University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Does v. Stewart PC-AZ-0009
Docket / Court 2:96-cv-00486 ( D. Ariz. )
State/Territory Arizona
Case Type(s) Prison Conditions
Case Summary
Beginning in 1995, inmates in Protective Segregation (PS) status filed a series of lawsuits, pro se, to enjoin the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADOC) from implementing a plan to screen its PS population for transfer to general population (GP) units. The lawsuits were brought under Section 198 ... read more >
Beginning in 1995, inmates in Protective Segregation (PS) status filed a series of lawsuits, pro se, to enjoin the Arizona Department of Corrections (ADOC) from implementing a plan to screen its PS population for transfer to general population (GP) units. The lawsuits were brought under Section 1983 in the District of Arizona; they charged violation of the 8th amendment.

In December 1995, the District Court for the District of Arizona stayed and consolidated the individual cases as Does v. Stewart, and appointed private counsel for the inmates. On February 22, 1996, counsel filed an amended class action complaint on behalf of all PS inmates seeking equitable relief, primarily requesting that the ADOC implement a plan ""to ensure that Protective Segregation prisoners' safety is protected."" In April 1996, the Court certified the PS inmates as a class. Following trial the Court, in a December 1996 memorandum opinion and order, permanently enjoined ADOC from transferring PS inmates to general population. In April 1997, the Court altered the order, to allow ADOC to submit a plan detailing the safe transfer of PS inmates to GP.

Nearly three years later, in February 2000, the ADOC filed a Proposed Remedial Plan. Under the revised process ADOC committed to the following, among other steps: PS-related decisions would be ""clearly documented, well-reasoned, and appropriately reviewed""; multi-level reviews would be allowed; and a PS Administrator and multi-disciplinary PS Committee would review all PS placement and removal decisions. Fundamental to the plan was recognition that PS is not a punitive status and that PS inmates would be provided the same privileges and programs as similarly classified GP inmates.

This plan was accepted by plaintiffs and included in a July 2000 settlement agreement. The settlement agreement requested that the Court conditionally dismiss the lawsuit pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(2) and place the lawsuit on the Court's inactive docket prior to final dismissal. Final dismissal could not occur before the first annual review by a jointly appointed Monitor. The settlement agreement named Steven J. Martin as a monitor, and required him to file quarterly reports with the Court regarding ADOC's compliance with the Plan. The settlement agreement provided for final dismissal after the monitor found ""substantial compliance.""

Following the filing of the Third Monitor Report on June 25, 2001, the monitor indicated to the ADOC he would likely recommend the monitoring period be terminated in December of 2001. The lawsuit was dismissed in June 2002.

Eoghan Keenan - 04/16/2005

compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Constitutional Clause
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Administrative segregation
Assault/abuse by residents/inmates/students
Classification / placement
Protective custody
Type of Facility
Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Defendant(s) Arizona DOC
Plaintiff Description prisoners of the State of Arizona being housed in administrative segregation
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status outcome Granted
Filed Pro Se Yes
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer No
Nature of Relief Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Litigation
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration 1996 - 2002
Filed 02/22/1996
Case Closing Year 2002
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  See this case at (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
  Sunbelt Justice: Arizona and the Transformation of American Punishment
Date: 2010
By: Mona Lynch (UC Irvine Faculty)
Citation: (2010)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Effective Post-PLRA Settlement Models: A Case Study of Arizona's Protective Segregation Lawsuit
Date: 2004
By: Debbie A. Hill, Larry Hammond, Bruce Skolnik, Steve Martin, & Donna Clement
Citation: 24 Pace L. Rev. 743 (2004)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Court Docket(s)
D. Ariz.
PC-AZ-0009-9000.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
D. Ariz.
Proposed Remedial plan by the Arizona DOC re: Protective segregation issues
PC-AZ-0009-0001.pdf | Detail
D. Ariz.
Settlement Agreement
PC-AZ-0009-0002.pdf | Detail
show all people docs
Judges Nielsen, William Fremming (E.D. Wash.) show/hide docs
Plaintiff's Lawyers Bendheim, Alice L. (Arizona) show/hide docs
Gordon, Andrew S. (Arizona) show/hide docs
Hammond, Larry A. (Arizona) show/hide docs
PC-AZ-0009-0002 | PC-AZ-0009-9000
Hentoff, Nicholas Simon (Arizona) show/hide docs
Hill, Debra Ann (Arizona) show/hide docs
PC-AZ-0009-0002 | PC-AZ-0009-9000
Peters, Donald M. (Arizona) show/hide docs
Whitten, Samuel V. III (Arizona) show/hide docs
Defendant's Lawyers Gaylord, John M. (Arizona) show/hide docs
Skolnik, Bruce L. (Arizona) show/hide docs
PC-AZ-0009-0001 | PC-AZ-0009-0002 | PC-AZ-0009-9000
Voss, Teresa M. (Arizona) show/hide docs

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -