Case: EEOC v. RAYTHEON TECHNICAL

1:04-cv-00487 | U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii

Filed Date: Aug. 9, 2004

Closed Date: Nov. 3, 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In August 2004, the EEOC's San Francisco District Office filed this suit against Raytheon Technical Services Company in the U.S. District Court for the District of Hawaii. The docket is the only document publicly available regarding this case. Therefore, the exact allegations of the complaint are unknown. The parties began settlement negotiations almost immediately and entered into a final consent decree in November 2004, the contents of which are unknown.

Summary Authors

Kevin Wilemon (6/4/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:04-cv-00487

Docket

EEOC v. Raytheon Technical

Nov. 3, 2004

Nov. 3, 2004

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 29, 2024, 3:09 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT; Jury Trial Demanded (gab) (Entered: 08/09/2004)

Aug. 9, 2004

Aug. 9, 2004

2

SUMMONS in a Civil Action issued (gab) (Entered: 08/09/2004)

Aug. 9, 2004

Aug. 9, 2004

3

ORDER by Judge David A. Ezra rule 16 conference set for 9:00 11/8/04 before Mag Judge Barry M. Kurren (gab) (Entered: 08/09/2004)

Aug. 9, 2004

Aug. 9, 2004

4

EP : Settlement on the Record held. Terms stated. Trial date and all deadlines and all scheduled Court hearings are Vacated. Magistrate Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi to recommend to all of the respective District Judges to enter Order for Dismissals with prejudice. Status Conference Re: Dismissal set for 9:30 11/1/04 before Mag Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi ( Ct Rptr : C7 CD22 1:44-1:55) JUDGE Mag Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi (eps) (Entered: 08/30/2004)

Aug. 27, 2004

Aug. 27, 2004

5

NOTICE OF CHANGE OF COUNSEL for plaintiff EEOC - ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff Equal Employment Opp by David F. Offen-Brown (eps) (Entered: 08/30/2004)

Aug. 27, 2004

Aug. 27, 2004

6

ORDER for dismissal by Judge Samuel P. King (cc: all counsel) (bbb) (Entered: 09/01/2004)

Aug. 30, 2004

Aug. 30, 2004

7

JUDGMENT: IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that this action is hereby DISMISSED with prejudice, each party to bear its own costs and attorneys' fees pursuant to the "Order of Dismissal" filed on August 30, 2004. by Judge Samuel P. King re [6-1] terminating case (cc: all counsel) (bbb) (Entered: 09/01/2004)

Sept. 1, 2004

Sept. 1, 2004

8

EO: Status Conference Re: Settlement Agreement set for 09/24/2004 09:30:00 AM before LEK. Raymond T. Cheung to notify all parties. ; settlement/status conference set for 9:30 9/24/04 before Mag Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi () JUDGE Mag Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi (bbb) (Entered: 09/27/2004)

Sept. 22, 2004

Sept. 22, 2004

9

EP: Status Conference Re: Settlement Agreement held. Raymond T. Cheung participated by phone. ; settlement/status conference held 9/24/04 before Mag Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi ( Ct Rptr : In chambers- no record) JUDGE Mag Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi (bbb) (Entered: 09/27/2004)

Sept. 24, 2004

Sept. 24, 2004

10

EO: Status Conference Re: Dismissal set for 11/01/2004 09:30:00 AM before LEK is Vacated. ; settlement/status conference set for 9:30 11/1/04 before Mag Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi () JUDGE Mag Judge Leslie E. Kobayashi (bbb) (Entered: 10/29/2004)

Oct. 27, 2004

Oct. 27, 2004

11

CONSENT Decree by Judge Samuel P. King by defendant Raytheon Technical Services Company (bbb) (Entered: 11/04/2004)

Nov. 3, 2004

Nov. 3, 2004

Case Details

State / Territory: Hawaii

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 9, 2004

Closing Date: Nov. 3, 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Raytheon Technical Services Company, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq.

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Unknown

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits