University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Las Americas Immigrant Advocacy Center v. Wolf IM-DC-0067
Docket / Court 1:19-cv-03640 ( D.D.C. )
State/Territory District of Columbia
Case Type(s) Immigration and/or the Border
Special Collection Civil Rights Challenges to Trump Immigration Enforcement Orders
Attorney Organization ACLU Chapters (any)
ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project
Case Summary
On October 7, 2019, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security implemented two new asylum processes to expedite applicants’ credible fear interviews, the Prompt Asylum Claim Review program and the Humanitarian Asylum Review Process. Under these programs, asylum seekers subject to credible fear ... read more >
On October 7, 2019, the U.S. Department of Homeland Security implemented two new asylum processes to expedite applicants’ credible fear interviews, the Prompt Asylum Claim Review program and the Humanitarian Asylum Review Process. Under these programs, asylum seekers subject to credible fear interviews would be kept in U.S. Customs and Border Protection facilities, called “ice boxes” for their cold temperatures, rather than U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement detention centers.

On December 5, 2019, the Las Americas Advocacy Center filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiff sued the U.S. Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection. The plaintiff, represented by the American Civil Liberties Union, claimed that the new programs for expedited removal violated the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.), the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.), the Convention against Torture, and the Due Process Clause of the Constitution. Specifically, the plaintiff claimed that Customs and Border Protection facilities only allowed them to contact attorneys by phone and otherwise limited their access to legal counsel. That, they said, deprived them of opportunities to meaningfully participate in credible fear interviews, which determined whether they could pursue a claim for asylum or other protection.

On the same day, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint, adding as plaintiffs asylum seekers who had been sent back to their home countries after receiving a negative evaluation for their credible fear interviews under the new programs. On December 20, 2019, the plaintiffs filed a motion for preliminary injunction. The case was assigned to Judge Ketanji Jackson on December 20, 2019. The plaintiffs filed a motion for summary judgment on January 27, 2020.

The judge has not ruled on the plaintiffs’ motions for a preliminary injunction and summary judgment as of February 7, 2020. The case is ongoing.

Bogyung Lim - 02/07/2020


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Due Process: Procedural Due Process
Defendant-type
Jurisdiction-wide
General
Access to lawyers or judicial system
International law
Placement in detention facilities
Immigration/Border
Asylum - procedure
Constitutional rights
Convention against Torture
Deportation - judicial review
Deportation - procedure
Detention - conditions
Detention - procedures
Immigration lawyers
Refugees
Undocumented immigrants - rights and duties
Plaintiff Type
Non-profit NON-religious organization
Private Plaintiff
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.
Defendant(s) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Department of Justice
Plaintiff Description Asylum seekers subject to expedited credible fear review proceedings and an advocacy organization.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations ACLU Chapters (any)
ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None yet
Source of Relief None yet
Filed 10/07/2019
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  See this case at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
  Implementation of Executive Order 13768, "Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States
The Washington Post
Date: May 22, 2017
By: Jefferson Sessions (U.S. Department of Justice)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Re: Implementing the President's Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements Policies (Final, 2/20/2017)
dhs.gov
Date: Feb. 20, 2017
By: DHS Secretary John Kelly (United States Department of Homeland Security)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Re: Enforcement of the Immigration Laws to Serve the National Interest (Final, 2/20/2017)
dhs.gov
Date: Feb. 20, 2017
By: DHS Secretary John Kelly (United States Department of Homeland Security)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Executive Order 13767: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements
Federal Register
Date: Jan. 27, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (Office of the President)
Citation: 82 Fed. Reg. Presidential Documents 8793 (Jan. 27, 2017)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ]

  Executive Order 13768: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States
Federal Register
Date: Jan. 25, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (Office of the President)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
1:19-cv-03640 (D.D.C.)
IM-DC-0067-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/10/2020
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [ECF# 1]
IM-DC-0067-0003.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/05/2019
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
First Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [ECF# 2]
IM-DC-0067-0004.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/05/2019
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Motion for a Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 21]
IM-DC-0067-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/20/2019
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 35]
IM-DC-0067-0002.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/27/2020
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
show all people docs
Judges Jackson, Ketanji Brown (D.D.C.) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers Balakrishnan, Anand V. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-0001 | IM-DC-0067-0002 | IM-DC-0067-0003 | IM-DC-0067-0004 | IM-DC-0067-9000
Buser-Clancy, Thomas Paul (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-0001 | IM-DC-0067-0002 | IM-DC-0067-0003 | IM-DC-0067-0004 | IM-DC-0067-9000
Cruz, Bernardo Rafael (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-0001 | IM-DC-0067-0002 | IM-DC-0067-0003 | IM-DC-0067-0004
Drake, Brantley Shaw (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-0001 | IM-DC-0067-0002 | IM-DC-0067-0003 | IM-DC-0067-9000
Huddleston, Kathryn Lynn (Arizona) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-0001 | IM-DC-0067-0002 | IM-DC-0067-0003 | IM-DC-0067-0004 | IM-DC-0067-9000
Michelman, Scott (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-0001 | IM-DC-0067-0002 | IM-DC-0067-0003 | IM-DC-0067-0004 | IM-DC-0067-9000
Segura, Andre (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-0001 | IM-DC-0067-0002 | IM-DC-0067-0003 | IM-DC-0067-0004 | IM-DC-0067-9000
Spitzer, Arthur (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-0001 | IM-DC-0067-0002 | IM-DC-0067-0003 | IM-DC-0067-0004 | IM-DC-0067-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Moran, Courtney Elizabeth (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-9000
Reuveni, Erez (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-9000
Other Lawyers Benach, Ava C (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-9000
Manning, Susan Baker (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-9000
Walters, Karolina Joanna (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-9000
Wise, Jane W (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0067-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -