University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name SDNY's ADA Investigation of the NYC Department of Correction JC-NY-0065
Docket / Court docket unknown ( No Court )
State/Territory New York
Case Type(s) Disability Rights-Pub. Accom.
Jail Conditions
Case Summary
On July 6, 2016, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York sent a report to the New York City Department of Corrections (DOC) detailing their investigation into the DOC’s compliance with the American Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. A prior investigation in 2004 had led to ... read more >
On July 6, 2016, the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Southern District of New York sent a report to the New York City Department of Corrections (DOC) detailing their investigation into the DOC’s compliance with the American Disabilities Act (ADA) of 1990. A prior investigation in 2004 had led to a Voluntary Compliance Agreement and the designation of an employee responsible for responding to requests from inmates and ensuring ADA-compliant living accommodation and training for staff. This investigation focused on the accessibility of the Rose M. Singer Center (RMSC), which housed female inmates with mobility impairments. The report also detailed DOC’s manner in responding to inmate’s accommodation requests.

An architect that was an expert in ADA-accessibility inspected RMSC, comparing its layout and infrastructure with the 1991 standards set forth by the ADA. The investigation concluded that the DOC failed to place inmates with mobility and visual impairments in accessible housing, to provide inmates with mobility impairments with appropriate mobility devices, and to ensure that inmates with hearing impairments had access to telecommunication services. The investigation revealed that the DOC did not consistently assess the needs of inmates with disabilities and often failed to place them in the limited accessible housing available. Canes and wheelchairs that were medically prescribed and intended to help alleviate symptoms from degenerative diseases were often confiscated and not returned, despite multiple requests.

The U.S. Attorney’s office reviewed the DOC’s policies and practices in receiving and responding to accommodation requests. The investigation also established that the DOC failed to respond to accommodation requests in an adequate and timely manner. Contrary to their policy, the investigation found that the DOC maintained no set system for recording or responding to inmate accessibility requests. While inmates had a right to file grievances, the complaints of disability discrimination were considered “non-grievable” there was no clear recourse for an inmate whose accessibility request was denied.

The investigation concluded that the DOC violated the ADA by denying inmates with disabilities an equal opportunity to participate in, and benefit in the provided services, programs and activities. As a remedy for these violations, the U.S. Attorney General’s office recommended an eight-step plan to meet minimum ADA requirements. These included staff training, the creation and implementation of a tracking system for responding to accessibility requests—which would provide prompt and equitable resolutions for inmates with disabilities—a prompt medical evaluation of each inmate’s needs upon admission, placement of inmates in accessible housing, and provision of support aids and devices for inmates with hearing disabilities to effectively communicate with their family, friends, and counsel.

On August 20, 2018, the U.S. Attorney’s office reached an out-of-court settlement and a new Voluntary Compliance Agreement with the city of New York and the DOC. In this agreement, the DOC agreed to correct its many violations of the ADA and to submit bi-annual compliance reports to the U.S. Attorney’s office. Correcting these ADA violations included: completing hundreds of modifications to the existing physical infrastructure under the supervision of an independent architect to make RMSC ADA-compliant; the implementation of a new policy regarding how, and when, accommodation requests are received and responded to, including a computerized system that tracks all accommodation requests and their response; and the prompt furnishment of all reasonable support devices to ensure that inmates with disabilities have equal access to facilities, activities, and services available to non-disabled inmates.

The majority of the provisions of the agreement are set to terminate five years after the effective date, provided that the DOC is in substantial compliance with its provisions. The architectural changes and implementation and enforcement of the policy changes will terminate in seven years.

Mary Book - 04/16/2019


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Content of Injunction
Monitoring
Reasonable Accommodation
Recordkeeping
Defendant-type
Corrections
Disability
Hearing impairment
Mental impairment
Mobility impairment
Visual impairment
Discrimination-basis
Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)
General
Access to public accommodations - governmental
Barrier Removal
Housing
Law library access
Reasonable Accommodations
Reasonable Modifications
Totality of conditions
Medical/Mental Health
Medical care, general
Medical care, unspecified
Special Case Type
Out-of-court
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.
Defendant(s) City of New York
New York City Health and Hospitals Corporation
New York Department of Corrections
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration 2018 - 2023
Filing Year 2016
Case Ongoing Yes
Case Listing PC-NY-0063 : Shariff v. Allah (W.D.N.Y.)
PC-NY-0060 : Messiah S. v. Alexander (S.D.N.Y.)
PC-NY-0057 : Shariff v. Goord (W.D.N.Y.)
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Officials Agree To Cap Population at D.C. Jail
https://www.prisonlegalnews.org/news/2009/feb/15/officials-agree-to-cap-population-at-dc-jail/
Date: February 2009
By: Michael Rigby (Prison Legal News)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
No docket sheet currently in the collection
General Documents
Findings Letter
JC-NY-0065-0001.pdf | External Link | Detail
Date: 07/06/2016
Source: U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section
Settlement Agreement
JC-NY-0065-0002.pdf | External Link | Detail
Date: 08/16/2018
Source: U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division, Disability Rights Section
show all people docs
Plaintiff's Lawyers Berman, Geoffrey S. (New York) show/hide docs
JC-NY-0065-0002
Eshkenazi, Lara K. (New York) show/hide docs
JC-NY-0065-0002
Powell, Jeffrey K. (New York) show/hide docs
JC-NY-0065-0002
Defendant's Lawyers Bowe, Martin John (New York) show/hide docs
JC-NY-0065-0002
Carter, Zachary W. (New York) show/hide docs
JC-NY-0065-0002
Grossman, Heidi (New York) show/hide docs
JC-NY-0065-0002

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -