University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Regents of University of California v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security IM-CA-0095
Docket / Court 3:17-cv-05211 ( N.D. Cal. )
Additional Docket(s) 17-801  [ 17-801 ]  U.S. Supreme Court
18-15068  [ 18-15068 ]  Federal Court of Appeals
State/Territory California
Case Type(s) Immigration and/or the Border
Special Collection Civil Rights Challenges to Trump Immigration Enforcement Orders
Take Care
Case Summary
The Regents of the University of California (UC) and Janet Napolitano, in her official capacity as President of the University of California, filed this lawsuit challenging the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) revocation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA). The ... read more >
The Regents of the University of California (UC) and Janet Napolitano, in her official capacity as President of the University of California, filed this lawsuit challenging the Department of Homeland Security’s (DHS) revocation of the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals program (DACA). The complaint was filed on September 8, 2017 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California.

According to the complaint, DACA has benefited approximately 800,000 individuals brought to the U.S. as children “through no choice of their own.” Under DACA, applicants who met certain criteria were eligible for deferred immigration action for two-year periods, pending approval of their applications. As the complaint stated, “DACA allowed these individuals to live, study, and work in the United States without fear that they could be arrested and deported at any time,” and so they “were able to pursue opportunities in higher education, to more readily obtain driver’s licenses and access lines of credit, to obtain jobs and access to certain Social Security and Medicare benefits, and to contribute to their communities and American society.” The plaintiffs stated that these individuals - known as Dreamers - have enabled the nation and UC to greatly benefit from their presence as students and employees at the university. The plaintiffs stated the Dreamers contribute significant to UC life, “expanding the intellectual vitality of the school, filling crucial roles as medical residents, research assistants, and student government leaders, and increasing the diversity of the community.” Plaintiff Janet Napolitano was the Secretary of Homeland Security who designed and implemented DACA in 2012.

But the revocation of DACA, the plaintiffs argued, threatened the Dreamers with “expulsion from the only country that they call home.” Moreover, the plaintiffs argued, DHS did not offer any “reasoned basis” for revoking DACA and did so in violation of legally required procedures. The plaintiffs argued that DHS’s justification for revocation is that a related but ultimately separate program - Deferred Action for Parents of Americans and Lawful Permanent Residents (DAPA) - is illegal. The plaintiffs asserted that this justification is based on “an incorrect legal premise” as the two programs “were governed by different sets of rules, applied to different individuals, and conferred different benefits” and that “no court has held that DACA is unlawful.” Further, the plaintiffs argued that in not accounting for the Dreamers' strong reliance on DACA, DHS violated Supreme Court precedent requiring agencies to provide “more substantial justification” for policy changes when there is significant reliance on the preexisting policy. The plaintiffs argued that DHS’ revocation of DACA violates the Fifth Amendment’s due process clause and the Administrative Procedure Act. They seek declaratory and injunctive relief.

The case was assigned to Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley on Sept. 8, but then reassigned to Judge Hon. William Alsup on Sept. 12.

On Sept. 18, the court related this case to State of California v. Department of Homeland Security, Case No. 17-cv-05235. Two days later, the court related two more cases to this one: Garcia v. United States of America, No. 17-cv-05380, and City of San Jose v. Trump, No. 17-cv-05329. On Oct. 16, County of Santa Clara v. Trump, No. 17-cv-05813, was added as a related case. All are summarized in this Clearinghouse.

On Oct. 6, the defendants filed the administrative record, available here, which included a series of government documents pertaining to DACA from its inception to the decision to rescind it. On Oct. 17, after the plaintiffs moved to compel the defendants to complete the administrative record, the court ordered them to do so. The court found that the defendants did not produce all documents leading to the rescission, specifically related documents that Acting Secretary Duke did not directly review. The defendants moved to stay further proceedings at this court on Oct. 18 in light of their intent to appeal this ruling to the Ninth Circuit. The court denied staying proceedings on Oct. 19, and the defendants appealed the next day by filing a petition for a writ of mandamus to the district court and and emergency motion for stay. On Oct. 23, the district court replied to the Ninth Circuit's invitation to answer the government's petition stating it would not stay proceedings in light of the narrow window of time until the DACA ends on March 5, 2018.

On Nov. 1, in the district court, the plaintiffs moved for preliminary injunction to enjoin defendants from rescinding DACA, arguing that the rescission "violates the fundamental prohibition on arbitrary agency action imposed by the Administrative Procedure Act" by not providing a reasoned basis for it. The same day, the defendants moved to dismiss the case, arguing that the rescission is an enforcement action "presumed immune from judicial review" and that the government provided ample explanation for the rescission based on DAPA's enjoinment.

On Nov. 16, the Ninth Circuit denied defendants' motion for a writ of mandamus and vacated the stay of discovery and record expansion that had been entered, and the District Court immediately ordered the federal government to file an augmented administrative record by Nov 22. On Nov. 17, the federal government filed an emergency motion noting that it intended to file an application for mandamus with the Supreme Court no later than Nov. 20, and requesting that the Ninth Circuit stay its order pending the Supreme Court's resolution of the forthcoming petition. On Nov. 21, the Ninth Circuit dismissed the federal government's motion, noting that jurisdiction currently lies with the District Court and instructing the federal government that further relief must be sought in a new petition for mandamus.

Meanwhile, in the District Court, Judge Alsup on Nov. 20 agreed to stay all discovery until Dec. 22, at which point the augmented administrative record will be due.

On Dec. 1, 2017, the government filed notice that they appealed the Ninth's Circuit denial of mandamus relief and applied for a stay to the Supreme Court. On Dec. 21 in a per curiam opinion, the Supreme Court vacated the Ninth Circuit's denial and remanded the case, arguing that the district court should have stayed implementation of the Oct. 17 order compelling the government to complete the administrative record. The Supreme Court stated that the lower court should have "first resolved the Government’s threshold arguments (that the Acting Secretary’s determination to rescind DACA is unreviewable because it is “committed to agency discretion,” 5 U. S. C. §701(a)(2), and that the Immigration and Nationality Act deprives the District Court of jurisdiction). Either of those arguments, if accepted, likely would eliminate the need for the District Court to examine a complete administrative record." 583 U. S. ____ (2017). The same day, the district court stayed the order compelling the government to complete the administrative record.

On Jan. 9, 2018, the court dismissed the government's motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction from Nov. 1, 2017 under rule 12(b)(1) and provided provisional relief to the plaintiffs. The order indicated the court would separately dismiss the government's motion to dismiss under rule 12(b)(6). The court ordered a nationwide preliminary injunction, ordering that DACA remain in effect on the same terms and conditions that existed prior to the recession. However, the government did not need to process new applications from individuals who never before received deferred action. The court then granted in part and denied in part the government's motion to dismiss on Jan. 12, dismissing the plaintiffs' Regulatory Flexibility Act and equitable estoppel claims as well the individual plaintiffs' declaratory relief claims. The court sustained the plaintiffs' APA, due process, and equal protection claims (with a few exceptions from the various complaints of the related cases).

The government appealed to the Ninth Circuit on Jan. 16, 2018. The government also sought certiorari from the Supreme Court on Jan. 18 while the Ninth Circuit appeal was pending, arguing that the Supreme Court's immediate review was warranted because of how long the appeal would take in the Ninth Circuit and how time sensitive the issue was. The Supreme Court denied cert without prejudice on Feb. 26, 2018, indicating the justices assume "that the Court of Appeals will proceed expeditiously to decide this case."

The related cases were consolidated in the Ninth Circuit for the purposes of appeal. From February through April 2018, the parties filed their briefs.

Meanwhile, the following entities filed amicus briefs in support of the plaintiffs: historians, the Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, Service Employees International Union, American Federation of Teachers, American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, Communications Workers of America, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, International Union of Painters and Allied Traders, United Farm Workers of America, United We Dream, public education groups, current and former prosecutors and law enforcement leaders, over 100 religious organizations, higher education institutions, over 100 companies and associations, the Bar Association of San Francisco, former federal immigration and homeland security officials, law professors and scholars, the Institute for Policy Integrity at NYU School of Law, Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Anti-Defamation League, social justice organizations, legal services organizations, American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, California Professional Society on the Abuse of Children, Partnership for Educational Justice, DelawareCAN, HawaiiKidsCAN, NewMexicoKidsCAN, Virginia Excels, various cities and counties, the National League of Cities, U.S. Conference of Mayors, various ACLU branches.

The Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's rulings on Nov. 8, 2018. The panel held that the government's decision to rescind DACA was reviewable because it was based on a belief that law foreclosed any alternative because the agency lacked authority rather than on exercise of discretion. The panel further concluded the decision was reviewable because the government based rescission only on the belief that DACA went beyond DHS' authority and so the APA's bar did not apply, and the decision did not fall within the three discrete occasions when the INA bars judicial review of DHS decisions. As to the merits of preliminary injunction, the panel held that "DACA was a permissible exercise of executive discretion" and the government's belief that DACA was illegal was wrong. 2018 WL 5833232. Thus, the panel concluded the plaintiffs were likely to succeed on the merits in showing that the rescission was arbitrary and capricious under the APA. The panel also held that a nationwide injunction was appropriate because it "promotes uniformity in immigration enforcement, and is necessary to provide the plaintiffs here with complete redress." Id.

The defendants petitioned the Supreme Court of the U.S. for a writ of certiorari on Nov. 5; that petition is still pending as of Feb. 17, 2019.

Virginia Weeks - 12/03/2017
Virginia Weeks - 11/08/2018
Sam Kulhanek - 02/17/2019


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Benefit Source
DACA (Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals)
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Content of Injunction
Preliminary relief granted
Defendant-type
Jurisdiction-wide
Discrimination-basis
Immigration status
Immigration/Border
Constitutional rights
Deportation - criteria
Deportation - judicial review
Deportation - procedure
Employment
Legalization/Amnesty
Status/Classification
Undocumented immigrants - rights and duties
Work authorization - criteria
Work authorization - procedures
Plaintiff Type
Non-profit NON-religious organization
Causes of Action Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Defendant(s) Department of Homeland Security
Plaintiff Description Regents of the University of California and Janet Napolitano in her official capacity as President of the University of California
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer No
Nature of Relief Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Source of Relief Litigation
Filing Year 2017
Case Ongoing Yes
Case Listing IM-CA-0096 : State of California v. Department of Homeland Security (N.D. Cal.)
IM-CA-0099 : Garcia v. United States of America (N.D. Cal.)
IM-CA-0098 : City of San Jose v. Trump (N.D. Cal.)
IM-CA-0106 : County of Santa Clara v. Trump (N.D. Cal.)
IM-NY-0055 : State of New York v. Trump (E.D.N.Y.)
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  See this case at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
  University of California sues Trump administration on unlawful repeal of DACA program
https://www.universityofcalifornia.edu/
Date: Sep. 8, 2017
By: UC Office of the President (University of California )
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Memorandum on Rescission Of Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
www.dhs.gov
Date: Sep. 5, 2017
By: Department of Homeland Security
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Implementation of Executive Order 13768, "Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States
The Washington Post
Date: May 22, 2017
By: Jefferson Sessions (U.S. Department of Justice)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Re: Implementing the President's Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements Policies (Final, 2/20/2017)
dhs.gov
Date: Feb. 20, 2017
By: DHS Secretary John Kelly (United States Department of Homeland Security)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Re: Enforcement of the Immigration Laws to Serve the National Interest (Final, 2/20/2017)
dhs.gov
Date: Feb. 20, 2017
By: DHS Secretary John Kelly (United States Department of Homeland Security)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Executive Order 13767: Border Security and Immigration Enforcement Improvements
Federal Register
Date: Jan. 27, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (Office of the President)
Citation: 82 Fed. Reg. Presidential Documents 8793 (Jan. 27, 2017)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ]

  Executive Order 13768: Enhancing Public Safety in the Interior of the United States
Federal Register
Date: Jan. 25, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (Office of the President)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
3:17-cv-5211 (N.D. Cal.)
IM-CA-0095-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/16/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint For Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [ECF# 1]
IM-CA-0095-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/08/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Motion for Provisional Relief & Memorandum in Support [ECF# 111]
IM-CA-0095-0002.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/01/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Notion of Motion and Motion to Dismiss All N.D. Cal. DACA Cases; Memorandum in Support [ECF# 114]
IM-CA-0095-0003.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/01/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Per Curiam [ECF# 224]
IM-CA-0095-0004.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/21/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Denying FRCP 12(b)(1) Dismissal and Granting Provisional Relief [ECF# 234] (2018 WL 339144) (N.D. Cal.)
IM-CA-0095-0005.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 01/09/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting in Part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Under FRCP 12(b)(6) [ECF# 239] (2018 WL 401177) (N.D. Cal.)
IM-CA-0095-0006.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 01/12/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Appellants’ Opening Brief [Ct. of App. ECF# 10762501]
IM-CA-0095-0009.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/13/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Principal and Response Brief of The States of California, Maine, Maryland, and Minnesota [Ct. of App. ECF# 10797115]
IM-CA-0095-0010.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/13/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Principal and Response Brief of Appellees The Regents of The University of California, Janet Napolitano, and City of San Jose [Ct. of App. ECF# 10797237]
IM-CA-0095-0011.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/13/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Principal and Response Brief for the Garcia and County of Santa Clara Plaintiffs [Ct. of App. ECF# 10797416]
IM-CA-0095-0012.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/13/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of 42 Historians and the Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees-Cross-Appellants [Ct. of App. ECF# 56-1]
IM-CA-0095-0014.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/19/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Service Employees International Union, et al. as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs [Ct. of App. ECF# 57]
IM-CA-0095-0015.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief for Amicus Curiae United We Dream in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees [Ct. of App. ECF# 62]
IM-CA-0095-0016.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Public Education Groups as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees for Affirmance of Preliminary Injunction [Ct. of App. ECF# 63-1]
IM-CA-0095-0017.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Amici Curiae Current and Former Prosecutors and Law Enforcement Leaders in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees and for Affirmance [Ct. of App. ECF# 64]
IM-CA-0095-0018.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Amici Curiae 119 Religious Organizations in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees for Affirmance of Preliminary Injunction [Ct. of App. ECF# 66-1]
IM-CA-0095-0019.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief for Amici Curiae Institutions of Higher Education in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees [Ct. of App. ECF# 71]
IM-CA-0095-0020.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Amici Curiae Eighteen Universities in Support of Plaintiff-Appellees and for Affirmance [Ct. of App. ECF# 73]
IM-CA-0095-0021.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Amici Curiae Eighteen Universities in Support of Plaintiff-Appellees and for Affirmance [Ct. of App. ECF# 75]
IM-CA-0095-0022.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Amicus Curiae the Bar Association of San Francisco in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees [Ct. of App. ECF# 78]
IM-CA-0095-0023.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Former Federal Immigration and Homeland Security Officials as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees and Affirmance [Ct. of App. ECF# 80]
IM-CA-0095-0024.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Partnership for Educational Justice, et al. as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellees and for Affirmance [Ct. of App. ECF# 81]
IM-CA-0095-0025.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of 40 Cities and Counties, the National League of Cities and the United States Conference of Mayors as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees and for Affirmance [Ct. of App. ECF# 85]
IM-CA-0095-0026.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Amici Curiae American Civil Liberties Union Foundation, ACLU Foundation of Northern California, ACLU Foundation of Southern California, and ACLU Foundation of San Diego & Imperial Counties in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees [Ct. of App. ECF# 86]
IM-CA-0095-0027.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Immigration Law Scholars as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellees the Regents of the University of California, Janet Napolitano, and the City of San Jose [Ct. of App. ECF# 87]
IM-CA-0095-0028.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of the Institute for Policy Integrity at New York University School of Law as Amicus Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees' Principal and Response Briefs [Ct. of App. ECF# 88]
IM-CA-0095-0029.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Twenty-Four Law Professors as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs [Ct. of App. ECF# 89]
IM-CA-0095-0030.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Amici Curiae the Lawyers' Committee for Civil Rights Under Law, Anti-Defamation League, and Social Justice Organizations in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees [Ct. of App. ECF# 90]
IM-CA-0095-0031.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Legal Services Organizations as Amici Curiae in Support of Appellees [Ct. of App. ECF# 91]
IM-CA-0095-0032.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief for Amici Curiae American Professional Society on the Abuse of Children and California Professional Society on the Abuse of Children in Support of Plaintiffs-Appellees [Ct. of App. ECF# 92]
IM-CA-0095-0033.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Appellants' Response and Reply Brief [Ct. of App. ECF# 134]
IM-CA-0095-0013.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/03/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Reply Brief of the States of California, Maine, Maryland, and Minnesota [Ct. of App. ECF# 139]
IM-CA-0095-0034.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/17/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Reply Brief of Appellees The Regents of the University of California, Janet Napolitano, and City of San Jose [Ct. of App. ECF# 141]
IM-CA-0095-0035.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/17/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Reply Brief for the Garcia and County of Santa Clara Plaintiffs [Ct. of App. ECF# 143]
IM-CA-0095-0036.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/17/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Supplemental Brief for the Garcia and County of Santa Clara Plaintiffs [Ct. of App. ECF# 166]
IM-CA-0095-0037.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/11/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Appellants' Supplemental Brief [Ct. of App. ECF# 167]
IM-CA-0095-0038.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/11/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Supplemental Brief of Appellees The Regents of the University of California, Janet Napolitano, and City of San Jose [Ct. of App. ECF# 168]
IM-CA-0095-0039.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/11/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Supplemental Brief of the States of California, Maine, Maryland, and Minnesota [Ct. of App. ECF# 172]
IM-CA-0095-0040.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/11/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California William Alsup, District Judge, Presiding [Ct. of App. ECF# 199] (908 F.3d 476)
IM-CA-0095-0041.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 11/08/2018
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
show all people docs
Judges Alsup, William Haskell (N.D. Cal.) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0005 | IM-CA-0095-0006 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Kim, Sallie Court not on record [Magistrate] show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers Almadani, Monica Marie-Ramirez (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-0011 | IM-CA-0095-0035 | IM-CA-0095-0039 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Anguas Nyquist, Ashley Ciara (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Becerra, Xavier (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0034 | IM-CA-0095-0040
Berengaut, Alexander A. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-0011 | IM-CA-0095-0035 | IM-CA-0095-0039 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Bersin, Alan Douglas (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Breuer, Lanny A. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Campion, Jacob (Minnesota) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0034 | IM-CA-0095-0040
Chahal, Harpreet Kaur (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Chemerinsky, Erwin (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Crowley, Megan Anne (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-0011 | IM-CA-0095-0035 | IM-CA-0095-0039 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Danitz, Brian (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0011 | IM-CA-0095-0035 | IM-CA-0095-0039
Davidson, Jeffrey Michael (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0001 | IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-0011 | IM-CA-0095-0035 | IM-CA-0095-0039 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Douglas, Erika M (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-0011 | IM-CA-0095-0035 | IM-CA-0095-0039 | IM-CA-0095-9000
DuMont, Edward C. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0034 | IM-CA-0095-0040
Friedlander, Julia M.C. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Frosh, Brian E. (Maryland) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0034 | IM-CA-0095-0040
Galler, Kirsten (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Hamill, Norman J. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Hansen, Greta Suzanne (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Helland, Kelsey J. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Herman, Susan P. (Maine) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0040
Jones, Breanna K. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0039
Kushner, Andrew (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Leyton, Stacey M. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Litman, Leah M. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
London, Judith Maura (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Long, Robert A. Jr. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0011 | IM-CA-0095-0035 | IM-CA-0095-0039
Lynch, Mark H. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-0011 | IM-CA-0095-0035 | IM-CA-0095-0039 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Mills, Janet T. (Maine) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0034 | IM-CA-0095-0040
Mincer, Jonathon Yakov (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Mongan, Michael J. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0034 | IM-CA-0095-0040
Morrisson, Hayley S. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Newman, Michael L. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0034 | IM-CA-0095-0040
Prevost, Tamarah P. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0011 | IM-CA-0095-0035 | IM-CA-0095-0039
Quinones, Marcelo (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Robinson, Charles Furlonge (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Rodgers, Megan Louise (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Romero, Luis Cortes (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Rosenbaum, Mark Dale (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Rozen, Matthew S. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Saharsky, Nicole A. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Sanchez, Sonya U. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Shah, Malhar (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Siegel, Samuel P. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0034 | IM-CA-0095-0040
Soleimani, Jonathan N. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Sullivan, Steven M. (Maryland) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0034 | IM-CA-0095-0040
Swanson, Lori (Minnesota) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0034 | IM-CA-0095-0040
Tribe, Laurence (Massachusetts) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Trice, Laura Susan (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Troncoso, Michael A (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Tullin, Leah J. (Massachusetts) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0034
Ventresca, Ivano Michael (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-0011 | IM-CA-0095-0035 | IM-CA-0095-0039 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Watnick, David S. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0011 | IM-CA-0095-0035 | IM-CA-0095-0039
Williams, James R. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0037
Wu, Margaret Louisa (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Zahradka, James F. II (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0010 | IM-CA-0095-0034 | IM-CA-0095-0040
Defendant's Lawyers Bailey, Kate (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0003 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Giang, Albert (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0024 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Harrell, J. Wells (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0024 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Leheny, Emma (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Mooppan, Hashim M. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0009 | IM-CA-0095-0038
Pezzi, Stephen M. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0003 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Pulham, Thomas (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0009 | IM-CA-0095-0013 | IM-CA-0095-0038
Readler, Chad Andrew (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0009 | IM-CA-0095-0013 | IM-CA-0095-0038
Robins, Jeffrey S (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Rosenberg, Brad P. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0003 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Shumate, Brett (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0003 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Stern, Mark B. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0009 | IM-CA-0095-0013 | IM-CA-0095-0038
Tse, Alex G. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0009 | IM-CA-0095-0013 | IM-CA-0095-0038
Wright, Abby C. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0009 | IM-CA-0095-0013 | IM-CA-0095-0038
Other Lawyers Alam, Lubna A. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Alger, Maureen P. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0032 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Ambrose, D. Michael (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Andrade, Vibiana (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Arulanantham, Ahilan T (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0027
Axelrod, Julie B. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Badlani, Chirag (Illinois) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0018
Berger, Justin Theodore (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0011 | IM-CA-0095-0035 | IM-CA-0095-0039 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Berner, Nicole (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0015
Bhabha, Ishan K (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0020 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Bohorquez, Fernando A. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Boutrous, Theodore J. Jr. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Bozio, Raoul (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Brown, Eric Prince (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0037 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Carome, Patrick J. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Carter, Margaret L. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Chopra, Apalla U (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Clark, James Patrick (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0026
Cooney, John F. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0031
Coston, William D. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0031
Crooks, James Wesley (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Davis, Seth (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0030
Dennehy, Johanna S. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0028
Deol, John-Paul Singh (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0022 | IM-CA-0095-0023 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Dettmer, Ethan D. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-0012 | IM-CA-0095-0036 | IM-CA-0095-0037 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Donovan, Andra M. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Dundas, Michael Joseph (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0026 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Eiland, Katrina L. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0027
Feuer, Michael Nelson (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0026 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Feuer, Ben (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0030
Fineman, Nancy L. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Flores, Valerie L. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0026
Fresco, Michael N. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0019
Gelernt, Lee (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0027
Geltzer, Joshua A. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0018
Gertner, Leo (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0015
Goldhammer, Sean (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Goldman, Lauren R (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Gray, Danielle C. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Greenbaum, Jon M. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0031
Gupta, Deepak (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0015
Hajela, Abhas (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Harrison, Lindsay C (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0020 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Hauck, Brian (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Hausman, David (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0027
Hemel, Daniel (Illinois) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0030
Hill, Phylicia (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0031
Holmquist, David (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Holtzblatt, Ari (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Juran, Laura P. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Kapur, Leela (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0026
Karanjia, Peter (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0016
Kennelly, Kaitland McCann (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0025
Khan, Juvaria (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0019
Kochsiek, Blythe Golay (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Kolick, Joseph E. (Maryland) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0015
Kolodin, Zachary J. F. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0019
Lederer, Caryn C (Illinois) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0018
Lee, Harry (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0028
Li, Joan Renxin (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0032 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Lienke, Jack (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0029
Lin, Karen (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Lopez, Janine Marie (Massachusetts) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Loy, David (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0027
Mangi, Adeel Abdullah (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0019
Martinez, Mario (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0015
Mass, Julia Harumi (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0027
Mathieson, Anna-Rose (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0030
McCoy, Daniel J. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0022 | IM-CA-0095-0023
McGinnis, James Landon (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0022 | IM-CA-0095-0023 | IM-CA-0095-0037 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Metlitsky, Anton (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0021
Nadolenco, John (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Negron, Francisco (Virginia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Newell, Jennifer Chang (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0027
O'Brien, Alice (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Perez, Jose-Luis (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Perrelli, Thomas J. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0020 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Persyn, Mary Kelly (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0033
Piers, Matthew J. (Illinois) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0018 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Pincus, Andrew J. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Popovic, Neil A. Freidman (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0022 | IM-CA-0095-0023 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Raymond, Bradley (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0015
Reed, Devora Navera (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Revesz, Richard L. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0029
Rice, Daniel B. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0018
Riley, Joshua P. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0024
Rivlin, Judith (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0015
Rodriguez, Dariely (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0031
Ross, Mark S. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0022 | IM-CA-0095-0023
Rothner, Glenn (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Saad, Martin L. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0031
Scherb, Matthew Alex (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0026
Schwartz, William J. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0025
Shea, Patricia M. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0015
Shebaya, Sirine (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0019
Sheffield, Kathryn M. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Sheikh, Sameer Parvez (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0031
Sherman, Monique R (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0032
Shin, Jean (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Smith, Michael L. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Smith, Christopher W. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0028
Smith, Deborah L. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0015
Smith, Johnathan James (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0019
Sokoler, Jennifer B (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0021 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Spence, Dorian (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0031
Stevens, Eric E. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Strom, David J. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0015
Suvor, Daniel R (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Tan, Michael K. T. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0027
Trainor, Sonja H. (Virginia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Valdivieso, Juan P. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0024
Walta, Jason (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Waxman, Seth (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Wilson, Kara Corinne (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-9000
Wilson, Kara C. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0032
Yama-Garcia, Elaine M. (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0017
Yun, Jennifer J. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0020
Zahradka, James (California) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0002 | IM-CA-0095-9000
Zalesin, Steven Alan (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0019
Zevin, Avi Benjamin (New York) show/hide docs
IM-CA-0095-0029

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -