University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Oster v. Wagner DR-CA-0027
Docket / Court 4:09-cv-4668 ( N.D. Cal. )
Additional Docket(s) 12-15366  [ 12-15366 ]  Federal Court of Appeals
09–17581  [ 09-17581 ]  Federal Court of Appeals
State/Territory California
Case Type(s) Disability Rights-Pub. Accom.
Public Benefits / Government Services
Special Collection Olmstead Cases
Attorney Organization Legal Services/Legal Aid
NDRN/Protection & Advocacy Organizations
Case Summary
On October 1, 2009, several disabled individuals requiring in-home support services filed this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the California Department of Health Care Services and California Department of Social Services. The plaintiffs ... read more >
On October 1, 2009, several disabled individuals requiring in-home support services filed this class action in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California against the California Department of Health Care Services and California Department of Social Services. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants' proposed budget cuts would threaten their ability to remain in the least restrictive settings appropriate, which would have violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, the Medicaid Act, Title XIX of the Social Security Act, the Rehabilitation Act, and the Medicaid Maintenance of Effort Clause of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. They raised these allegations under Fourteenth Amendment Due Process. Represented by attorneys from Disability Rights California and private counsel, the plaintiffs sought injunctive and declaratory relief. The case was originally assigned to Magistrate Judge Joseph C. Spero and then reassigned to Judge Claudia Wilken.

Due to budget cuts, the defendants planned on cutting funds for In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS). The IHSS program enabled aged, blind, and disabled poor to avoid institutionalization because they could remain in their homes with proper supportive services. Seniors with disabilities utilized IHSS services to avoid living in more costly nursing homes. But the defendants had scheduled the statewide budget cuts to occur on November 1, 2009. These cuts to programs would cause immediate and irreparable harm to over 130,000 people with disabilities, according to the plaintiffs, by depriving them of services that would keep them in the least restrictive setting appropriate, putting them at risk of unnecessary institutionalization. The plaintiffs claimed that because of these consequences, the cuts violated the Americans with Disabilities Act under the 1999 Supreme Court precedent, Olmstead v. L.C.

In the first month of this case, the plaintiffs addressed the defendants’ plans to mail notices that IHSS benefits had been reduced or terminated. The plaintiffs filed several motions for temporary restraining orders and preliminary injunctions. The plaintiffs claimed that the defendants failed to provide adequate notice and opportunity to be heard prior to depriving the plaintiffs of necessary IHSS services, thus violating due process, as well as the Medicaid Act's notice and hearing provisions. Separate injunctions to halt mailing of these notices were granted on October 14 and October 23. The judge ruled that California could not proceed with cutting funding that would so greatly affect a large number of people with disabilities in California. On October 23, 2009, the Court prohibited the defendants from delaying benefits payments to IHSS providers, even if the defendants had planned on terminating their eligibility. The defendants appealed the order to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (09-17581). The case was deferred pending the United States Supreme Court’s decision in the consolidated appeals of several other cases in the Ninth Circuit, all of which also involved beneficiaries seeking to enjoin the California Department of Health Care Services from implementing state legislation reducing payments to certain medical service providers. (Maxwell-Jolly v. Indep. Living Ctr., 572 F.3D 644; Maxwell-Jolly v. Calif. Pharmacists Ass'n, 2010 WL 737650; Maxwell-Jolly v. Santa Rose Mem. Hosp., 2010 WL 2124276; certiorari granted, 2011 WL 134272). 504 Fed.Appx. 555.

On January 5, 2010, the plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint adding another individual plaintiff. The defendants filed a motion to dismiss on February 2, claiming that the plaintiffs lacked standing to bring the action, that several of their claims for relief failed to state a claim upon which relief could be granted, and that their claim for damages was barred by Eleventh Amendment state immunity. On April 23, 2010, the parties stipulated to stay all district court proceedings pending the resolution of the defendants’ appeal of the injunction.

While the preliminary injunction was in place pending the outcome of the appeal, the California legislature re-wrote the applicable statutes to modify the IHSS coverage formula. Signed by the Governor on June 30, 2011, SB 73 aimed to reduce all IHSS hours by 20%. The new regime would contain a number of exemptions and provide recipients with an opportunity to request additional service hours in light of the across-the-board reductions. SB 73 was set to take effect on January 1, 2012.

On December 1, 2011, the plaintiffs filed a new motion for a temporary restraining order and preliminary injunction in light of the legislation. They also amended their complaint to add four more plaintiffs and remove one of the original plaintiffs, and submitted a motion to certify the class. The judge granted the TRO, which the defendants again appealed to the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals (12-15366) on February 22, 2012. On March 2, 2012, the judge granted the injunction to enjoin implementation of SB 73. The court also certified a class of "all recipients of IHSS in the State of California whose IHSS services will be limited, cut, or terminated due to the budget cuts, and all applicants to IHSS in the State of California who would have been eligible for IHSS services but who are either not eligible, or are eligible for fewer services, as a result of the budget cuts."

In the meantime, the United States submitted a statement of interest because the litigation implicated the proper interpretation and application the ADA's integration mandate under Title II.

On January 7, 2013, the defendants’ first appeal to the Ninth Circuit (09-17581) was dismissed and remanded back to the district court. The court held that the claim was moot—it no longer presented a "live controversy" amenable to federal court adjudication because it could no longer grant effective relief in light of California's suspension statute.

In March 2013, the parties submitted a joint status report with a proposed class action settlement, which was approved on May 23, 2013. The settlement prevented the planned permanent 20% cut and replaced it with smaller temporary reductions. Following the California legislature's action on these changes, the parties moved jointly on August 7, 2013 to dismiss the case and pending appeals, including a second appeal to the Ninth Circuit (12-15366). In an order filed September 3, 2014, Judge Wilken approved a modification to the settlement agreement submitted by both parties: they agreed to cooperate on legislation that would authorize an assessment of home care services as well as subsequent submission of the assessment to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) for approval. We do not have information about how CMS proceeded on the assessment. The parties agreed that the district court would retain jurisdiction for 30 months after the date of CMS approval or disapproval of the assessment. The parties agreed to return to the district court if there were problems with this process. The 2015 California state budget, SB 97, eliminated the remaining 7% cut to IHSS services from July 1, 2015 to June 30, 2016.

There was no further activity in the court after the September 3, 2014 order and the case is now closed.

Beth Kurtz - 04/12/2013
Kate Craddock - 10/29/2015
Esther Vinarov - 11/08/2018


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Benefit Source
Medicaid
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Content of Injunction
Preliminary relief granted
Reasonable Accommodation
Defendant-type
Hospital/Health Department
Jurisdiction-wide
Disability
disability, unspecified
Integrated setting
Least restrictive environment
Discrimination-basis
Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)
General
Classification / placement
Deinstitutionalization/decarceration
Discharge & termination plans
Payment for care
Public benefits (includes, e.g., in-state tuition, govt. jobs)
Reasonable Accommodations
Staff (number, training, qualifications, wages)
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 12111 et seq.
Section 504 (Rehabilitation Act), 29 U.S.C. § 701
State law
Title XIX of the Social Security (Medicaid) Act, 42 U.S.C §1396
Defendant(s) California Department of Social Services, California Department of Health Care Services
Plaintiff Description Over 130,000 low-income seniors and other people with disabilities in California, threatened with the loss of critical In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) that enable them to remain safely in their homes.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations Legal Services/Legal Aid
NDRN/Protection & Advocacy Organizations
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted Yes
Filed Pro Se No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Litigation
Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration 2009 - 2015
Filing Year 2009
Case Closing Year 2014
Case Ongoing No
Case Listing DR-CA-0031 : Dominguez v. Schwarzenegger (N.D. Cal.)
Docket(s)
4:09-cv-4668 (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/03/2014
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF [ECF# 1]
DR-CA-0027-0030.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/01/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF [ECF# 16]
DR-CA-0027-0006.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/05/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Amended Class Action Complaint for Injunctive and Declaratory Relief [ECF# 17]
DR-CA-0027-0001.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/05/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
PLAINTIFFS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT [ECF# 20]
DR-CA-0027-0007.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/05/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF OCTOBER 14, 2009 ORDER GRANTING EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [ECF# 169]
DR-CA-0027-0008.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/05/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
PLAINTIFFS’ OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’ ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 7-11 TO CONDUCT LIMITED DISCOVERY OF NAMED PLAINTIFFS [ECF# 92]
DR-CA-0027-0009.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/06/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
ORDER (1) GRANTING MOTION TO HEAR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION MOTION ON SHORTENED TIME; (2) SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE; AND (3) DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR EXPEDITED DISCOVERY [ECF# 94] (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0010.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/06/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF OCTOBER 7, 2009 ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE [ECF# 105]
DR-CA-0027-0011.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/07/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
ORDER DENYING CALIFORNIA STATE DEFENDANTS’ REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF OCTOBER 7, 2009 ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND HEARING DATE [ECF# 110] (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0012.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/09/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
DEFENDANTS’ OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER AND/OR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [ECF# 112]
DR-CA-0027-0013.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/13/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
EMERGENCY EX PARTE APPLICATION FOR A TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [ECF# 125]
DR-CA-0027-0014.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/14/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
ORDER GRANTING EMERGENCY TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER [ECF# 128] (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0005.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/14/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
REPLY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [ECF# 158]
DR-CA-0027-0015.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/15/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Minute Order [ECF# 181] (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0004.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/19/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 182]
DR-CA-0027-0003.pdf | Detail
Date: 10/19/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR A PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION [ECF# 198] (669 F.Supp.2d 1106) (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0002.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 10/23/2009
Source: Plaintiffs' counsel
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT SANCTIONS OR IN THE ALTERNATIVE FOR A FURTHER PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT [ECF# 206]
DR-CA-0027-0018.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/10/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
COURT TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS FROM NOVEMBER 19TH, 2009 [ECF# 238]
DR-CA-0027-0021.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/19/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
ORDER GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CIVIL CONTEMPT SANCTIONS AND ENFORCING INJUNCTION [ECF# 248] (2009 WL 4282079) (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0031.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 11/25/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
ORDER ON SUPPLEMENTAL NOTICE TO COUNTIES RE: PROVIDER TIME-CARDS FOR HOURS WORKED IN NOVEMBER, 2009 [ECF# 257] (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0019.pdf | Detail
Date: 11/30/2009
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
SECOND AMENDED CLASS ACTION COMPLAINT FOR INJUNCTIVE AND DECLARATORY RELIEF [ECF# 280]
DR-CA-0027-0017.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/05/2010
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
DEFENDANTS’ NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION TO DISMISS PORTIONS OF PLAINTIFFS’ SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT; MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES IN SUPPORT THEREOF [ECF# 289]
DR-CA-0027-0020.pdf | Detail
Date: 02/02/2010
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Ex Parte Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue [ECF# 328]
DR-CA-0027-0022.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/01/2011
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting Application for Temporary Restraining Order and Order to Show Cause Why a Preliminary Injunction Should Not Issue [ECF# 330] (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0023.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/01/2011
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Notice of Motion and Motion for Class Certification; Memorandum of Points and Authorities in Support [ECF# 356]
DR-CA-0027-0024.pdf | Detail
Date: 12/01/2011
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Statement of Interest of the United States of America [ECF# 449]
DR-CA-0027-0025.pdf | Detail
Date: 01/09/2012
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification [ECF# 505] (2012 WL 685808) (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0026.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 03/02/2012
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting Plaintiffs' Request for a Preliminary Injunction [ECF# 506] (2012 WL 691833) (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0027.pdf | WESTLAW | Detail
Date: 03/02/2012
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Notice of Motion and Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement Agreement, and for Order Directing Notice to the Class and Scheduling a Fairness Hearing [ECF# 526]
DR-CA-0027-0029.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/28/2013
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement Agreement, Directing Notice to the Class, and Setting a Schedule and Fairness Hearing [ECF# 530] (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0028.pdf | Detail
Date: 04/04/2013
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Granting Final Approval of Class Settlement [ECF# 536] (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0033.pdf | Detail
Date: 05/23/2013
Source: Bloomberg Law
Joint Notice and Request for Dismissal; Order [ECF# 542] (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0035.pdf | Detail
Date: 07/08/2013
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Stipulation to Amend Settlement Agreement; Order (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0034.pdf | Detail
Date: 09/03/2014
Source: Bloomberg Law
Judges White, Jeffrey Steven (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0010
Wilken, Claudia Ann (N.D. Cal.)
DR-CA-0027-0002 | DR-CA-0027-0003 | DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0005 | DR-CA-0027-0012 | DR-CA-0027-0019 | DR-CA-0027-0021 | DR-CA-0027-0023 | DR-CA-0027-0026 | DR-CA-0027-0027 | DR-CA-0027-0028 | DR-CA-0027-0031 | DR-CA-0027-0033 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers Berzon, Stephen P. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0021 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0024 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Bird, Melinda R. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0021 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0024 | DR-CA-0027-0029 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Branch, Sujatha Jagadeesh (California)
DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Cervantez, Eve Hedy (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0021 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0024 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Coursolle, Abigail K. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0035
Dorfman, Deborah A. (Washington)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Gershon, Elissa Staci (California)
DR-CA-0027-0035
Holle, Marilyn (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0024 | DR-CA-0027-0029 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Leyton, Stacey M. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0021 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0024 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Menasche, Ann Esther (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Nisen, Frederick P. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0021 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Parks, Shawna L (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Pearlman, Paula D. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Perkins, Jane (North Carolina)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035
Pham, Jung (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Rich, Anna Margaret (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0029 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Roberts, Casey A. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Schur, Dara L. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Thoreen, Peder J. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0024 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Wolfinger, Charles (California)
DR-CA-0027-0001 | DR-CA-0027-0006 | DR-CA-0027-0007 | DR-CA-0027-0009 | DR-CA-0027-0011 | DR-CA-0027-0014 | DR-CA-0027-0015 | DR-CA-0027-0017 | DR-CA-0027-0018 | DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0030 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Zwillinger, Rachel J. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0022 | DR-CA-0027-0024 | DR-CA-0027-0035
Defendant's Lawyers Brown, Edmund G. Jr. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0008 | DR-CA-0027-0013 | DR-CA-0027-0020
Brown, Gregory David (California)
DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0008 | DR-CA-0027-0013 | DR-CA-0027-0020 | DR-CA-0027-0021 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Carson, Susan (California)
DR-CA-0027-0004 | DR-CA-0027-0008 | DR-CA-0027-0013 | DR-CA-0027-0020 | DR-CA-0027-0034 | DR-CA-0027-0035 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Elias, Nimrod P (California)
DR-CA-0027-0035
Schwartz, Karin S. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0008 | DR-CA-0027-0013 | DR-CA-0027-0020
Sondheimer, Joshua N. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0008 | DR-CA-0027-0013 | DR-CA-0027-0020
Zwibelman, Michael A. (District of Columbia)
DR-CA-0027-0008 | DR-CA-0027-0013 | DR-CA-0027-0020 | DR-CA-0027-9000
Other Lawyers Barkoff, Alison (District of Columbia)
DR-CA-0027-0025
Deiss, Ila Casy (California)
DR-CA-0027-0025
England, Travis W (District of Columbia)
DR-CA-0027-0025
Haag, Melinda (District of Columbia)
DR-CA-0027-0025
Hill, Eve L. (District of Columbia)
DR-CA-0027-0025
Nichol, Allison (District of Columbia)
DR-CA-0027-0025
Perez, Thomas E. (District of Columbia)
DR-CA-0027-0025
Swanson, Joann M. (California)
DR-CA-0027-0025
Wohlenhaus, Renee M. (District of Columbia)
DR-CA-0027-0025

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -