University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Crisman v. Department of Justice NS-DC-0091
Docket / Court 1:12-cv-1871 ( D.D.C. )
State/Territory District of Columbia
Case Type(s) National Security
Case Summary
On November 19, 2012, an individual plaintiff and National Security Counselors filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs sued Department of Justice, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Department of Homeland Security, and Office of the ... read more >
On November 19, 2012, an individual plaintiff and National Security Counselors filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The plaintiffs sued Department of Justice, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, Department of Homeland Security, and Office of the Director of National Intelligence under the Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), the Privacy Act (collectively “FOIA/PA”), the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), the Federal Declaratory Judgment Act, and the All Writs Act. The plaintiffs sought declaratory, injunctive and monetary relief.

Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that the individual plaintiff was fired by a federal government contractor in 2004 when the FBI received Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (“FISA) alert document and placed her on national security and homeland security watch lists, which were disseminated to federal security agencies. The plaintiffs’ FOIA requests sought information regarding the individual plaintiff and actual or potentially classified records of each of the defendant agencies. The FOIA requests sought records related to FISA alerts and whether the private individual’s name appeared on the government’s No Fly list and/or Selectee list.

This case was assigned to District Judge Emmet G. Sullivan.

On May 2, 2013, Judge Sullivan ordered the parties to engage in settlement negotiations. On August 15, 2013, the defendants moved for mediation and to stay pending resolution of ADR. In September 2013, the plaintiffs opposed the defendants’ motion. Judge Sullivan decided not to appoint a mediator for the parties.

On December 3, 2013, the defendants filed a motion for summary judgment, indicating that the government agencies released reasonably segregable materials, conducted reasonable searches and provided declarations or Vaughn indices explaining the administrative process associated with their processing of the plaintiffs’ FOIA/Privacy Act claims. The plaintiffs filed a memorandum in opposition to the summary judgment motion on January 29, 2014.

This case was reassigned to District Judge Tanya S. Chutkan in June 2014. On June 10, 2014, the defendants filed a second motion for summary judgment and to dismiss. On August 19, 2014, the plaintiffs filed a memorandum in opposition to the second motion.

The court has not yet ruled on the summary judgment motion.
As of April 1, 2017, this case is ongoing.

Susie Choi - 04/02/2017


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
General
Record-keeping
Records Disclosure
Plaintiff Type
Non-profit NON-religious organization
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Freedom of Information Act (FOIA), 5 U.S.C. § 552
Defendant(s) the United States
Plaintiff Description Plaintiff is a resident of the commonwealth of Virginia. Plaintiff National Security Counselors is a non-profit organization in Virginia that has the ability to disseminate information on a wide scale.
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None yet
Source of Relief None yet
Filing Year 2012
Case Ongoing Yes
Docket(s)
1:12-cv-1871 (D.D.C.)
NS-DC-0091-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 08/27/2016
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint [ECF# 1]
NS-DC-0091-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/19/2012
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Chutkan, Tanya Sue (D.D.C.)
NS-DC-0091-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers McClanahan, Kelly Brian (Maryland)
NS-DC-0091-0001 | NS-DC-0091-9000
Defendant's Lawyers McDaniel, Oliver W. (District of Columbia)
NS-DC-0091-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -