University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
view search results
page permalink
Case Name B.K. v. McKay CW-AZ-0002
Docket / Court 2:15-cv-00185 ( D. Ariz. )
State/Territory Arizona
Case Type(s) Child Welfare
Special Collection Post-WalMart decisions on class certification
Attorney Organization Children's Rights, Inc.
Case Summary
On February 3, 2015, minors in the custody of the Arizona foster care system filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs sued the Arizona Department of Child Safety, the Arizona Department of Health Services, and the Arizona Health Care Cost ... read more >
On February 3, 2015, minors in the custody of the Arizona foster care system filed this lawsuit in the United States District Court for the District of Arizona. The plaintiffs sued the Arizona Department of Child Safety, the Arizona Department of Health Services, and the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The plaintiffs, represented by Children’s Rights, Inc., the Arizona Center for Law in the Public Interest, and private counsel, sought class certification and both declaratory and injunctive relief. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants had violated their First, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendment rights, and provisions of the federal Medicaid Act. Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that certain child welfare policies and practices exposed them to physical and emotional harm and unreasonable risk of harm while in the State’s care.

Over the past several years, Arizona had experienced a dramatic increase in the number of children in state foster care, nearly doubling from 2003 to 2012. The plaintiffs alleged that this growth had been fueled by extensive state budget cuts to important support services that had previously helped keep families together. The plaintiffs alleged that these cuts resulted in problematic policies and institutional issues in Arizona, including: a severe shortage of physical, mental, and behavioral health services available to children in state care; a widespread failure to conduct timely investigations of reports that children have been maltreated while in state custody; and severe and sustained shortage of family foster homes. Allegedly, there was also a widespread failure to engage in basic child welfare practices aimed at maintaining family relationships, such as placing siblings together, placing children with their biological parents on a trial reunification basis, coordinating visits between children and their biological families, and having caseworkers make regular visits with the children’s biological parents to monitor progress toward family reunification. Due to these problems, children were frequently placed far from their home communities, forced to change schools, separated from their siblings, and did not receive the mental and physical health care that they required.

On September 29, 2015, Judge Roslyn O. Silver denied the defendants’ motion to abstain and dismiss due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. 2015 WL 9690914. On May 13, 2016, the Court ordered that one of the three next of friends (a person who represents a minor - in this case - who is unable to maintain a lawsuit on his or her own behalf) be dismissed. The defendants had argued that the three individuals were not appropriate candidates to be next of friends. 2016 WL 8200450.

After two years of continuous discovery disputes and scheduling delays, Judge Roslyn O. Silver granted class certification for the plaintiffs on September 30, 2017. The class was defined as:
"General Class: All children who are or will be in the legal custody of DCS due to a
report or suspicion of abuse or neglect.
Non-Kinship Subclass: All members in the General Class who are not placed in
the care of an adult relative or person who has a significant relationship with the child.
Medicaid Subclass: All members of the General Class who are entitled to early
and periodic screening, diagnostic, and treatment services under the federal Medicaid
statute."
The defendants appealed to the United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit and on December 19, 2017, the Ninth Circuit granted the right to appeal the class certification issued on September 30, 2017.

On January 3, 2018, the defendants moved to stay further action in the case while the class action appeal was decided by the Ninth Circuit. The defendants argue that the District Court proceedings should be stayed because discovery for the class action was time intensive and expensive, and the deadlines for dispositive motions in the District Court conflicted with deadlines in the Court of Appeals. Plaintiffs argued that an indefinite stay would cause irreparable harm to children in foster care.

As of February 12, 2018, discovery is ongoing in the District Court.

Katrina Fetsch - 04/16/2016
Mary Kate Sickel - 02/13/2018


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Benefit Source
Medicaid
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Defendant-type
Jurisdiction-wide
General
Adoption
Classification / placement
Education
Emergency shelter
Failure to supervise
Family abuse and neglect
Family reunification
Foster care (benefits, training)
Juveniles
Parents (visitation, involvement)
Pattern or Practice
Placement in shelters
Relative caretakers
Siblings (visitation, placement)
Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)
Suicide prevention
Totality of conditions
Visiting
Youth / Adult separation
Medical/Mental Health
Dental care
Medical care, general
Mental health care, general
Self-injurious behaviors
Suicide prevention
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.
Title XIX of the Social Security (Medicaid) Act, 42 U.S.C §1396
Defendant(s) Arizona
Plaintiff Description Children who are or will be placed in Arizona state foster care custody following reports that they have suffered child abuse or neglect.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations Children's Rights, Inc.
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted Yes
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None yet
Source of Relief None yet
Filing Year 2015
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Legal Accountability in the Service-Based Welfare State: Lessons from Child Welfare Reform
Date: Summer 2009
By: Kathleen G. Noonan, Charles F. Sabel, William H. Simon (Center for High Impact Philanthropy , Columbia Law School and Stanford Law School Faculty)
Citation: 34 Law & Soc. Inquiry 523 (Summer 2009)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
2:15-cv-00185-ROS (D. Ariz.)
CW-AZ-0002-9001.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/01/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and Request for Class Action [ECF# 1]
CW-AZ-0002-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/03/2015
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Second Amended Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief and Request for Class Action [ECF# 37]
CW-AZ-0002-0003.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/08/2015
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [ECF# 51] (2015 WL 9690914) (D. Ariz.)
CW-AZ-0002-0002.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 09/29/2015
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [ECF# 363] (D. Ariz.)
CW-AZ-0002-0004.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/29/2017
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Silver [Moore-Silver], Roslyn O. (D. Ariz.)
CW-AZ-0002-0002 | CW-AZ-0002-0004 | CW-AZ-0002-9001
Plaintiff's Lawyers Adelman, Daniel Jay (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Barber, Philip (New York)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Beauchamp, Keith (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-0001 | CW-AZ-0002-9001
Davis, Julia L. (New York)
CW-AZ-0002-0001 | CW-AZ-0002-0003 | CW-AZ-0002-9001
Desai, Roopali H. (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-0001 | CW-AZ-0002-9001
Dixon, Stephen (New York)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Finch, Aaron Hirsh (New York)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Frischer, Harry (New York)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Gerard, Daniele (New York)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Hogan, Timothy Michael (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-0001 | CW-AZ-0002-0003 | CW-AZ-0002-9001
Kapell, William (New York)
CW-AZ-0002-0001 | CW-AZ-0002-0003 | CW-AZ-0002-9001
Luciano, Adriana Teresa (New York)
CW-AZ-0002-0003 | CW-AZ-0002-9001
Mais, Joseph E. (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-0003 | CW-AZ-0002-9001
McGuinness, Erin Geloff (New York)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Nili, Rachel Brodin (New York)
CW-AZ-0002-0003 | CW-AZ-0002-9001
Persson, Stephanie (New York)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Ronan, Anne (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-0001 | CW-AZ-0002-0003 | CW-AZ-0002-9001
Swindle, Shane R. (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-0003 | CW-AZ-0002-9001
Tolman, Shelley (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-0001 | CW-AZ-0002-9001
Wood, Kathryn Anne (New York)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Defendant's Lawyers Acedo, Nicholas Daniel (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Albracht-Crogan, Cynthia Christine (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Bojanowski, Timothy J (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Ellman, Robert Lawrence (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Giallonardo, Dana M. (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Gottlieb, Stacey Faith (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Harrison, Wendy J. (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Johnston, Logan T. (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Koloseike, Lauren Marie (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Lento, Gary N. (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
McBride, Melanie Grace (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Plumb, Catherine Dodd (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Quigley, Daniel P. (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Struck, Daniel Patrick (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Weinzweig, David Daniel (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Wieneke, Kathleen L (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Zimmerman, Joshua Robert (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Zoellner, Tara B. (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001
Other Lawyers Porter, Camilla June (Arizona)
CW-AZ-0002-9001

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
view search results
page permalink

- top of page -