On July 9, 2002 inmates, either serving sentences or awaiting trial at the Bristol County Jail or Bristol County House of Correction, filed this pro se action in the Bristol County Superior Court challenging the validity of cost of care fees, medical care fees, haircut fees and GED fees charged ...
read more >
On July 9, 2002 inmates, either serving sentences or awaiting trial at the Bristol County Jail or Bristol County House of Correction, filed this pro se action in the Bristol County Superior Court challenging the validity of cost of care fees, medical care fees, haircut fees and GED fees charged to inmates by Bristol County Sheriff Hodgson pursuant to his Bristol County Inmate Financial Responsibility Program. Plaintiffs obtained private counsel who then filed an amended complaint on August 28,2002, alleging federal and state law causes of action. The defendant removed the case to the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. Plaintiffs voluntarily dismissed their federal law claims and the case was remanded to the Bristol County Superior Court for resolution of the state claims. Thereafter, both parties moved for summary judgment.
On July 28, 2004, the Superior Court (Judge Richard T. Moses) granted plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment and denied defendants' cross-motion. Judge Moses declared that all fees imposed under the Bristol County Inmate Financial Responsibility Program were invalid and unauthorized by law and he permanently enjoined the defendant from assessing those fees. Defendant appealed.
On August 19, 2004, the Court of Appeals for the Commonwealth Of Massachusetts (Judge Cowin) affirmed the Superior Court's order granting injunctive relief.
We have no further information on this matter.
Dan Dalton - 02/08/2007
compress summary