University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Henry IM-OK-0003
Docket / Court 08-109 ( W.D. Okla. )
State/Territory Oklahoma
Case Type(s) Immigration
Case Summary
On February 1, 2008, national, state and local chambers of commerce and other nonprofit organizations advocating for their members' business interests filed a lawsuit against the State of Oklahoma in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma under the supremacy clause of the ... read more >
On February 1, 2008, national, state and local chambers of commerce and other nonprofit organizations advocating for their members' business interests filed a lawsuit against the State of Oklahoma in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Oklahoma under the supremacy clause of the federal constitution. The plaintiffs, represented by private and public interest council, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, claiming that parts of the Oklahoma Taxpayer and Citizen Protection Act were preempted by federal legislation. Specifically, the plaintiffs claimed that Sections 7 and 9 of that act, which impose tax penalties on businesses that don't check the work eligibility of all of their employees in a federal database and allow discharged employees to bring discrimination suits against their employers for employing unauthorized workers, were preempted by the federal Immigration Reform and Control Act.

Plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction on the same day that they filed their complaint, and defendants moved to dismiss the claim on February 20, 2008. On June 4, 2008, the Court (Judge Robin J. Cauthron) ruled on both motions, denying the motion to dismiss and granting the preliminary injunction. Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. Henry, No. CIV-08-109-C, 2008 WL 2329164 (W.D. Okla. June 4, 2008).

The defendants appealed to the Tenth Circuit, and on February 2, 2010, the Court of Appeals (Judge Harris L. Hartz, Judge Paul Joseph Kelly, Jr., and Judge Carlos F. Lucero) affirmed the District Court's grant of a preliminary injunction barring the discrimination lawsuit provisions and the tax penalty provisions from taking effect, but reversed the grant of injunction as to the verification requirement. Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. Edmondson, 594 F.3d 742 (10th Cir. 2010).

The case was remanded to the District Court. In June of 2010, the court granted a continuance of the case pending the Supreme Court's decision in Chamber of Commerce of the United States v. Whiting (IM-AZ-0013). On May 26, 2011, the Supreme Court (Justice Samuel A. Alito) issued its opinion, holding that federal law does not preempt an Arizona law that requires businesses to verify employees' work eligibility and allows the state to revoke the business licenses of employers who knowingly hire unauthorized workers. Chamber of Commerce of the U.S. v. Whiting, 131 S. Ct. 1968 (2011).

On June 23, 2011, the District Court (Judge Cauthron) granted another continuance to allow the parties to assess the impact of Whiting on their positions.

On December 19th, 2012, the court entered the final judgment. Section 7(b) remained good law, which require persons to contract with the State to use the employment authorization system. However, section 7(c), which creates a cause of action for discrimination against employers who terminate an authorized employee while retaining an unauthorized employee and section 9, which requires businesses to verify individual independent contractors’ authorization status and creates a withholding for work performed by individual independent contractors, were both struck down. Oklahoma is permanently enjoined from enforcing these provisions.

The court ordered all parties to bear their own fees and costs in this matter.

Christopher Schad - 06/01/2012
Sihang Zhang - 11/02/2016


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Federalism
Content of Injunction
Preliminary relief granted
Immigration
Employment
Undocumented immigrants - state and local regulation
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Immigration Reform and Control Act of 1986 (IRCA)
Defendant(s) The State of Oklahoma
The State of Oklahoma
Plaintiff Description Nationwide, state and local chambers of commerce and other associations advocating for their members' business interests
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party None Yet / None
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Source of Relief Litigation
Case Ongoing Yes
Docket(s)
(W.D. Okla.)
IM-OK-0003-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/19/2012
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Complaint [ECF# 1] (2008 WL 8224693)
IM-OK-0003-0001.pdf | WESTLAW | External Link | Detail
Date: 02/01/2008
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Motion to Dismiss Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief [ECF# 25] (2008 WL 8224694)
IM-OK-0003-0002.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 02/20/2008
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Memorandum Opinion and Order [ECF# 59] (2008 WL 2329164) (W.D. Okla.)
IM-OK-0003-0006.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 06/04/2008
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order of Injunction [ECF# 60] (W.D. Okla.)
IM-OK-0003-0003.pdf | Detail
Date: 06/04/2008
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Consolidated Brief of Plaintiffs/Appellees (2008 WL 4735384)
IM-OK-0003-0004.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 10/14/2008
Source: Westlaw
Opinion (Tenth Circuit) (594 F.3d 742)
IM-OK-0003-0005.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 02/02/2010
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Decree for Permanent Prospective Injunctive Relief [ECF# 114] (W.D. Okla.)
IM-OK-0003-0007.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/19/2012
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judgment [ECF# 115] (W.D. Okla.)
IM-OK-0003-0008.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/19/2012
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Cauthron, Robin J. (W.D. Okla.)
IM-OK-0003-0003 | IM-OK-0003-0006 | IM-OK-0003-0007 | IM-OK-0003-0008 | IM-OK-0003-9000
Hartz, Harris L. (Tenth Circuit)
IM-OK-0003-0005
Kelly, Paul Joseph Jr. (Tenth Circuit)
IM-OK-0003-0005
Lucero, Carlos F. (Tenth Circuit)
IM-OK-0003-0005
Plaintiff's Lawyers Berenson, Bradford Allan (District of Columbia)
IM-OK-0003-0001 | IM-OK-0003-9000
Nelson, Brian E (District of Columbia)
IM-OK-0003-0004
Parker, Robert Alton (District of Columbia)
IM-OK-0003-0001 | IM-OK-0003-0004 | IM-OK-0003-9000
Phillips, Carter G (District of Columbia)
IM-OK-0003-0001 | IM-OK-0003-0004 | IM-OK-0003-9000
Ryan, Patrick M. (Oklahoma)
IM-OK-0003-0001 | IM-OK-0003-9000
Shumsky, Eric A. (District of Columbia)
IM-OK-0003-0001 | IM-OK-0003-0004 | IM-OK-0003-9000
Sorenson, Quin M (District of Columbia)
IM-OK-0003-9000
Webber, Daniel G Jr (Oklahoma)
IM-OK-0003-0001 | IM-OK-0003-9000
Whaley, Phillip G. (Oklahoma)
IM-OK-0003-0001 | IM-OK-0003-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Bass, Kathryn L. (Oklahoma)
IM-OK-0003-9000
Hurst, Guy Lee (Oklahoma)
IM-OK-0003-9000
Jones, Kindanne C. (Oklahoma)
IM-OK-0003-9000
McClure, Kevin Lynn (Oklahoma)
IM-OK-0003-0002 | IM-OK-0003-9000
McFarland, Sean R. (Oklahoma)
IM-OK-0003-9000
Patton, Larry D. (Oklahoma)
IM-OK-0003-9000
Rinehart, Sandra D. (Oklahoma)
IM-OK-0003-0002 | IM-OK-0003-9000
Weitman, M. Daniel (Oklahoma)
IM-OK-0003-0002 | IM-OK-0003-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -