EEOC v. LANSINK CONSULTING INC. & E3 GROUP, INC. | Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse

Case Profile		new search page permalink

Case Name	EEOC v. LANSINK CONSULTING INC. & E3 GROUP, INC.	EE-TX-0198
Docket / Court	3-98-CV-2817-G ( N.D. Tex. )
State/Territory	Texas
Case Type(s)	Equal Employment
Special Collection	EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization	EEOC
Case Summary	The EEOC's Dallas district office sued Lansink Consulting, Inc., a Texas technology consultant, and E3 Group, Inc., a Texas commercial real estate property manager, on December 1, 1998 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The EEOC's complaint is unavailable, but the ... read more > The EEOC's Dallas district office sued Lansink Consulting, Inc., a Texas technology consultant, and E3 Group, Inc., a Texas commercial real estate property manager, on December 1, 1998 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas. The EEOC's complaint is unavailable, but the consent decree states that the EEOC alleged that the defendants violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act with regards to an elderly employee. The parties entered into the consent decree on November 19, 1999 which stipulated that the defendants would not discriminate based on age in the future, destroy the files surrounding the aggrieved employee's termination, and pay the aggrieved employee $20,000 in damages. Aaron Weismann - 06/06/2007 compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -

Issues and Causes of Action

Issues

Content of Injunction

Discrimination Prohibition

Expungement of Employment Record

Retaliation Prohibition

Discrimination-basis

Age discrimination

EEOC-centric

Direct Suit on Merits

General

Disparate Treatment

Plaintiff Type

EEOC Plaintiff

Causes of Action

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Case Details


Defendant(s)	E3 Group, Inc. Lansink Consulting, Inc.
Plaintiff Description	Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations	EEOC
Class action status sought	No
Class action status granted	No
Prevailing Party	Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer	Yes
Nature of Relief	Damages Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief	Settlement
Form of Settlement	Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration	1999 - 2000
Case Closing Year	1999
Case Ongoing	No

Additional Resources


	Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit Date: Oct. 14, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants http://www.pwcagecase.com/ Date: Apr. 27, 2016 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Smith Barney Gender Discrimination https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/ Date: August 2008 By: Outten & Golden [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform Date: Mar. 1, 2008 By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law Faculty) Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]
	Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach Date: Apr. 1, 2001 By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School Faculty) Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001) [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Documents

Docket(s)

3:98-cv-02817 (N.D. Tex.)
EE-TX-0198-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/10/2000
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]

General Documents

Consent Decree

EE-TX-0198-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/19/1999

People