Case: Sheehan v. Fedex Corporation

3:05-cv-00531 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Indiana

Filed Date: 2005

Closed Date: 2011

Clearinghouse coding in progress

Case Summary

Between 2003 and 2009, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FedEx”) drivers nationwide sued FedEx alleging that they were not paid overtime wages because the company misclassified them as independent contractors instead of employees (the resolution of the MDL is tracked in Docket 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG). One of these cases was Sheehan v. Fedex Corporation discussed below.On May 6, 2005, four former delivery drivers at FedEx filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Distri…

Between 2003 and 2009, FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. (“FedEx”) drivers nationwide sued FedEx alleging that they were not paid overtime wages because the company misclassified them as independent contractors instead of employees (the resolution of the MDL is tracked in Docket 3:05-md-00527-RLM-MGG). One of these cases was Sheehan v. Fedex Corporation discussed below.

On May 6, 2005, four former delivery drivers at FedEx filed this class action lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts on their own behalf and on behalf of a nationwide group of all others similarly situated who have worked as delivery drivers for FedEx. The case was assigned to Judge Richard G. Stearns. The plaintiffs sued FedEx under the Declaratory Judgment Act, ERISA, and state law. Represented by private counsel, the plaintiffs sought injunctive relief, declaratory judgment, and monetary damages. They alleged that by incorrectly classifying them as independent contractors and not employees, FedEx violated statutory and common law. Specifically, they claimed that FedEx engaged in acts of behavioral and financial control over the drivers such that the plaintiffs should have been classified as employees and not independent contractors. For example:

- FedEx required every driver to sign a Standard Contractor Operating Agreement that established the terms and conditions of employment of FedEx drivers. However, none of the drivers were able to negotiate for different terms and conditions, resulting in FedEx unilaterally setting the compensation to be paid to the drivers.

- Despite the language in the Agreement, FedEx restricted the freedom of the drivers from selling their routes.

- FedEx required the drivers to purchase vehicles and uniforms and required them to put FedEx’s logo on them.

- FedEx had almost total control of the drivers' working hours and number of packages to deliver.

On June 16, 2005, FedEx answered the complaint. On August 8, 2005, this case was transferred from the District Court of Massachusetts to the District Court of Northern Indiana to be litigated in a multi-district litigation (MDL) under Judge Richard L. Miller Jr. Three law firms were selected from across the country to represent all plaintiffs from all 27 states involved in the MDL.

On March 25, 2005, Judge Miller denied the motion for class certification for the Massachusetts plaintiffs, but granted the motion for plaintiffs from other states. On October 22, 2010, Judge Miller remanded this case back to the District Court of Massachusetts.

On April 4, 2011, the Massachusetts plaintiffs filed a seventh amended complaint. This complaint increased the total number of named plaintiffs to 189. It also sought additional relief: (1) rescission of the Operating Agreement and a restitution award compensating for the reasonable value of the benefit provided to the defendant and (2) punitive damages. On April 7, 2011, Judge Richard Stearns approved a Confidential Settlement Agreement and dismissed the case. The plaintiffs were awarded an undisclosed amount of monetary damages.

In the Northern District of Indiana, MDL counsel continued to fight for attorneys’ fees. On October 17, 2019, the Court granted an amended motion for the allocation of ERISA attorneys’ fees. The Court noted that the case is closed.

Summary Authors

Lisa Koo (2/16/2019)

Justin Hill (11/2/2019)

People


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Agostino, Peter J. (Indiana)

Attorney for Defendant

Abely, James P. (Massachusetts)

Becker, Evelyn L. (District of Columbia)

Chused, Wesley S. (Massachusetts)

Efkeman, Edward J. (Tennessee)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:05-cv-10936

Docket

Sheehan v. FedEx Corporation

U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

April 7, 2011

April 7, 2011

Docket

3:05-cv-00531

Docket [PACER]

Sheehan v. FedEx Corporation

May 6, 2011

May 6, 2011

Docket
1

1:05-cv-10936

Class Action Complaint

U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

May 6, 2005

May 6, 2005

Complaint
2

1:05-cv-10936

Amended Complaint

Sheehan v. FedEx Corporation

U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

May 26, 2005

May 26, 2005

Complaint
2227

1:05-cv-10936

Seventh Amended Class Action Complaint

Sheehan v. FedEx Ground Package System Inc.

U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

April 4, 2011

April 4, 2011

Complaint
2229

1:05-cv-10936

Order Approving the Settlement and Dismissing the Action with Prejudice

U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts

April 7, 2011

April 7, 2011

Order/Opinion

Docket

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT against FedEx Corporation, Fedex Ground Package System. Inc., Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. Filing fee: $ 250, receipt number 64026, filed by Edward Sheehan, Ronald Perry, Randy Azzato, Alan Pacheco. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Boyce, Kathy) (Entered: 05/09/2005)

May 6, 2005

May 6, 2005

If the trial Judge issues an Order of Reference of any matter in this case to a Magistrate Judge, the matter will be transmitted to Magistrate Judge Bowler. (Boyce, Kathy) (Entered: 05/09/2005)

May 6, 2005

May 6, 2005

Summons Issued as to FedEx Corporation, Fedex Ground Package System. Inc., Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. (Boyce, Kathy) (Entered: 05/09/2005)

May 6, 2005

May 6, 2005

2

AMENDED COMPLAINT against all defendants, filed by Edward Sheehan, Ronald Perry, Randy Azzato, Alan Pacheco.(Flaherty, Elaine) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

May 26, 2005

May 26, 2005

3

SUMMONS Returned Executed Fedex Ground Package System, Inc. served on 6/1/2005, answer due 6/21/2005. (Flaherty, Elaine) (Entered: 06/07/2005)

June 7, 2005

June 7, 2005

4

ANSWER to Amended Complaint by Fedex Ground Package System, Inc..(Chused, Wesley) (Entered: 06/16/2005)

June 16, 2005

June 16, 2005

5

CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.. (Chused, Wesley) (Entered: 06/16/2005)

June 16, 2005

June 16, 2005

6

Assented to MOTION to Stay by Fedex Ground Package System, Inc..(Chused, Wesley) (Entered: 07/12/2005)

July 12, 2005

July 12, 2005

7

MEMORANDUM in Support re 6 Assented to MOTION to Stay filed by Fedex Ground Package System, Inc.. (Chused, Wesley) (Entered: 07/12/2005)

July 12, 2005

July 12, 2005

Judge Richard G. Stearns : Electronic ORDER entered granting 6 Motion to Stay (Flaherty, Elaine) (Entered: 07/21/2005)

July 21, 2005

July 21, 2005

Civil Case Terminated. (Flaherty, Elaine) (Entered: 08/11/2005)

Aug. 11, 2005

Aug. 11, 2005

Case file sent to Northern District Indiana pursuant to MDL Transfer Order dated 8/10/05 (received for docketing 9/12/05) (Flaherty, Elaine) (Entered: 09/15/2005)

Sept. 15, 2005

Sept. 15, 2005

8

MDL ORDER LIFTING STAY OF CONDITONAL REMAND ORDER. Remand Order: remanded from the Northern District of Indiana; Case Number 05 − 531 (05 − 10936),05 − 796 (05 − 10976). Associated Cases: 1:05 − cv − 10936 − RGS, 1:05 − cv − 10976 − WGY(Jones, Sherry) Modified on 9/27/2010 (Jones, Sherry). (Entered: 09/27/2010)

Sept. 27, 2010

Sept. 27, 2010

9

Letter/request (non − motion) from Shannon Liss − Riordan. (Liss − Riordan, Shannon) (Entered: 09/27/2010)

Sept. 27, 2010

Sept. 27, 2010

10

NOTICE of Appearance by James Rehnquist on behalf of Fedex Ground Package System. Inc. (Rehnquist, James) (Entered: 09/27/2010)

Sept. 27, 2010

Sept. 27, 2010

11

NOTICE of Appearance by James P. Abely on behalf of Fedex Ground Package System. Inc. (Abely, James) (Entered: 09/27/2010)

Sept. 27, 2010

Sept. 27, 2010

12

NOTICE of Appearance by Elianna J. Nuzum on behalf of Fedex Ground Package System. Inc. (Nuzum, Elianna) (Entered: 09/27/2010)

Sept. 27, 2010

Sept. 27, 2010

13

NOTICE of Appearance by Ian O. Russell on behalf of Edward Sheehan (Russell, Ian) (Entered: 09/28/2010)

Sept. 28, 2010

Sept. 28, 2010

14

MOTION for Related Case Designation and Transfer/Reassignment by Fedex Ground Package System. Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F)(Rehnquist, James) (Entered: 09/29/2010)

Sept. 29, 2010

Sept. 29, 2010

15

Letter/request (non − motion) from James C. Rehnquist. (Rehnquist, James) (Entered: 09/29/2010)

Sept. 29, 2010

Sept. 29, 2010

16

Opposition re 14 MOTION for Related Case Designation and Transfer/Reassignment filed by Edward Sheehan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit MDL Panel Transfer Order, # 2 Exhibit Civil Action Cover Sheets Hayes and Duval, # 3 Exhibit Memo and Order Brown, # 4 Exhibit Decision Oliveira, # 5 Exhibit Decision Derochers, # 6 Exhibit Hayes Complaint, # 7 Exhibit Decision Fucci, # 8 Exhibit Decision Amero)(Lichten, Harold) (Entered: 10/05/2010)

Oct. 5, 2010

Oct. 5, 2010

18

REPLY to Response to 14 MOTION for Related Case Designation and Transfer/Reassignment (PROVISIONALLY FILED; LEAVE TO FILE REQUESTED 10/06/10) filed by Fedex Ground Package System. Inc.. (Rehnquist, James) (Entered: 10/12/2010)

Oct. 12, 2010

Oct. 12, 2010

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 17 Motion for briefing schedule: Defendant's reply (not to exceed 5 pages) due on or before 10/12/10; Plaintiffs Surreply (not to exceed 5 pages) due on or before 10/19/10. (Seelye, Terri) (Entered: 10/13/2010)

Oct. 12, 2010

Oct. 12, 2010

19

REPLY to Response to 14 MOTION for Related Case Designation and Transfer/Reassignment (Leave to File Granted 10/13/10) filed by Fedex Ground Package System. Inc.. (Rehnquist, James) (Entered: 10/13/2010)

Oct. 13, 2010

Oct. 13, 2010

20

NOTICE of Appearance by Harold L. Lichten on behalf of Edward Sheehan (Lichten, Harold) (Entered: 10/13/2010)

Oct. 13, 2010

Oct. 13, 2010

21

SUR − REPLY to Motion re 14 MOTION for Related Case Designation and Transfer/Reassignment filed by Edward Sheehan. (Lichten, Harold) (Entered: 10/15/2010)

Oct. 15, 2010

Oct. 15, 2010

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered denying 14 Motion transfer/reassign case to Judge O'Toole, as the identified cases against FedEx are at different stages of litigation. The court directs the Clerk to set a scheduling conference in this case. (Zierk, Marsha) (Entered: 11/08/2010)

Nov. 8, 2010

Nov. 8, 2010

22

NOTICE of Scheduling Conference. Scheduling Conference set for 12/9/2010 at 4:00 PM in Courtroom 21 before Judge Richard G. Stearns. (Seelye, Terri) (Entered: 11/10/2010)

Nov. 10, 2010

Nov. 10, 2010

23

Joint MOTION to Continue Scheduling Conference to December 21 by Edward Sheehan.(Liss − Riordan, Shannon) (Entered: 12/02/2010)

Dec. 2, 2010

Dec. 2, 2010

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered granting 23 Motion to Continue. Scheduling Conference RESET for 12/21/2010 at 10:45 AM in Courtroom 21 before Judge Richard G. Stearns. (Seelye, Terri) (Entered: 12/03/2010)

Dec. 3, 2010

Dec. 3, 2010

ELECTRONIC NOTICE Resetting time for 12/21/10 Scheduling Conference to: 10:30 A.M. (Seelye, Terri) (Entered: 12/17/2010)

Dec. 17, 2010

Dec. 17, 2010

24

JOINT STATEMENT re scheduling conference (Joint Statement Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) and Local Rule 16.1(D)) . (Rehnquist, James) (Entered: 12/17/2010)

Dec. 17, 2010

Dec. 17, 2010

25

CERTIFICATION pursuant to Local Rule 16.1 by FedEx Ground Package System, Inc. . (Rehnquist, James) (Entered: 12/17/2010)

Dec. 17, 2010

Dec. 17, 2010

ELECTRONIC Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Richard G. Stearns: Scheduling Conference/Status Conference held on 12/21/2010. Parties discussed logistics of settlement; a proposed settlement agreement to be provided, in camera, to the court on or before 1/4/2011. (Court Reporter: None)(Attorneys present: Liss − Riordan; Rehnquist) (Seelye, Terri) (Entered: 12/21/2010)

Dec. 21, 2010

Dec. 21, 2010

ELECTRONIC NOTICE of Hearing: Status Conference (re: Settlement) set for 1/10/2011 at 3:00 PM in Courtroom 21 before Judge Richard G. Stearns. (Seelye, Terri) (Entered: 12/27/2010)

Dec. 27, 2010

Dec. 27, 2010

ELECTRONIC NOTICE Canceling today's 3:00 p.m. Status Conference with consent of parties. (Seelye, Terri) Modified text on 1/10/2011 (Seelye, Terri). (Entered: 01/10/2011)

Jan. 10, 2011

Jan. 10, 2011

2225

Case remanded from from District of Northern District of Indiana; Case Number 3:05md00527. Original file with documents numbered 1 to 2224, certified copy of transfer order and docket sheet received. (Attachments: # 1 Stipulation of Record, # 2 Docket Sheet, # 3 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 1, # 4 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 2, # 5 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 3, # 6 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 4, # 7 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 5, # 8 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 6, # 9 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 7, # 10 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 8, # 11 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 9, # 12 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 10, # 13 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 11, # 14 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 12, # 15 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 13, # 16 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 14, # 17 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 15, # 18 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 16, # 19 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 17, # 20 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 18, # 21 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 19, # 22 Docket entries 1 to 2224 part 20) (York, Steve) (Entered: 02/01/2011)

Feb. 1, 2011

Feb. 1, 2011

2226

Assented to MOTION for Leave to File Seventh Amended Complaint by Edward Sheehan. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Liss − Riordan, Shannon) (Entered: 04/01/2011)

April 1, 2011

April 1, 2011

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ENDORSED ORDER entered granting 2226 Motion for Leave to File Document: Seventh Amended Complaint by Edward Sheehan; Counsel using the Electronic Case Filing System should now file the document for which leave to file has been granted in accordance with the CM/ECF Administrative Procedures. Counsel must include − Leave to file granted on (date of order) − in the caption of the document. (Seelye, Terri) (Entered: 04/04/2011)

April 4, 2011

April 4, 2011

2227

AMENDED COMPLAINT Seventh against Fedex Ground Package System. Inc., filed by Edward Sheehan.(Liss − Riordan, Shannon) (Entered: 04/04/2011)

April 4, 2011

April 4, 2011

Case Reopened per Remand order docket entry [2225} (Sonnenberg, Elizabeth) (Entered: 04/05/2011)

April 5, 2011

April 5, 2011

2228

Proposed Document(s) submitted by Edward Sheehan. Document received: Proposed Order. (Liss − Riordan, Shannon) (Entered: 04/06/2011)

April 6, 2011

April 6, 2011

2229

Judge Richard G. Stearns: ORDER APPROVING SETTLEMENT AND DISMISSING CASE WITH PREJUDICE(Flaherty, Elaine) (Entered: 04/07/2011)

April 7, 2011

April 7, 2011

Civil Case Terminated. (Flaherty, Elaine) (Entered: 04/07/2011)

April 7, 2011

April 7, 2011

Case Details

State / Territory: Indiana

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Filing Date: 2005

Closing Date: 2011

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

189 named Plaintiffs on behalf of a Class of similarly situated persons who have worked as delivery drivers for FedEx Ground in the state of Massachusetts for Defendant.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Denied

Defendants

FedEx, Private Entity/Person

Defendant Type(s):

Retailer

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Declaratory Judgment Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2201

Special Case Type(s):

Multi-District Litigation (MDL)

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Attorneys fees

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Issues

General:

Pattern or Practice

Discrimination-area:

Other Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc)

Pay / Benefits