Case: Griffith v. Board of Education of Yancey County

59-cv-01881 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina

Filed Date: Nov. 11, 1959

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On November 11, 1959, the plaintiffs brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. The plaintiffs, African-American minor school children by and through their parents, sued the defendant Yancey County Board of Education to enjoin the operation of a segregated school system. They were represented by, among others, Thurgood Marshall and Jack Greenberg (for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund).When the lawsuit was filed, the Yancey County school system had two…

On November 11, 1959, the plaintiffs brought this action in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of North Carolina. The plaintiffs, African-American minor school children by and through their parents, sued the defendant Yancey County Board of Education to enjoin the operation of a segregated school system. They were represented by, among others, Thurgood Marshall and Jack Greenberg (for the NAACP Legal Defense Fund).

When the lawsuit was filed, the Yancey County school system had two high schools with about 1,200 students and 13 elementary schools with a total of 3,000 students. Prior to the 1958-59 school year, there was a separate one-room elementary school for black students. Shortly before the lawsuit commenced, local officials declared that school unsafe and unsanitary; they began busing the black elementary school students to Asheville -- along with the black high school students, who attended school there because of the lack of a black high school in Yancey County. The trip was 40 miles and took an hour and a half.

At the end of the 1958-59 school year, the plaintiffs filed for a transfer to the then-all-white schools under the North Carolina student placement law on the books. They were denied for failing to comply with the proper procedure.

Reaffirming the validity of freedom of choice and the notion that "federal courts should not be called upon to interfere in the administration of the local schools until plaintiffs have exhausted their administrative remedies under the law," the district court (Judge Wilson Warlick), after trial, concluded that the plaintiffs had in fact followed those procedures and were improperly denied a transfer. Griffith v. Board of Education of Yancey County, 186 F.Supp. 511, 516 (W.D.N.C. Sept. 12, 1960).

After the action was filed, the Board began construction of a two-room school to replace the school that had been shut down. It subsequently assigned all black children to that school without regard to age or grade. The plaintiffs then amended their complaint, seeking to enjoin the assignment of students to that school on the basis of race. The district court granted the injunction as to the high school students, ordering the Board to assign them to Yancey County schools. As to the elementary school students, the court concluded that the Board should treat the new school as part of the district and make assignment accordingly "giv[ing] consideration to the location of these schools, the distances involved, so as to provide for the effective instruction, health, safety and general welfare of the pupils assigned to such schools." Id. at 519.

The district court then issued a preliminary injunction on September 26, 1960.

Unsurprisingly, the Board took this not-so-subtle hint and did little to integrate -- notwithstanding (or because of) the addition of this new school. In 1963, the plaintiffs again went to court, seeking a preliminary injunction and temporary restraining order to force the Board to make more of an effort to integrate. In a judgment on October 28, 1963, the court ordered the Board to produce a new plan that would better integrate the schools.

Unfortunately, we were unable to find out what happened in Yancey County after the court granted the plaintiffs' motion in October of 1963. There is no digitized docket available. However, researchers for Pro Publica report that the case was still open as of 2014.

Available Opinions

Griffith v. Board of Education of Yancey County, 186 F.Supp. 511 (W.D.NC. Sept. 12, 1960)

Summary Authors

Greg Margolis (2/28/2017)

People


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dailey, Ruben J. (North Carolina)

Greenburg, Jack (New York)

Marshall, Thurgood (District of Columbia)

Pearson, C. O. (North Carolina)

Attorney for Defendant

Randolph, C.P. (North Carolina)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

59-cv-01881

Docket

Griffith v. Board of Education of Yancey Countey

Oct. 28, 1960

Oct. 28, 1960

Docket

59-cv-01881

[Order]

Sept. 12, 1960

Sept. 12, 1960

Order/Opinion

59-cv-01881

Judgment

Griffith v. Yancey County Board of Education

Oct. 28, 1963

Oct. 28, 1963

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 5, 2024, 3:06 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: North Carolina

Case Type(s):

School Desegregation

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 11, 1959

Case Ongoing: Perhaps, but long-dormant

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

African-American minor school children, by and through their parents, in the Yancey County, North Carolina school system

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

NAACP Legal Defense Fund

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Yancey County , School District

Defendant Type(s):

Elementary/Secondary School

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Litigation

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 1962 - None

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Student assignment

Discrimination Prohibition

Issues

General:

Education

Racial segregation

School/University Facilities

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Discrimination-basis:

Race discrimination

Race:

Black

Type of Facility:

Government-run