Case: In re Crawford

10-05298 | California state trial court

Filed Date: 2010

Closed Date: Sept. 24, 2012

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On February 25, 2011, the plaintiff, a prisoner in the Pelican Bay State Prison, filed a habeas corpus petition in the California Superior Court of Del Norte County. He alleged that the prison had violated his First Amendment rights by confiscating a letter about political prisoners in California prisons he attempted to send to a San Francisco newspaper. A prison official who was responsible for monitoring the mail intercepted the letter and determined that it promoted gang activity and was the…

On February 25, 2011, the plaintiff, a prisoner in the Pelican Bay State Prison, filed a habeas corpus petition in the California Superior Court of Del Norte County. He alleged that the prison had violated his First Amendment rights by confiscating a letter about political prisoners in California prisons he attempted to send to a San Francisco newspaper. A prison official who was responsible for monitoring the mail intercepted the letter and determined that it promoted gang activity and was therefore contraband. The official who confiscated the letter testified that he believed that the letter contained coded messages for gang members. The plaintiff, however, claimed that his letter was purely political, and argued that the confiscation of the letter did not “further the penological interests of prison security” but instead was an unconstitutional violation of his First Amendment rights.

The plaintiff first filed a grievance with the prison authorities. The warden refused to release the letter, so the plaintiff sought a Director’s Level Appeal Decision. The director affirmed the confiscation decision. After that, the plaintiff filed a pro se habeas petition in superior court. The case was assigned to Judge Robert Weir, who summarily denied the petition. The prisoner then filed a new petition in the court of appeals (No. A131276).

On May 4, 2011, the appellate court ordered the warden to show cause for the confiscation and, in the interim, ordered that the plaintiff should have a lawyer assigned.

Oral argument was set for May 16, 2012, and on June 4, 2012, the appellate court granted the plaintiff’s habeas petition, ordering the prison to return the letter. 2016 Cal. App. 4th 1259. The defendant appealed to the California Supreme Court, but the appeal was denied on August 19, 2012, and the case was marked closed on August 24.

Summary Authors

Elizabeth Helpling (3/12/2020)

People


Judge(s)

Lambden, James R. (California)

Judge(s)

Lambden, James R. (California)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

No. HCPB 10-5298

A131276

[Opinion granting relief]

California state appellate court

June 4, 2012

June 4, 2012

Order/Opinion

206 Cal.App.4th 206

Docket

Last updated March 31, 2024, 3:17 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: California

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: 2010

Closing Date: Sept. 24, 2012

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Prisoner at the Pelican Bay State Prison who had a letter confiscated by prison officials

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Warden of the Pelican Bay State Prison (Del Norte), State

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Case Details

Causes of Action:

State law

Constitutional Clause(s):

Freedom of speech/association

Special Case Type(s):

Habeas

Available Documents:

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Habeas relief

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Issues

Type of Facility:

Government-run