University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
view search results
page permalink
Case Name Blixt v. Tillerson [later Pompeo] IM-DC-0043
Docket / Court 1:18-cv-00124 ( D.D.C. )
State/Territory District of Columbia
Case Type(s) Immigration and/or the Border
Case Summary
On January 22, 2018, a mother and her minor son filed this lawsuit in the District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs sued the U.S. Department of State (DOS) for not granting U.S. citizenship to the child plaintiff, because he was born outside of the U.S. to a same-sex dual- ... read more >
On January 22, 2018, a mother and her minor son filed this lawsuit in the District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs sued the U.S. Department of State (DOS) for not granting U.S. citizenship to the child plaintiff, because he was born outside of the U.S. to a same-sex dual-nationality couple. Represented by the nonprofit organization Immigration Equality and the private law firm Sullivan & Cromwell (who also represented plaintiffs in a similar lawsuit filed the same day), the plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief granting birthright U.S. citizenship to the child.

The adult plaintiff, a natural-born U.S. citizen, entered into a civil partnership with her Italian partner in England in 2009. (The partnership was later converted into a marriage after the legalization of same-sex marriage in England in 2015.) While living in England, both women each gave birth to one son, with sperm from a donor. Both the children's birth certificates listed only the names of the two mothers as parents.

However, when the mothers applied for U.S. citizenship for the two sons, DOS only recognized the citizenship of the son born to the U.S. citizen, under the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) § 301(g) (8 U.S.C. § 1401(g)) (governing derivation of U.S. citizenship for a child born abroad to a U.S. citizen). DOS did not recognize U.S. citizenship of the child plaintiff born to the Italian woman because he lacked a biological or adoptive relationship to the U.S. citizen adult plaintiff. According to the plaintiffs, DOS erroneously considered this child born "out of wedlock" and not entitled to U.S. citizenship at birth under INA § 309 (8 U.S.C. § 1409).

The plaintiffs asserted that DOS had a policy of discrimination against the children of same-sex couples. Any child born to a U.S. citizen woman married to a man was born "in wedlock." But a child of a U.S. citizen who was not the biological or adoptive parent, but instead whose spouse conceived through reproductive technology, could be considered born "out of wedlock." The plaintiffs argued that this policy, which largely burdened same-sex couples, was unsupported by the INA's text and intent to keep families together, as well as case law supporting the rights of same-sex married couples.

The plaintiffs alleged that DOS's policy and its application to plaintiffs violated the Due Process and Equal Protection Clauses of the Fifth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution, as well as the Administrative Procedures Act (APA) as arbitrary, capricious, and contrary to the INA.

The case was assigned to Chief Judge Beryl A. Howell, and then reassigned to Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.

Status reports filed in May and July 2018 indicated that the parties were continuing to try to resolve the matter without resorting to litigation.

This case is ongoing.

Ava Morgenstern - 04/08/2018
Virginia Weeks - 07/17/2018


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Equal Protection
Discrimination-basis
Family discrimination
Sexual orientatation
General
Family reunification
Gay/lesbian/transgender
Government Services (specify)
Juveniles
Marriage
Youth / Adult separation
Immigration/Border
Admission - criteria
Admission - procedure
Constitutional rights
Family
Status/Classification
U.S. citizenship - acquiring
Visas - criteria
Visas - procedures
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.
Defendant(s) U.S. Department of State
Plaintiff Description U.S. citizen mother and son, the latter born abroad and denied U.S. citizenship
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted Moot
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None yet
Source of Relief None yet
Filing Year 2018
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Meet the Blixt-Zaccari Family
www.immigrationequality.org
Date: Jan. 24, 2018
By: Immigration Equality
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Same-sex couples file suits claiming their children were unconstitutionally denied citizenship
www.abajournal.com
Date: Jan. 24, 2018
By: Alvarez, Gerardo (American Bar Association)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
1:18-cv-00124 (D.D.C.)
IM-DC-0043-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 07/16/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Preliminary Statement [ECF# 1]
IM-DC-0043-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/22/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Sullivan, Emmet G. (D.D.C.)
IM-DC-0043-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers Blair, Scott E (New York)
IM-DC-0043-9000
Cassady, Elizabeth A. (District of Columbia)
IM-DC-0043-0001 | IM-DC-0043-9000
Edelman, Theodore (New York)
IM-DC-0043-9000
Jennings, Andrew H. (New York)
IM-DC-0043-9000
Klein, Jessica M. (New York)
IM-DC-0043-9000
Morris, Aaron (New York)
IM-DC-0043-0001
Moss, Alexandra K. (New York)
IM-DC-0043-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Andrapalliyal, Vinita (District of Columbia)
IM-DC-0043-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
view search results
page permalink

- top of page -