University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
view search results
page permalink
Case Name Wagafe v. U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services IM-WA-0031
Docket / Court 2:17-cv-00094 ( W.D. Wash. )
State/Territory Washington
Case Type(s) Immigration and/or the Border
National Security
Presidential Authority
Special Collection Civil Rights Challenges to Trump Refugee/Visa Order
Attorney Organization ACLU Chapters (any)
ACLU National (all projects)
ACLU of Southern California
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project (NWIRP)
Case Summary
This lawsuit challenges President Trump’s Jan. 27, 2017 Executive Order (EO) suspending entry into the United States of citizens or nationals of Syria, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, and Libya. This case also challenges the government's Controlled Application Review and Resolution Program ( ... read more >
This lawsuit challenges President Trump’s Jan. 27, 2017 Executive Order (EO) suspending entry into the United States of citizens or nationals of Syria, Iraq, Iran, Yemen, Somalia, Sudan, and Libya. This case also challenges the government's Controlled Application Review and Resolution Program (CARRP), alleging it was a precursor to the EO's "extreme vetting" of Muslims, and chronicles the government's attempts to resist disclosure of documents about this program.

The original complaint was filed Jan. 23, 2017 (four days before the EO was issued). On Jan. 26 (the day before the EO was issued), the court scheduled a status conference for May 2, 2017.

The amended complaint, filed Feb. 1, 2017, alleged that U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) interpreted the Jan. 27 EO to mandate suspending adjudication of all pending petitions, applications, or requests from citizens or nationals of the seven banned countries, and that this suspension violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA), the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), and the Establishment Clause, Equal Protection Clause, and Due Process Clause of the Constitution. The plaintiffs also alleged that the EO had or would expand USCIS's Controlled Application Review and Resolution Program (CARRP), which they argued imposed extra-statutory rules and criteria on Muslim applicants to delay and deny immigration benefits to which applicants were entitled.

The plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief. Additionally, the plaintiffs sought class certification for all others affected by the "Muslim ban" and by the "extreme vetting" suspension of naturalization and LPR (adjustment of status) applications. The plaintiffs and their counsel, including attorneys from the ACLU, Northwest Immigrant Rights Project, and private firms, filed the case in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington, where it was assigned to Judge John C. Coughenour.

The plaintiffs were both Muslims. One was a a Somali national, refugee, and LPR who had been waiting over three and a half years for adjudication of his naturalization application. The other was an Iranian nonimmigrant visa holder who had been waiting three years for adjudication of his LPR application. The plaintiffs alleged that they met all INA statutory criteria for the successful adjudication of their respective applications, but nevertheless that USCIS had suspended the adjudication of their applications under CARRP or its "extreme vetting" successor program.

The plaintiffs filed a class certification motion on Feb. 9. First, plaintiffs argued that CAARP and the EO were unlawfully delaying or denying the immigration applications of thousands of people nationwide. Plaintiffs then proposed two nationwide classes: one class of naturalization applicants (LPRs applying for citizenship and subject to CAARP or its "extreme vetting" successor program, whose applications had not or would not be adjudicated within six months of filing), and one class of adjustment of status applicants (the same, except for persons applying for LPR status).

Defendants filed a motion to transfer on Mar. 2. Defendants noted that USCIS had already granted the first plaintiff's naturalization application on Feb. 22. Because the second plaintiff lived in North Dakota, defendants requested that the case be transferred to the District of North Dakota.

Under pressure because of adverse developments in other litigation, including Washington v. Trump, in the 9th Circuit, on Mar. 6, the President rescinded the Jan. 27 EO and replaced it with a narrower one, Executive Order 13780.

On Mar. 21, plaintiffs responded to defendants' Mar. 2 motion to transfer, arguing that the first plaintiff should remain as a proposed class representative because USCIS had delayed his application for so long, despite its recent approval. Plaintiffs also announced that their second amended complaint would add more plaintiffs in the Western District of Washington. Defendants in turn replied on Mar. 23.

Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint on Apr. 4, arguing that the second EO had essentially the same effect on plaintiffs as the first EO, because it targeted almost the same countries and allowed CAARP or a successor "extreme vetting" program to continue. The second amended complaint also listed three additional Muslim plaintiffs from Libya, Iraq, and Pakistan who had all waited over one year for adjudication of their immigration applications.

Plaintiffs followed this with an Apr. 10 motion to amend their Feb. 9 class certification motion, retaining the same two proposed classes but adding the new plaintiffs as additional class representatives. On Apr. 11, Judge Coughenour dismissed as moot the original class certification motion and replaced it with the amended motion. Also on Apr. 11, Judge Coughenour lifted the stay on defendants' motion to transfer venue, and then denied the motion. Judge Coughenour noted that, although the first plaintiff had recently been approved for naturalization (after waiting for three and a half years), additional plaintiffs who resided in the Western District of Washington had just been added to plaintiffs' amended complaint. Consequently, the government could not argue that no plaintiffs with viable claims remained in the District.

Defendants moved to dismiss on Apr. 18. They argued that, first, no case or controversy existed because plaintiffs had no interest in adjudication of their applications. Second, they argued that plaintiffs lacked standing under both the EO and the Naturalization Clause. Defendants also alleged that plaintiffs had not stated sufficient facts that the EO or "extreme vetting" caused their application delays or denials. Finally defendants argued that plaintiffs had not established viable claims that CAARP violated Due Process, INA, or APA (as a substantive agency rule or final agency action). Plaintiffs responded on May 8, and defendants replied on May 12.

On May 10, defendants responded to plaintiffs' amended class certification motion. They argued that it was impossible to determine whether CAARP or an "extreme vetting" policy had delayed any case without examining the specific facts of that case. Plaintiffs replied on May 19, maintaining that the case was about the legality of CAARP as a general policy and thus that a class action was appropriate.

On June 13, the case was reassigned to Judge Richard A. Jones. On June 21, Judge Jones granted plaintiffs' Apr. 10 class certification motion, and granted in part and denied in part defendants' Apr. 18 motion to dismiss. 2017 WL 2671254 (W.D. Wash. June 21, 2017). Judge Jones noted that there was a case or controversy because plaintiffs sought both an injunction on adjudication of their applications as well as a declaration that CAARP and any "extreme vetting" successor program was unlawful.

Judge Jones certified two nationwide classes of plaintiffs: a "naturalization
class" of individuals whose naturalization applications had or would be subject to CAARP and were not or would not be adjudicated within six months of filing, as well as an "adjustment class" of individuals whose applications for adjustment of status had or would be subject to CAARP and were not or would not be adjudicated within six months of filing.

Although Judge Jones dismissed plaintiffs' Due Process claim for the class alleging procedural violations in adjustment of status (because adjustment does not present a protected property interest such as naturalization does), all other claims stood.

On July 5, defendants filed a motion for reconsideration of Judge Jones' June 21 order, arguing that plaintiffs could not show commonality in how CAARP had injured them, and that the nationwide class certification and six-month adjudication deadline were erroneous. Plaintiffs responded on July 13, arguing that CAARP created a common injury and that the class certification was rational. Defendants replied July 18.

The parties filed a joint status report and discovery plan on July 28. Judge Jones, on Aug. 2, scheduled the trial for Sept. 24-28, 2018, and set a discovery and briefing schedule.

On Aug. 16, Judge Jones denied defendants' motion for reconsideration of his class certification order. 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 130836 (W.D. Wash. Aug. 16, 2017). He explained that defendants had failed to identify error in his order, but instead simply had tried to re-argue their position.

On Oct. 19, Judge Jones granted in part and denied in part plaintiffs' motion of Sept. 28 to compel production of documents. 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 173374 (W.D. Wash. Oct. 19, 2017). He ordered defendants to disclose class members' identities, as well as certain classified documents or a privilege log. On Nov. 2, defendants moved for a reconsideration; plaintiffs responded on Nov. 14.

On Nov. 20, the parties reported that they were at an impasse as to the appropriate scope of discovery related to the first and second EOs. The parties sought the Court's guidance on this issue, and planned to file a joint motion to compel briefing by Dec. 8.

On Nov. 28, Judge Jones denied defendants' Nov. 2 reconsideration of his Oct. 19 order to compel production of documents. Judge Jones reaffirmed his finding that the balance of parties' needs weighed in favor of disclosure, because the plaintiffs had requested nothing more than names of potential class members.

This case is ongoing and discovery is underway, with a trial set for Sept. 2018.

Ava Morgenstern - 11/29/2017


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Equal Protection
Establishment Clause
Discrimination-basis
National origin discrimination
Religion discrimination
General
Disparate Treatment
Government Services (specify)
Record-keeping
Terrorism/Post 9-11 issues
Wait lists
Immigration/Border
Constitutional rights
Refugees
Status/Classification
U.S. citizenship - acquiring
Visas - criteria
Visas - procedures
National Origin/Ethnicity
Arab/Afgani/Middle Eastern
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.
Mandamus, 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Defendant(s) U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
United States
Plaintiff Description Plantiffs are a Somali LPR and Iranian nonimmigrant visa holder in the US, both of who have waited over 3 years for adjudication of their immigration status applications, and both of who are Muslim. The Court also certified two nationwide classes of plaintiffs whose naturalization and adjustment of status applications were delayed or denied.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations ACLU Chapters (any)
ACLU National (all projects)
ACLU of Southern California
Northwest Immigrant Rights Project (NWIRP)
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted Yes
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None yet
Source of Relief None yet
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Presidential Executive Order on Resuming the United States Refugee Admissions Program with Enhanced Vetting Capabilities
White House
Date: Oct. 24, 2017
By: United States (United States)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Presidential Proclamation Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats
www.whitehouse.gov
Date: Sep. 24, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (Office of the President)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Implementing Executive Order 13780 Following Supreme Court Ruling -- Guidance to Visa-Adjudicating Posts
Reuters
Date: Jun. 28, 2017
By: U.S. Department of State
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Wagafe v. Trump
www.aclu-wa.org
Date: Jun. 23, 2017
By: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) of Washington
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Wagafe v. Trump: "Extreme Vetting" of Immigration Benefit Applicants
www.nationalimmigrationproject.org
Date: Jun. 21, 2017
By: National Immigration Project of the National Lawyers Guild
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence
The White House
Date: Jun. 14, 2017
By: Donald Trump (White House)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Executive Order Protecting The Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States
Date: Mar. 6, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (President of the United States)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Class-Action Lawsuit Challenges Trump Order on Behalf of Tens of Thousands of Immigrants Living in U.S. Legally
www.aclu.org
Date: Feb. 2, 2017
By: American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Memorandum to the Acting Secretary of State, the Acting Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security
The White House
Date: Feb. 1, 2017
By: Donald F. McGahn II, Counsel to the President (The White House)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Statement by Acting Attorney General Sally Yates
https://www.nytimes.com/
Date: 1/30/2017
By: Acting Attorney General Sally Yates (Department of Justice)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Statement By Secretary John Kelly on the Entry of Lawful Permanent Residents into the United States
https://www.dhs.gov/
Date: 1/29/2017
By: DHS Secretary John Kelly (Department of Homeland Security)
Citation: https://www.dhs.gov/news/2017/01/29/statement-secretary-john-kelly-entry-lawful-permanent-residents-united-states
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  OLC Memo Re: Proposed Executive Order Entitled "Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States"
Date: Jan. 27, 2017
By: Curtis Gannon (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Executive Order: Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States
Federal Register
Date: Jan. 27, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (Office of the President)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
2:17-cv-00094-JCC (W.D. Wash.)
IM-WA-0031-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/20/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [ECF# 1]
IM-WA-0031-0006.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/23/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Muslim Ban Unlawfully Targets U.S. Residents Seeking Citizenship and Immigration Status, Civil Rights Groups Sue
IM-WA-0031-0003.pdf | External Link | Detail
Date: 02/01/2017
Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [ECF# 17]
IM-WA-0031-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/01/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Motion for Class Certification [ECF# 26]
IM-WA-0031-0004.pdf | External Link | Detail
Date: 02/09/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue [ECF# 39]
IM-WA-0031-0013.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/02/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Transfer Venue [ECF# 40]
IM-WA-0031-0014.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Reply in Support of Motion to Transfer Venue [ECF# 43]
IM-WA-0031-0015.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/23/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [ECF# 47]
IM-WA-0031-0011.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/04/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
First Amended Motion for Class Certification [ECF# 49]
IM-WA-0031-0010.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/10/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Minute Order [ECF# 55] (W.D. Wash.)
IM-WA-0031-0005.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/11/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint for Lack of Jurisdiction, In Part, and Failure to State a Claim, In Part [ECF# 56]
IM-WA-0031-0012.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/18/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 58]
IM-WA-0031-0008.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/08/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' First Amended Motion for Class Certification [ECF# 60]
IM-WA-0031-0016.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/10/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint [ECF# 61]
IM-WA-0031-0017.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/12/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Reply in Support of First Amended Motion for Class Certification [ECF# 63]
IM-WA-0031-0018.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/19/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [ECF# 69] (2017 WL 2671254 / 2017 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 95887) (W.D. Wash.)
IM-WA-0031-0009.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 06/21/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Motion to Reconsider Class Certification [ECF# 73]
IM-WA-0031-0019.pdf | Detail
Date: 07/05/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Reconsider Class Certification [ECF# 75]
IM-WA-0031-0020.pdf | Detail
Date: 07/13/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Reply in Support of Defendants' Motion to Reconsider Class Certification [ECF# 77]
IM-WA-0031-0021.pdf | Detail
Date: 07/18/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Joint Status Report and Discovery Plan [ECF# 78]
IM-WA-0031-0022.pdf | Detail
Date: 07/28/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [ECF# 85] (2017 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 130836) (W.D. Wash.)
IM-WA-0031-0023.pdf | LEXIS | Detail
Date: 08/16/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [ECF# 98] (2017 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 173374) (W.D. Wash.)
IM-WA-0031-0024.pdf | LEXIS | Detail
Date: 10/19/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Motion to Reconsider Order of October 19, 2017 [ECF# 99]
IM-WA-0031-0025.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/02/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Reconsider Order of October 19, 2017 [ECF# 100]
IM-WA-0031-0026.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/14/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Joint Status Report Regarding Documents Related to the Executive Orders [ECF# 101]
IM-WA-0031-0027.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/20/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [ECF# 102] (W.D. Wash.)
IM-WA-0031-0028.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/28/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Jones, Richard A. (W.D. Wash.)
IM-WA-0031-0009 | IM-WA-0031-0023 | IM-WA-0031-0024 | IM-WA-0031-0028 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers Adams, Matthew (Washington)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0003 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0006 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Ahmed, Sameer (New York)
IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027
Chiang, Emily (Washington)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0006 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Gelernt, Lee (New York)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0006 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Gellert, Nicholas Peter (Washington)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Handeyside, Hugh (New York)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0006 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Hennessey, Laura Kaplan (Washington)
IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Macleod-Ball, Kristin A. (Massachusetts)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0006 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Madrid, Glenda Melinda Aldana (Washington)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0006 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Pasquarella, Jennifer (California)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0006 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Perez, David A. (Washington)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Realmuto, Trina (Massachusetts)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0003 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0006 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Reddy, Kathryn (Washington)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Schneider, Harry H. Jr. (Washington)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Shamsi, Hina (New York)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0006 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Tolchin, Stacy Eva (California)
IM-WA-0031-0001 | IM-WA-0031-0004 | IM-WA-0031-0006 | IM-WA-0031-0008 | IM-WA-0031-0010 | IM-WA-0031-0011 | IM-WA-0031-0014 | IM-WA-0031-0018 | IM-WA-0031-0020 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0026 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Belsan, Timothy Michael (District of Columbia)
IM-WA-0031-0013 | IM-WA-0031-0015 | IM-WA-0031-0016 | IM-WA-0031-0019 | IM-WA-0031-0021 | IM-WA-0031-0025
Carilli, Joseph F. Jr. (District of Columbia)
IM-WA-0031-0019 | IM-WA-0031-0021 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0025 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Dempsey, Christopher W. (District of Columbia)
IM-WA-0031-0012 | IM-WA-0031-0017
Peachey, William Charles (District of Columbia)
IM-WA-0031-0012 | IM-WA-0031-0013 | IM-WA-0031-0015 | IM-WA-0031-0016 | IM-WA-0031-0017 | IM-WA-0031-0019 | IM-WA-0031-0021 | IM-WA-0031-0025
Petty, Aaron R. (Illinois)
IM-WA-0031-0012 | IM-WA-0031-0013 | IM-WA-0031-0015 | IM-WA-0031-0017 | IM-WA-0031-0019 | IM-WA-0031-0021 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0025 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000
Readler, Chad A. (District of Columbia)
IM-WA-0031-0012 | IM-WA-0031-0013 | IM-WA-0031-0015 | IM-WA-0031-0016 | IM-WA-0031-0017 | IM-WA-0031-0019 | IM-WA-0031-0021 | IM-WA-0031-0025
Westwater, Gisela Ann (District of Columbia)
IM-WA-0031-0016
White, Edward S. (District of Columbia)
IM-WA-0031-0012 | IM-WA-0031-0013 | IM-WA-0031-0015 | IM-WA-0031-0016 | IM-WA-0031-0017 | IM-WA-0031-0019 | IM-WA-0031-0021 | IM-WA-0031-0022 | IM-WA-0031-0025 | IM-WA-0031-0027 | IM-WA-0031-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
view search results
page permalink

- top of page -