University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Arab American Civil Rights League (ACRL) v. Trump IM-MI-0004
Docket / Court 2:17-cv-10310 ( E.D. Mich. )
State/Territory Michigan
Case Type(s) Immigration
Presidential Authority
Special Collection Civil Rights Challenges to Trump Refugee/Visa Order
Attorney Organization ACLU Chapters (any)
ACLU of Michigan
Case Summary
On January 31, 2017, the Arab American Civil Rights League and seven of its individual members filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The plaintiffs sued President Trump, the Department of Homeland Security, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection under ... read more >
On January 31, 2017, the Arab American Civil Rights League and seven of its individual members filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The plaintiffs sued President Trump, the Department of Homeland Security, and U.S. Customs and Border Protection under the Declaratory Judgment Act, the Administrative Procedures Act, and the Religious Freedom Restoration Act, claiming that President Trump’s Executive Order (EO) of January 27, 2017, violated these statutes as well as their Fifth Amendment procedural and substantive due process and equal protection rights. They also claimed the EO violates the First Amendment’s Establishment Clause by giving preference to Christian over Muslim refugees.

The plaintiffs, represented by private attorneys, included ACRL members who were Muslim lawful permanent residents (LPRs) from Yemen and Syria, countries whose nationals were banned from entering the United States by the challenged EO. On Jan. 27, some of the plaintiffs were outside the United States when the EO was issued. They were unable to board flights to return to their homes and families in Detroit, or they feared being denied flights to do so. Other plaintiffs were inside the United States and feared that they would be denied re-entry if they left, or were unable to petition for immigration status for their family members abroad.

The plaintiffs asked the court to strike down the EO, enjoining the defendants from detaining or stopping individuals solely on its basis, and to declare unlawful the defendants’ actions preventing the plaintiffs from traveling to the United States.

The lawsuit was assigned to Judge Victoria A. Roberts.

On Feb. 2, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO), seeking an order that "prohibits the denial of entry into the US of legal permanent residents and those with valid immigrant visas on the basis of [the] January 27, 2017 Executive Order." The same day, the Court entered a permanent injunction barring the United States from applying Sections 3(c) and 3(e) of the Jan. 27, 2017 EO against lawful permanent residents of the United States. This injunction protected four of the named plaintiffs, who are lawful permanent residents, as well as all other lawful permanent residents of the United States who are similarly situated. The injunction did not apply to the remainder of the named plaintiffs, who sought other relief.

On Feb. 6, 2017, plaintiffs filed an amended complaint, adding the ACLU of Michigan as counsel and several new plaintiffs. That same day, the defendants filed a motion to dissolve the permanent injunction, arguing that both parties agreed that the EO did not apply to lawful permanent residents and therefore there was no case or controversy.

On Feb. 9, the plaintiffs withdrew their Feb. 2 motion for a TRO for emergency relief. The plaintiffs cited changed circumstances created by the entry of the nationwide TRO in State of Washington v. Trump. Some of the plaintiffs had already entered the United States and the rest planned to enter within the next several days. However, the plaintiffs continued to pursue a permanent injunction guaranteeing them the ability to travel outside the country and re-enter in the future.

Meanwhile, the U.S. had appealed the temporary injunction in Washington v. Trump, but the 9th Circuit declined to stay that injunction while the appeal proceeded, and expressed considerable skepticism about the EO's legality in the opinion denying a stay. The federal government responded on Mar. 6, 2017, when the President rescinded the Jan. 27 EO and replaced it with a narrower one, Executive Order 13780. On the same day, the government filed notice of the new EO in this case.

Plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on Mar. 16, arguing that although the Mar. 6 EO was intended to bolster the President's policy against legal challenges, the new EO's purpose suffers the same problem as the old EO--it is discriminatory. Plaintiffs also filed a motion to expedite discovery and a concurrent motion to expedite briefing. However, since the new EO did definitively except lawful permanent residents from its scope, that same day, the plaintiffs did file a notice of voluntary dismissal on behalf of the lawful permanent resident plaintiffs. Finally, plaintiffs asked the court to deny defendants' motion to dissolve the prior injunction as moot.

On Mar. 20, defendants renewed their motion to vacate the permanent injunction; the court agreed with the plaintiffs that this motion was moot, because the new EO rendered the court's original injunction ineffective. The court explained, "[a]n order vacating or dissolving the injunction is unnecessary and would be inappropriate."

On Apr. 17, defendants filed a motion to dismiss the second amended complaint. The motion argued that the plaintiffs' claims were not justiciable because the individual plaintiffs had not demonstrated injury as a result of the new EO and the organizational plaintiffs lacked associational standing. The motion further argued that the plaintiffs' claims failed on the merits because the INA grants the president the authority to create temporary entry-suspension provisions.

Several procedural developments ensued as the parties engaged in discovery.

However, on May 31, defendants filed a motion to stay proceedings pending the Supreme Court's "likely consideration" of the 4th Circuit's decision in IRAP v. Trump. Plaintiffs responded to the defendants' motion to stay on Jun. 2, arguing that "[t]his last-minute motion to stay is just the latest attempt by Defendants to avoid responding to the narrow discovery requests approved by the Court...The Court should deny the new motion to stay, and resolve the motion to dismiss." On Jun. 9, the court granted the motion to stay proceedings. The order stated that while the case in the Supreme Court will not resolve all issues in the case here, it would "settle some issues and simplify others" while also providing "the legal standard for reviewing the Executive Order under the Establishment Clause." Further, the order stated that the consequences of a stay for the plaintiffs will not be as drastic as the plaintiffs indicated.

Several organizations and individuals filed documents supporting the plaintiffs on May 23. Muslim Advocates, American Muslim Health Professionals, Network of Arab-American Professionals, and Muppies, Inc. filed an amicus brief opposing the government's motion to dismiss. A number of constitutional law professors filed a separate amicus brief opposing the motion to dismiss. Professor Lila Abu-Lughod filed a declaration.

This case is ongoing.

Ava Morgenstern - 02/15/2017
Julie Aust - 02/24/2017
Jamie Kessler - 06/06/2017
Virginia Weeks - 09/13/2017


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Equal Protection
Establishment Clause
Defendant-type
Law-enforcement
Discrimination-basis
National origin discrimination
Religion discrimination
General
Disparate Treatment
Family reunification
Terrorism/Post 9-11 issues
Immigration
Admission - criteria
Admission - procedure
Constitutional rights
Status/Classification
Visas - criteria
Visas - procedures
National Origin/Ethnicity
Arab/Afgani/Middle Eastern
Plaintiff Type
Non-profit NON-religious organization
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Bivens
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.
Religious Freedom Rest. Act/Religious Land Use and Inst. Persons Act (RFRA/RLUIPA)
Defendant(s) U.S. Customs and Border Protection
United States
Plaintiff Description The plaintiffs are the Detroit-based organization Arab American Civil Rights League and seven of its members, lawful permanent residents (LPRs) from Yemen and Syria, countries whose citizens are banned from traveling to the United States under President Trump's Executive Order of January 27, 2017. The LPR plaintiffs were outside the United States when the Executive Order was issued and have been denied flights or fear being denied flights.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations ACLU Chapters (any)
ACLU of Michigan
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer No
Nature of Relief Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Source of Relief Litigation
None yet
Order Duration 2017 - n/a
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Implementing Executive Order 13780 Following Supreme Court Ruling -- Guidance to Visa-Adjudicating Posts
Reuters
Date: Jun 28, 2017
By: U.S. Department of State
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Presidential Memorandum for the Secretary of State, the Attorney General, the Secretary of Homeland Security, and the Director of National Intelligence
The White House
Date: Jun 14, 2017
By: Donald Trump (White House)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Executive Order Protecting The Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into The United States
Date: Mar 6, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (President of the United States)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Memorandum to the Acting Secretary of State, the Acting Attorney General, and the Secretary of Homeland Security
The White House
Date: Feb 1, 2017
By: Donald F. McGahn II, Counsel to the President (The White House)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Statement by Acting Attorney General Sally Yates
https://www.nytimes.com/
Date: 1/30/2017
By: Acting Attorney General Sally Yates (Department of Justice)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Statement By Secretary John Kelly on the Entry of Lawful Permanent Residents into the United States
https://www.dhs.gov/
Date: 1/29/2017
By: DHS Secretary John Kelly (Department of Homeland Security)
Citation: https://www.dhs.gov/news/2017/01/29/statement-secretary-john-kelly-entry-lawful-permanent-residents-united-states
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  OLC Memo Re: Proposed Executive Order Entitled "Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States"
Date: Jan 27, 2017
By: Curtis Gannon (U.S. Department of Justice, Office of Legal Counsel)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Executive Order: Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States
Federal Register
Date: Jan 27, 2017
By: President Donald Trump (Office of the President)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
2:17−cv−10310−VAR−SDD (E.D. Mich.)
IM-MI-0004-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/09/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [ECF# 1]
IM-MI-0004-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/31/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Ex-Parte Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 5]
IM-MI-0004-0002.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/02/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Notice of Relevant Authority [ECF# 7]
IM-MI-0004-0006.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/02/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Regarding Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 8] (E.D. Mich.)
IM-MI-0004-0003.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/02/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Motion to Dissolve Injunction and Amend order Regarding Plaintiffs' Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [Doc.8] [ECF# 15]
IM-MI-0004-0004.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/06/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dissolve Injunction [ECF# 20]
IM-MI-0004-0005.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/07/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Opposition to Motion to Dissolve Injunction [ECF# 20]
IM-MI-0004-0007.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/07/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Request for a Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 24]
IM-MI-0004-0008.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/08/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Notice of Withdrawal of Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [ECF# 28]
IM-MI-0004-0009.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/09/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants’ Reply in Support of Their Motion to Dissove Injunction and Amend Order Regarding Plaintiffs’ Motion for Temporary Restraining Order [Doc. 8] [ECF# 22]
IM-MI-0004-0014.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/16/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Declaration of Ahmed Shalabi, MD [ECF# 37]
IM-MI-0004-0016.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/22/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Notice of Filing of Executive Order [ECF# 39]
IM-MI-0004-0018.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/06/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Second Amended Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [ECF# 41]
IM-MI-0004-0020.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/16/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice [ECF# 42]
IM-MI-0004-0021.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/16/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Notice Regarding Defendants' Motion to Dissolve Injunction [ECF# 45]
IM-MI-0004-0019.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/16/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Renewed Motion to Vacate Permanent Injunction [ECF# 57]
IM-MI-0004-0024.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/20/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Deeming Moot Defendants' Motion to Dissolve Injunction [Doc. 15] and Renewed Motion to Vacate Injunction [Doc. 57] [ECF# 58] (E.D. Mich.)
IM-MI-0004-0026.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/21/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 76]
IM-MI-0004-0032.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/17/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plantiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 86]
IM-MI-0004-0035.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/08/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Amici Curiae the Fred T. Korematsu Center for Law and Equality, Jay Hirabayashi,Holly Yasui, Karen Korematsu, Civil Rights Organizations, and National and Michigan Bar Associations of Color in Support of Plaintiffs [ECF# 90]
IM-MI-0004-0041.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/18/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Former National Security Officials as Amici Curiae in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 94]
IM-MI-0004-0042.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/19/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Proposed Brief of Amici Curiae in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 95-1]
IM-MI-0004-0043.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/19/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Amici Curiae Constitutional Law Professors in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 97-1]
IM-MI-0004-0044.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/22/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 98]
IM-MI-0004-0037.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/22/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Reply to Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 98]
IM-MI-0004-0045.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/22/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Amici Curiae in Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 99]
IM-MI-0004-0039.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/23/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Amici Curiae Constitutional Law Professors in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 101]
IM-MI-0004-0038.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/23/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Brief of Amici Curiae Constitutional Law Professors in Support of Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss [ECF# 101]
IM-MI-0004-0046.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/23/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting Defendants' Motion for Stay Pending Supreme Court Proceedings [ECF# 114] (2017 WL 2501060) (E.D. Mich.)
IM-MI-0004-0055.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 06/09/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Davis, Stephanie Dawkins Court not on record [Magistrate]
IM-MI-0004-9000
Roberts, Victoria A. Court not on record
IM-MI-0004-0003 | IM-MI-0004-0026 | IM-MI-0004-0055 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers Aoun, Rula (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035
Aukerman, Miriam (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Ayad, Nabih H (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Bagenstos, Samuel R. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035
Benson, Frederick C. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021
Dakhlallah, Kassem (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Fadlallah, Mona (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Farhat, Helal (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Hammoud, Ali (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021
Korobkin, Daniel S. (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Maskay, Nishchay H. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Moss, Kary L. (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021
Murray, William J. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021
Qandah, Natalie C. (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Raofield, Jason C. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Samona, Nida (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0001 | IM-MI-0004-0002 | IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021
Schlanger, Margo J. (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Steffan, Taylor M. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021
Steinberg, Michael J. (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0005 | IM-MI-0004-0007 | IM-MI-0004-0009 | IM-MI-0004-0019 | IM-MI-0004-0020 | IM-MI-0004-0021 | IM-MI-0004-0035 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Doroghazi, John (Connecticut)
IM-MI-0004-0042 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Flentje, August E. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0008
Peachey, William Charles (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0004 | IM-MI-0004-0006 | IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-0014 | IM-MI-0004-0024 | IM-MI-0004-0032 | IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-0045
Press, Joshua S. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-0018 | IM-MI-0004-0024 | IM-MI-0004-0032 | IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-0045 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Readler, Chad A. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0004 | IM-MI-0004-0006 | IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-0014 | IM-MI-0004-0024 | IM-MI-0004-0032 | IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-0045
Reuveni, Erez (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0004 | IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-0014 | IM-MI-0004-0024 | IM-MI-0004-0032 | IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-0045
Shinners, Katherine J. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Westwater, Gisela Ann (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0004 | IM-MI-0004-0006 | IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-0014 | IM-MI-0004-0024 | IM-MI-0004-0032 | IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-0045 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Yuh, Briana (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0004 | IM-MI-0004-0008 | IM-MI-0004-0014 | IM-MI-0004-0018 | IM-MI-0004-0024 | IM-MI-0004-0032 | IM-MI-0004-0037 | IM-MI-0004-0045 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Other Lawyers Bergman, Andrew D. (Texas)
IM-MI-0004-0039
Chang, Robert S. (Washington)
IM-MI-0004-0041
Cicconi, Martine E. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0041
Ellis, Abram J. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0038 | IM-MI-0004-0044 | IM-MI-0004-0046 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Fang, Jerry (New York)
IM-MI-0004-0038 | IM-MI-0004-0044 | IM-MI-0004-0046
Freiman, Jonathan Marc (Connecticut)
IM-MI-0004-0042
Goodman, William Harry (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0041
Hayes, Dina M. (Illinois)
IM-MI-0004-0039 | IM-MI-0004-0043 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Huq, Aziz (California)
IM-MI-0004-0043
Johnson, Robert Alan (New York)
IM-MI-0004-0041 | IM-MI-0004-9000
Koh, Harold H. (Connecticut)
IM-MI-0004-0042
Martel, Jonathan (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0039
Metcalf, Hope R. (Connecticut)
IM-MI-0004-0042
Mittelman, Reena (New York)
IM-MI-0004-0038 | IM-MI-0004-0044 | IM-MI-0004-0046
Roseman, Daniella (New York)
IM-MI-0004-0041
Rosen, Elizabeth C. (New York)
IM-MI-0004-0041
Shah, Pratik A. (District of Columbia)
IM-MI-0004-0041
Smith, Johnathan James (California)
IM-MI-0004-0039 | IM-MI-0004-0043
Thomas, Kim (Michigan)
IM-MI-0004-0038 | IM-MI-0004-0044 | IM-MI-0004-0046
Townsend, Tahlia (Connecticut)
IM-MI-0004-0042
Turner, Alan C. (New York)
IM-MI-0004-0038 | IM-MI-0004-0044 | IM-MI-0004-0046
Ware, Anton (California)
IM-MI-0004-0039
Weisel, Jessica M. (California)
IM-MI-0004-0041
Yan, Patricia (New York)
IM-MI-0004-0038 | IM-MI-0004-0044 | IM-MI-0004-0046

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -