University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
view search results
page permalink
Case Name Garza v. Hargan IM-DC-0034
Docket / Court 1:17-cv-02122-TSC ( D.D.C. )
Additional Docket(s) 17-05236  [ 17-5236 ]
17-05276  [ 17-5276 ]
17-5277  [ 17-5277 ]
State/Territory District of Columbia
Case Type(s) Immigration and/or the Border
Special Collection Take Care
Attorney Organization ACLU Chapters (any)
ACLU National (all projects)
ACLU of Northern California
ACLU of Southern California
Case Summary
On Oct. 13, 2017, a 17-year-old pregnant unaccompanied immigrant minor in immigration custody filed this suit against the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and its components Administration for Children and Families (ACF) and Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). Represented by the ... read more >
On Oct. 13, 2017, a 17-year-old pregnant unaccompanied immigrant minor in immigration custody filed this suit against the Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) and its components Administration for Children and Families (ACF) and Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR). Represented by the ACLU's national, DC, and Northern and Southern California offices, the plaintiff filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The case was assigned to Judge Tanya S. Chutkan.

In her complaint, the plaintiff alleged that ORR holds thousands of unaccompanied immigrant minors in federal custody. Under a Mar. 2017 policy, ORR prohibited all federally-funded shelters from taking "any action that facilitates" abortion access for unaccompanied minors in their care without "direction and approval from the Director of ORR."

The plaintiff maintained that she was an unaccompanied immigrant minor held in a Texas facility. She was pregnant and wanted an abortion. She received a judicial bypass approval as required under Texas law in the absence of parental consent. However, she alleged that, apparently on direct orders from the heads of ORR and ACF, facility staff refused to allow her to travel out of the detention facility to have the abortion. Additionally, facility staff forced her against her will to go to religiously-affiliated anti-abortion counseling, and notified her mother that she was pregnant.

The plaintiff asserted that ORR was obstructing her and other unaccompanied immigrant minors' rights to reproductive healthcare, including to abortion without "undue burden." She moved for class certification of a class of similarly situated pregnant unaccompanied immigrant minors in the legal custody of the federal government.

According to the plaintiff, the defendants' obstruction of abortions violated the First and Fifth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, by forcing pregnant minors to speak in religiously-affiliated anti-abortion counseling, and by violating their rights to privacy and liberty. The defendants' practices also violated the terms of the Flores v. Reno settlement agreement mandating certain standards for the treatment of unaccompanied immigrants in detention, including reproductive healthcare access; and a 2013 ORR regulation requiring reproductive healthcare for victims of sexual assault.

The plaintiff feared that the health risk of abortion would increase for every week the procedure was delayed. She thus sought an emergency Temporary Restraining Order (TRO), compelling the defendants to allow her to travel to have the abortion. This was accompanied by a motion for preliminary injunction to stop the defendants from obstructing other pregnant minors' access to abortion. Finally, the plaintiff sought Bivens damages for constitutional violations committed by federal officials.

Granting the plaintiffs' request for expedited briefing, Judge Chutkan held a hearing on Oct. 18, 2017 and then issued an order granting a TRO. 2017 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 175415. Finding in particular that the plaintiff would suffer irreparable harm to her health were she not permitted to have the abortion, Judge Chutkan ordered the defendants to promptly transport the plaintiff for the procedure or to allow her guardian or attorney ad litem to transport her.

The defendants immediately appealed to the D.C. Circuit and sought an emergency stay pending the appeal. There, the states of Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina filed an amicus brief supporting the defendants.

The D.C. Circuit, in an unpublished Oct. 19 per curiam order, administratively stayed Judge Chutkan's TRO until the Court could consider the defendants' emergency motion for a stay on its merits. 2017 WL 4707112. The next day, Judges Henderson, Kavanaugh and Millett held oral argument.

In its Oct. 20 unpublished per curiam order, the Court of Appeals first lifted the administrative stay and then vacated and remanded part of the TRO to the District Court. 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20711. While the Court found that the plaintiff had an uncontested constitutional right to an abortion, the Court agreed with the defendants that, pursuant to HHS policy, she first must secure and be released to a sponsor. If this had not occurred by Oct. 31, the District Court could again issue injunctive-type relief and the defendants could again appeal. Judge Millett dissented.

On Oct. 22, the plaintiff sought an emergency en banc rehearing in the D.C. Circuit. On Oct. 24, the District of Columbia and the States of California, Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Vermont, and Washington, filed an amicus brief supporting the plaintiff's motion. Then, the D.C. Circuit granted the plaintiff's requested en banc rehearing, and in an unpublished per curiam Oct. 24 order it vacated its Oct. 20 order. 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 20911. Judge Millett wrote a concurrence; Judges Kavanaugh (joined by Judge Henderson and Griffith) and Judge Henderson dissented. Judge Kavanaugh's dissent took the position that the delay accompanying the panel's original order was not an undue burden on the the plaintiff's abortion right; Judge Henderson's dissent argued that undocumented people not yet admitted to the United States have no or very limited abortion rights.

The plaintiff immediately returned to the district court and filed an emergency motion asking Judge Chutkan to amend her Oct. 18 TRO. She did so on Oct. 24, again ordering the defendants to promptly transport the plaintiff for the abortion or to allow her guardian or attorney ad litem to transport her, within 14 days. In her findings of fact, Judge Chutkan explained that the process of securing an ORR sponsor could take weeks or months, whereas the plaintiff was now 15 weeks pregnant and Texas law prohibited abortions after 20 weeks.

On Oct. 25, the plaintiff had the abortion, according to an ACLU press release. The same day in the district court, the plaintiff filed an unopposed motion for leave to proceed under a pseudonym.

The defendants opposed the plaintiff's motion for class certification on Nov. 20; the plaintiff replied on Nov. 27.

On Nov. 3, the defendants petitioned the Supreme Court for review of the circuit court's Oct. 24 order, asking the Supreme Court to vacate that order and remand the case to the district court with directions to dismiss all claims for prospective relief regarding pregnant unaccompanied minors. In the meantime, the defendants asked the district court to stay proceedings. The plaintiff opposed the stay on Nov. 7, arguing that the district court "should not facilitate Defendants' desire to put this case on hold for several months while they continue to violate the constitutional rights of young women." The defendants replied on Nov. 9.

The Supreme Court opened a docket, No. 17-654, on Nov. 6. On Dec. 4, the plaintiff submitted a brief arguing that the Court should deny the cert petition. The plaintiff maintained that the Court should not review or vacate the circuit court's denial of the emergency stay, as the petition presented no legal issue worthy of review. In the alternative, the plaintiff alleged that her claims regarding the defendants' treatment of pregnant detained minors were not moot.

Also on Dec. 4 in the Supreme Court, 11 states submitted an amicus brief in support of the defendants.

On Dec. 19 in the Supreme Court, the defendants submitted a brief. The defendants argued for vacatur of the circuit court's decision and dismissal of the entire case, which they maintained was moot after the plaintiff's abortion. The case was scheduled to be considered at the Supreme Court's Apr. 27, 2018 conference.

Meanwhile in the District Court, the plaintiff moved for a TRO and submitted an amended complaint on Dec. 15. The plaintiff asked the court to restrain the defendants from interfering with or obstructing the planned abortions of two other pregnant 17-year-olds, one of whom the plaintiff proposed as a class representative. Both these pregnant teenagers are held in detention in undisclosed locations. The defendants responded on Dec. 17, and the plaintiff replied Dec. 18.

Judge Chutkan held a Dec. 18 motion hearing, and issued a TRO that day. She found that as ORR had not changed its policies since October, the two pregnant teenagers would suffer irreparable harm without the TRO. As before, she ordered the defendants to restrain from interfering with or obstructing the two teenagers' access to abortions.

However, Judge Chutkan also stayed execution of the TRO for 24 hours to allow the defendants to appeal to the D.C. Circuit, which they did the next day, but only for one of the teenagers who was 10 weeks pregnant. The D.C. Circuit opened a new docket (No. 17-5276 and 17-5277, consolidated). Judge Chutkan then granted the plaintiff's emergency motion to lift the stay as to the other teenager who was 22 weeks pregnant.

However, in the D.C. Circuit on Dec. 19, the defendants notified the Court that they had discovered that the 10-week-pregnant teenager was in fact nineteen years old instead of seventeen. ORR transferred her to ICE that day. The Court then granted the defendants' request to voluntarily dismiss the appeal. (Both of these teenagers obtained abortions, according to Dec. 21 news reports.)

In the District Court on Dec. 22, the plaintiff followed up on her original motion for class certification, requesting that the Court certify the putative class of pregnant unaccompanied minors in ORR's custody who seek abortions. The defendants responded on Jan. 2, 2018, and the plaintiff replied Jan. 9.

On Dec. 28, the plaintiff requested an extension of the Dec. 18 TRO until the Court rules on the preliminary injunction motion; the defendants responded on Dec. 29 and the plaintiff replied on Dec 30. Judge Chutkan granted the TRO on Dec. 31.

On Jan. 8, 2018, eleven states filed an amicus brief in support of the defendants.

Next in the District Court on Jan. 11, the plaintiff filed another amended complaint and emergency motion for a temporary restraining order, adding another teenager who sought an abortion. The defendants responded on Jan. 12. On Feb. 1, the defendants moved to dismiss the plaintiff's second amended complaint, arguing that the Court lacked jurisdiction and that the plaintiff had failed to state a claim, because all the plaintiffs had been released from custody and because ORR had done nothing unconstitutional.

On Mar. 2, the plaintiff filed a renewed motion for class certification and a preliminary injunction, pointing to new facts that the plaintiff argued demonstrated a continued need for urgent relief. (The plaintiff had learned this information through discovery in American Civil Liberties Union v. Burwell.) Specifically, at least three additional minors held in the defendants' custody between Aug. 2017 and Dec. 2017 had requested abortions, but apparently the defendant had obstructed these requests. The plaintiff argued that the defendants had a uniform policy of coercion and banning abortions, and thus that class certification of minors currently in this situation was appropriate. The defendants responded on Mar. 16 and the plaintiff replied on Mar. 23.

On Mar. 30, Judge Chutkan granted the plaintiff's motions for a preliminary injunction and class certification. She certified a class of "all pregnant, unaccompanied immigrant minors who are or will be in the federal government's custody," because ORR's policies applied to the entire class. As to the preliminary injunction, Judge Chutkan first found that the plaintiff was likely to succeed on the merits of her claim that ORR policies (which vested in the ORR Director complete control over abortion access and banned all facilitation of abortion) placed an undue burden on abortion access. 304 F.Supp.3d 145.

The defendants then, on Apr. 3, requested a stay of the preliminary injunction. According to the defendants, the requirements restricted ORR's ability to carry out its statutory and custodial responsibilities to involve a pregnant minor's parents and notify authorized medical personnel as it deemed necessary. The plaintiff opposed this request on Apr. 5, arguing that the defendants were unlikely to succeed in their stay request or subsequent appeal.

The defendants then appealed the preliminary injunction to the circuit court, which opened a new docket (No. 18-5093). On Apr. 9, the defendants moved for a stay of the preliminary injunction and to appeal the class certification, and also asked for expedited consideration. Back in the District Court, on Apr. 25, 2018 Judge Chutkan denied the defendants' Apr. 3 motion to stay, holding that the defendants were unlikely to succeed in their stay request or subsequent appeal. 2018 WL 2561040. Meanwhile, the Court of Appeals denied leave to appeal on June 4, 2018.

The plaintiff filed a third amended complaint on Sept. 18, 2018 in the district court.

Ava Morgenstern - 05/05/2018
Virginia Weeks - 09/25/2018


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Establishment Clause
Freedom of speech/association
Content of Injunction
Preliminary relief granted
General
Conditions of confinement
Confidentiality
Counseling
Government Services (specify)
Juveniles
Personal injury
Religious programs / policies
Transportation
Immigration/Border
Constitutional rights
Detention - conditions
Undocumented immigrants - rights and duties
Undocumented immigrants - state and local regulation
Medical/Mental Health
Reproductive health care (including birth control, abortion, and others)
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens
Defendant(s) U.S. Administration for Children and Families
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
U.S. Office of Refugee Resettlement
Plaintiff Description A pregnant unaccompanied immigrant minor held in federal immigration custody and seeking an abortion, on behalf of a class of all similarly situated minors
Indexed Lawyer Organizations ACLU Chapters (any)
ACLU National (all projects)
ACLU of Northern California
ACLU of Southern California
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted Yes
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Source of Relief Litigation
Filing Year 2017
Case Ongoing Yes
Case Listing IM-CA-0002 : Flores v. Reno [later Meese, Johnson, Kelly, Sessions] (C.D. Cal.)
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  See this case at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
  Judge Orders Trump Administration to Stop Blocking Abortion for Two Immigrant Women
www.aclu.org
Date: Dec. 19, 2017
By: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Azar v. Garza
www.scotusblog.com
Date: Nov. 3, 2017
By: SCOTUSblog
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  After a Month of Obstruction by the Trump Administration, Jane Doe Gets Her Abortion
www.aclu.org
Date: Oct. 25, 2017
By: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Garza v. Hargan - Challenge to Trump Administration's Attempts to Block Abortions for Young Immigrant Women
www.aclu.org
Date: Oct. 23, 2017
By: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
1:17-cv-02122-TSC (D.D.C.)
IM-DC-0034-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/15/2019
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint For Injunctive Relief and Damages [ECF# 1]
IM-DC-0034-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/13/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Application For a Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 3]
IM-DC-0034-0002.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/14/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Emergency Motion to Shorten Defendants' Time In Which to Respond to Plaintiff's Application For a Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 4]
IM-DC-0034-0003.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/14/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Motion For a Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 5]
IM-DC-0034-0004.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/14/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiff's Motion For Class Certification [ECF# 18]
IM-DC-0034-0005.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/18/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 20] (2017 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 175415) (D.D.C.)
IM-DC-0034-0006.pdf | LEXIS | Detail
Date: 10/18/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief For the States of Texas, et al. As Amici Curiae In Support of Appellants and a Stay Pending Appeal [Ct. of App. ECF# BL-7]
IM-DC-0034-0007.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/19/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [Ct. of App. ECF# BL-21] (2017 U.S.App.LEXIS 20711)
IM-DC-0034-0017.pdf | LEXIS | Detail
Date: 10/20/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Emergency Petition For Rehearing En Banc to Vacate the Panel's Order and Deny Defendants-Appellants' Motion For an An Emergency Stay [Ct. of App. ECF# BL-24]
IM-DC-0034-0008.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/22/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief For Amici Curiae States fo New York et al. In Support of Appellee's Motion For Rehearing En Banc [Ct. of App. ECF# BL-33]
IM-DC-0034-0009.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/23/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Corrected Brief For Amici Curiae States of New York et al. In Support of Appellee's Motion For Rehearing En Banc [Ct. of App. ECF# BL-35]
IM-DC-0034-0010.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/24/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [Ct. of App. ECF# BL-36] (2017 U.S.App.LEXIS 20911)
IM-DC-0034-0016.pdf | LEXIS | Detail
Date: 10/24/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Emergency Motion to Amend the Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 27]
IM-DC-0034-0013.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/24/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Amended Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 29] (D.D.C.)
IM-DC-0034-0014.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/24/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Leave for J.D. to Proceed Under Pseudoym [ECF# 33]
IM-DC-0034-0018.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/25/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Motion For Briefing on Class Wide Relief and Stay Pending Supreme Court Proceedings [ECF# 44]
IM-DC-0034-0019.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/03/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Briefing on Class-wide Relief and for Stay Pending Supreme Court Appeal [ECF# 46]
IM-DC-0034-0021.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/07/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Reply to Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Briefing on Class Wide Relief and Stay Pending Supreme Court Proceedings [ECF# 49]
IM-DC-0034-0020.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/09/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion For Class Certification [ECF# 53]
IM-DC-0034-0022.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/20/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiff's Reply in Further Support of Class Certification [ECF# 56]
IM-DC-0034-0023.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/27/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief in Opposition of Rochelle Garza, as Guardian AD Litem to Unaccompanied Minor J.D.
IM-DC-0034-0030.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/04/2017
Brief for the States of Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Michigan, Missouri, Nebraska, Ohio, Oklahoma, South Carolina, West Virginia, and The Commonwealth of Kentucky, by and through Governor Matthew G. Bevin, as Amici Curiae in Support of Petitioners
IM-DC-0034-0031.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/04/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Application for a Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 63]
IM-DC-0034-0024.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/15/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Supplemental Memorandum Regarding Additional Class Representative in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification [ECF# 65]
IM-DC-0034-0025.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/17/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 66]
IM-DC-0034-0026.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/17/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Opposition to Motion for Temporary Restraining Order of Defendants Wagner and Lloyd (in their Individual Capacities) [ECF# 67]
IM-DC-0034-0027.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/17/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Reply to Defendants' Oppositions to Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 69]
IM-DC-0034-0032.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/18/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 75] (2017 WL 6462270) (D.D.C.)
IM-DC-0034-0033.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 12/18/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Response to Court Orders [Ct. of App. ECF# BL-8]
IM-DC-0034-0028.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/19/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Reply Brief for the Petitioners [ECF# BL-18]
IM-DC-0034-0035.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/20/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Motion for an Order Requiring Notice to, or Regarding, Additional Class Members and Request to Shorten Defendants' Time in Which to Respond [ECF# 90]
IM-DC-0034-0029.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/22/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for Extension of TRO for Jane Roe and Jane Poe [ECF# 94]
IM-DC-0034-0036.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/28/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Emergency Motion for an Extension of TRO for Jane Roe and Jane Poe [ECF# 95]
IM-DC-0034-0037.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/29/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Reply in Further Support of their Emergency Motion to Extent the TRO for Jane Roe and Jane Poe [ECF# 96]
IM-DC-0034-0038.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/30/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Motion for Provisional Class Certification and Notice [ECF# 98]
IM-DC-0034-0034.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/02/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief for the States of Texas, et al. by and through Governor Matthew G. Bevin, as Amici Curiae in Support of Defendants [ECF# 102]
IM-DC-0034-0039.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/08/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Reply in Further Support of Their Motion for Provisional Class Certification and Notice [ECF# 103]
IM-DC-0034-0040.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/09/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Second Amended Complaint for Injunctive Relief [ECF# 104]
IM-DC-0034-0041.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/11/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Application for a Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 105]
IM-DC-0034-0042.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/11/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiff Jane Moe's Memorandum in Support of Her Application for a Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 105-1]
IM-DC-0034-0044.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/11/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants’ Opposition to Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 108]
IM-DC-0034-0043.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/12/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Pro 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) [ECF# 116]
IM-DC-0034-0045.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/01/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs’ Renewed Motion for Class Certification and a Preliminary Injunction Based on New Facts Demonstrating Continued Need for Urgent Relief [ECF# 121]
IM-DC-0034-0046.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/02/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Renewed Motion for Class Certification and a Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 124]
IM-DC-0034-0047.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/16/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Reply in Further Support of Their Renewed Motion for Class Certification and a Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 125]
IM-DC-0034-0048.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/23/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Memorandum Opinion and Order [ECF# 126] (2018 WL 1567600) (D.D.C.)
IM-DC-0034-0049.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 03/30/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Motion for a Stay of the Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 128]
IM-DC-0034-0050.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/03/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for a Stay of the Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 130]
IM-DC-0034-0051.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/05/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Motion for a Stay of the Preliminary Injunction and Request to Certify Appeal of Class Certification [ECF# 4]
IM-DC-0034-0052.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/09/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs-Appellees' Opposition to Appellants' Motion for a Stay Pending Appeal [Ct. of App. ECF# 11]
IM-DC-0034-0054.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/19/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order on Motion for Stay Pending Appeal [ECF# 137] (2018 WL 2561040) (D.D.C.)
IM-DC-0034-0053.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 04/25/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Reply in Support of Stay Pending Appeal [Ct. of App. ECF# 12]
IM-DC-0034-0055.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/26/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Third Amended Complaint [ECF# 143]
IM-DC-0034-0056.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/18/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
show all people docs
Judges Chutkan, Tanya Sue (D.D.C.) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0006 | IM-DC-0034-0014 | IM-DC-0034-0033 | IM-DC-0034-0049 | IM-DC-0034-0053 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Garland, Merrick B. (D.C. Circuit) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0016
Henderson, Karen LeCraft (D.S.C., D.C. Circuit) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0017
Kavanaugh, Brett M. (D.C. Circuit, SCOTUS) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0017
Millett, Patricia Ann (D.C. Circuit) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0017
Plaintiff's Lawyers Amiri, Brigitte A. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0001 | IM-DC-0034-0002 | IM-DC-0034-0003 | IM-DC-0034-0004 | IM-DC-0034-0005 | IM-DC-0034-0008 | IM-DC-0034-0013 | IM-DC-0034-0018 | IM-DC-0034-0021 | IM-DC-0034-0023 | IM-DC-0034-0024 | IM-DC-0034-0025 | IM-DC-0034-0029 | IM-DC-0034-0030 | IM-DC-0034-0032 | IM-DC-0034-0036 | IM-DC-0034-0038 | IM-DC-0034-0040 | IM-DC-0034-0041 | IM-DC-0034-0042 | IM-DC-0034-0044 | IM-DC-0034-0046 | IM-DC-0034-0048 | IM-DC-0034-0051 | IM-DC-0034-0054 | IM-DC-0034-0056 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Burrows, Meagan (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0001 | IM-DC-0034-0002 | IM-DC-0034-0003 | IM-DC-0034-0004 | IM-DC-0034-0005 | IM-DC-0034-0008 | IM-DC-0034-0013 | IM-DC-0034-0018 | IM-DC-0034-0021 | IM-DC-0034-0023 | IM-DC-0034-0024 | IM-DC-0034-0025 | IM-DC-0034-0029 | IM-DC-0034-0030 | IM-DC-0034-0032 | IM-DC-0034-0036 | IM-DC-0034-0038 | IM-DC-0034-0040 | IM-DC-0034-0041 | IM-DC-0034-0042 | IM-DC-0034-0044 | IM-DC-0034-0046 | IM-DC-0034-0048 | IM-DC-0034-0051 | IM-DC-0034-0054 | IM-DC-0034-0056
Chou, Jennifer Ling (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0001 | IM-DC-0034-0002 | IM-DC-0034-0003 | IM-DC-0034-0004 | IM-DC-0034-0005 | IM-DC-0034-0013 | IM-DC-0034-0018 | IM-DC-0034-0021
Dalven, Jennifer (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0008 | IM-DC-0034-0018 | IM-DC-0034-0021 | IM-DC-0034-0023 | IM-DC-0034-0024 | IM-DC-0034-0025 | IM-DC-0034-0029 | IM-DC-0034-0030 | IM-DC-0034-0032 | IM-DC-0034-0036 | IM-DC-0034-0038 | IM-DC-0034-0040 | IM-DC-0034-0041 | IM-DC-0034-0042 | IM-DC-0034-0044 | IM-DC-0034-0046 | IM-DC-0034-0048 | IM-DC-0034-0051 | IM-DC-0034-0054 | IM-DC-0034-0056
Gill, Elizabeth O. (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0041 | IM-DC-0034-0042 | IM-DC-0034-0044 | IM-DC-0034-0046 | IM-DC-0034-0048 | IM-DC-0034-0051 | IM-DC-0034-0054 | IM-DC-0034-0056
Goodman, Melissa (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0001 | IM-DC-0034-0002 | IM-DC-0034-0003 | IM-DC-0034-0004 | IM-DC-0034-0005 | IM-DC-0034-0013 | IM-DC-0034-0018 | IM-DC-0034-0021 | IM-DC-0034-0023 | IM-DC-0034-0024 | IM-DC-0034-0025 | IM-DC-0034-0032 | IM-DC-0034-0036 | IM-DC-0034-0038 | IM-DC-0034-0040 | IM-DC-0034-0041 | IM-DC-0034-0042 | IM-DC-0034-0044 | IM-DC-0034-0046 | IM-DC-0034-0048 | IM-DC-0034-0051 | IM-DC-0034-0054 | IM-DC-0034-0056
Kaley, Lindsey (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0024 | IM-DC-0034-0025 | IM-DC-0034-0029 | IM-DC-0034-0032 | IM-DC-0034-0038 | IM-DC-0034-0040 | IM-DC-0034-0041 | IM-DC-0034-0042 | IM-DC-0034-0044 | IM-DC-0034-0046 | IM-DC-0034-0048 | IM-DC-0034-0051 | IM-DC-0034-0054 | IM-DC-0034-0056
Knizhnik, Shana (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0046 | IM-DC-0034-0048 | IM-DC-0034-0051 | IM-DC-0034-0054 | IM-DC-0034-0056
Mach, Daniel (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0001 | IM-DC-0034-0002 | IM-DC-0034-0003 | IM-DC-0034-0004 | IM-DC-0034-0005 | IM-DC-0034-0013 | IM-DC-0034-0018 | IM-DC-0034-0021 | IM-DC-0034-0023 | IM-DC-0034-0024 | IM-DC-0034-0025 | IM-DC-0034-0030 | IM-DC-0034-0032 | IM-DC-0034-0036 | IM-DC-0034-0038 | IM-DC-0034-0040 | IM-DC-0034-0041 | IM-DC-0034-0042 | IM-DC-0034-0044 | IM-DC-0034-0046 | IM-DC-0034-0048 | IM-DC-0034-0051 | IM-DC-0034-0054 | IM-DC-0034-0056 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Michelman, Scott (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0001 | IM-DC-0034-0002 | IM-DC-0034-0003 | IM-DC-0034-0004 | IM-DC-0034-0005 | IM-DC-0034-0008 | IM-DC-0034-0013 | IM-DC-0034-0018 | IM-DC-0034-0021 | IM-DC-0034-0023 | IM-DC-0034-0024 | IM-DC-0034-0025 | IM-DC-0034-0029 | IM-DC-0034-0030 | IM-DC-0034-0032 | IM-DC-0034-0036 | IM-DC-0034-0038 | IM-DC-0034-0040 | IM-DC-0034-0041 | IM-DC-0034-0042 | IM-DC-0034-0044 | IM-DC-0034-0046 | IM-DC-0034-0048 | IM-DC-0034-0051 | IM-DC-0034-0054 | IM-DC-0034-0056 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Spitzer, Arthur (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0001 | IM-DC-0034-0002 | IM-DC-0034-0003 | IM-DC-0034-0004 | IM-DC-0034-0005 | IM-DC-0034-0008 | IM-DC-0034-0013 | IM-DC-0034-0018 | IM-DC-0034-0021 | IM-DC-0034-0023 | IM-DC-0034-0024 | IM-DC-0034-0025 | IM-DC-0034-0029 | IM-DC-0034-0030 | IM-DC-0034-0032 | IM-DC-0034-0036 | IM-DC-0034-0038 | IM-DC-0034-0040 | IM-DC-0034-0041 | IM-DC-0034-0042 | IM-DC-0034-0044 | IM-DC-0034-0046 | IM-DC-0034-0048 | IM-DC-0034-0051 | IM-DC-0034-0054 | IM-DC-0034-0056 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Wroe, Mishan Raini (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0001 | IM-DC-0034-0002 | IM-DC-0034-0003 | IM-DC-0034-0004 | IM-DC-0034-0005 | IM-DC-0034-0013 | IM-DC-0034-0018 | IM-DC-0034-0021 | IM-DC-0034-0023 | IM-DC-0034-0024 | IM-DC-0034-0025 | IM-DC-0034-0030 | IM-DC-0034-0032 | IM-DC-0034-0036 | IM-DC-0034-0038 | IM-DC-0034-0040 | IM-DC-0034-0041 | IM-DC-0034-0042 | IM-DC-0034-0044 | IM-DC-0034-0046 | IM-DC-0034-0048 | IM-DC-0034-0051 | IM-DC-0034-0054 | IM-DC-0034-0056
Defendant's Lawyers Cole, David (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0030
Consovoy, William S. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0027 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Cook, Caroline Asley (Virginia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0027 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Darrow, Joseph A. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0019 | IM-DC-0034-0022 | IM-DC-0034-0026 | IM-DC-0034-0028 | IM-DC-0034-0034 | IM-DC-0034-0045 | IM-DC-0034-0047 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Dorsey, Catherine (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0028
Fabian, Sarah B. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-9000
Flentje, August E. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0022 | IM-DC-0034-0026 | IM-DC-0034-0028 | IM-DC-0034-0034 | IM-DC-0034-0037 | IM-DC-0034-0043 | IM-DC-0034-0045 | IM-DC-0034-0047 | IM-DC-0034-0050 | IM-DC-0034-0052 | IM-DC-0034-0055
Francisco, Noel (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0035
Goodman, Melissa (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0030
Greer, Christina P. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0052 | IM-DC-0034-0055
Haas, Alexander K (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-9000
Heyse, Michael C. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0047 | IM-DC-0034-0050 | IM-DC-0034-0052 | IM-DC-0034-0055 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Leo, Sabatino Fioravante (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0022 | IM-DC-0034-0026 | IM-DC-0034-0028 | IM-DC-0034-0037 | IM-DC-0034-0043 | IM-DC-0034-0045 | IM-DC-0034-0047 | IM-DC-0034-0050 | IM-DC-0034-0052 | IM-DC-0034-0055 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Molina, Ernesto H. Jr. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0019 | IM-DC-0034-0020 | IM-DC-0034-0022 | IM-DC-0034-0026 | IM-DC-0034-0028 | IM-DC-0034-0034 | IM-DC-0034-0037 | IM-DC-0034-0043 | IM-DC-0034-0045 | IM-DC-0034-0047 | IM-DC-0034-0050 | IM-DC-0034-0052 | IM-DC-0034-0055 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Mooppan, Hashim M. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0052 | IM-DC-0034-0055
Park, Michael H. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0027 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Phillips, Carter G (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0030
Readler, Chad Andrew (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0019 | IM-DC-0034-0020 | IM-DC-0034-0022 | IM-DC-0034-0026 | IM-DC-0034-0028 | IM-DC-0034-0034 | IM-DC-0034-0037 | IM-DC-0034-0043 | IM-DC-0034-0045 | IM-DC-0034-0047 | IM-DC-0034-0050 | IM-DC-0034-0052 | IM-DC-0034-0055
Sandhu, Papu (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0019 | IM-DC-0034-0020 | IM-DC-0034-0022
Shieh, Woei-Tyng Daniel (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0022 | IM-DC-0034-0026 | IM-DC-0034-0028 | IM-DC-0034-0037 | IM-DC-0034-0043 | IM-DC-0034-0045 | IM-DC-0034-0047 | IM-DC-0034-0050 | IM-DC-0034-0052 | IM-DC-0034-0055 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Stewart, Scott Grant (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-9000
Strawbridge, Patrick (Massachusetts) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0027 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Other Lawyers Becerra, Xavier (California) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
Chin, Douglas S.G. (Hawaii) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
Dasgupta, Anisha (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0009 | IM-DC-0034-0010
Davis, James E. (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007
Denn, Matthew P. (Delaware) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
DeWine, Michael (Ohio) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0031
Donovan, Thomas J. Jr. (Vermont) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
Ferguson, Robert W. (Washington) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
Hacker, David J. (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0031
Hawkins, Kyle (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0031 | IM-DC-0034-0039
Hawley, Joshua D. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0031
Healey, Maura T. (Massachusetts) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
Hunter, Mike (Oklahoma) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0031
Jepson, George (Connecticut) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
Keller, Scott A. (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0031 | IM-DC-0034-0039 | IM-DC-0034-9000
Landry, Jeff (Louisiana) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0031
Madigan, Lisa (Illinois) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
Mateer, Jeffrey C. (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0031 | IM-DC-0034-0039
Miller, Thomas J. (Iowa) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
Mills, Janet T. (Maine) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
Morrisey, Patrick (West Virginia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0031
Murdukhayeva, Ester (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0009 | IM-DC-0034-0010
Paxton, Ken (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0031 | IM-DC-0034-0039
Peterson, Doug (Nebraska) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0031
Pitt, Mark Stephen (Kentucky) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0031
Racine, Karl A. (Maryland) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
Rosenblum, Ellen F. (Oregon) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
Rutledge, Leslie (Arkansas) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0031
Schneiderman, Eric T. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0009 | IM-DC-0034-0010
Schuette, Bill (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0031
Shapiro, Josh (Pennsylvania) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0010
Starr, Brantley D. (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0039
Underwood, Barbara D. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0009 | IM-DC-0034-0010
Wilson, Alan (South Carolina) show/hide docs
IM-DC-0034-0007 | IM-DC-0034-0031

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
view search results
page permalink

- top of page -