University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
view search results
page permalink
Case Name Georgia Advocacy Office v. Jackson JC-GA-0034
Docket / Court 1:19-cv-01634-WMR-JFK ( N.D. Ga. )
State/Territory Georgia
Case Type(s) Disability Rights-Pub. Accom.
Jail Conditions
Special Collection Solitary confinement
Attorney Organization Southern Center for Human Rights
Case Summary
On April 10, 2019, two female detainees in the South Fulton Municipal Regional Jail and the Georgia Advocacy Office filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The plaintiff sued the Fulton County Sheriff’s Office and the South Fulton Municipal ... read more >
On April 10, 2019, two female detainees in the South Fulton Municipal Regional Jail and the Georgia Advocacy Office filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The plaintiff sued the Fulton County Sheriff’s Office and the South Fulton Municipal Jail under 42 U.S.C.§ 1983 and the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). The plaintiffs, represented by the Southern Center for Human Rights and the Georgia Advocacy Office, sought class certification, declaratory relief, preliminary and permanent injunctive relief, and damages. The plaintiffs alleged that the defendants violated the Eighth Amendment, Fourteenth Amendment Equal Protection Clause, and the Americans with Disabilities Act through their use of prolonged solitary confinement on individuals with mental disabilities; through conditions of confinement that deprived the plaintiffs of basic human needs, excluded plaintiffs and other women from the competency restoration program on the basis of sex; and by denying plaintiffs’ access to important services and programs solely by reason of their disabilities. Over 200 female detainees within South Fulton Municipal Jail with psychiatric disabilities were detained in 23-hour solitary confinement. The conditions within the mental health pods deprived women of basic human needs. During visits to the South Fulton Jail plaintiffs’ counsel described seeing women unresponsive on the floor, covered in their own food and feces, feces smeared on the walls, pods that had mold growing on the walls, urine puddles on the floor, and women sleeping on metal cots without any bedding. Plaintiffs described that they spent on average less than one hour per day outside of their cells to the pod common area often alone and unable to have any social interactions with others. The plaintiffs argued that the solitary confinement and the totality of the conditions increased their risk of psychological harm. No programs or therapy were provided to the female detainees in the South Fulton Municipal Jail. In contrast, male inmates in the Fulton County Jail system with mental disabilities were provided with therapeutic restorative programs.

On April 12, 2019, the plaintiffs moved to certify a principal class that consisted of women who experienced mental disabilities and were or would be in the future confined in the Fulton County Jail system, and a subclass for women who experienced mental disabilities who were or would be deemed incompetent to stand trial while confined in the Fulton County Jail system. Defendants moved to dismiss the class action on May 3, 2019. They argued that the plaintiffs failed to state a proper claim upon which relief could be granted against the defendants. Further, the defendants argued that: (1) they had Eleventh Amendment immunity from all claims in their official capacities; (2) even under the assumption that the plaintiffs’ claims were true, the Fourteenth Amendment did not prohibit the plaintiffs from having limited out of cell time; and (3) the plaintiffs did not fully exhaust their administrative remedies in accordance to the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA).

Plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction ordering Defendants to remedy unconstitutional conditions in the South Fulton Municipal Regional Jail on May 7, 2019. The plaintiffs requested that the court order for defendants to offer at least four hours of daily out of cell time to all female detainees in the mental health pods, including one hour per day of outdoor time; and within a month, establish and present the Court for approval a plan to be implemented within another month for providing a medically sound environment for women with mental disabilities. The defendants filed an amended motion to dismiss. The amended motion brief provided the same arguments as the original, with the addition of several affidavits from the defendants.

As of June 11, 2019, the case remains open.

Kimberly Goshey - 06/11/2019


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
Constitutional Clause
Cruel and Unusual Punishment
Equal Protection
Defendant-type
Corrections
Disability
Mental impairment
Discrimination-basis
Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)
General
Access to public accommodations - governmental
Administrative segregation
Bathing and hygiene
Conditions of confinement
Confinement/isolation
Reasonable Accommodations
Reasonable Modifications
Rehabilitation
Sanitation / living conditions
Solitary confinement/Supermax (conditions or process)
Totality of conditions
Medical/Mental Health
Mental health care, general
Mental Disability
Intellectual/developmental disability, unspecified
Plaintiff Type
Non-profit NON-religious organization
Private Plaintiff
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.
Defendant(s) Fulton County Sheriffs Office
South Fulton Municipal Regional Jail
Plaintiff Description The Georgia Advocacy Office (GAO) and two female detainees with psychiatric disabilities held in solitary confinement at South Fulton Municipal Regional Jail. GAO is a private non-profit organization that advocates on behalf of Georgia residents with disabilities.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations Southern Center for Human Rights
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted Pending
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None yet
Source of Relief None yet
Filing Year 2019
Case Ongoing Yes
Docket(s)
1:19-cv-01634 (N.D. Ga.)
JC-GA-0034-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/10/2019
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Class Action Complaint [ECF# 1]
JC-GA-0034-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/10/2019
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
show all people docs
Judges Ray, William McCrary II (State Appellate Court, N.D. Ga.) show/hide docs
JC-GA-0034-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers Geraghty, Sarah E. (Georgia) show/hide docs
JC-GA-0034-0001 | JC-GA-0034-9000
Kuhns, Anne Jessamyn Isham (Georgia) show/hide docs
JC-GA-0034-0001 | JC-GA-0034-9000
Littman, Aaron Michael (Georgia) show/hide docs
JC-GA-0034-0001 | JC-GA-0034-9000
Orland, Devon (Georgia) show/hide docs
JC-GA-0034-0001 | JC-GA-0034-9000
Primerano, Ryan (Georgia) show/hide docs
JC-GA-0034-0001 | JC-GA-0034-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Arrington, Michelle (Georgia) show/hide docs
JC-GA-0034-9000
Moore-Palmer, Ashley Jenell (Georgia) show/hide docs
JC-GA-0034-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
view search results
page permalink

- top of page -