University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Melendres v. Arpaio PN-AZ-0003
Docket / Court 2:07-cv-02513-GMS ( D. Ariz. )
State/Territory Arizona
Case Type(s) Immigration and/or the Border
Policing
Attorney Organization ACLU Chapters (any)
ACLU National (all projects)
MALDEF
U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division
Case Summary
On December 12, 2007, a group of plaintiffs filed this lawsuit in United States District Court for the District of Arizona against the County of Maricopa and the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO), as well as Sheriff Joe Arpaio. The plaintiffs sought to represent a class of Latino persons who ... read more >
On December 12, 2007, a group of plaintiffs filed this lawsuit in United States District Court for the District of Arizona against the County of Maricopa and the Maricopa County Sheriff's Office (MCSO), as well as Sheriff Joe Arpaio. The plaintiffs sought to represent a class of Latino persons who have been or will be stopped, detained, interrogated, or searched by the Sheriff or his agents in moving or parked vehicles in Maricopa County. They alleged claims under the Fourth Amendment (search and seizure) and Fourteenth Amendment (equal protection) to the U.S. Constitution; Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964; and the Arizona state constitution. The plaintiffs were represented by private pro bono attorneys, the American Civil Liberties Union (both local and national), and the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund. The United States Department of Justice (Civil Rights Division and local U.S. Attorneys) appeared in the case as amicus, explaining that they had a sharp interest in the matter because of its separate civil rights lawsuit against the County, United States v. Maricopa County, PN-AZ-0001 in this Clearinghouse. The plaintiffs sought declaratory and injunctive relief against the defendants, claiming that defendants have engaged in a widespread pattern and practice of racial profiling and racially or ethnically discriminatory treatment in "enforcing" federal immigration laws against Latino persons without regard for actual citizenship or immigration status.

The plaintiffs alleged that defendants have launched a series of "crime suppression sweeps" to target Latino persons for investigation of immigration status, using pretextual and unfounded stops, racially motivated questioning, searches, and/or baseless arrests. These sweeps include a volunteer "posse" that help to carry out defendants' policies and practices. Defendants had claimed authority under a limited agreement with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE). However, plaintiffs allege that the ICE agreement prohibits these practices, because the agreement only allows for questioning of immigration status once someone is suspected of violating a state or federal law more severe than a traffic offense. The plaintiffs further allege that defendants' pattern and practice of racial profiling goes beyond these "sweeps" to include widespread, everyday targeting and mistreatment of drivers and passengers in Maricopa County who appear to be Latino. The plaintiffs allege that Latino drivers and passengers are stopped at higher rates, treated more intrusively, and detained longer than similarly situated Caucasian drivers and passengers (even within the same vehicle). The plaintiffs also allege that defendants have set up a "hotline" for "tips" on illegal immigrants, which they allege invites individuals to equate race with immigration status. Finally, the plaintiffs allege a failure to train personnel and volunteers adequately and to promulgate appropriate policies to prevent infringement of plaintiffs' rights. Allegedly, the Sheriff made many public statements about his intent to "go after illegals" and said publicly that physical appearance was basis to question someone about their immigration status.

On July 15, 2009, the court (Judge Mary H. Murgia) granted the defendants' motion for recusal. The defendants claimed that only the day after Judge Murgia ruled against them did they become aware that Judge Murgia's (identical twin) sister was the President and CEO of the National Council of La Raza (NCLR); they argued that accordingly, Judge Murgia must recuse herself. The court found that the motion was untimely, that the defendants had not shown any evidence of the court's bias, and that her sister's position was not enough to compel recusal. However, the court found that NCLR's "Stop the Hate" online campaign, which contains articles that are highly disparaging of these defendants and which takes a strong stand on disputed legal and factual matters in this case (and which contain pictures of the judge's identical twin sister) might lead the public to question Judge Murgia's impartiality, and that she should recuse herself in this close call. Melendres v. Arpaio, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65069, 2009 WL 2132693 (D. Ariz. July 15, 2009). The case was reassigned to Judge G. Murray Snow.

On August 13, 2009, Judge Snow denied the County's motion to stay proceedings pending DOJ investigations. Melendres v. Maricopa County, 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 75364, 2009 WL 2515618 (D. Ariz. Aug. 13, 2009). On October 13, 2009, the court approved a joint motion and stipulation of plaintiffs and defendant Maricopa County to dismiss Maricopa County without prejudice.

On December 23, 2011, the court issued an order denying summary judgment and sending the case to trial in large part. Based on the few statistic sheets that were available, the court held that the finder of fact may draw the following inferences from the statistic sheets that MCSO shredded: that they would have suggested officers involved in special operations did not follow a "zero tolerance" policy requiring them to stop all traffic offenders; that they would have included a significantly higher number of arrests in the categories "Illegal Alien turned over to ICE/LEAR" and/or "Suspected Illegal Alien arrested on state charges" than records documenting ordinary patrol activity. Based on the recovered emails, the court found that the finder of fact could draw the following inferences from emails that MCSO irretrievably purged: that MCSO maintained a file of citizen complaints making requests for special operations; that MCSO conducted operations in areas named in the complaints; and that at least some of the citizen communications complained about "Mexicans," "day laborers," or "illegal immigrants" but did not provide a description of any criminal activity. Melendres v. Arpaio, 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 148187 (D. Ariz. Dec. 23, 2011).

On the same day, December 23, 2011, the court certified the class of "all Latino persons who, since January 2007, have been or will be in the future, stopped, detained, questioned, or searched by MCSO agents while driving or sitting in a vehicle on a public roadway or parking area in Maricopa County, Arizona." The court also enjoined MCSO and its officers from detaining any person only because they believe or know that the person is unlawfully present in the United States. Ortega-Melendres v. Arpaio, 836 F. Supp. 2d 959 (D. Ariz. 2011). The Maricopa County Sheriff's Office filed an interlocutory appeal with the Ninth Circuit. Later, on September 25, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District court's order. De Jesus Ortega Melendres v. Arpaio, 695 F.3d 990 (9th Cir. Ariz. 2012).

In the meantime, the matter proceeded to a bench trial, held in July and August 2012. On May 24, 2013, Judge Snow issued a 142-page decision finding for the plaintiffs. The court found the plaintiffs entitled to injunctive relief to remedy the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment violations caused by the Sheriff's Office past and continuing operations, and entered a permanent injunction forbidding the MCSO from:
  • detaining, holding or arresting Latino occupants of vehicles in Maricopa County based on a reasonable belief, without more, that such persons are in the country without authorization;
  • following or enforcing its LEAR policy against any Latino occupant of a vehicle in Maricopa County;
  • using race or Latino ancestry as a factor in determining to stop any vehicle in Maricopa County with a Latino occupant;
  • using race or Latino ancestry as a factor in making law enforcement decisions with respect to whether any Latino occupant of a vehicle in Maricopa County may be in the country without authorization;
  • detaining Latino occupants of vehicles stopped for traffic violations for a period longer than reasonably necessary to resolve the traffic violation in the absence of reasonable suspicion that any of them have committed or are committing a violation of federal or state criminal law;
  • detaining, holding or arresting Latino occupants of a vehicle in Maricopa County for violations of the Arizona Human Smuggling Act without a reasonable basis for believing that, under all the circumstances, the necessary elements of the crime are present; and
  • detaining, arresting or holding persons based on a reasonable suspicion that they are conspiring with their employer to violate the Arizona Employer Sanctions Act.
  • The defendant appealed this decision, along with the denial of their initial motion to dismiss (Docket No. 13-16285).

    The parties negotiated a consent decree to ensure the Maricopa Sheriff's Office complied with the court's findings of facts for the plaintiffs. On October 2, 2013, after hearing the terms on which the parties could and could not agree, the court (Judge Snow) issued an order making the previous injunctions permanent and establishing the methods for compliance. The order required the Sheriff's Office to create a unit to aid in compliance and a system for identifying problematic behavior and provided for an independent monitor to ensure compliance. It further demanded that all of the Sheriff's policies and procedures conform to the US and AZ constitutions and laws, that the monitor review any of the Sheriff's immigration-related policies and practices, that all officers receive training on nondiscriminatory policing, that the Sheriffs create an accountable system for documenting traffic stops including dash-cam recording, that all complaints are brought forward and addressed, and that the Sheriffs get involved in the community to rebuild public trust.

    The Sheriffs appealed this order as well (Docket No. 13-17238), and it was consolidated with their previous appeal.

    On April 4, and October 10, 2014, the court issued orders amending the permanent injunction, giving the Monitor, rather than the Sheriff's Office, the community outreach responsibility to serve as a liaison between the public and the Sheriff's Office. The second of the orders amended the injunction to allow for body-mounted cameras as opposed to dash mounted cameras, for the purpose of recording traffic stops.

    On September 11, 2014, the court (Judge Snow) awarded attorneys' fees and costs to the plaintiffs, as the prevailing party in a civil rights case, totaling $4,439,241.66. The court retained jurisdiction of this action for all purposes until such time as the defendants have achieved full and effective Compliance and maintained such compliance for no less than three years.

    On February 12, 2015, Judge Snow entered an order for an evidentiary hearing to address whether MCSO committed contempt of the court. This order was in response to a 2013 video released of Sherriff Arpaio telling his officers to disregard the court's order requiring them to track the race and ethnicity of the individuals they stopped. Further videos were retrieved showing officers had detained people against the court's earlier orders and that these officers had been unlawfully taking detainees possessions.

    On April 15, 2015, Justice John Wallace for the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded Judge Snow's May 24, 2013 permanent injunction. He held that the the named plaintiffs were adequate class representatives and the district court had not abused its discretion. He found the requirement within the permanent injunction that monitors consider "disciplinary outcomes for any violation of department policy" and assess whether deputies should be subject to "civil suites or criminal charges for off-duty conduct" was overbroad. 784 F.3d 1254

    The United States moved to intervene based on the "general public importance" of the matter. Judge Snow granted the motion on August 13, 2015. The United States's intervenor complaint cited violations of 42 USC § 14141(b) and Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. It sought equitable and injunctive relief.

    On August 26, 2015, Judge Snow issued an order amending the supplemental permanent injunction. In response to the defendants' appeal of the initial supplemental permanent injunction, the Ninth Circuit affirmed all provisions except for those allowing the Monitor to consider MCSO's discipline for "any violations of department policy" and whether any deputies were repeatedly party to any "complaints, civil suits, or criminal charges, including for off-duty conduct." After the Ninth Circuit's ruling, Judge Snow narrowed the Monitor's considerations to only include violations pursuant to this particular case and injunction.

    Meanwhile, in a related case filed by the Department of Justice in 2012, Judge Silver for the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona, settled certain issues but required the DOJ to pursue further relief within this case. (PN-AZ-0001 in this Clearinghouse).

    The parties then litigated evidentiary issues for several months. On May 13, 2016, Judge Snow issued a Finding of Fact holding defendants in civil contempt of the court and setting a hearing date for May 31, 2016. 2016 WL 2783715. Based on the Finding of Fact, the court found that the defendants' had failed to implement the court's preliminary injunction, failed to disclose thousands of relevant discovery items, and deliberately violated court orders. These actions harmed the plaintiff class, impeded litigation, and led to a trial that did not adequately address plaintiffs' constitutional rights. Judge Snow therefore issued an amended supplemental permanent injunction on July 22, 2016. The Injunction required MCSO to investigate all allegations of employee misconduct related to the issues in this case; implement misconduct related training, develop a civilian complaint intake, implement transparency measures, and ensure document preservation and production. It further demanded that all policies, procedures, protocols, training materials, and other relevant materials remain subject to review and comment by the compliance Monitor implemented in the first supplemental permanent injunction. 2016 WL 3965949.

    In November 2016, Paul Penzone defeated Joe Arpaio in the Arizona election for Sheriff. On January 13, 2017, the court replaced Penzone as the named defendant for the case.

    Prior to the change in defendant, Judge Snow issued an order on August 19, 2016 referring Sheriff Arpaio to a randomly selected judge for criminal proceedings to determine whether he should be held in criminal contempt for:
  • Violation of the court's December 23, 2011, preliminary injunction;
  • failure to disclose all relevant materials for the investigation; and
  • his intentional failure to preserve and produce required records as directed in the court's April 23, 2015, order.
  • The criminal proceedings continued separately to this case.

    On July 31, 2017, District Judge Susan R. Bolton issued an order finding Sheriff Arpaio guilty of criminal contempt. 2017 WL 3268180. The court found that Judge Snow’s preliminary injunction was clear and spelled out that detaining persons past the time sufficient to conduct a criminal investigation was a violation of their Fourth Amendment rights and that Sheriff Arpaio had to cease the practice immediately. Further, the court found that Sheriff Arpaio had the requisite knowledge of the order and that, based on public statements demonstrating flagrant disregard for the order, he has willfully violated the preliminary injunction order. On August 14, 2017, Sheriff Arpaio filed a motion for a new trial, and/or that the verdict be vacated, arguing that he was wrongfully denied a trial by jury. On that same date, he also filed a motion for a judgment of acquittal. After President Trump issued an Executive grant of clemency to Joe Arpaio on August 28, 2017, he filed an additional motion to vacate the verdict. Subsequently, the court dismissed the first two motions with prejudice, reserving only the motion to vacate the verdict.

    On October 19, 2017, Judge Bolton denied Sheriff Arpaio's motion to vacate the verdict, insofar as it sought relief beyond dismissal with prejudice. 2017 WL 4839072. The court held that although the presidential pardon spared Sheriff Arpaio from any punishment that otherwise might have been imposed, it did not "revise the historical facts" of the case. Thus, the judgment of conviction was maintained. Sheriff Arpaio appealed this decision to the Ninth Circuit. On April 17, 2018, the Ninth Circuit issued an order appointing a special prosecutor to defend the district court’s decision. United States v. Arpaio, 887 F.3d 979 (9th Cir. 2018). The role of the “special prosecutor” under the order was limited to providing briefing and argument to the merits panel. A judge of the appeals court sua sponte called for a vote on whether to rehear en banc the order appointing a special prosecutor. Rehearing en banc was denied. On October 25, 2018, the Court stayed briefing in this case to allow the Solicitor General to consider whether to file certiorari in the Supreme Court of the United States. On January 1, 2019, the Solicitor General determined that the government would not seek certiorari in the Supreme Court and the appeals court reinstated a briefing schedule. Thus, the appeal in the contempt proceedings is still pending.

    Meanwhile, in the district court, the parties continued litigating over legal fees. Although they went to mediation, this was unsuccessful. On March 3, 2017, the Ninth Circuit ordered Maricopa County to pay $400,395.55 to the plaintiffs to cover legal fees. On March 1, 2018, the Ninth Circuit ordered that an employee of Maricopa County pay the plaintiffs $52,877.42 in additional attorneys' fees for work performed on a motion to dismiss the employee's appeal of the district court's order finding that he had committed civil contempt for violating the injunction.

    In 2017, the Monitor noted that MCSO had completed the delivery of misconduct investigations training. As of November 2018, the Monitor noted steady improvement in the quality of internal investigations, particularly since completion of the training.

    On May 24, 2018, MCSO published its Third Traffic Stop Annual Report. The Monitor noted issues with the underlying data due to a lack of quality control procedures with MCSO’s contracted vendor responsible for the various analyses. MCSO has since contracted with a new vendor. Despite the Monitor's concerns with the data, the Report found that the issue of racial differences in post-stop outcomes is systemic and cannot be attributed only to a small number of deputies. The Report did, however, identify several deputies which were outliers when compared to their geographic peers and MCSO is working to address those outliers.

    The Monitor continues to oversee the MCSO's compliance with the multiple supplemental injunctive relief orders entered. The plaintiffs have filed a supplemental motion for attorneys' fees incurred from June 1, 2016, through August 31, 2017, in the total amount of $1,237,192.10. The court has not yet ruled on this motion. The case is ongoing as of January 2019.

    Emily Goldman - 03/02/2013
    Benjamin St. Pierre - 11/20/2014
    Gabriela Hybel - 04/13/2017
    Eva Richardson - 01/25/2019


    compress summary

    - click to show/hide ALL -
    Issues and Causes of Action
    click to show/hide detail
    Issues
    Constitutional Clause
    Equal Protection
    Unreasonable search and seizure
    Content of Injunction
    Develop anti-discrimination policy
    Discrimination Prohibition
    Implement complaint/dispute resolution process
    Monitor/Master
    Monitoring
    Preliminary relief denied
    Provide antidiscrimination training
    Recordkeeping
    Reporting
    Defendant-type
    Jurisdiction-wide
    Law-enforcement
    Discrimination-basis
    National origin discrimination
    General
    Aggressive behavior
    Disparate Impact
    Disparate Treatment
    Excessive force
    Failure to discipline
    Failure to supervise
    Failure to train
    False arrest
    Language/ethnic/minority needs
    Loss or damage to property
    Over/Unlawful Detention
    Pattern or Practice
    Placement in detention facilities
    Racial profiling
    Records Disclosure
    Search policies
    Transportation
    Immigration/Border
    Constitutional rights
    Detention - procedures
    Undocumented immigrants - state and local regulation
    Language
    Spanish
    National Origin/Ethnicity
    Hispanic
    Plaintiff Type
    Private Plaintiff
    U.S. Dept of Justice plaintiff
    Type of Facility
    Government-run
    Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. § 14141
    42 U.S.C. § 1983
    Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201
    State law
    Title VI, Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000d et seq.
    Defendant(s) County of Maricopa
    Maricopa County Sherriff's Office
    Plaintiff Description All Latino persons who, since January 2007, have been or will be in the future, stopped, detained, questioned or searched by MCSO agents while driving or sitting in a vehicle on a public roadway or parking area in Maricopa County, Arizona.
    Indexed Lawyer Organizations ACLU Chapters (any)
    ACLU National (all projects)
    MALDEF
    U.S. Dept. of Justice Civil Rights Division
    Class action status sought Yes
    Class action status granted Yes
    Filed Pro Se No
    Prevailing Party Plaintiff
    Public Int. Lawyer Yes
    Nature of Relief Attorneys fees
    Damages
    Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
    Source of Relief Litigation
    Order Duration 2013 - n/a
    Filing Year 2007
    Case Ongoing Yes
    Case Listing PN-AZ-0001 : United States v. Maricopa County (D. Ariz.)
    Additional Resources
    click to show/hide detail
      See this case at CourtListener.com (May provide additional documents and, for active cases, real-time alerts)
      Data examining the Department of Justice's civil rights investigations of local and state police departments
    Marshall Project
    Date: Jan. 17, 2017
    By: Tom Meagher (Marshall Project)
    [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

      The Civil Rights Division’s Pattern and Practice Police Reform Work: 1994-Present
    https://www.justice.gov/
    Date: Jan. 4, 2017
    By: U.S. Department of Justice
    [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

      An Interactive Guide to the Civil Rights Division’s Police Reforms
    https://www.justice.gov/
    Date: Jan. 4, 2017
    By: U.S. Department of Justice Civil Rights Division (U.S. Department of Justice)
    [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

      What Happens When Police Are Forced to Reform?
    Date: Nov. 13, 2015
    By: Kimbriell Kelly, Sarah Childress and Steven Rich (Frontline/Post)
    Citation: Washington Post (Nov. 13, 2015)
    [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

      Federal Enforcement of Police Reform
    Date: 2014
    By: Stephen Rushin (University of Illinois College of Law, University of California, Berkeley - Jurisprudence and Social Policy Program Faculty)
    Citation: 82 Fordham Law Review 3189 (2014)
    [ Detail ] [ External Link ]

    Docket(s)
    2:07-cv-02513-GMS (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-9001.pdf | Detail
    Date: 04/06/2018
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    2:07−cv−02513 (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-9000.pdf | Detail
    Date: 02/08/2019
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    General Documents
    First Amended Complaint [ECF# 18]
    PN-AZ-0003-0030.pdf | Detail
    Date: 07/16/2008
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 25] (2008 WL 4174918) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0001.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
    Date: 09/05/2008
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint [ECF# 39]
    PN-AZ-0003-0036.pdf | Detail
    Date: 09/24/2008
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 36] (2008 WL 4446696) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0002.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
    Date: 09/29/2008
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Response in Opposition to Defendants' Rule 12(b)(6) Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' First Amended Complaint [ECF# 48]
    PN-AZ-0003-0037.pdf | Detail
    Date: 10/14/2008
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 60] (598 F.Supp.2d 1025) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0003.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
    Date: 02/10/2009
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 138] (2009 WL 2132693) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0004.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
    Date: 07/15/2009
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 147] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0035.pdf | Detail
    Date: 07/27/2009
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 154] (2009 WL 2515618) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0005.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
    Date: 08/13/2009
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 155] (2009 WL 2707241) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0006.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
    Date: 08/21/2009
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 194] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0007.pdf | Detail
    Date: 10/13/2009
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 208] (2009 WL 3489402) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0008.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
    Date: 10/28/2009
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 261] (2010 WL 582189) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0009.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
    Date: 02/11/2010
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 278] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0010.pdf | Detail
    Date: 03/01/2010
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 278] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0011.pdf | Detail
    Date: 03/01/2010
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 289] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0012.pdf | Detail
    Date: 03/22/2010
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 311] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0034.pdf | Detail
    Date: 06/04/2010
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Protective Order [ECF# 333] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0033.pdf | Detail
    Date: 08/05/2010
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 368] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0032.pdf | Detail
    Date: 10/01/2010
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 386] (2010 WL 4879148) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0013.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
    Date: 11/23/2010
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 392] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0031.pdf | Detail
    Date: 12/09/2010
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 409] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0014.pdf | Detail
    Date: 03/21/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 413]
    PN-AZ-0003-0038.pdf | Detail
    Date: 04/29/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Defendants' Statement of Fact in Support of their Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 413-1]
    PN-AZ-0003-0039.pdf | Detail
    Date: 04/29/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF# 413]
    PN-AZ-0003-0040.pdf | Detail
    Date: 04/29/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 448] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0016.pdf | Detail
    Date: 06/01/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Defendants' Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF# 452]
    PN-AZ-0003-0041.pdf | Detail
    Date: 06/03/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Defendants' Response to Plaintiffs' Statement of Facts in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment and Controverting Statement of Facts [ECF# 453]
    PN-AZ-0003-0042.pdf | Detail
    Date: 06/03/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Plaintiffs' Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 455]
    PN-AZ-0003-0043.pdf | Detail
    Date: 06/03/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Plaintiffs' Responses and Objections to Defendants' Statements of Fact and Supplemental Facts in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 456]
    PN-AZ-0003-0044.pdf | Detail
    Date: 06/03/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 461] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0015.pdf | Detail
    Date: 06/08/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Judgment on Attorneys' Fees [ECF# 462] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0018.pdf | Detail
    Date: 06/08/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Motion for Summary Judgment [ECF# 465]
    PN-AZ-0003-0045.pdf | Detail
    Date: 06/16/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    [Plaintiffs'] Reply Memorandum in Support of [Their] Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF# 466]
    PN-AZ-0003-0046.pdf | Detail
    Date: 06/23/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Plaintiffs' Responses to Defendants' Supplemental Statement of Facts and Reply to Defendants' Responses and Objections to Plaintiffs' Separate Statement of Facts in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [ECF# 467]
    PN-AZ-0003-0047.pdf | Detail
    Date: 06/23/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 482] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0017.pdf | Detail
    Date: 12/09/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 493] (2011 WL 6740709) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0020.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
    Date: 12/23/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 494] (836 F.Supp.2d 959) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0021.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
    Date: 12/23/2011
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Notice of Appeal (Interlocutory) [ECF# 500]
    PN-AZ-0003-0023.pdf | Detail
    Date: 01/13/2012
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    [Appeals court docketing notice] [Ct. of App. ECF# 503]
    PN-AZ-0003-0024.pdf | Detail
    Date: 01/17/2012
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order Setting Trial [ECF# 529] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0025.pdf | Detail
    Date: 03/23/2012
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Final Pretrial Order [ECF# 530] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0026.pdf | Detail
    Date: 03/23/2012
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 537] (2012 WL 2339528) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0022.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
    Date: 06/19/2012
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 542] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0048.pdf | Detail
    Date: 07/03/2012
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 566] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0027.pdf | Detail
    Date: 08/13/2012
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 567] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0029.pdf | Detail
    Date: 08/15/2012
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Opinion [Ct. of App. ECF# 578-1] (695 F.3d 990)
    PN-AZ-0003-0028.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
    Date: 09/13/2012
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law [ECF# 579] (989 F.Supp.2d 822) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0049.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
    Date: 05/24/2013
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Statement of Interest by the United States [ECF# 580]
    PN-AZ-0003-0055.pdf | External Link | Detail
    Date: 06/13/2013
    Source: U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, Special Litigation Section
    Supplemental Permanent Injunction/Judgment Order [ECF# 606] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0050.pdf | Detail
    Date: 10/02/2013
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order Appointing Monitor [ECF# 649] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0051.pdf | Detail
    Date: 01/17/2014
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Amendments to the Supplemental Permanent Injunction/Judgment Order [ECF# 670] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0052.pdf | Detail
    Date: 04/04/2014
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order Granting Motion for Attorney fees [ECF# 742] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0053.pdf | Detail
    Date: 09/11/2014
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    First Quarterly Report [ECF# 744]
    PN-AZ-0003-0066.pdf | Detail
    Date: 09/18/2014
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order Granting Stipulation to Amend Supplemental/permanent Injunction/Judgment Order [ECF# 748] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0054.pdf | Detail
    Date: 10/10/2014
    Second Quarterly Report [ECF# 834]
    PN-AZ-0003-0067.pdf | Detail
    Date: 12/15/2014
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order to Show Cause [ECF# 880] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0057.pdf | Detail
    Date: 02/12/2015
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Opinion [Ct. of App. ECF# 69-1] (784 F.3d 1254)
    PN-AZ-0003-0065.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
    Date: 04/15/2015
    Source: ACLU
    Third Report [ECF# 1010]
    PN-AZ-0003-0068.pdf | Detail
    Date: 04/16/2015
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Fourth Report [ECF# 1170]
    PN-AZ-0003-0069.pdf | Detail
    Date: 07/14/2015
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 1239] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0058.pdf | Detail
    Date: 08/13/2015
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order Amending Supplemental Permanent Injunction/Judgment Order [ECF# 1270] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0059.pdf | Detail
    Date: 08/26/2015
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Complaint in Intervention [ECF# 1277]
    PN-AZ-0003-0060.pdf | Detail
    Date: 08/31/2015
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Fifth Report [ECF# 1474]
    PN-AZ-0003-0070.pdf | Detail
    Date: 10/16/2015
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Findings of Facts and Order Setting a Hearing [ECF# 1677] (2016 WL 2783715) (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0064.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
    Date: 05/13/2016
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Eighth Report [ECF# 1759]
    PN-AZ-0003-0071.pdf | Detail
    Date: 07/21/2016
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Amended Second Supplemental Permanent Injunction/Judgement Order [ECF# 1760] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0061.pdf | Detail
    Date: 07/22/2016
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Second Amended Second Supplemental Permanent Injunction/Judgement Order [ECF# 1765] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0062.pdf | Detail
    Date: 07/26/2016
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order Re Criminal Contempt [ECF# 1792] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0063.pdf | Detail
    Date: 08/19/2016
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Ninth Report [ECF# 1858]
    PN-AZ-0003-0072.pdf | Detail
    Date: 10/28/2016
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Tenth Report [ECF# 1943]
    PN-AZ-0003-0073.pdf | Detail
    Date: 02/10/2017
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [Ct. of App. ECF# 1968]
    PN-AZ-0003-0074.pdf | Detail
    Date: 03/03/2017
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Eleventh Report [ECF# 2028]
    PN-AZ-0003-0075.pdf | Detail
    Date: 05/05/2017
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Twelfth Report [ECF# 2097]
    PN-AZ-0003-0076.pdf | Detail
    Date: 07/28/2017
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Findings of Fact and Conclusion of law [ECF# 210] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0083.pdf | Detail
    Date: 07/31/2017
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [ECF# 251] (D. Ariz.)
    PN-AZ-0003-0084.pdf | Detail
    Date: 10/19/2017
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Thirteenth Report [ECF# 2167]
    PN-AZ-0003-0077.pdf | Detail
    Date: 11/20/2017
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Fourteenth Report [ECF# 2218]
    PN-AZ-0003-0078.pdf | Detail
    Date: 02/13/2018
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [Ct. of App. ECF# 2236]
    PN-AZ-0003-0079.pdf | Detail
    Date: 03/01/2018
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [Ct. of App. ECF# 25]
    PN-AZ-0003-0085.pdf | Detail
    Date: 04/17/2018
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Fifteenth Report [ECF# 2279]
    PN-AZ-0003-0080.pdf | Detail
    Date: 05/07/2018
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Sixteenth Report [ECF# 2302]
    PN-AZ-0003-0081.pdf | Detail
    Date: 08/06/2018
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Order [Ct. of App. ECF# 41]
    PN-AZ-0003-0086.pdf | Detail
    Date: 10/10/2018
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    Seventeenth Report [ECF# 2335]
    PN-AZ-0003-0082.pdf | Detail
    Date: 11/05/2018
    Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
    show all people docs
    Judges Berzon, Marsha Siegel (Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0028 | PN-AZ-0003-0030 | PN-AZ-0003-0065
    Bolton, Susan Ritchie (D. Ariz.) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0083 | PN-AZ-0003-0084 | PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Graber, Susan (Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0028 | PN-AZ-0003-0065
    Murguia, Mary Helen (D. Ariz., Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0001 | PN-AZ-0003-0002 | PN-AZ-0003-0003 | PN-AZ-0003-0004
    Snow, G. Murray (State Appellate Court, D. Ariz.) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0005 | PN-AZ-0003-0006 | PN-AZ-0003-0007 | PN-AZ-0003-0008 | PN-AZ-0003-0009 | PN-AZ-0003-0010 | PN-AZ-0003-0011 | PN-AZ-0003-0012 | PN-AZ-0003-0013 | PN-AZ-0003-0014 | PN-AZ-0003-0015 | PN-AZ-0003-0016 | PN-AZ-0003-0017 | PN-AZ-0003-0020 | PN-AZ-0003-0021 | PN-AZ-0003-0022 | PN-AZ-0003-0025 | PN-AZ-0003-0026 | PN-AZ-0003-0027 | PN-AZ-0003-0029 | PN-AZ-0003-0031 | PN-AZ-0003-0032 | PN-AZ-0003-0033 | PN-AZ-0003-0034 | PN-AZ-0003-0035 | PN-AZ-0003-0048 | PN-AZ-0003-0049 | PN-AZ-0003-0050 | PN-AZ-0003-0051 | PN-AZ-0003-0052 | PN-AZ-0003-0053 | PN-AZ-0003-0054 | PN-AZ-0003-0057 | PN-AZ-0003-0058 | PN-AZ-0003-0059 | PN-AZ-0003-0061 | PN-AZ-0003-0062 | PN-AZ-0003-0063 | PN-AZ-0003-0064 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Tallman, Richard C. (FISCR, Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0085 | PN-AZ-0003-0086
    Tashima, Atsushi Wallace (C.D. Cal., Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0086
    Wallace, John Clifford (S.D. Cal., Ninth Circuit) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0028 | PN-AZ-0003-0065
    Monitors/Masters Warshaw, Robert S. (New Hampshire) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0066 | PN-AZ-0003-0067 | PN-AZ-0003-0068 | PN-AZ-0003-0069 | PN-AZ-0003-0070 | PN-AZ-0003-0071 | PN-AZ-0003-0072 | PN-AZ-0003-0073 | PN-AZ-0003-0075 | PN-AZ-0003-0076 | PN-AZ-0003-0077 | PN-AZ-0003-0078 | PN-AZ-0003-0080 | PN-AZ-0003-0081 | PN-AZ-0003-0082
    Plaintiff's Lawyers Albarran, Tammy (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0040 | PN-AZ-0003-0043 | PN-AZ-0003-0046 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Bendor, Joshua David R. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Bodney, David Jeremy (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0037 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Brody, Kathleen E. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Byrnes, Andrew Carl (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0040 | PN-AZ-0003-0043 | PN-AZ-0003-0046 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Byun, Hyun Sik (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Campbell, Kristina Michelle (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0030 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Caspar, Edward G. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0055 | PN-AZ-0003-0060 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Castillo, Jorge Martin (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Cataldo, Simon Joseph (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Chanin, James B. (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Cheema, Puneet (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0060 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Chien, Stephen C. (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Cincotta, Caroline (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Coe, Cynthia (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Dodson, Priscilla G. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Flood, Kelly Joyce (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Furnish, Brenda Munoz (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Gallagher, Lesli Rawles (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0040 | PN-AZ-0003-0043 | PN-AZ-0003-0046 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Goldfaden, Robin Lisa (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0030 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Gomez Hernandez, Julia Alejandra (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Hartman-Tellez, Karen J. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0030 | PN-AZ-0003-0037 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Hernandez, Isaac Pasaret (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0030 | PN-AZ-0003-0037 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Hickey, Kevin Joseph (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0040 | PN-AZ-0003-0043 | PN-AZ-0003-0046 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Huddleston, Kathryn Lynn (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Hults, David (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Jacobs, Rebecca Ariel (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Johnston, Maureen (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Kappelhoff, Mark (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0060
    Keller, John Dixon (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Killebrew, Paul (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0055 | PN-AZ-0003-0060 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Kozinets, Peter Shawn (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0030 | PN-AZ-0003-0037 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Lai, Anne (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0040 | PN-AZ-0003-0043 | PN-AZ-0003-0046 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Limon, Gladys (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Lockwood, Aaron James (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Lyall, James Duff (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Moffa, Luis R. Jr. (New Jersey) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Mondino, Jennifer L. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0055 | PN-AZ-0003-0060 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Morin, Michelle L. (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Mygatt, Timothy D (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0060 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    O'Gara, Rosaleen Tobin (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Pace, Julie A. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Pedley, Lauren Elizabeth (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Pochoda, Daniel Joseph (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0030 | PN-AZ-0003-0040 | PN-AZ-0003-0043 | PN-AZ-0003-0046 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Preston, Judith C. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0060
    Ramirez, Nancy A. (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0030 | PN-AZ-0003-0040 | PN-AZ-0003-0046 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Ramírez, Mónica M. (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0030 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Sadasivan, Bhanu K. (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Salgado, Victor R (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Segura, Andre Ivan (New York) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Steilen, Matthew James (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0040 | PN-AZ-0003-0043 | PN-AZ-0003-0046 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Vidutis, Nida (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Wang, Cecillia D (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0040 | PN-AZ-0003-0043 | PN-AZ-0003-0046 | PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Young, Stanley (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0040 | PN-AZ-0003-0043 | PN-AZ-0003-0044 | PN-AZ-0003-0046 | PN-AZ-0003-0047 | PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Defendant's Lawyers Ackerman, Justin Michael (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Brandon, Maria R. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0038 | PN-AZ-0003-0042 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Casey, Timothy James (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0023 | PN-AZ-0003-0036 | PN-AZ-0003-0038 | PN-AZ-0003-0039 | PN-AZ-0003-0041 | PN-AZ-0003-0042 | PN-AZ-0003-0045 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Cooper, Charles Justin (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Danneman, Dale A (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Dowell, Leigh Eric (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Elston, Diana Jean (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Fry, John Michael (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Garner, Deborah L. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    GilBride, Eileen Dennis (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Goldman, Mark David (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Hartsig, Charitie L. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Hillbo, Alec R. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Iafrate, Michele Marie (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Jirauch, Charles W. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Kirk, Michael W. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Liddy, Thomas P (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0038 | PN-AZ-0003-0042 | PN-AZ-0003-0045 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Martin, Kerry Scott (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Masterson, John T. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Mathis, Casson N. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0036
    Mayr, Vincent Rene (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    McDonald, Andrew Melvin Jr. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Metcalf, Drew (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Mitchell, Barry D. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Moberly, Michael D. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Popolizio, Joseph John (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Reeves, Harold S. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Schwab, Douglas Arthur (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Selden, David A. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Stack, Thomas George (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Stein, Lee David (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Surdakowski, Jeffrey Sinclair (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Tivorsak, Linda Kim (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Uglietta, Ann Thompson (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Walker, Richard K (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Wilenchik, Dennis Ira (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Wilenchik, John Douglas (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Williams, James Lawrence (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Other Lawyers Aftergut, Dennis (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Aminfar, Amin (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Austin, Roy L. (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0055
    Bassin, Ian (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Bowman, Locke E. III (Illinois) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Cabou, Jean-Jacques (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Fein, Ronald A (Massachusetts) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Florence, Justin (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Gayle, Winsome (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000 | PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Hammond, Larry A. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Harwood, Ann Elizabeth (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Jung, Je Yon (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    May, Katherine Elizabeth (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Perez, Sergio (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0055
    Piccarreta, Michael L (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Renne, Louise H. (California) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Scharff, Spencer Garrett (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Shapiro, David M. (Illinois) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Smith, Jonathan Mark (District of Columbia) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-0055
    Spector, Phil (Massachusetts) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001
    Strange, Elizabeth A. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9000
    Swindle, Shane R. (Arizona) show/hide docs
    PN-AZ-0003-9001

    - click to show/hide ALL -

    new search
    page permalink

    - top of page -