University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. FORT OSAGE R-I SCHOOL DISTRICT EE-MO-0032
Docket / Court 4:04-CV-00592-DW ( W.D. Mo. )
State/Territory Missouri
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Case Summary
The St. Louis office of the EEOC brought this EPA suit against Fort Osage School District in July 2004, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri. The complaint alleges that the defendant paid the charging party, a female assistant superintendent, less money than male ... read more >
The St. Louis office of the EEOC brought this EPA suit against Fort Osage School District in July 2004, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri. The complaint alleges that the defendant paid the charging party, a female assistant superintendent, less money than male assistant superintendents performing substantially equal jobs. The charging party intervened in the suit in December 2004. After a period marked by a substantial amount of discovery motions, the parties came to an agreement and the EEOC dismissed its case.

The Settlement Agreement called for the defendant to pay the charging party $3,000 as a wage payment and $86,795.42 in reasonable attorneys' fees. The defendant also agreed to modify its Policy GCBA Professional Staff Salary Schedules, give annual reports to the EEOC of the salaries, names and genders of assistant superintendents, and comply with the EPA. In exchange, the charging party agreed to refrain from seeking employment with the District or its Board of Education.

Kevin Wilemon - 06/01/2007


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
General
Disparate Treatment
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. ยง 2000e
Defendant(s) Fort Osage School District
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Damages
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Voluntary Dismissal
Order Duration 2006 - 2008
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Microsoft Gender Discrimination Class Action Lawsuit
Date: Oct. 14, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Age Discrimination Class Action seeks Fair Employment for Older PwC Applicants
http://www.pwcagecase.com/
Date: Apr. 27, 2016
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Smith Barney Gender Discrimination
https://www.lieffcabraser.com/employment/smith-barney/
Date: August 2008
By: Outten & Golden
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Date: Mar. 1, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
4:04-cv-00592 (W.D. Mo.)
EE-MO-0032-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/12/2006
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Order Denying Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (W.D. Mo.)
EE-MO-0032-0005.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/14/2006
Complaint
EE-MO-0032-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/10/2007
Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice and Final Settlement Agreement
EE-MO-0032-0007.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/10/2007

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -