University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Armstrong v. Newsom PC-CA-0001
Docket / Court 4:94-cv-02307-CW ( N.D. Cal. )
State/Territory California
Case Type(s) Disability Rights-Pub. Accom.
Prison Conditions
Special Collection California's Prisoners' Rights Bar article
Attorney Organization Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund (DREDF)
Prison Law Office
Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld
Case Summary
On June 29, 1994, disabled prisoners and parolees in California filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of California, charging that, on account of their disabilities, the two divisions of the California Youth and Adult Corrections Authority California, Department of ... read more >
On June 29, 1994, disabled prisoners and parolees in California filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court of the Northern District of California, charging that, on account of their disabilities, the two divisions of the California Youth and Adult Corrections Authority California, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation ("CDCR") and Board of Prison Terms ("BPT"), were generally depriving disabled prisoners of benefits and accommodations provided to other prisoners or required by due process. The plaintiffs were represented by the Prison Law Office, the Disability Rights Education and Defense Fund, and private attorneys. They sought declaratory and injunctive relief for violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. § 12131-34, the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (Rehab Act), 29 U.S.C. § 794, and the Due Process Clause of the Constitution.

The district court (Judge Claudia Wilken) certified the plaintiff class in January 1995. In December 1998, the parties stipulated to amend the class definition to include "all present and future California state prisoners and parolees with mobility, sight, hearing, learning, and kidney disabilities that substantially limit one or more of their major life activities." The class was further modified in January 1999 to include prisoners and parolees with developmental disabilities.

By agreement of the parties, the claims against CDCR (prison claims) and BPT (parolee claims) were bifurcated and proceeded on two different litigation tracks. The plaintiffs and CDCR entered into a settlement agreement that agreed to liability for CDCR, if the district court found the ADA and Rehab Act applied to prisons. The district court did find that both statutes applied to state prisons. Armstrong v. Wilson, 942 F.Supp. 1252, 1258-59 (N.D. Cal. 1996). The court also found that the State was not entitled to immunity under the Eleventh Amendment for its violations of the ADA and Rehab Act. Id. at 1263. The district court entered a remedial order and injunction directing CDCR to develop a plan for compliance with the statutes by improving access to prison programs for prisoners with physical disabilities at all of California's prisons and parole facilities. The State appealed, and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Judge Alfred Goodwin) affirmed. Armstrong v. Wilson, 124 F.3d 1019 (9th Cir. 1997).

The claims against BPT were litigated by the parties; the district court held a bench trial in April 1999. The plaintiffs offered evidence including stories of a prisoner who used a wheelchair forced to crawl to a hearing, a deaf prisoner rendered unable to communicate with a sign language interpreter because he was shackled, and a blind inmate left without assistance to read complicated written materials. The court issued a permanent injunction in March 2001 and ordered the State to come into compliance with the ADA and the Rehab Act by identifying disabled prisoners and providing them with accessible locations for parole hearings, assistance in communicating, and special aid in the screening, appeals, and grievance processes.

The State appealed, asserting that the injunction regarding parole hearings was overbroad and violated the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA). In November 2001, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Judge Stephen Reinhardt) found that the class certified by the district court was overbroad, in that it included "sexually violent predators, mentally disordered offenders, and prisoners or parolees with renal impairments"--groups not represented by any named plaintiff. Armstrong v. Davis, 275 F.3d 849 (9th Cir. 2001). The injunction was upheld in all other respects.

The court entered a Revised Permanent Injunction on February 11, 2002, which required that the State create and maintain a system for tracking prisoners and parolees with disabilities, take reasonable steps to identify prisoners and parolees with disabilities prior to parole proceedings, and provide reasonable accommodations to prisoners and parolees with disabilities at all parole proceedings, including parole revocations and revocation extensions, life prisoner hearings, mentally disordered offender proceedings, and sexually violent predator proceedings. The State failed to fully comply with the provisions of the Revised Permanent Injunction and the Plaintiffs filed an enforcement motion, which was granted in an order against the BPT defendants entered on May 30, 2006.

In November 2006, the plaintiffs sought imposition of a population cap in California state prisons. Many of the plaintiffs' complaints about disabled prisoners being denied their rights stemmed from the fact that prisons were dramatically overcrowded, resulting in disabled prisoners often being placed in administrative segregation due to lack of space. However, at this time there were several ongoing class action law suits having to do with prison conditions in California. In this case, the district court appointed an expert in 2007 to facilitate the coordination of remedial processes in this case with three other pending class actions: Coleman v. Brown (E.D. Cal.), Plata v. Brown (N.D. Cal.), and Perez v. Tilton (N.D. Cal.). The district court also decided that issues relating to the sought population cap would be addressed in the other lawsuits.

On January 18, 2007, Judge Wilken issued a separate Injunction. She found that despite extensive monitoring of CDCR institutions by plaintiffs' counsel, the State was continuing to severely violate the rights of prisoners with disabilities under the ADA and Rehab Act. She found the State was not compliant with the law, the Revised Permanent Injunction, or its own Remedial Plan (first put forth in 1998, and amended in 2001, 2002, and 2006). The violations were occurring with regard to inaccessible housing, denial of sign language interpreters to prisoners who need them, confiscation of medically prescribed assistive devices, late and inadequate disability grievance responses, and inadequate disability tracking. Judge Wilken ordered that the State increase the number of staff on its compliance and grievance response teams, develop and implement a state-wide computerized tracking system and integrate it with the tracking system previously ordered in February 2002, generate an inventory of accessible housing, develop a system to hold wardens and prison medical administrators accountable for compliance with the Remedial Plan and other court orders, provide proper training to health care staff and correctional officers, and establish permanent salaried positions for sign language interpreters.

The remedial phase of the litigation has continued since 2007. The defendants argued unsuccessfully on numerous occasions that they have no duty to provide reasonable accommodations for prisoners and parolees under the ADA. The defendants also argued that when they sent class members sent to county facilities, they were not responsible for any ADA noncompliance that occurred. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Judge Stephen Reinhardt) issued an opinion in 2010 that summarily rejected these arguments. However, it did remand to the district court for further hearings on whether system-wide relief was necessary on the grounds that the evidentiary record as presented was not sufficient. Once remanded, the plaintiffs submitted additional evidence as to the nature and extent of violations, and the district court issued an order granting the renewed system-wide enforcement motion.

On March 28, 2011, the court entered a stipulation order requiring the parties to file
periodic joint statements describing the status of the litigation every other month,
beginning on May 16, 2011.

In 2012, the district court modified the 2007 injunction to clarify what was expected of the State. The modified injunction provided that the court-appointed expert would solve disputes between the parties. The U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Judge Tashima) vacated the provisions in the modified injunction relating to the dispute resolution mechanism, finding that it was an impermissible delegation of authority to an expert. The district court then amended the dispute resolution mechanism to make it reviewable by the district court on motion by any dissatisfied party.

On February 3, 2015, the district court granted a motion for further enforcement of the 2007 injunction. Judge Wilken found the State was still routinely housing class members in administrative segregation because of lack of housing in violation of the ADA and the court's prior orders. She ordered that if the State placed class members in administrative segregation, they needed to fully document their reason for doing so and submit such report to plaintiff's counsel. 2015 WL 496799.

On March 26, 2015, Judge Wilken filed a stipulated order confirming the undisputed attorneys' fees and costs for the fourth quarter of 2014. The amount totaled $1,190,379.99.

On June 29, 2015, Judge Wilken filed a stipulated order confirming the undisputed attorneys' fees and costs for the first quarter of 2015. The amount totaled $1,090,718.30.

On September 25, 2015, Judge Wilken filed a stipulated order confirming the undisputed attorneys' fees and costs for the second quarter of 2015. The amount totaled $1,246,103.35. Attorney fees and costs remained undisputed.

Over the next four years, the parties filed several joint status reports. As of May 2020, the most recent status report was filed on January 15, 2020. The statement presented the status of issues such as allegations of abuse and violence by CDCR staff, accommodations for deaf prisoners, the problem of equal access to job and program assignments for people with disabilities, statewide durable medical equipment reconciliation and accuracy of disability tracking information, accommodations for blind and low vision class members, and more. For the most part, the parties continued to work collaboratively and in good faith. However, the plaintiffs expressed concern about ongoing reports of discrimination by CDCR staff against class members. In 2019, the plaintiffs had sent a letter cataloguing multiple incidents of staff misconduct against Armstrong and Coleman v. Brown (E.D. Cal.) class members at Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility (“RJD”) over the past two and a half years and demanding that CDCR implement remedial measures by January 1, 2020. Given the ongoing reports of abuse, plaintiffs had begun taking depositions of CDCR staff members in January 2020. Additionally, plaintiffs remained concerned about accommodations for D/deaf prisoners, in particular with respect to defendants’ heavy reliance on video remote interpretation (VRI), which plaintiffs’ counsel have observed to be inadequate in many group settings, in violation of the ADA and court orders.

On February 28, 2020, the plaintiffs filed a sealed motion for an injunction stopping defendants from assaulting, abusing and retaliating against people with disabilities at RJD. In support of their motion, 54 incarcerated people submitted declarations. Some of the declarants alleged instances in which correctional officers at RJD retaliated against them or others for, among other things, submitting or threatening to submit complaints regarding staff misconduct or failures to provide disability accommodations. Some of the declarants also alleged instances in which correctional officers at RJD retaliated against incarcerated people by charging incarcerated people with false rules violations reports. On March 17, 2020, the court entered a stipulation in which defendants agreed to prohibit RJD staff members from retaliating against declarants (or others involved in the February 28 motion) and to implement procedures to assess allegations of retaliation.

On March 6, 2020, Judge Wilken entered a stipulated order confirming the undisputed attorneys' fees and costs for the fourth quarter of 2019. The amount totaled $2,215,330.36.

On June 3, 2020, the plaintiffs filed a second motion for an injunction, alleging similar abuse to the February 28, 2020 motion through CDCR's many facilities and requesting statewide relief.

The plaintiffs filed a motion for a temporary restraining order on July 1, 2020, requesting that the court move some of the declarants who had been victims of retaliation. Judge Wilken granted the temporary restraining order the next day, though the defendants had not transferred the declarants in question on July 16, 2020.

The court heard arguments on the February and June injunction motions on July 16, 2020. On July 30, the court issued a preliminary injunction, finding that the defendants had retaliated against the two declarants who were the subject of the TRO and again ordering the defendants to move them to a different facility. In reaching this conclusion, the court noted that another declarant had died at the hands of his cellmate, after a corrections officer ignored his requests to be moved for his safety.

After an August 11, 2020 oral argument, on September 8, 2020, the Court issued a lengthy opinion granting much of the relief requested by the plaintiffs in the February 28, 2020 motion. After describing numerous instances of unpunished staff violence on class members at RJD, the court found that the defendants violated the class members' rights under the ADA and the Rehab Act. In one such instance, one of the declarants who Judge Wilkens ordered transferred to another facility on July 30 received a threatening note signed by a "correctional officer gang" the night before his transfer. Finding that the defendants' failure to investigate and discipline staff was the "root cause" of the violations, the Court ordered the defendants to work with the plaintiffs to create a modified remedial plan including: installing surveillance cameras in areas of RJD accused by class members, equipping RJD corrections officers with body cameras and creating policies for their use, revamping the staff complaint, investigation and discipline process, third party monitoring, information sharing with the plaintiffs' counsel, increased supervision and training of staff, and further anti retaliation measures. The court also set a schedule for the development of the remedial plan, with a due date of October 20, 2020 for both the plaintiffs and defendants, however, it appears from the docket that this deadline was extended.

On September 25, 2020, the defendants appealed the court's September 8, 2020 injunction to the Ninth Circuit, where the case was docketed as number 20-16921. The defendant-appellants' brief is due on January 11, 2021.

On September 18, 2020, Judge Wilken entered a stipulated order confirming the undisputed attorneys' fees and costs for the second quarter of 2020. The amount totaled $2,227,769.01.

After oral argument on October 6, 2020, the June 3, 2020 motion for statewide injunctive relief remains pending in the District Court. As of October 22, 2020 this case is ongoing.

Kristen Sagar - 11/13/2008
Anna Dimon - 03/19/2015
Jessica Kincaid - 11/04/2015
Jennifer Huseby - 10/26/2018
Elena Malik - 05/18/2020
Jonah Hudson-Erdman - 10/22/2020


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
Male
Constitutional Clause
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Due Process
Content of Injunction
Discrimination Prohibition
Implement complaint/dispute resolution process
Monitoring
Reasonable Accommodation
Recordkeeping
Reporting
Defendant-type
Corrections
Jurisdiction-wide
Disability
Hearing impairment
Mental impairment
Mobility impairment
Visual impairment
Discrimination-area
Accommodation / Leave
Discrimination-basis
Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)
General
Access to lawyers or judicial system
Administrative segregation
Bathing and hygiene
Bathrooms
Buildings
Classification / placement
Conditions of confinement
Confinement/isolation
Disparate Treatment
Housing
Reasonable Accommodations
Reasonable Modifications
Recreation / Exercise
Retaliation
Totality of conditions
TTY/Close Captioning/Videophone/etc.
Medical/Mental Health
Intellectual/Developmental Disability
Mental Disability
Intellectual/developmental disability, unspecified
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.
Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701
Defendant(s) California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation
Plaintiff Description All present and future California state prison inmates and parolees with mobility, sight, hearing, learning, mental, kidney, or developmental disabilities.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations Disability Rights Education & Defense Fund (DREDF)
Prison Law Office
Rosen, Bien, Galvan & Grunfeld
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted Yes
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Attorneys fees
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Litigation
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration 1999 - n/a
Filed 06/29/1994
Case Ongoing Yes
Case Listing PC-CA-0033 : Perez v. Tilton (N.D. Cal.)
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  See this case at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
Docket(s)
4:94-cv-02307-CW (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-9001.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/29/2020
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
4:94-cv-02307-CW (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-9002.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/06/2020
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
2007 Annual Report
PC-CA-0001-0013.pdf | External Link | Detail
Date:
Complaint [ECF# 1]
PC-CA-0001-0059.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/29/1994
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Statement of Stipulated Facts (for Settlement Purposes Only)
PC-CA-0001-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/01/1996
Remedial Order, Injunction, and Certification of Interlocutory Appeal Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0020.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/20/1996
Source: Plaintiffs' counsel
Order Denying Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (942 F.Supp. 1252) (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0025.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 09/20/1996
Source: Google Scholar
Appellate Opinion (124 F.3d 1019)
PC-CA-0001-0002.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 08/27/1997
Source: Google Scholar
Memorandum (215 F.3d 1332)
PC-CA-0001-0027.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 04/11/2000
Source: Google Scholar
Opinion (275 F.3d 849)
PC-CA-0001-0023.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 11/28/2001
Source: Google Scholar
CA DOC Armstrong v. Davis Board of Prison Terms Parole Proceedings Remedial Plan
PC-CA-0001-0005.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/04/2002
Stipulation and Order on Revised Injunction [ECF# 1124] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0008.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/11/2002
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Opinion (537 U.S. 812)
PC-CA-0001-0037.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 10/07/2002
Source: Westlaw
Opinion (318 F.3d 965)
PC-CA-0001-0024.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 02/10/2003
Source: Google Scholar
Memorandum (58 Fed.Appx. 695)
PC-CA-0001-0026.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 02/10/2003
Order Granting Motion to Enforce Revised Permanent Injunction [ECF# 1124] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0010.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/30/2006
Injunction [ECF# 1045] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0049.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/18/2007
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Appointing Court Expert Pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 706 [ECF# 1121] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0009.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/11/2007
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion to Enforce Compliance with May 30, 2006 Order; Memorandum of Points and Authorities [ECF# 1123]
PC-CA-0001-0011.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/15/2007
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting in Part Plaintiffs' Motion to Enforce the May 30, 2006 Order [ECF# 1199] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0012.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/11/2007
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order and Construction Agreement [ECF# 1284] (E.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0014.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/26/2008
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Approving Information Technology Coordination Agreement [ECF# 1292] (E.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0015.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/10/2008
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Approving Space Coordination Agreement [ECF# 1364] (E.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0016.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/07/2008
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order to Show Cause (Re: Health Care Administrative Appeals Coordination Agreement) [ECF# 1412] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0017.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/15/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order to Show Cause (Re: Transcription and Dictation Coordination Agreement) [ECF# 1413] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0018.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/15/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion to Require Defendants to Track and Accommodate needs of Armstrong Class Members Housed in County Jails and Ensure Access to a Workable Grievance Procedure [ECF# 1587] (261 F.R.D. 173) (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0043.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 09/16/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Enforcement Order [ECF# 1661] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0044.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/20/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Opinion [Ct. of App. ECF# 1767] (622 F.3d 1058)
PC-CA-0001-0042.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 09/07/2010
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Amended Order Granting Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion to Require Defendants to Track and Accommodate Needs of Armstrong Class Members Housed in County Jails, Ensure Access to a Grievance Procedure, and to Enforce 2001 Permanent Injunction [ECF# 2034] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0021.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/11/2012
Source: Plaintiffs' counsel
Amended Order Granting Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion to Require Defendants to Track and Accommodate Needs of Armstrong Class Members Housed in County Jails, Ensure Access to a Grievance Procedure, and to Enforce 2001 Permanent Injunction [ECF# 2034] (857 F.Supp.2d 919) (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0045.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 04/11/2012
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Denying Motion for Contempt, Denying as Moot Motion to Strike and Modifying Permanent Injunction [ECF# 2180] (2012 WL 3638675) (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0046.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 08/22/2012
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Distributing and Enforcing the Amended County Jail Order And Plan [ECF# 2193] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0029.pdf | Detail
Date: 08/28/2012
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Opinion in Support of Order Distributing and Enforcing the Amended County Jail Order and Plan [ECF# 2194] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0047.pdf | Detail
Date: 08/28/2012
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants’ Reply To Plaintiffs’ Response To Order Directing Parties To File Briefs Addressing Monitoring by The Office of The Inspector General [ECF# 2291]
PC-CA-0001-0032.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/06/2013
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants’ Evidentiary Objections and Request to Strike the Expert Declaration of Pablo Stewart, Exhibits 3-5, and Paragraph 7 to the Declaration of Corene Kendrick in Support of Plaintiffs’ Reply to Defendants’ Opposition [Truncated Title] [ECF# 2279]
PC-CA-0001-0031.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/16/2013
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting Motion For A Further Enforcement Order and Denying Motion To Hold Defendants in Contempt of Court [ECF# 2345] (939 F.Supp.2d 1012) (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0033.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 06/04/2013
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Opinion [Ct. of App. ECF# 2374] (732 F.3d 955)
PC-CA-0001-0034.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 10/04/2013
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Opinion [Ct. of App. ECF# 2434] (768 F.3d 975)
PC-CA-0001-0039.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 09/26/2014
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Revising the Modified Injunction (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0038.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/05/2014
Source: Bloomberg Law
Order Modifying January 18, 2007 Injunction (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0041.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/29/2014
Source: Bloomberg Law
Order Granting Motion for Further Enforcement (2015 WL 496799) (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0040.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 02/03/2015
Source: Bloomberg Law
Defendant's Report in Response the Court's February 3, 2015 Order [ECF# 2507]
PC-CA-0001-0050.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/16/2015
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Stipulated Order Confirming Undisputed Attorneys' Fees and Costs for the Fourth Quarter of 2014 [ECF# 2510] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0051.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/26/2015
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Stipulated Order Confirming Undisputed Attorneys' Fees and Costs for the First Quarter of 2015 [ECF# 2535] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0053.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/29/2015
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Stipulated Order Confirming Undisputed Attorney's Fees and Costs for the Second Quarter of 2015 [ECF# 2546] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0054.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/25/2015
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Joint Case Status Statement [ECF# 2671]
PC-CA-0001-0055.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/15/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Joint Case Status Statement [ECF# 2680]
PC-CA-0001-0056.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/15/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Joint Case Status Statement [ECF# 2726]
PC-CA-0001-0058.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/14/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Joint Case Status Statement [ECF# 2749]
PC-CA-0001-0057.pdf | Detail
Date: 07/16/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Joint Case Status Statement [ECF# 2910]
PC-CA-0001-0048.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/15/2020
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Stipulated Order Confirming Undisputed Attorneys' Fees and Costs for the Fourth Quarter of 2019 [ECF# 2927] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0061.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/06/2020
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Stipulation and Order Prohibiting Retaliation [ECF# 2931] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0062.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/17/2020
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 2972] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0066.pdf | Detail
Date: 07/02/2020
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting in Part Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 3025] (2020 WL 4368234) (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0065.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 07/30/2020
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting in Part Motion to Modify Remedial Orders and Injunctions [ECF# 3059] (2020 WL 5511523) (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0063.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 09/08/2020
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order for Additional Remedial Measure [ECF# 3060] (N.D. Cal.)
PC-CA-0001-0064.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/08/2020
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
show all people docs
Judges Alarcón, Arthur Lawrence (Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0027
Berzon, Marsha Siegel (Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0023 | PC-CA-0001-0024 | PC-CA-0001-0026 | PC-CA-0001-0034 | PC-CA-0001-0042
Goodwin, Alfred Theodore (D. Or., Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0002
Henderson, Thelton Eugene (N.D. Cal.) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0014 | PC-CA-0001-0015 | PC-CA-0001-0016 | PC-CA-0001-0017 | PC-CA-0001-0018
Karlton, Lawrence K. (E.D. Cal.) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0014 | PC-CA-0001-0015 | PC-CA-0001-0016 | PC-CA-0001-0017 | PC-CA-0001-0018
Nelson, Dorothy Wright (Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0002
Reinhardt, Stephen Roy (Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0024 | PC-CA-0001-0026 | PC-CA-0001-0034 | PC-CA-0001-0042
Silverman, Barry G. (D. Ariz., Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0027
Tashima, Atsushi Wallace (C.D. Cal., Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0024 | PC-CA-0001-0026 | PC-CA-0001-0034 | PC-CA-0001-0039 | PC-CA-0001-0042
Trott, Stephen S. (Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0002
Van Graafeiland, Ellsworth Alfred (Second Circuit) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0027
White, Jeffrey Steven (N.D. Cal.) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0014 | PC-CA-0001-0015 | PC-CA-0001-0016 | PC-CA-0001-0017 | PC-CA-0001-0018
Wilken, Claudia Ann (N.D. Cal.) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0001 | PC-CA-0001-0008 | PC-CA-0001-0009 | PC-CA-0001-0010 | PC-CA-0001-0012 | PC-CA-0001-0014 | PC-CA-0001-0015 | PC-CA-0001-0016 | PC-CA-0001-0017 | PC-CA-0001-0018 | PC-CA-0001-0020 | PC-CA-0001-0021 | PC-CA-0001-0025 | PC-CA-0001-0029 | PC-CA-0001-0033 | PC-CA-0001-0038 | PC-CA-0001-0040 | PC-CA-0001-0041 | PC-CA-0001-0043 | PC-CA-0001-0044 | PC-CA-0001-0045 | PC-CA-0001-0046 | PC-CA-0001-0047 | PC-CA-0001-0049 | PC-CA-0001-0051 | PC-CA-0001-0053 | PC-CA-0001-0054 | PC-CA-0001-0061 | PC-CA-0001-0062 | PC-CA-0001-0063 | PC-CA-0001-0064 | PC-CA-0001-0065 | PC-CA-0001-0066 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Plaintiff's Lawyers Asaro, Andrea G. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0024
Baldwin, Holly MacLeish (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0011 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Bien, Michael W. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0008 | PC-CA-0001-0009 | PC-CA-0001-0011 | PC-CA-0001-0020 | PC-CA-0001-0024 | PC-CA-0001-0054 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Bien-Kahn, Benjamin Joseph (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Cervantez, Eve Hedy (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Ells, Lisa Adrienne (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Evenson, Rebekah B. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0054 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Feeser, Mark Raymond (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Feingold, Lainey [Elaine] (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0008 | PC-CA-0001-0020 | PC-CA-0001-9001
Feingold, Elaine B. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Fernholz, William (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0008 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Freedman, Michael Louis (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0054 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Galvan, Ernest (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0054 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
George, Warren E. Jr. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0008 | PC-CA-0001-0009 | PC-CA-0001-0011 | PC-CA-0001-0020 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Godbold, Penny (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0048 | PC-CA-0001-0055 | PC-CA-0001-0057 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Grunfeld, Gay Crosthwait (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0009 | PC-CA-0001-0011 | PC-CA-0001-0054 | PC-CA-0001-0061 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Hagler, Megan (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Hanson, Shawn A. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0008 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Hardy, Alison (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Holtz, Geoffrey Thomas (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0054 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Huey, Shirley (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Jonak, Jennifer Lee (Oregon) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9002
Jonak, Jennifer Lee (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0008 | PC-CA-0001-9001
Kahn, Jane E. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0059
Kendrick, Corene Thaedra (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0056 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Kilb, Linda D. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0009 | PC-CA-0001-0054 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Knapp, Kelly Jean (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Lomio, Rita Katherine (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001
Lomio, Rita Katherine (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9002
Loren, Stewart Grey (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001
Mania, Anne (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0011 | PC-CA-0001-9001
Mayerson, Arlene Brynne (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0008 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Mendelson, Margot Knight (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0058 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Mitchell, Caroline N. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0008 | PC-CA-0001-0009 | PC-CA-0001-0011 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Morris, Maria V. (Alabama) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Nolan, Thomas Bengt (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Norman, Sara Linda (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0008 | PC-CA-0001-0009 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Shapiro, Eve H. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0002 | PC-CA-0001-9001
Specter, Donald H. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0001 | PC-CA-0001-0002 | PC-CA-0001-0008 | PC-CA-0001-0009 | PC-CA-0001-0011 | PC-CA-0001-0020 | PC-CA-0001-0054 | PC-CA-0001-0059 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Stewart, Loren Grey (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Stone-Manista, Krista Michelle (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Thompson, Blake (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0054 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Walczak, Kenneth M. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Whelan, Amy E. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Defendant's Lawyers Becerra, Xavier (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0056 | PC-CA-0001-0057 | PC-CA-0001-0058
Blonien, Jessica N. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0024
Bower, Alicia Anne (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Chen, Janet Nah (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
De La Torre−Fennell, Annakarina (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Druliner, David P. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Duggan, Jeremy Michael (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
East, Rochelle C. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Feudale, Scott John (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Fluet, Edward Rheem (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0050 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Fritz, Cynthia Clarke (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Garske, Sharon Anne (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0050 | PC-CA-0001-0054 | PC-CA-0001-0055 | PC-CA-0001-0056 | PC-CA-0001-0057 | PC-CA-0001-0058 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
German, G. Michael (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0024
Goldman, Jay M. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0031 | PC-CA-0001-0032 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Grunder, Frances T. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0008 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Harris, Kamala D. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0031 | PC-CA-0001-0032 | PC-CA-0001-0050
Henkels, Robert W. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Hood, Joanna Breiden (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0048 | PC-CA-0001-0061 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Humes, James M. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0002 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Kamberian, Van (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Kao, Bryan An-Chieh (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0050 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Lenk, Morris (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Lewis, Kyle Anthony (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Lodholz, Sean Walter (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Mackie, Jane Beasley (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Maiorino, Trace O. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
McClain, Damon Grant (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
McKinney, Patrick R. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0050 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Mello, Paul Brian (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Nelson, Katherine Kylin (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Nguyen, Giam Minh (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Nygaard, Jennifer J (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
O'Bannon, Danielle Felice (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Perkell, Jennifer G. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Prince, George D. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0020 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Quinn, Michael James (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Rhoan, Erick Joseph (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Rice, Benjamin Terrence (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Russell, Jay C. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0050 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Siggins, Peter J. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0001
Smith, Janelle M. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Tartaglio, Anthony (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Valdez, Danette E. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Zelidon-Zapeda, Jose Alfonso (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001
Zelidon-Zepeda, Jose Alfonso (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Other Lawyers Adam, Gregg Mclean (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Albertine, Christine (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Colasurdo, Brent Scott (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Galanter, Seth Michael (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0002
Perley, Sharon N. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0020 | PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Spurling, James Casey (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Stoughton, Jennifer Spencer (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Swanson, Edward W. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Sybesma, Benjamin C. (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Uitti, Mary Beth (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Umberg, Thomas John (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002
Utti, Mary Beth (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-0020
Yank, Ronald (California) show/hide docs
PC-CA-0001-9001 | PC-CA-0001-9002

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -