request for reinstatement on the Court's trial calendar is filed herein ; possbl dsm ddl set for 8/22/03 ; FURTHER ORDERED all pending motions are denied without prejudice with leave to reinstate should the parties fail to finalize the settlement agreement; FURTHER ORDERED vacating any scheduled hearings and/or trial date discovery deadline vacated; dispositive motions ddl vacated (cc: all counsel) (SAT) (Entered: 07/22/2003)

July 22, 2003

July 22, 2003

21

JUDGMENT: that pursuant to the Court's order dated 7/22/03, this action is dismissed. Therefore, plaintiff shall take nothing. This complaint and action are hereby dismissed. case terminated (cc: all counsel) (SAT) (Entered: 08/22/2003)

Aug. 22, 2003

Aug. 22, 2003

22

Notice of Settlement Status and MOTION (titled "Request for Reinstatement on the Court's Calendar") to reopen the case by pla [22-1] (SAT) (Entered: 08/25/2003)

Aug. 22, 2003

Aug. 22, 2003

23

JOINDER by dft in Motion (titled "Request for Reinstatement on the Court's Calendar") to reopen the case by pla [22-1] (SAT) (Entered: 09/02/2003)

Aug. 28, 2003

Aug. 28, 2003

24

ORDER by Judge Roslyn O. Silver having considered parties' Motion ("Request for Reinstatement on the Court's Calendar") to reopen the case by pla [22-1], it is hereby ORDERED that the above case is reinstated on the Court's trial calendar Case reopened (cc: all counsel) (SAT) (Entered: 09/10/2003)

Sept. 10, 2003

Sept. 10, 2003

25

MINUTE ORDER: On September 9, 2003, this Court signed an order reinstating this case. On Court's motion, IT IS ORDERED setting a status hearing on October 10, 2003 at 10:00 a.m. Counsel should review the prior Rule 16 Scheduling Order to determine if new deadlines need to be established in this case and be prepared to submit an Amended Rule 16 Scheduling Order on October 10, 2003 if necessary. (cc: all counsel) [25- 2] (SJF) (Entered: 09/15/2003)

Sept. 15, 2003

Sept. 15, 2003

26

MINUTE ENTRY before Judge Roslyn O. Silver. Crt Rptr: David Lee. Appearances: Mary Joleen O'Neill for Plaintiff and Teresa Foster for Defendant. Court and counsel confer regarding the status of the case. Counsel are trying to resolve some limited issues with a consent decree. Therefore, continued status hearing is set October 24, 2003 at 8:45 a.m. Counsel are to file a joint statement of remaining disputes issues left to be resolved by no later than noon on October 22, 2003. If counsel are able to resolve this matter prior to the hearing date, counsel are to notify the court and the status hearing will be vacated. status hearing set for 8:45 10/24/03 [cc: ROS] [26-3] (SJF) (Entered: 10/10/2003)

Oct. 10, 2003

Oct. 10, 2003

27

CONSENT DECREE by Judge Roslyn O. Silver (cc: all counsel) re: decree [27-1] (SAT) (Entered: 10/24/2003)

Oct. 24, 2003

Oct. 24, 2003

Case Details

State / Territory: Arizona

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 27, 2002

Closing Date: Oct. 24, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Cannon & Wendt Electric Company, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits