University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Abdulmutallab v. Sessions PC-CO-0029
Docket / Court 1:17-cv-02493-KMT ( D. Colo. )
State/Territory Colorado
Case Type(s) Prison Conditions
Case Summary
Note: This case was later titled Abdulmutallab v. Barr.

A Muslim prisoner in the custody of the United States Penitentiary-Adminstrative Maximum Prison in Florence, CO had gone on a hunger strike because he was denied a Halal diet in the course of his imprisonment. The prison he was ... read more >
Note: This case was later titled Abdulmutallab v. Barr.

A Muslim prisoner in the custody of the United States Penitentiary-Adminstrative Maximum Prison in Florence, CO had gone on a hunger strike because he was denied a Halal diet in the course of his imprisonment. The prison he was housed in force fed him and, allegedly, did not intervene when other prisoners harassed him and other Muslim inmates during their Islamic prayer. The prison placed him under indefinite solitary confinement, and, under special administrative measures (SAMs), he endured extreme conditions of confinement, arbitrarily being denied any communication whatsoever with even his own sister.

On October 18, 2017, he filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado. The plaintiff sued Attorney General Jefferson Sessions, the Federal Bureau of Prisons (BOP), and various agents of the Department of Justice (DOJ) all under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act (RFRA). The plaintiff, represented by private counsel, sought declaratory and injunctive relief as well as attorneys’ fees and costs. He alleged that the defendants violated RFRA and his First, Fifth, and Eighth Amendment rights. The case was initially assigned to Magistrate Judge Gordon P. Gallagher. The case was reassigned to Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya on October 23, 2017, and then reassigned again to Magistrate Judge Raymond P. Moore on December 4, 2017. The plaintiff sought injunctive relief to remove his SAMs status, to prohibit defendant Sessions from reimposing SAMs, to require defendant BOP to remove the plaintiff from solitary confinement, and to prohibit defendant BOP from force-feeding the plaintiff or interfering with his First Amendment-protected freedom to practice his religion.

On February 2, 2018, defendant Sessions filed a motion to dismiss and a motion for partial summary judgment. In support of his motion to dismiss, Sessions argued that eleven of the plaintiff’s fourteen claims ought to be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, failure to exhaust administrative remedies, and failure to state a claim. The court, however, denied both motions for their failure to comply with civil practice standards. On February 5, 2018, Sessions refiled the same motions, but with additions to comply with the court’s request.

On February 22, 2018, the plaintiff moved the court to deny the motion for partial summary judgment, arguing that it was premature because the plaintiff has not been able to conduct discovery. The plaintiff focused this discussion on the defendant's failure to exhaust remedies argument, saying that he wanted more information on that claim.

On April 14, 2018, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint. On May 11, 2018, Sessions renewed his motions to dismiss using similar arguments. The plaintiff again asked the court to either dismiss the motion or defer it until further discovery was completed.

In March of 2019, Magistrate Judge Kathleen M. Tafoya recommended that defendant's motion for summary judgment be partially or fully granted on every complaint. Judge Raymond P. Moore adopted those measures in September and closed the case. Plaintiff's claims were dismissed either due to lack of standing or because the plaintiff did not adequately exhaust his administrative remedies.

Jake Parker - 06/18/2018
Jack Hibbard - 06/02/2020


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Due Process
Free Exercise Clause
Freedom of speech/association
Defendant-type
Corrections
Discrimination-basis
Religion discrimination
General
Administrative segregation
Assault/abuse by residents/inmates/students
Classification / placement
Conditions of confinement
Disciplinary procedures
Disciplinary segregation
Excessive force
Language/ethnic/minority needs
Religious programs / policies
Solitary confinement/Supermax (conditions or process)
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Religious Freedom Rest. Act/Religious Land Use and Inst. Persons Act (RFRA/RLUIPA)
Defendant(s) Attorney General Jeff Sessions
United States
Plaintiff Description A Muslim prisoner in the United States Penitentiary–Administrative Maximum in Florence, Colorado.
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer No
Nature of Relief None
Source of Relief None
Filed 10/18/2017
Case Closing Year 2019
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  See this case at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
Docket(s)
1:17-cv-2493 (D. Colo.)
PC-CO-0029-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/13/2019
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint for Injunctive Relief, Declaratory Relief, and Attorney's Fees [ECF# 1]
PC-CO-0029-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/18/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [ECF# 42] (D. Colo.)
PC-CO-0029-0003.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/08/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Amended Complaint for Injunctive Relief, Declaratory Relief, and Attorney's Fees [ECF# 76]
PC-CO-0029-0002.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/14/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint [ECF# 79, 79-3, 79-4]
PC-CO-0029-0004.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/11/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF# 80, 80-1, 80-3]
PC-CO-0029-0005.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/11/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Amended Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [ECF# 120] (2019 WL 1058184)
PC-CO-0029-0006.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 03/06/2019
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge [ECF# 121] (2019 WL 1064062)
PC-CO-0029-0007.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 03/06/2019
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order on Amended Recommendation [ECF# 132] (2019 WL 4463282) (D. Colo.)
PC-CO-0029-0008.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 09/18/2019
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order on Recommendation [ECF# 133] (2019 WL 4463284) (D. Colo.)
PC-CO-0029-0009.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 09/18/2019
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
show all people docs
Judges Moore, Raymond Paul (D. Colo.) show/hide docs
PC-CO-0029-0008 | PC-CO-0029-0009 | PC-CO-0029-9000
Tafoya, Kathleen M. (D. Colo.) [Magistrate] show/hide docs
PC-CO-0029-0003 | PC-CO-0029-0006 | PC-CO-0029-0007 | PC-CO-0029-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers Johnson, Gail K. (Colorado) show/hide docs
PC-CO-0029-0001 | PC-CO-0029-0002 | PC-CO-0029-9000
Kapoor, Amy B. (Colorado) show/hide docs
PC-CO-0029-0001 | PC-CO-0029-9000
Randolph, Aurora Lynn (Colorado) show/hide docs
PC-CO-0029-0002 | PC-CO-0029-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Moskowitz, David Z. (Colorado) show/hide docs
PC-CO-0029-0004 | PC-CO-0029-0005 | PC-CO-0029-9000
Troyer, Robert C (Colorado) show/hide docs
PC-CO-0029-0004 | PC-CO-0029-0005

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -