University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
view search results
page permalink
Case Name Arab American Civil Rights League (ACRL) v. Trump IM-MI-0004
Docket / Court 2:17-cv-10310 ( E.D. Mich. )
State/Territory Michigan
Case Type(s) Immigration and/or the Border
Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority
Special Collection Trump Travel Ban Challenges
Attorney Organization ACLU Affiliates (any)
ACLU of Michigan
Case Summary
On January 31, 2017, the Arab American Civil Rights League (ACLR) and seven of its individual members filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (in Detroit). The plaintiffs sued President Trump, the Department of Homeland Security, and U.S. Customs and ... read more >
On January 31, 2017, the Arab American Civil Rights League (ACLR) and seven of its individual members filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (in Detroit). The plaintiffs sued President Trump, the Department of Homeland Security, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection under the Declaratory Judgment Act (28 U.S.C. §2201), the Administrative Procedures Act (5 U.S.C. §5), and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act. They claimed that President Trump’s executive order (EO) of January 27, 2017, which banned entry into the US of refugees and nationals of seven predominantly Muslim countries violated these statutes as well as their Fifth Amendment rights to procedural due process, substantive due process, and equal protection. They also claimed the EO violated the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause by giving preference to Christian over Muslim refugees. The case was assigned to District Judge Victoria Roberts who referred proceedings to Magistrate Judge Stephanie Dawkins Davis.

On February 2, 2017, the same day that the plaintiffs filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO), the court entered a permanent injunction barring the United States from applying Sections 3(c) and 3(e) of the Jan. 27, 2017 EO against lawful permanent residents of the United States. The plaintiffs subsequently withdrew their motion for a TRO, citing changed circumstances created by the entry of a nationwide TRO in State of Washington v. Trump. However, the plaintiffs continued to pursue a permanent injunction guaranteeing them the ability to travel outside the country and re-enter in the future.

Following President Trump’s replacement of the January 27 EO with a narrower EO on March 6, 2017, the plaintiffs filed an amended complaint arguing that this new EO was also discriminatory. Since the new EO definitively excluded lawful permanent residents from its scope, the plaintiffs filed a notice of voluntary dismissal on behalf of those plaintiffs who were lawful permanent residents.

Because a third iteration of the EO was issued on September 24, 2017, the district court allowed the plaintiffs to file another amended complaint. The plaintiffs filed their third amended complaint on September 13, 2018, arguing that the third EO violated the Establishment Clause, the First Amendment right to freedom of speech and association, and the Fifth Amendment equal protection guarantee. In this complaint, the ACLR was joined by the ACLU of Michigan, the American Arab Chamber of Commerce, the Arab American and Chaldean Council, the Arab American Studies Association, and five named plaintiffs. The plaintiffs sought to represent a class of all individuals in the US whose ability to reunify with family members who are citizens of the “designated countries” (Iran, Libya, Somalia, Syria, and Yemen) was interfered with by the renewed executive order. The amended complaint dropped the procedural and substantive due process claims, focusing instead on how the EO violated the Establishment Clause, equal protection, and the rights to freedom of speech and association. In addition to the defendants from the first complaint, the third amended complaint also named U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services, the State Department, the Department of Justice, and the Office of the Director of National Intelligence as defendants. The plaintiffs sought the following relief: 1) a permanent injunction prohibiting the defendants from implementing or enforcing the third EO against nationals of the designated countries; 2) a judgment declaring the third EO as unlawful and invalid; and 3) attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act.

The government filed a motion to dismiss the third amended complaint on October 15, 2018. The plaintiffs filed a reply brief to this motion on November 19, 2018. More than half a year later, on July 10, 2019, District Judge Roberts issued an order and opinion denying the government’s motion to dismiss. Judge Roberts held that the complaint sufficiently pleaded a claim that the third EO violated the Establishment Clause, the First Amendment’s protections of speech and association, and the Fifth Amendment’s guarantee of Equal Protection. 399 F. Supp. 3d. 717.

On July 23, 2019, the government moved for certification of the district court’s July 10 order so that the decision could be appealed to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals; the government also requested a stay of discovery pending resolution of the appeal. The government filed an answer to the third amended complaint on July 31, 2019. On August 6, 2019, the plaintiffs replied to the motion for certification, arguing that the government had not met the standard for a certificate of appealability and that a stay of discovery was not warranted. District Judge Roberts granted the defendant’s motion for certification but denied their motion to stay discovery on November 1, 2019. 2019 WL 5684371.

With the denial of their motion to dismiss certified, the government filed an appeal in the Sixth Circuit and asked the court of appeals to order the district court to stay proceedings pending resolution of the interlocutory appeal. In a November 26, 2019, order issued by Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton and Circuit Judges Karen Nelson Moore and John Nalbandian, the court of appeals permitted an appeal on the denial of the motion to dismiss and ordered the district court to stay all proceedings, including discovery.

In the Sixth Circuit, the government filed its brief for the appeal on March 20, 2020, and the plaintiffs filed their brief on July 24. The court of appeals scheduled oral arguments for November 17, 2020. But before this could take place, on November 13, the court granted a November 10 motion by the plaintiffs to hold the case in abeyance until February 2, 2021. While the November 10, 2020, motion is not available on PACER, it was likely prompted by the news that Joseph Biden had won the 2020 presidential election and was planning on undoing a large number of President Trump’s executive orders. In addition to granting the motion to hold the case in abeyance, the Sixth Circuit ordered the plaintiffs' counsel to file a status report on settlement negotiations between the parties due on February 21, 2021.

Counsel for the plaintiffs filed the status report on February 1, 2021, and informed the Sixth Circuit that the parties agreed the appeal and the underlying lawsuit were moot because President Biden revoked the EO at issue on his first day in office, January 20, 2021. The parties filed a joint motion to dismiss the appeal as moot without prejudice and to remand the case to the distinct court with instructions to dismiss on February 8. Two days later, on February 10, 2021, Circuit Judges Raymond Kethledge, Bernice Donald, and Joan Larsen entered an order granting the joint motion to dismiss the appeal and remanded the case to the district court with instructions to dismiss as moot. Additionally, the three-judge panel vacated the July 10, 2019 denial of the defendants’ motion to dismiss stating that “mootness precludes us from reviewing the merits of that order.” The plaintiffs petitioned for a rehearing on the order to vacate in front of the original Sixth Circuit panel of Sutton, Moore, and Nalbandian, but this was denied on March 11, 2021, by Kethledge, Donald, and Larsen. This ended the case.

Julie Aust - 02/24/2017
Jamie Kessler - 11/21/2017
Taylor Brook - 03/22/2018
Eva Richardson - 04/23/2019
Kevin Longhany - 11/01/2019
Esteban Woo Kee - 07/10/2021


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Equal Protection
Establishment Clause
Content of Injunction
Monitor/Master
Preliminary relief granted
Defendant-type
Jurisdiction-wide
Law-enforcement
Discrimination-basis
National origin discrimination
Religion discrimination
General
Terrorism/Post 9-11 issues
Immigration/Border
Admission - criteria
Admission - procedure
Constitutional rights
Status/Classification
Visas - criteria
Visas - procedures
National Origin/Ethnicity
Arab/Afgani/Middle Eastern
Plaintiff Type
Non-profit NON-religious organization
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ex parte Young (federal or state officials)
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.
Religious Freedom Rest. Act/Religious Land Use and Inst. Persons Act (RFRA/RLUIPA)
Defendant(s) Office of the Director of National Intelligence
U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
U.S. Customs and Border Protection
U.S. Department of Homeland Security
U.S. Department of Justice
U.S. Department of State
United States
Plaintiff Description The plaintiffs were the Detroit-based organization Arab American Civil Rights League, the ACLU of Michigan, the American Arab Chamber of Commerce, the Arab American and Chaldean Council, the Arab American Studies Association, and five named plaintiffs. In the third amended complaint, the plaintiffs sought to represent a class of all individuals in the US whose ability to reunify with family members was interfered with by the third version of Trump's "travel ban" executive order.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations ACLU Affiliates (any)
ACLU of Michigan
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status outcome Mooted before ruling
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party Mixed
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Source of Relief Litigation
Order Duration 2017 - 2021
Filed 01/31/2017
Case Closing Year 2021
Case Ongoing No
Case Listing IM-HI-0004 : State of Hawaii v. Trump (D. Haw.)
IM-MD-0004 : International Refugee Assistance Project (“IRAP”) v. Trump (D. Md.)
IM-WA-0029 : States of Washington & Minnesota v. Trump (W.D. Wash.)
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  See this case at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
  Proclamation 10141 of January 20, 2021: Ending Discriminatory Bans on Entry to the United States
Federal Register
Date: Jan. 20, 2021
By: President Joseph R. Biden (Office of the President)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Donald Trump's Muslim Ban
ACLU
Date: 2021
By: ACLU Michigan
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Presidential Executive Order on Resuming the United States Refugee Admissions Program with Enhanced Vetting Capabilities
Federal Register
Date: Oct. 24, 2017
By: United States
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Presidential Proclamation Enhancing Vetting Capabilities and Processes for Detecting Attempted Entry Into the United States by Terrorists or Other Public-Safety Threats
Federal Register
Date: Sep. 24, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (Office of the President)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence
Date: Jun. 14, 2017
By: Donald Trump (White House)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Executive Order Protecting The Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States
Federal Register
Date: Mar. 6, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (President of the United States)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Memorandum to the Acting Secretary of State, the Acting Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security
The White House
Date: Feb. 1, 2017
By: Donald F. McGahn II, Counsel to the President (The White House)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Statement by Acting Attorney General Sally Yates
https://www.nytimes.com/
Date: 1/30/2017
By: Acting Attorney General Sally Yates (Department of Justice)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Statement By Secretary John Kelly on the Entry of Lawful Permanent Residents into the United States
https://www.dhs.gov/
Date: 1/29/2017
By: DHS Secretary John Kelly (Department of Homeland Security)
Citation: https://www.dhs.gov/news/2017/01/29/statement-secretary-john-kelly-entry-lawful-permanent-residents-united-states
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Executive Order: Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States
Federal Register
Date: Jan. 27, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (Office of the President)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

Court Docket(s)
E.D. Mich.
03/11/2021
2:17−cv−10310−VAR−SDD
IM-MI-0004-9000.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
E.D. Mich.
01/31/2017
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [ECF# 1]
IM-MI-0004-0001.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
02/02/2017
Ex-Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 5]
IM-MI-0004-0002.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
02/02/2017
Notice of Relevant Authority [ECF# 7]
IM-MI-0004-0006.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
02/02/2017
Order Regarding Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 8]
IM-MI-0004-0003.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
02/06/2017
Motion to Dissolve Injunction and Amend order Regarding Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [Doc.8] [ECF# 15]
IM-MI-0004-0004.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
02/07/2017
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dissolve Injunction [ECF# 20]
IM-MI-0004-0005.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
02/07/2017
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dissolve Injunction [ECF# 20]
IM-MI-0004-0007.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
02/08/2017
Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Request for a Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 24]
IM-MI-0004-0008.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
02/09/2017
Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 28]
IM-MI-0004-0009.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
02/16/2017
Defendants’ Reply in Support of Their Motion to Dissove Injunction and Amend Order Regarding Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [Doc. 8] [ECF# 22]
IM-MI-0004-0014.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
02/22/2017
Declaration of Ahmed Shalabi, MD [ECF# 37]
IM-MI-0004-0016.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
03/06/2017
Defendants' Notice of Filing of Executive Order [ECF# 39]
IM-MI-0004-0018.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
03/16/2017
Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [ECF# 41]
IM-MI-0004-0020.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
03/16/2017
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice [ECF# 42]
IM-MI-0004-0021.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
03/16/2017
Plaintiffs' Notice Regarding Defendants' Motion to Dissolve Injunction [ECF# 45]
IM-MI-0004-0019.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
03/20/2017
Defendants' Renewed Motion to Vacate Permanent Injunction [ECF# 57]
IM-MI-0004-0024.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
03/21/2017
Order Deeming Moot Defendants' Motion to Dissolve Injunction [Doc. 15] and Renewed Motion to Vacate Injunction [Doc. 57] [ECF# 58]
IM-MI-0004-0026.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
04/17/2017
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 76]
IM-MI-0004-0032.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
05/08/2017
Plantiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 86]
IM-MI-0004-0035.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
05/18/2017
Brief of Amici Curiae the Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, Jay Hirabayashi,Holly Yasui, Karen Korematsu, Civil Rights Organizations, and National and Michigan Bar Associations of Color in Support of Plaintiffs [ECF# 90]
IM-MI-0004-0041.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
05/19/2017
Brief of Former National Security Officials as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 94]
IM-MI-0004-0042.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
05/19/2017
Proposed Brief of Amici Curiae in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 95-1]
IM-MI-0004-0043.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
05/22/2017
Brief of Amici Curiae Constitutional Law Professors in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 97-1]
IM-MI-0004-0044.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
05/22/2017
Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 98]
IM-MI-0004-0037.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
05/22/2017
Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 98]
IM-MI-0004-0045.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
05/23/2017
Brief of Amici Curiae in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 99]
IM-MI-0004-0039.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
05/23/2017
Brief of Amici Curiae Constitutional Law Professors in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 101]
IM-MI-0004-0038.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
05/23/2017
Brief of Amici Curiae Constitutional Law Professors in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 101]
IM-MI-0004-0046.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
06/09/2017
Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Stay Pending Supreme Court Proceedings [ECF# 114] (2017 WL 2501060)
IM-MI-0004-0055.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
11/16/2017
Order: (1) Granting Joint Motion for Clarification [Doc. 188]; (2) Allowing Plaintiffs to File a Third Amended Complaint; (3) and Deeming Moot Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 76] and Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Production of Documents [Doc. 104] [ECF# 119]
IM-MI-0004-0056.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
09/13/2018
Third Amended Complaint [ECF# 124]
IM-MI-0004-0057.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
07/10/2019
Order Denying Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Amended Complaint [ECF# 138] (399 F.Supp.3d 717)
IM-MI-0004-0058.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
E.D. Mich.
11/01/2019
[Order Granting in Part and Denying in Part Defendants' Motion to Certify; Certifying July 10 Order for Interlocutory Appeal; Declining to Stay Discovery Pending Appeal] [ECF# 157] (2019 WL 5684371)
IM-MI-0004-0059.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
U.S. Court of Appeals
11/26/2019
Order [Ct. of App. ECF# 18-1]
IM-MI-0004-0060.pdf | Detail
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
show all people docs
Judges Davis, Stephanie Dawkins (E.D. Mich.) [Magistrate] show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-9000
Moore, Karen Nelson (Sixth Circuit) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0060
Nalbandian, John Baylor (Sixth Circuit) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0060
Roberts, Victoria A. (E.D. Mich.) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0003 | IM-MI-0004-0026 | IM-MI-0004-0055 | IM-MI-0004-0056 | IM-MI-0004-0058 | IM-MI-0004-0059 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Sutton, Jeffrey S. (Sixth Circuit) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0060
Plaintiff's Lawyers Aoun, Rula (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-0057
Aukerman, Miriam (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-0057 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Ayad, Nabih H (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-0057 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Bagenstos, Samuel R. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035
Benson, Frederick C. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0057
Cavataro, Benjamin L. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0057
Dakhlallah, Kassem (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-0057 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Fadlallah, Mona (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-0057 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Farhat, Helal (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-0057 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Fried, Rachel L. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0057
Hammoud, Ali (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0057
Korobkin, Daniel S. (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0057 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Maskay, Nishchay H. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0057 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Moss, Kary L. (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021
Murray, William J. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021
Price, Ingrid L. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0057
Qandah, Natalie C. (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-0057 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Raofield, Jason C. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-0057 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Samona, Nida (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021
Schlanger, Margo J. (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-0057 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Steffan, Taylor M. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0057
Steinberg, Michael J. (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-0057 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Flentje, August E. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Peachey, William Charles (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0004 | IM-MI-0004-0006 | IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-0014 | IM-MI-0004-0024 | IM-MI-0004-0032 | IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-0045
Press, Joshua S. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-0018 | IM-MI-0004-0024 | IM-MI-0004-0032 | IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-0045 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Readler, Chad Andrew (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0004 | IM-MI-0004-0006 | IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-0014 | IM-MI-0004-0024 | IM-MI-0004-0032 | IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-0045
Reuveni, Erez (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0004 | IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-0014 | IM-MI-0004-0024 | IM-MI-0004-0032 | IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-0045
Shinners, Katherine J. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Westwater, Gisela Ann (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0004 | IM-MI-0004-0006 | IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-0014 | IM-MI-0004-0024 | IM-MI-0004-0032 | IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-0045 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Yuh, Briana (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0004 | IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-0014 | IM-MI-0004-0018 | IM-MI-0004-0024 | IM-MI-0004-0032 | IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-0045 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Other Lawyers Bergman, Andrew D. (Texas) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0039
Chang, Robert S. (Washington) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0041
Cicconi, Martine E. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0041
Doroghazi, John (Connecticut) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0042 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Ellis, Abram J. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0038 | IM-MI-0004-0044 | IM-MI-0004-0046 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Fang, Jerry (New York) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0038 | IM-MI-0004-0044 | IM-MI-0004-0046
Freiman, Jonathan Marc (Connecticut) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0042
Goodman, William Harry (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0041
Hayes, Dina M. (Illinois) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0039 | IM-MI-0004-0043 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Huq, Aziz (California) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0043
Johnson, Robert Alan (New York) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0041 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Koh, Harold H. (Connecticut) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0042
Martel, Jonathan (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0039
Metcalf, Hope R. (Connecticut) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0042
Mittelman, Reena (New York) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0038 | IM-MI-0004-0044 | IM-MI-0004-0046
Roseman, Daniella (New York) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0041
Rosen, Elizabeth C. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0041
Shah, Pratik A. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0041
Smith, Johnathan James (California) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0039 | IM-MI-0004-0043
Thomas, Kim (Michigan) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0038 | IM-MI-0004-0044 | IM-MI-0004-0046
Townsend, Tahlia (Connecticut) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0042
Turner, Alan C. (New York) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0038 | IM-MI-0004-0044 | IM-MI-0004-0046
Ware, Anton (California) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0039
Weisel, Jessica M. (California) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0041
Yan, Patricia (New York) show/hide docs
IM-MI-0004-0038 | IM-MI-0004-0044 | IM-MI-0004-0046

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
view search results
page permalink

- top of page -