On April 12, 2017, the ACLU of Arizona filed this suit under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA). This was one of over a dozen aimed at shedding light on how U.S. Customs and Border Protection implemented President Trump's January 27 and March 6 Executive Orders (EO) that banned admission to the U.S. for nationals of Iraq, Iran, Libya, Somalia, Sudan, Syria, and Yemen.
Specifically, the plaintiff sought information “concerning CBP’s local implementation of President Trump’s January 27, 2017 Executive Order...as well as any other judicial order or executive directive issued regarding the Executive Order,” including President Trump’s March 6, 2017 Executive Order. The request concerned implementation at sites within the purview of CBP’s Tucson Field Office, including Phoenix Sky Harbor International Airport. The request also concerned the number of individuals who were detained or subjected to secondary screening, extended questioning, enforcement examination, or consideration for a waiver at the aforementioned airports pursuant to the EO.
In the complaint, the plaintiff argued that the requested records “would facilitate the public’s understanding of how Defendants implemented and enforced the Executive Orders,” and that “[s]uch information is critical to the public’s ability to hold the government accountable.”
The case was assigned to Judge Deborah M. Fine.
On May 8, 2017,
the government filed a motion to treat all of these FOIA cases as “multidistrict litigation,” effectively consolidating them before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The ACLU filed their opposition to the motion to transfer on May 30, arguing that “[g]ranting consolidation and transfer would promote forum-shopping and delay, not justice.” On August 3, 2017 the U.S. District Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation denied the government’s consolidation motion. In its order, the Panel found that, although the thirteen FOIA cases shared “a limited number of factual issues,” these issues “appear[ed] relatively straightforward and unlikely to entail extensive pretrial proceedings.”
Litigation continued over a production schedule, and on June 5, 2018 the court (now Judge Diane Humetewa) ordered the government to complete its production on a rolling basis by November 30, 2018. On June 22, 2018 the court amended its order to indicate that documents were to be processed by, rather than produced by, November 30, 2018.
On December 4, 2018, the defendants reported that the processing of documents was completed on October 31, 2018. On May 24, 2019, the plaintiff filed a motion for attorneys’ fees, claiming that it was entitled to an award of attorneys’ fees in the amount of $88,900 and costs in the amount of $400.00. The court granted the plaintiff’s attorneys’ fees in the amount of $76,900 and costs in the amount of $400.00 on March 27, 2020. On March 31, 2020, the court directed the court clerk to close the case.
This case is closed.
Virginia Weeks - 05/04/2017
Virginia Weeks - 06/30/2018
Jamie Kessler - 08/07/2017
Bogyung Lim - 08/14/2020
compress summary
