On June 13, 1975, a juvenile detainee of the Spokane County Juvenile Detention Center (JDC) filed a class action lawsuit, under the U.S. Constitution, Washington State Constitution, and Revised Code of Washington, against Spokane County and its School District in the Superior Court of the State of ...
read more >
On June 13, 1975, a juvenile detainee of the Spokane County Juvenile Detention Center (JDC) filed a class action lawsuit, under the U.S. Constitution, Washington State Constitution, and Revised Code of Washington, against Spokane County and its School District in the Superior Court of the State of Washington for Spokane County. The plaintiff, represented by Spokane Legal Services, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that Spokane County had a duty to provide full education to all residents of JDC. Specifically, the plaintiff contended that he had been deprived of education since his involuntary confinement at JDC, in direct conflict with mandatory education polices of the State of Washington, and Fifth and Fourteenth Amendment due process rights. WASH. REV. CODE. §§ 28A.02.010, 28A.02.040, 28A.13.010, 28A.27.010.
On December 13, 1976, the Superior Court of the State of Washington (Judge Philip H. Faris) dismissed the School District as a defendant, and allowed the County time to amend its actions to be compliant with the relevant law. The Court found that the County and the Juvenile Court were the parties responsible for the education of juveniles temporarily held in custody. Despite giving leave to the defendants to change their policies, on January 11, 1977, the Court (Judge Faris) entered a declaratory judgment ordering the JDC to meet the educational needs of the Plaintiff. The Court noted that the Spokane County Commissioners had the opportunity to draft an education plan of its own design, but if it did not comply with the relevant laws, the Court would have the duty to order a program of educational treatment that did.
The defendants appealed to the Supreme Court of Washington, which remanded in December 1978 for findings in response to the Washington Juvenile Justice Act of 1977 that took effect on July 1, 1978. WASH. REV. CODE. § 13.40. On remand the Superior Court (Judge Faris) added the Superior Court of Spokane County (itself) as a defendant. According to the state supreme court decision described below, the Court (Judge Faris) entered a consent order providing that the Superior Court would administer the provision of educational services to the residents of the JDC.
On a second hearing before the Supreme Court of Washington, en banc, the defendants challenged their duty to establish and pay for an education program. On May 27, 1982, the Supreme Court of Washington, (Justice Vernon R. Pearson) held that juveniles of school age had a right to education while detained in JDC, before and after adjudication, and that the county was responsible for the cost of running the necessary education program. Tommy P. v. Bd. of County Comm'rs of Spokane County, 645 P.2d 697 (Wash, 1982). The Court (Justice Pearson) found that the County was responsible pursuant to State law, and did not venture into liability under the United States Constitution; it also did not determine whether the County could recover costs from the State of Washington. A dissent in the same opinion (Justice Fred H. Dore) called for remand to Superior Court with joinder of the State of Washington and the Superintendent of Public Instruction as defendants to show cause why they should not reimburse Spokane County for the education of juvenile detainees. Tommy P., 645 P.2d at 705.
PACER has no docket for this state case, and we have no further information.Greg Venker - 05/29/2006