This entry is a combination of two cases (Owino v. CoreCivic, Inc. and Gonzalez v. CoreCivic, Inc.), which have been effectively combined into one class action.

Owino was filed by former immigration detainees on May 31, 2017 as a putative class action in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. The plaintiffs sued CoreCivic, Inc. under the Trafficking Victims Protection Act (TVPA) and state law. The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, sought declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief. The plaintiffs alleged that CoreCivic had a practice of paying detainees at the Otay Mesa Detention Center only one dollar a day if they volunteered to perform certain jobs and services. The plaintiffs also alleged that, in other instances, CoreCivic forced detainees to perform various forms of manual labor for no compensation at all.

The defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on August 11, 2017. The defendant alleged that the plaintiff had failed to state a claim under the TVPA for which relief could be granted, and alleged that the plaintiff’s state law claims were preempted by federal law. Pending resolution of a motion to consolidate Gonzalez with Owino, the judge stayed proceedings on February 16, 2018 and deferred ruling on the defendant’s motion to dismiss.

In Gonzalez, immigration detainees sued CoreCivic on December 27, 2017 under the TVPA and state law, alleging substantially the same facts as the plaintiffs in Owino. The plaintiffs, represented by Al Otro Lado and private counsel, sought declaratory, injunctive, and monetary relief. On January 22, 2018, the plaintiffs moved to consolidate the two cases due to legal and factual similarities between them. On February 23, 2018, the plaintiffs in Owino moved to intervene in order to oppose consolidation. The court granted the motion to intervene. On April 4, 2018, the court denied the Gonzalez plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate and stayed the case on grounds that the facts were duplicative of those alleged in Owino. Over a year later, the case is presumably still ongoing pending resolution in Owino.

On May 14, 2018, the judge in Owino lifted the stay and denied the defendant’s motion to dismiss in part, and granted it in part. The plaintiffs’ TVPA claim remained largely intact, and was dismissed only to the extent that it alleged violations of a particular amendment to the TVPA that occurred prior to the amendment’s enactment in December 2008.

While the parties litigated various discovery issues, the plaintiffs filed a First Amended Complaint on October 12, 2018, asserting additional claims of negligence and unjust enrichment against CoreCivic. On April 15, 2019, the plaintiff's requested to certify a class.

On June 5, 2019, the plaintiffs moved for partial summary judgment on its claims under the California Labor Code. But on July 11, 2019, the defendants moved for judgment on the pleadings.

As of February 15, 2020, these motions are pending before the district court.

Peter Harding - 10/11/2019
Aaron Gurley - 02/15/2020


compress summary