University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Project Home v. City of Philadelphia PB-PA-0002
Docket / Court 2:92-cv-07108 ( E.D. Pa. )
State/Territory Pennsylvania
Case Type(s) Fair Housing/Lending/Insurance
Public Benefits / Government Services
Case Summary
In the early 1990s, the United States and a group of potential residents to a proposed home for homeless persons with mental illness and/or substance abuse problems, filed separate but related complaints in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against the City of ... read more >
In the early 1990s, the United States and a group of potential residents to a proposed home for homeless persons with mental illness and/or substance abuse problems, filed separate but related complaints in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against the City of Philadelphia under the Fair Housing Act. In each case, the plaintiffs asked the Court to declare that the city's conduct constituted a violation of the Fair Housing Act by refusing to allow the use of a certain building to house chronically homeless people who were mentally ill or recovering substance abusers. More specifically, the plaintiffs argued that though the building in question did not have a rear yard, as required by the Zoning Code, the building was built prior to the passage of the Zoning Code and therefore should be granted nonconforming status, meaning that it could be used as a housing facility so long as it was not extended in any way so as to increase the nonconformity.

Project H.O.M.E., a Pennsylvania non-profit organization, provides a continuum of services to homeless men who are mentally ill and/or recovering substance abuser. After acquiring two adjacent buildings at 1515 and 1523 Fairmount Avenue, H.O.M.E. attempted to get permission from the city to use these buildings as "Single Room Occupancy" (SRO) facilities which would benefit many of the residents who had been doing well in the shared facilities. Not only would the new facility provide successful current residents with more privacy and control over their environment, but it would open up beds in the shared rooms for homeless individuals who needed them.

On August 9, 1990, H.O.M.E. applied for a zoning and use permit for 1515-1523 Fairmount Avenue. The Philadelphia Department of Licensing and Inspections granted their permit. Two civic associations that had publicly opposed the introduction into the neighborhood of a new residential facility for handicapped persons, appealed the grant of the permit, arguing that the building failed to meet the requirements The building at 1515 Fairmont did not meet the requirements but because it was built before 1932 when the Zoning Code took effect, it constituted a permitted nonconforming structure.

On July 5, 1991, the Zoning Board upheld the permit, reasoning that charitable organizations were exempt under the Zoning Code from having a rear yard requirement. The civil associations appealed to the Court of Common Pleas which reversed the Zoning Board's decision on December 19, 1991, arguing that there was no charitable exemption in the Code. Project H.O.M.E. then appealed to the Commonwealth Court, which reversed the decision of the Court of Common Pleas and reinstated the permit on November 10, 1992. On February 10, 1993, the civil associations filed a petition for allowing of appeal with the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, but the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had not yet acted on that petition when the plaintiffs sued in federal district court.

On March 31, 1993, both the plaintiff United States and the defendant city of Philadelphia filed cross-motions for summary judgment. Oral arguments on these cross motions were set for November 3, 1993. After oral arguments, U.S. District Court Judge Louis H. Pollak issued an opinion stating that the plaintiffs had established a violation of the Fair Housing Act, and granted the plaintiffs' motion for summary judgment on November 19, 1993; he denied the city's motions for summary judgment. 838 F.Supp. 223.

The city appealed on November 22, 1993, and the judgment was affirmed. 30 F.3d 1488. The docket shows no further litigation. According to plaintiffs' counsel's website, after the district court "ordered the City to issue the necessary permits, . . . the project was completed and thousands of homeless persons have found decent housing, training, and medical services." The case is closed.

Kristen Sagar - 04/09/2009
Saeeda Joseph-Charles - 11/03/2016


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Content of Injunction
Discrimination Prohibition
Defendant-type
Jurisdiction-wide
Disability
Least restrictive environment
Mental impairment
Discrimination-basis
Disability (inc. reasonable accommodations)
General
Housing
Poverty/homelessness
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Fair Housing Act/Fair Housing Amendments Act (FHAA), 42 U.S.C. §§ 3601 et seq.
Defendant(s) City of Philadelphia
Plaintiff Description The United States and a group of potential residents to a proposed home for homeless persons with mental illness and/or substance abuse problems.
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer No
Nature of Relief Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Litigation
Order Duration 1993 - n/a
Case Closing Year 1994
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  William G. v. Pataki
http://www.bazelon.org/william-g-v-pataki/
Date: 2017
By: The Bazelon Center (The Bazelon Center)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Disability Rights New Jersey v. Velez
http://www.bazelon.org/drnj-v-velez/
Date: 2017
By: The Bazelon Center (The Bazelon Center)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Williams v. Quinn
http://www.bazelon.org/williams-v-quinn/
Date: 2017
By: The Bazelon Center (The Bazelon Center)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  United States of America v. Commonwealth of Virginia
http://www.bazelon.org/u-s-v-virginia/
Date: 2017
By: The Bazelon Center (The Bazelon Center)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  United States of America v. North Carolina
http://www.bazelon.org/u-s-v-north-carolina/
Date: 2017
By: The Bazelon Center (The Bazelon Center)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  U.S. v. Georgia
http://www.bazelon.org/u-s-v-georgia/
Date: 2017
By: The Bazelon Center (The Bazelon Center)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  O'Toole v. Cuomo [Formerly DAI v. Cuomo]
http://www.bazelon.org/otoole-v-cuomo/
Date: 2017
By: The Bazelon Center (The Bazelon Center)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Amanda D. v. Hassan
http://www.bazelon.org/amanda-d-v-hassan/
Date: 2017
By: The Bazelon Center (The Bazelon Center)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
2:92−cv−07108−LP (E.D. Pa.)
PB-PA-0002-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 07/06/1994
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Opinion (838 F.Supp. 223) (E.D. Pa.)
PB-PA-0002-0001.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 11/19/1993
Source: Westlaw
Judges Pollak, Louis Heilprin (E.D. Pa.)
PB-PA-0002-0001
Plaintiff's Lawyers Dunne, John R. (District of Columbia)
PB-PA-0002-9000
Hancock, Paul F. (District of Columbia)
PB-PA-0002-9000
Handley, Harvey L. III (District of Columbia)
PB-PA-0002-9000
Votaw, Catherine (Pennsylvania)
PB-PA-0002-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Eichert, Michael F. (Pennsylvania)
PB-PA-0002-9000
Harris, Judith E. (Pennsylvania)
PB-PA-0002-9000
Jordan, James B. (Pennsylvania)
PB-PA-0002-9000
Russo, Debora M (Pennsylvania)
PB-PA-0002-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -