Case: Rasho v. Walker

1:07-cv-01298 | U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois

Filed Date: Nov. 7, 2007

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On November 7, 2007, mentally ill prisoners incarcerated by the Illinois Department of Corrections ("IDOC") filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 et seq.; and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, against the state of Illinois. The plaintiffs, represented by the Uptown People's Law Center, Equip for Equality, and private counsel, claimed that their lack of acce…

On November 7, 2007, mentally ill prisoners incarcerated by the Illinois Department of Corrections ("IDOC") filed this lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of Illinois under 42 U.S.C. § 1983; the Americans with Disabilities Act ("ADA"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12131 et seq.; and the Rehabilitation Act, 29 U.S.C. § 794, against the state of Illinois. The plaintiffs, represented by the Uptown People's Law Center, Equip for Equality, and private counsel, claimed that their lack of access to adequate mental health treatment constituted cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments, and discrimination under the ADA and Rehabilitation Act. They asked the Court for a judgment declaring defendants' conduct unconstitutional and an injunction against defendants' unlawful conduct.

Plaintiffs were incarcerated in various correctional centers of the IDOC. Most incoming prisoners at these facilities did not receive a meaningful mental health screening upon arrival. Additionally, the plaintiffs alleged that care of those prisoners who were identified as needing mental health care was grossly substandard. What limited care was available was provided chiefly by medication and prisoners were only infrequently able to consult with mental health professionals. Only four of the IDOC's correctional facilities offered some form of specialized mental health services. As a result of defendants' failure to reasonably accommodate plaintiffs' disabilities, the plaintiffs alleged that they experienced mental and physical pain and, in many cases, the exacerbation of existing mental illnesses.

On May 8, 2013, Judge Michael Mihm entered an interim order to facilitate a consent decree. The order required the parties to assess and negotiate the number of additional mental health staff and bed and treatment space needed, and mandated that the IDOC develop policies related to the segregation, protective custody, and discipline of mentally ill prisoners.

On December 22, 2015, the case settled. Under the terms of the settlement:

  • For the first time ever, Illinois would provide both long-term and acute care in residential treatment centers for prisoners who are so seriously mentally ill that they require hospitalization. Previously, these very ill people were housed in isolation.
  • More than 300 new clinical staff would be hired to treat prisoners with serious mental illnesses, along with over 400 new security staff to work at the new residential treatment units. This would allow the state to provide group therapy and one-on-one therapy for prisoners.
  • IDOC agreed to review the mental health of all prisoners with more than 60 days left in solitary, to determine if they should be given early release. IDOC also agreed to release from solitary all prisoners with serious mental illnesses who are confined there for minor, non-violent offenses, and in the future to consider mental health before sentencing someone to segregation.
  • Prisoners with mental illnesses who were in solitary confinement for over 60 days would have their out-of-cell time increased from less than an hour a day to 20 hours a week.Construction costs for the new facilities were estimated to be $40 million and the new personnel costs were expected to be approximately $40 million annually.

 

On May 10, 2016, parties filed a settlement agreement with the court. On May 23, 2016, the judge accepted the settlement with an amended settlement agreement. The agreement required IDOC to hire more mental health professionals, renovate 1258 beds, update health records to better indicate mental health problems and medication, provided staff with training in recognition and dealing with common mental disorders, provide mental health screenings for all prisoners upon, admission, conduct bimonthly review of prisoner mental health, conduct monthly review of prison mental health for those in segregation, provide for an initial mental health review within 7 days of putting a prison in segregation, and establish a referral program to all prisoners, staff, and those close to prisoners to refer prison for a mental health checkup. The settlement also provided that plaintiffs would be awarded attorney's fees, that the court retained jurisdiction for three years after the acceptance of the settlement, and that parties would try to resolve issues before taking the issue to the court.

Plaintiffs were awarded attorney's fees of $3.8 million, with half paid immediately on February 10, 2017. Multiple prisoners filed complaints alleging that the settlement was not being properly followed throughout 2017. The court indicated that complaints should be handled by the Department of Corrections grievance process.

A monitor was appointed: forensic psychiatrist Pablo Stewart. On June 5, 2017, Dr. Stewart submitted his first annual report. The report noted that although the defendants made many significant improvements to the mental health care delivery system during the first year of the settlement, the defendants continued to have challenges in meeting the first-year requirements. Specifically, the report noted the grossly insufficient and extremely poor quality of psychiatric services, which negatively impacted all aspects of the settlement and contributed to the defendants being non-compliant in the vast majority of areas.

On October 10, 2017, the plaintiffs filed a motion to enforce the settlement agreement in light of the defendants' alleged violations of the settlement terms. The court held an evidentiary hearing on December 12, 2017, which it continued in February and March 2018. On May 25, 2018, the court issued a preliminary injunction enforcing the settlement agreement and imposing additional requirements and deadlines to bring the defendants into constitutional compliance. The court found that there had been a systemic constitutional deficiency in addressing the psychiatric and mental health professional staffing shortage. The preliminary injunction was set to expire after 90 days.

On June 6, 2018, the plaintiffs filed a motion for a permanent injunction, which the court granted on October 30. The court found that the defendants had been deliberately indifferent to the medical needs of the plaintiffs in medication management, mental health treatment in segregation, mental health treatment on crisis watch, mental health evaluations, and mental health treatment plans within the meaning of the Eighth Amendment. Further, the court found that the plaintiffs have suffered or will suffer irreparable injury if a permanent injunction was not issued. The court deferred entering specific injunctive relief, and instead allowed the defendants to submit a proposal to address their constitutional deficiencies, which they submitted on November 13, 2018. The court approved the content of the permanent injunction on December 20, 2018. The permanent injunction contained staffing requirements, parameters for class members placed on mental health crisis watch, parameters for class members placed in segregation, parameters for class members prescribed psychotropic medication, and provisions on treatment plans. The injunction required the defendants to submit quarterly status reports, as well as quality assurance audits at least every 90 days. The injunction is to remain in place for two years.

The defendants appealed the permanent injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit on January 23, 2019. On April 15, the court of appeals remanded the case to the district court for the limited purpose of permitting the district court to modify the preliminary injunction in order to conform to the requirements of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65.  

On February 26, 2019, the court issued an order granting in part and denying in part the defendants' request to modify the injunction (making limited changes to three provisions of the injunction), denying the defendants’ motion for the court to reconsider its injunction orders, denying the defendants’ motion for partial stay, and granting the plaintiffs’ § 1988 petition for attorneys’ fees and costs in the amount of $841,137.98 in fees and $31,864.77 in expenses.

On April 22, 2019, the court consolidated the above injunctions and post-judgment orders (from October 30, 2018, December 20, 2018, and February 26, 2019) into a single, final permanent injunction. On May 22, 2019, the defendants appealed that final permanent injunction to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.

On May 28, 2019, the Monitor submitted his third annual report. The report noted that although IDOC had greatly improved its ability to care for mentally ill offenders and was found to be in substantial compliance in eleven areas, a major problem preventing IDOC from being substantially compliant with the entire settlement agreement was inadequate staffing. The report also noted that IDOC still had much work to do with mental health evaluations and referrals, treatment planning, medication, segregation, confidentiality, use of force, and discipline.

While the appeal was pending with the Seventh Circuit, the parties filed an amended settlement agreement which modified the jurisdictional provisions of the agreement. Those modifications terminated the court’s jurisdiction on April 23, 2021, over any provision that the IDOC was in direct compliance with and extended jurisdiction over those provisions that it was not. Although the amended agreement also specifically referenced the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), the requirements to amend an agreement under the PLRA were not met. 

On January 20, 2022, the Seventh Circuit vacated the permanent injunction, reasoning that the injunction was not sufficiently narrow and that, regardless, IDOC had indeed made reasonable efforts to mitigate the Eighth Amendment violations. The Seventh Circuit’s reversal order did not remand the case back to the district court for further proceedings. The Seventh Circuit also clarified that the parties’ settlement agreement was actually a consent decree; consequently, it was subject to judicial enforcement, and any modifications to the decree were governed by the PLRA. Finally, the Seventh Circuit found that the consent decree’s terms did not require the court to extend its jurisdiction and therefore jurisdiction was set to expire by the decree’s own terms. 22 F.4th 703. 

Following the Seventh Circuit’s ruling, the plaintiffs filed multiple amended complaints containing claims identical to their earlier claims while also adding Equal Protection and Due Process violation claims (under the Fourteenth Amendment). The Plaintiffs also added Illinois Governor J.B. Pritzker as a defendant. While the defendants moved to dismiss the amended claims, they did not raise the issue of subject matter jurisdiction. However, on September 18, 2023, the court raised jurisdiction sua sponte and requested briefing on the issue. 

Following briefing and argument, the court dismissed the case on October 23, 2023, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The court reasoned that under the consent decree, jurisdiction terminated three years after the approval date of May 23, 2016, so long as IDOC was in substantial compliance with those provisions at the time of termination. During those three years, the plaintiffs filed for and were granted permanent injunctive relief on five areas of noncompliance with the settlement agreement; while the court retained jurisdiction over those five areas, the court’s jurisdiction as to the remaining areas terminated on May 23, 2019, by the agreement’s terms. As discussed above, Defendants appealed the permanent injunction and, in the interim, entered into an Amended Consent Decree. 

However, the court further reasoned the amended decree was likely jurisdictionally deficient. The court explained that its “jurisdiction had already terminated . . . over a year earlier on May 23, 2019” and, even if the court’s jurisdiction persisted over the five areas subject to the permanent injunction, “those areas were on appeal, divesting [the] Court of jurisdiction”. Moreover, jurisdiction aside, the PLRA requirements to amend the decree were not made. Consequently, the court’s jurisdiction terminated following the Seventh Circuit’s reversal of its injunction. As such, the court dismissed with prejudice the claims embodied in the consent decree and dismissed without prejudice the newly-added claims in the most recent Fifth Amended Complaint. 

On November 1, 2023, plaintiffs appealed the dismissal to the Seventh Circuit. The case is ongoing. 

Summary Authors

Nate West (10/4/2014)

David Smellie (3/30/2017)

Eva Richardson (5/29/2019)

Jonah Feitelson (2/12/2020)

Alex Levin (1/1/2024)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6236519/parties/rasho-v-walker/


Judge(s)

Baker, Harold Albert (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Antholt, Amanda C. (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Bautista, Laura K (Illinois)

Bean, Alexander B. (Illinois)

Bedell, Lindsey A. (Illinois)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other
Judge(s)

Baker, Harold Albert (Illinois)

Gorman, John A. (Illinois)

Mihm, Michael Martin (Illinois)

Posner, Richard Allen (Illinois)

Williams, Ann Claire (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Bautista, Laura K (Illinois)

Bean, Alexander B. (Illinois)

Bedell, Lindsey A. (Illinois)

Bitner, Douglass R (Illinois)

Bratkiewicz, Jeffrey L. (Illinois)

Carey, Charles Edward (Illinois)

Choate, Kelly R. (Illinois)

Colbert, Brent J (Illinois)

Corrigan, Terence J. (Illinois)

Corsi, Alexandra (Illinois)

Dibble, Candie M (Illinois)

Dickson, Charles Dickson (Illinois)

Dugan, Timothy P. (Illinois)

Dunbar, John J. (Illinois)

Feulner, Timothy J (Illinois)

Francolla, Brian Christopher (Illinois)

Gandhi, Melissa Y. (Illinois)

Gibbs, Francesca Bridgette (Illinois)

Halliday, Patrick E (Illinois)

Higgerson, Christopher L. (Illinois)

Hoelzer, John David (Illinois)

Jones, Isaac N. (Illinois)

Judge, Daniel J (Illinois)

Keating, Timothy P. (Illinois)

Kokal, Michael T (Illinois)

Kumar, Desiree K (Illinois)

Lawson, Elizabeth C. (Illinois)

Lombardo, Joseph J. (Illinois)

Lu, Terry Shing-Ren (Illinois)

McMahon, Kate Fay (Illinois)

Meloy, Dorianne Avery (Illinois)

Merritt, Matthew J. (Illinois)

Migchelbrink, Amanda Marie (Illinois)

O'Brien, Lexie P (Illinois)

O'Neill, Terrence M. (Illinois)

Pines, Jonathan L. (Illinois)

Pratt, Tyler J (Illinois)

Rees, R. Douglas (Illinois)

Rosencrantz, Caryn Anne (Illinois)

Rupcich, Joseph N (Illinois)

Silverberg, Steven Mark (Illinois)

Slovis, Michael R. (Illinois)

Smith, Katherine Elizabeth (Illinois)

Smith, Brian Michael (Illinois)

Strauss, Peter James (Illinois)

Strom, Steven R. (Illinois)

Unrath, Craig L (Illinois)

Weathers, John J. (Illinois)

Weber, Stephanie Judith (Illinois)

Weller, Matthew Howard (Illinois)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:07-cv-01298

1:11-cv-01308

Docket [PACER]

June 10, 2019

June 10, 2019

Docket
1

1:07-cv-01298

Complaint

Nov. 6, 2007

Nov. 6, 2007

Complaint
43

1:07-cv-01298

Motion for Preliminary Injunction

April 25, 2008

April 25, 2008

Pleading / Motion / Brief
54

1:07-cv-01298

Amended Class Action Complaint

May 4, 2009

May 4, 2009

Complaint
82

1:07-cv-01298

Plaintiffs’ and State Defendants’ Proposed Case Management Plan

Nov. 19, 2010

Nov. 19, 2010

Pleading / Motion / Brief
83

1:07-cv-01298

Stipulated Motion for Class Certification for Settlement Purposes

Nov. 19, 2010

Nov. 19, 2010

Pleading / Motion / Brief
95

1:07-cv-01298

Second Amended Class Action Complaint

Rasho v.Walker

April 29, 2011

April 29, 2011

Complaint
95

1:07-cv-01298

Second Amended Class Action Complaint

April 29, 2011

April 29, 2011

Complaint
97

1:07-cv-01298

Order on Stipulated Motion for Class Certification for Settlement Purposes

May 6, 2011

May 6, 2011

Order/Opinion
112

1:07-cv-01298

Motion for Entry of an Agreed Scheduling Order Solely with Respect to Severed Count VI [With Order Granting Attached]

Aug. 8, 2011

Aug. 8, 2011

Pleading / Motion / Brief

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/6236519/rasho-v-walker/

Last updated March 17, 2024, 3:14 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Ashoor Rasho. (Attachments: # 1 Part 2, # 2 Part 3, # 3 Part 4)(RK, ilcd) (Entered: 11/08/2007)

1 Part 2

View on RECAP

2 Part 3

View on RECAP

3 Part 4

View on RECAP

Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

Clearinghouse
2

PETITION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS and Complaint against all defendants, filed by Ashoor Rasho.(RK, ilcd) (Entered: 11/08/2007)

Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

PACER
3

MOTION to Appoint Counsel by Plaintiff Ashoor Rasho. Responses due by 11/26/2007 (RK, ilcd) (Entered: 11/08/2007)

Nov. 7, 2007

Nov. 7, 2007

PACER
4

Letter from CDIL Clerk to PCC requesting trust fund ledgers for Inmate Ashoor Rasho for the period 6/7/07 thru 11/7/07. (RK, ilcd) (Entered: 11/08/2007)

Nov. 8, 2007

Nov. 8, 2007

PACER

MERIT REVIEW ORDER: This case is set for merit review. The court is required by 28 U.S.C. Section 1915A to ''screen'' the plaintiff's complaint, and through such process to identify and dismiss any legally insufficient claim, or the entire action if warranted. A claim is legally insufficient if it ''(1) is frivolous, malicious, or fails to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (2) seeks monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief.'' The plaintiff must be prepared to identify each of his claims and defendants during the hearing. The clerk is to notify the plaintiff's place of incarceration and to issue a writ for the plaintiff's participation in the video conference call. Merit Review Hearing set for 12/17/2007 01:30 PM before Judge Harold A. Baker. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 11/9/07. (RK, ilcd)

Nov. 9, 2007

Nov. 9, 2007

PACER

Merit Review Opinion

Nov. 9, 2007

Nov. 9, 2007

PACER
5

WRIT of Video issued for Ashoor Rasho B38970 for hearing before Judge Baker on 12/17/07 at 1:30 PM. (Writ faxed to PCC, Urbana Video Clerk and IDOC Video Scheduler). (RK, ilcd) (Entered: 11/09/2007)

Nov. 9, 2007

Nov. 9, 2007

PACER
6

Prisoner Trust Fund Ledgers submitted by Trust Fund Office of Pontiac Correctional Center on behalf of Ashoor Rasho for the period from 6/7/07 through 11/7/07, showing a negative trust fund balance of -$858.27. (ML, ilcd) Modified on 11/16/2007 to reflect negative balance.(ML, ilcd). (Entered: 11/16/2007)

Nov. 14, 2007

Nov. 14, 2007

PACER

TEXT ORDER entered by Magistrate Judge John A. Gorman on 11/16/07 granting 2 Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff`s trust fund ledgers indicate he has no funds to make an initial partial payment of the filing fee. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Section 1915(b)(4), the initial partial filing fee is waived. The agency having custody of Plaintiff is directed to make monthly payments of 20 percent of the preceding month`s income credited to Plaintiff`s account to the Clerk of Court. The agency having custody of the plaintiff shall forward these payments each time Plaintiff`s account exceeds $10, until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to mail a copy of this order to Plaintiff`s place of confinement, to the attention of the Trust Fund Office. (cc: plaintiff/Correctional Center Trust Fund Office/Fin Adm) (ML, ilcd)

Nov. 16, 2007

Nov. 16, 2007

PACER

Order on Petition to Proceed In Forma Pauperis

Nov. 16, 2007

Nov. 16, 2007

PACER
7

Request for production of documents by Ashoor Rasho (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 11/19/2007)

Nov. 16, 2007

Nov. 16, 2007

PACER
8

Letter from plaintiff requesting copy of complaint be sent back to him. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 11/19/2007)

Nov. 16, 2007

Nov. 16, 2007

Clearinghouse

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Harold A. Baker: Merit Review Hearing held on 12/17/2007. Appearance of plaintiff pro se. Case management order to be entered. Court will not appoint counsel at this time. Court will reconsider at a later date. (Tape #UR B; 1:37.) (KW, ilcd)

Dec. 17, 2007

Dec. 17, 2007

PACER

Merit Review Hearing

Dec. 17, 2007

Dec. 17, 2007

PACER
9

MERIT REVIEW AND ORDER ON PENDING MOTIONS Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 12/21/07. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT:(1). The petition to proceed in forma pauperis [d\e 2] is allowed and the clerk is directed to notify the trust officer at the plaintiffs place of incarceration to withhold appropriate payments from the plaintiffs trust fund until the court fees are paid in full;(2). The motion for appointment of counsel [d\e 3] is denied at this time but may be renewed once the defendants have answered and scheduling has been established;(3). The complaint states a claim for relief within notice pleading requirements for violation of the Eighth Amendment rights to be free from indifference to a serious medical need and cruel and unusual punishment. And the case shall proceed on that basis unless the parties can articulate a different claim to the court;(4). The case is assigned to the Magistrate Judge for scheduling and provision for entries of appearance and waiver of process. (cc: plaintiff/IDOC)(KB, ilcd) (Entered: 12/21/2007)

Dec. 21, 2007

Dec. 21, 2007

PACER
10

MOTION to reconsider to award plaintiff damages and sue defendants in their individual capacities by Plaintiff Ashoor Rasho. Responses due by 1/14/2008 (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 12/27/2007)

Dec. 26, 2007

Dec. 26, 2007

Clearinghouse
11

CASE MANAGEMENT ORDER #1 Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 1/29/08. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED THAT: (1) The case is assigned to the magistrate judge for scheduling and for an order that the filing fee be collected from the plaintiff's trust fund as provided in 28 U.S.C. §1915; (2) The clerk shall send notice of suit and waiver of process to the litigation coordinator at Pontiac for service on Melody Ford; (3) On the court's own motion 07-1298 and 08-1008 are consolidated and all docketing shall be done in the 07-1298 case; (4) The clerk is directed to schedule these combined cases for further Rule 16 hearing as soon as practicable after the entry of appearance of Mark Kadish, Esq. as pro bono counsel for the plaintiff; (5) All pending motions in 08-1008 [d/e 2, 3, 4] are denied as rendered moot by this order.(cc: Plaintiff)(KB, ilcd) (Entered: 01/29/2008)

Jan. 29, 2008

Jan. 29, 2008

PACER
12

PRISONER SCHEDULING ORDER Entered by Magistrate Judge John A. Gorman on 1/30/08. Clerk is directed to prepare for each deft a notice of lawsuit and request for waiver of service of summons and waiver of service of summons. Clerk to mail said forms, a copy of the complaint, and this scheduling order to each defendant. Cause set for further scheduling procedures under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16. Rule 16 Scheduling Conference set for 1:30 p.m. on 4/29/2008 by video conference (court to initiate conference) before Judge Harold A. Baker.Plaintiff to notify the court of any change in his mailing address and telephone number. Failure to notify the court of any change in the mailing address will result in dismissal of this lawsuit, with prejudice. Clerk to notify parties of their option to consent to disposition of this case before the U.S. Magistrate Judge (form enclosed). (cc: plaintiff/IDOC/Records Dept) (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

Jan. 30, 2008

Jan. 30, 2008

PACER
13

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Defendant Roger E Walker, Jr. on 1/30/08. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

Jan. 30, 2008

Jan. 30, 2008

PACER
14

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Defendant Eddie Jones, Warden on 1/30/08. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

Jan. 30, 2008

Jan. 30, 2008

PACER
15

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Defendant Dr Willard Elyea on 1/30/08. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

Jan. 30, 2008

Jan. 30, 2008

PACER
16

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Defendant Dr Navarro, Chief Medical Health Services of IDOC on 1/30/08. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

Jan. 30, 2008

Jan. 30, 2008

PACER
17

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Defendant Dr. Sylvia Mahone on 1/30/08. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

Jan. 30, 2008

Jan. 30, 2008

PACER
18

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Defendant Dr John Garlic on 1/30/08. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

Jan. 30, 2008

Jan. 30, 2008

PACER
19

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Defendant Dr Michael F Massa on 1/30/08. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

Jan. 30, 2008

Jan. 30, 2008

PACER
20

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Defendant Department of Corrections on 1/30/08. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

Jan. 30, 2008

Jan. 30, 2008

PACER
21

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Defendant Melody Ford, Chairperson Administrative Review Board IDOC (08-1008) on 1/30/08. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 01/30/2008)

Jan. 30, 2008

Jan. 30, 2008

PACER
22

Letter re: information (address etc ) on the attorney appointed for plaintiff. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 02/06/2008)

Feb. 5, 2008

Feb. 5, 2008

PACER
23

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed on defendant Roger E Walker, Jr. Roger E Walker, Jr waiver signed on 2/5/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 02/06/2008)

Feb. 6, 2008

Feb. 6, 2008

PACER
24

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Defendant Roger E Walker, Jr. Defendant served 2/5/08. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 02/14/2008)

Feb. 14, 2008

Feb. 14, 2008

PACER
25

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Michael F Massa. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 02/19/2008)

Feb. 19, 2008

Feb. 19, 2008

PACER

Waiver of Service Unexecuted

Feb. 19, 2008

Feb. 19, 2008

PACER
26

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Eddie Jones. Defendant Eddie Jones served on 2/7/2008, answer due 4/7/2008. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 02/19/2008)

Feb. 19, 2008

Feb. 19, 2008

PACER
27

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by John Garlic. Defendant John Garlic served on 2/13/2008, answer due 4/14/2008. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 02/19/2008)

Feb. 19, 2008

Feb. 19, 2008

PACER

Waiver of Service Returned Unexecuted as to Melody Ford. (KB, ilcd)

Feb. 19, 2008

Feb. 19, 2008

PACER
28

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Defendant Melody Ford on 2/20/08 to new address in Springfield, IL. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 02/20/2008)

Feb. 20, 2008

Feb. 20, 2008

PACER
29

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Melody Ford. Melody Ford waiver sent on 2/20/2008, answer due 4/21/2008. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 02/25/2008)

Feb. 22, 2008

Feb. 22, 2008

PACER
30

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed on Dr. Willard Elyea. Dr. Willard Elyea waiver sent on 1/30/08, executed on 2/12/2008, answer due 4/14/2008. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 03/04/2008)

March 4, 2008

March 4, 2008

PACER
31

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed on Sylvia Mahone. Sylvia Mahone waiver sent on 1/30/08, served on 2/14/2008, answer due 4/14/2008. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 03/04/2008)

March 4, 2008

March 4, 2008

PACER
32

NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Theresa M Powell on behalf of Sylvia Mahone, Michael F Massa (Powell, Theresa) (Entered: 03/11/2008)

March 11, 2008

March 11, 2008

PACER
33

NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by David M Walter on behalf of Sylvia Mahone, Michael F Massa (Walter, David) (Entered: 03/11/2008)

March 11, 2008

March 11, 2008

PACER
34

ANSWER to 1 Complaint by Defendants Sylvia Mahone, Michael F Massa.(Powell, Theresa) (Entered: 03/11/2008)

March 11, 2008

March 11, 2008

PACER
35

MOTION for Protective Order HIPAA by Defendants Sylvia Mahone, Michael F Massa. Responses due by 3/28/2008 (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit A)(Powell, Theresa) (Entered: 03/11/2008)

1 Text of Proposed Order Exhibit A

View on PACER

March 11, 2008

March 11, 2008

PACER
36

MOTION to Continue/Reschedule Video Conference by Plaintiff Ashoor Rasho. Responses due by 4/3/2008 (Attachments: # 1 part 2, # 2 part 3)(HK, ilcd) (Entered: 03/17/2008)

1 part 2

View on PACER

2 part 3

View on PACER

March 17, 2008

March 17, 2008

PACER
37

Letter re: Plaintiff from inmate at PCC (Attachments: # 1 part 2, # 2 part 3) (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 03/26/2008)

1 part 2

View on PACER

2 part 3

View on PACER

March 26, 2008

March 26, 2008

PACER
38

ANSWER to 1 Complaint by Defendants Roger E Walker, Jr, Eddie Jones, Willard Elyea,. Navarro, Melody Ford, John Garlic.(Hildebrand, Heidi) (Entered: 03/31/2008)

March 31, 2008

March 31, 2008

PACER
39

ANSWER to 1 Complaint 07-1298 consol w/ 08-1008 by Defendants Roger E Walker, Jr, Eddie Jones, Willard Elyea,. Navarro, Melody Ford, John Garlic.(Hildebrand, Heidi) (Entered: 03/31/2008)

March 31, 2008

March 31, 2008

PACER
40

MOTION to Amend/Correct 38 Answer to Complaint by Defendants Roger E Walker, Jr, Eddie Jones, Willard Elyea,. Navarro, Melody Ford, John Garlic. Responses due by 4/17/2008 (Attachments: # 1 proposed Amended Answer)(Hildebrand, Heidi) (Entered: 03/31/2008)

1 proposed Amended Answer

View on PACER

March 31, 2008

March 31, 2008

PACER
41

TRANSFER WRIT issued for Plaintiff to attend video hearing at 1:30 p.m. on 4/29/08 at Stateville Corr Ctr Video Room. Rule 16 Hearing before Judge Baker. (cc: PCC/Stateville Corr Ctrs) (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 04/21/2008)

April 21, 2008

April 21, 2008

PACER
42

VIDEO WRIT issued for Plaintiff to attend Video Hearing at 1:30 p.m. on 4/29/08 (at Stateville Corr Ctr) before Judge Baker. (cc: IDOC Scheduler/PCC and Stateville Corr Ctrs) (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 04/21/2008)

April 21, 2008

April 21, 2008

PACER
43

MOTION for Preliminary Injunction by Plaintiff Ashoor Rasho. Responses due by 5/12/2008 (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 04/28/2008)

April 25, 2008

April 25, 2008

Clearinghouse

TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 4/29/08. Before the court is the plaintiff's motion "to reconsider to award plaintiff damages and sue defendants in their individual capacities" 10 . The court performed a merit review of the plaintiff's complaint on December 10, 2007 and allowed him to proceed against the defendants. This lawsuit proceeds against the defendants only in their individual capacities. The court cannot award the plaintiff damages. That issue will be determined by a jury if this case goes to trial. The plaintiff's motion is denied as to his request that this court reconsider awarding damages to him and rendered moot as to his request that he be allowed to proceed against the defendants in their individual capacities 10 .(KB, ilcd)

April 29, 2008

April 29, 2008

PACER

Order on Motion for Reconsideration

April 29, 2008

April 29, 2008

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Harold A. Baker: Scheduling Conference held on 4/29/2008. Appearance of plaintiff pro se. Appearances for defendants by Theresa Powell and Joe Rupcich. Court informs parties that pro bono counsel will be entering an appearance for the pro se plaintiff. Further hearing to be scheduled after pro bono counsel files their appearances. Copy mailed to pro se plaintiff. (Tape #UR B; 1:35 P.M..) (KW, ilcd)

April 29, 2008

April 29, 2008

PACER

Scheduling Conference

April 29, 2008

April 29, 2008

PACER

TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 4/29/08. Before the court is the plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction 43 . The court is still waiting on the pro bono counsel to enter an appearance. The court denies this motion at this time, with leave to reinstate if pro bono counsel chooses to do so. The defendants' unopposed motion to amend their answer is allowed 40 . The defendants may file their amended answer. (cc: Plaintiff) (KB, ilcd)

April 29, 2008

April 29, 2008

PACER

Order on Motion to Amend/Correct

April 29, 2008

April 29, 2008

PACER
44

Amended ANSWER to 1 Complaint by Defendants Roger E Walker, Jr, Eddie Jones, Willard Elyea,. Navarro, Melody Ford, John Garlic.(Hildebrand, Heidi) (Entered: 04/29/2008)

April 29, 2008

April 29, 2008

PACER
45

ORDER: defendants unopposed motion for order for HIPAA Qualified Protective Order 35 . The court finds that good cause exists for the entry of a HIPAA Qualified Protective Order to prevent the unauthorized disclosure and direct the use of protected health information during the course of this litigation. The motion is allowed. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 5/28/8. (cc:Pla)(HK, ilcd) (Entered: 05/28/2008)

May 28, 2008

May 28, 2008

PACER
46

Letter on behalf of plaintiff requesting copy of grievance April 5, 2007. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 05/29/2008)

May 29, 2008

May 29, 2008

PACER

Remark: Court continues to pursue bono counsel for the plaintiff. (KW, ilcd)

June 12, 2008

June 12, 2008

PACER

Remark

June 12, 2008

June 12, 2008

PACER

TEXT ORDER: Plaintiff's Motion to Continue/Reschedule Video Conference 36 is rendered moot. (cc: pla) Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 9/5/08. (FDT, ilcd)

Sept. 8, 2008

Sept. 8, 2008

PACER

Order on Motion to Continue

Sept. 8, 2008

Sept. 8, 2008

PACER
47

NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Marc R Kadish on behalf of Ashoor Rasho (Kadish, Marc) (Entered: 11/05/2008)

Nov. 5, 2008

Nov. 5, 2008

PACER
48

CERTIFICATE of Service/Counsel re 47 Notice of Appearance of Attorney by Marc R Kadish on behalf of Ashoor Rasho (Kadish, Marc) (Entered: 11/05/2008)

Nov. 5, 2008

Nov. 5, 2008

PACER

TEXT ORDER: A Rule 16 conference is scheduled for December 1, 2008 at 1:30 pm., via video conference. The plaintiff's attorney may appear by video at the Thompson Building in Chicago. The clerk of the court is directed to enter a writ for the parties' appearance, via video. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 11/24/08. (cc:Pla)(HK, ilcd)

Nov. 24, 2008

Nov. 24, 2008

PACER

Order

Nov. 24, 2008

Nov. 24, 2008

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Harold A. Baker: Scheduling Conference held on 12/1/2008. Appearance for plaintiff by Marc Kadish. Appearances for defendants by Heidi Hildebrand and Theres Powell. Plaintiff's counsel moves for leave to amend complaint.; granted. Amended Pleadings due by 2/2/2009. Defendants' response to amended complaint due 3/2/009. Further Status Conference set for 3/10/2009 at 1:30 PM by video conference (court to initiate conference) before Judge Harold A. Baker. Plaintiff Rasho to be by video. Video writ to be issued for Mr. Kadish at their office Mayer & Brown.(Court Reporter TJ.) (KW, ilcd)

Dec. 1, 2008

Dec. 1, 2008

PACER

Scheduling Conference

Dec. 1, 2008

Dec. 1, 2008

PACER
49

STRICKEN Letter from Plaintiff re: attending hearings. (KB, ilcd) Modified on 12/11/2008 (KW, ilcd). (Entered: 12/03/2008)

Dec. 3, 2008

Dec. 3, 2008

PACER

TEXT ORDER STRIKINGDOCUMENT Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 12/11/08. Before the Court is a unsigned letter 49 filed on behalf of the plaintiff by an unidentified person. The Clerk of the Court is directed to strike the letter 49 forthwith. See FRCP Rule 11(a). (KW, ilcd)

Dec. 11, 2008

Dec. 11, 2008

PACER

Order Striking/Vacating Document

Dec. 11, 2008

Dec. 11, 2008

PACER
50

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint by Plaintiff Ashoor Rasho. Responses due by 2/6/2009 (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Letter, # 2 Exhibit Letter, # 3 Exhibit Letter, # 4 Exhibit Letter)(Kadish, Marc) (Entered: 01/20/2009)

1 Exhibit Letter

View on PACER

2 Exhibit Letter

View on PACER

3 Exhibit Letter

View on PACER

4 Exhibit Letter

View on PACER

Jan. 20, 2009

Jan. 20, 2009

PACER
51

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Ashoor Rasho re 50 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint (Kadish, Marc) (Entered: 01/20/2009)

Jan. 20, 2009

Jan. 20, 2009

PACER
52

RESPONSE to Motion re 50 MOTION for Extension of Time to File Amended Complaint filed by Defendants Sylvia Mahone, Michael F Massa. (Powell, Theresa) (Entered: 01/30/2009)

Jan. 30, 2009

Jan. 30, 2009

PACER

TEXT ORDER: The Plaintiff's unopposed 50 Motion for Extension of Time to File an Amended Complaint is GRANTED. Plaintiff is allowed 60 days or by 5/4/2009, from the date of this order to file an amended complaint. Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 3/3/9. (cc:Pla)(HK, ilcd)

March 3, 2009

March 3, 2009

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File

March 3, 2009

March 3, 2009

PACER
53

VIDEO WRIT issued for Hearing set on 3/10/09 at 1:30 pm (Central Time) before Judge Baker. (cc: PCC, IDOC Scheduler) (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 03/09/2009)

March 9, 2009

March 9, 2009

PACER

Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Harold A. Baker. Status Conference held on 3/10/2009. Appearance of plaintiff by Marc Kadish/Daniel Herrer; appearance of defendants by Heidi Hildebrand/Matt Lurkin. Status discussed. (Tape #UR-B: 1:37 PM.) (MT, ilcd)

March 10, 2009

March 10, 2009

PACER

Status Conference

March 10, 2009

March 10, 2009

PACER
54

AMENDED COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Ashoor Rasho. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate of Service)(Kadish, Marc) (Entered: 05/04/2009)

1 Certificate of Service

View on PACER

May 4, 2009

May 4, 2009

Clearinghouse
55

NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Harold C Hirshman on behalf of Patrice Daniels, Gerrodo Forrest, Lynda Smith, Laterial Stinson, Keith Walker, Ashoor Rasho (Hirshman, Harold) (Entered: 05/08/2009)

May 8, 2009

May 8, 2009

PACER
56

NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Camille E Bennett on behalf of Patrice Daniels, Gerrodo Forrest, Lynda Smith, Laterial Stinson, Keith Walker, Ashoor Rasho (Bennett, Camille) (Entered: 05/08/2009)

May 8, 2009

May 8, 2009

PACER
57

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Defendant Roberta Fews on 5/11/09. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 05/11/2009)

May 11, 2009

May 11, 2009

PACER
58

REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF SERVICE and Notice of Lawsuit sent to Wexford Health Sources, Inc. on 5/11/09. (KB, ilcd) (Entered: 05/11/2009)

May 11, 2009

May 11, 2009

PACER
59

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 54 Amended Complaint by Defendants Roger E Walker, Jr, Eddie Jones, Willard Elyea, Wendy Navarro, Melody Ford, John Garlic. Responses due by 6/4/2009 (Hildebrand, Heidi) (Entered: 05/18/2009)

May 18, 2009

May 18, 2009

PACER
60

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 54 Amended Complaint by Defendants Sylvia Mahone, Michael F Massa. Responses due by 6/4/2009 (Powell, Theresa) (Entered: 05/18/2009)

May 18, 2009

May 18, 2009

PACER

TEXT ORDER Entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 5/26/09. The defendants, Roger E Walker, Jr, Eddie Jones, Willard Elyea, Wendy Navarro, Melody Ford and John Garlic's unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer 59 is allowed. Defendants are allowed up to and including June 18, 2009 to file their answers. Provided there are no meritorious objections, the defendants, Sylvia Mahone and Michael F Massa's Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer 60 is allowed. Defendants are allowed up to and including July 15, 2009 to file their answers. Any meritorious objects must be filed within 14 days of this order (ddl 6/10/09). (cc: Plaintiff) (KB, ilcd)

May 26, 2009

May 26, 2009

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

May 26, 2009

May 26, 2009

PACER

Set/Reset Deadlines: SEE TEXT ORDER entered 5/26/09 - Any meritorious objections must be filed within 14 days of the Text Order entered 5/26/09 - Miscellaneous Deadline 6/10/2009. (KB, ilcd)

May 26, 2009

May 26, 2009

PACER

Set/Reset Deadlines

May 26, 2009

May 26, 2009

PACER
61

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Plaintiff Wexford Health Sources Inc waiver sent on 5/11/2009, served 6/8/09, answer due 7/10/2009. (KB, ilcd) Modified on 7/7/2009 (HK, ilcd). (Entered: 06/15/2009)

June 15, 2009

June 15, 2009

PACER
62

MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 54 Amended Complaint by Defendants Roger E Walker, Jr, Eddie Jones, Willard Elyea, Wendy Navarro, Melody Ford, John Garlic. Responses due by 7/6/2009 (Hildebrand, Heidi) (Entered: 06/18/2009)

June 18, 2009

June 18, 2009

PACER
63

NOTICE of Appearance of Attorney by Christopher L Higgerson on behalf of Roger E Walker, Jr, Eddie Jones, Willard Elyea, Wendy Navarro, Melody Ford, John Garlic (Higgerson, Christopher) (Entered: 06/23/2009)

June 23, 2009

June 23, 2009

PACER
64

WAIVER OF SERVICE Returned Executed by Plaintiff. Roberta Fews waiver sent on 5/11/2009, served 6/16/09, answer due 7/10/2009. (KB, ilcd) Modified on 7/7/2009 (HK, ilcd). (Entered: 06/23/2009)

June 23, 2009

June 23, 2009

PACER

TEXT ORDER entered by Judge Harold A. Baker on 7/2/09. The defendants' unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer 62 is allowed. Defendants are allowed up to and including July 18, 2009 to file an answer.(cc: Plaintiff) (KB, ilcd)

July 2, 2009

July 2, 2009

PACER

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer

July 2, 2009

July 2, 2009

PACER

Notice of Docket Text or Event Modification re 64 Waiver of Service Executed, 61 Waiver of Service Executed. Events modified to reflect waiver executed by Plaintiff. (HK, ilcd)

July 7, 2009

July 7, 2009

PACER

Notice of Docket Text or Event Modification

July 7, 2009

July 7, 2009

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Disability Rights

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 7, 2007

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiffs are mentally ill inmates incarcerated at various correctional facilities of the Illinois Department of Corrections.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

Uptown People's Law Center

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

State of Illinois, State

Defendant Type(s):

Jurisdiction-wide

Corrections

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.

Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Non-settlement Outcome

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Attorneys fees

Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Litigation

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 3,800,000

Order Duration: 2016 - 2019

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Hire

Other requirements regarding hiring, promotion, retention

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Reporting

Recordkeeping

Monitoring

Issues

General:

Classification / placement

Conditions of confinement

Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)

Totality of conditions

Disability and Disability Rights:

Mental impairment

Discrimination-basis:

Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)

Medical/Mental Health:

Medication, administration of

Mental health care, general

Type of Facility:

Government-run