Filed Date: June 15, 1982
Closed Date: April 13, 1989
Clearinghouse coding complete
In 1982, various pro se inmates filed lawsuits in the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey against county and state officials regarding conditions in the Manmouth County Correctional Institute (MCCI) in New Jersey. On January 4, 1983, the district court consolidated the lawsuits. Plaintiffs were represented by the Department of the Public Advocate. The court referred the matter to a special master, James R. Zazzali, to investigate conditions at MCCI. The Master's report concluded that the conditions were unconstitutional and on October 10, 1984, the court (Judge Harold A. Ackerman) ordered a population limit of 344 inmates in MCCI, an increase in visitation hours, one hour of recreation per day for all inmates, and medical screening prior to release for all inmates. Monmouth County Corr. Inst. Inmates v. Lanzaro, 595 F.Supp. 1417 (D.N.J. 1984).
In January of 1985, plaintiffs sought preliminary injunctive relief from deficiencies in meeting the health needs of pregnant inmates. The parties entered into a consent judgment, but inmates again filed a lawsuit after they were unable to obtain services related to the termination of pregnancies. MCCI had a policy of only providing abortions in life-threatening situations. Some inmates were allowed to leave the facility after obtaining a court-ordered release to personally arrange an abortion. Inmates incarcerated on serious charges were not permitted to leave and were forced to carry pregnancies to term. Plaintiffs challenged the requirement of getting a court order as an infringement of their right to privacy. On June 30, 1986, the court (Judge Ackerman) found the policy unconstitutional. Monmouth County Corr. Inst. Inmates v. Lanzaro, 643 F.Supp. 1217 (D.N.J. 1986). Additionally, the refusal to appropriate funds for non-life-threatening situations violated the New Jersey constitution, although not the federal Constitution. Judge Ackerman ordered the facility to cease its practice of requiring pregnant inmates to seek a court-ordered release, to inform women of their right to continue their pregnancy or obtain an abortion, to provide counseling, to make arrangements necessary to obtain an abortion, to assume the cost of all inmate abortions, and to provide a copy of the order to all pregnant inmates.
Defendants appealed. The United States Court of Appeal for the Third Circuit (Judge A. Leon Higginbotham) affirmed the decision of the district court and modified it in part. Monmouth County Corr. Inst. Inmates v. Lanzaro, 834 F.2d 326 (3d Cir. 1987). The court modified the order so that authorities were not required to make arrangements for an abortion, only provide transportation, and only fund abortions if no other funding is available. The United States Supreme Court denied certiorari on May 16, 1988. Lanzano v. Monmouth County, New Jersey, Corr. Inst. Inmates, 486 U.S. 1006 (1988).
On September 1, 1988, Judge Ackerman modified his 1984 order to reflect improved conditions in the facility as reported by the special master and increased the capacity to 560 inmates. Monmouth County Corr. Inst. Inmates v. Lanzaro, 695 F.Supp. 759 (D.N.J. 1988). Plaintiffs requested a modification to reduce the inmate cap. This was denied. Monmouth County Corr. Inst. Inmates v. Lanzaro, 717 F.Supp. 268 (D.N.J. 1989).
Summary Authors
Angela Heverling (5/9/2006)
Ackerman, Harold Arnold (New Jersey)
Ayala, Anthony J. (New Mexico)
Bomsey, Audrey (New Jersey)
Boswell, Gerald (New Jersey)
Benshoof, Janet (New York)
Ackerman, Harold Arnold (New Jersey)
Higginbotham, Aloyisus Leon Jr. (Pennsylvania)
Last updated March 25, 2024, 3:03 a.m.
Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.State / Territory: New Jersey
Case Type(s):
Key Dates
Filing Date: June 15, 1982
Closing Date: April 13, 1989
Case Ongoing: No reason to think so
Plaintiffs
Plaintiff Description:
Inmates at the Monmouth County Correctional Institution challenging conditions of confinement
Plaintiff Type(s):
Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown
Filed Pro Se: Yes
Class Action Sought: Unknown
Class Action Outcome: Unknown
Defendants
Monmouth County Correctional Institution (Monmouth), County
Case Details
Causes of Action:
Constitutional Clause(s):
Due Process: Substantive Due Process
Available Documents:
Outcome
Prevailing Party: Plaintiff
Nature of Relief:
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief:
Order Duration: 1984 - None
Issues
General:
Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:
Type of Facility: