On May 17, 2016, an African American man whose request for accommodations through Airbnb was rejected because of his race, brought this class-action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. He sued Airbnb under Title II of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and 42 U.S.C. § 1981, alleging that he, and all others similarly situated, had been injured by the pertinent discriminatory acts or practices committed by Airbnb's host agents, representatives, and servants. Specifically, the plaintiff alleged that while planning a trip to Philadelphia, PA, he tried to use the housing accommodation service known as Airbnb but was told by an agent of Airbnb that the accommodation he was interested in was no longer available. However, the plaintiff soon found out that the accommodation was in fact still available, and after creating two fake accounts, one of a black man and one of a white man, he found that the Airbnb host only offered the accommodation to the white individual.

Represented by Emejuru & Nyomnbi L.L.C., the plaintiff asked for judgment and damages including compensatory, statutory, and punitive damages, and attorneys' fees. On May 20, 2016, the plaintiff filed an amended complaint that also alleged a violation of the Fair Housing Act. The plaintiff filed another amended complaint on June 27.

On July 13, 2016, the defendant filed a motion to compel arbitration and dismiss the case. In a November 1, 2016 opinion, U.S. District Court Judge Christopher R. Cooper found that the plaintiff had entered into a valid and enforceable arbitration agreement with Airbnb, and therefore granted Airbnb's motion to compel arbitration and stay the case. On November 7, 2016, the plaintiff filed a motion for certification for interlocutory appeal, which the court denied on December 19. On February 2, 2017, the Circuit Court dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction, and subsequently denied rehearing en banc. 681 Fed.Appx. 1. The plaintiff then appealed to the Supreme Court, which denied certiorari on October 2, 2017. 138 S.Ct. 222.

Arbitration continued for nearly two years. On May 30, 2019, the arbitrator granted the defendant's motion for summary judgement in full. The arbitrator said that the most troubling piece of the case was the defendant's requirement that potential renters submit a picture of themselves before renting. But because the defendant had ended this practice, the arbitrator found the case moot.

The plaintiff moved to vacate arbitration, alleging that the arbitrator overstepped by denying the plaintiff's requests for depositions. Claiming that the plaintiff "has not shouldered the heavy burden required to vacate an arbitration decision", the judge denied the motion on Nov 27, 2019. The court found that the plaintiff did not request the depositions of Airbnb representatives in a timely manner; therefore, the arbitrator did not unreasonably deny a timely request for depositions. Even if he did, claimed the court, the plaintiff did not not met his burden to establish grounds to vacate the arbitrator's decision.

The plaintiff appealed this decision to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia on December 24, 2019. This case is ongoing.

Saeeda Joseph-Charles - 12/17/2016
Virginia Weeks - 02/22/2018
Maddie McFee - 06/03/2020


compress summary