Case: Garnes v. Taylor

1:72-00159 | U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia

Filed Date: Jan. 25, 1972

Closed Date: 1976

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In January 1972, a female inmate at the federal correctional institution at Alderson, West Virginia, filed a class action lawsuit claiming sex discrimination and a constitutional denial of equal protection against the District of Columbia Department of Corrections and the U.S. Attorney General. The class action was on behalf of all women convicted of D.C. offenses serving time in federal prisons. The Plaintiffs alleged that D.C. women were serving more time than D.C. men with similar sentences …

In January 1972, a female inmate at the federal correctional institution at Alderson, West Virginia, filed a class action lawsuit claiming sex discrimination and a constitutional denial of equal protection against the District of Columbia Department of Corrections and the U.S. Attorney General. The class action was on behalf of all women convicted of D.C. offenses serving time in federal prisons. The Plaintiffs alleged that D.C. women were serving more time than D.C. men with similar sentences and circumstances because the women were paroled later. The Plaintiffs asked that the transfer of D.C. women to federal facilities be halted and declared unconstitutional. Clarice Feinman and Claudine SchWeber, Criminal Justice Politics and Women: The Aftermath of Legally Mandated Change, Women & Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (Fall 1984).

The problem occurred because D.C. had no facilities for women offenders serving more than one year, so the women were sent to federal institutions located outside of D.C. As a result, the women were seen by federal parole authorities, whose release guidelines were more rigid than those of the D.C. Parole Board. Clarice Feinman and Claudine SchWeber, Criminal Justice Politics and Women: The Aftermath of Legally Mandated Change, Women & Politics Vol. 4 No. 3 (Fall 1984).

According to the D.C. Circuit in Cosgrove v. Smith, 697 F.2d 1125 (D.C. Cir. 1983), on December 10, 1976, the Federal Bureau of Prisons entered a consent decree in this case approved by Judge William Bryant, stipulating that all female offenders sentenced in the District of Columbia would be paroled under local, rather than federal, standards, regardless of the site of incarceration or the type of offense, be it D.C. or U.S. Code. The female inmates were to remain in federal prisons but the women were allowed to personally request transfers to the D.C. Department of Corrections "nine months prior to their parole eligibility date." This was done to permit the D.C. women from federal institutions to be heard by their own parole board. The agreements was known as the Garnes Decree.

According to L. Steinitz, The Garnes Decree in Reality: Parole Eligibility and Determination for D.C. Women in Federal Correctional Institutions (1981), the Women Offenders Network (an organization sponsored by the Women's Bureau of the U.S. Department of Labor) discovered in 1981 that the agreements made in Garnes were not being carried out because the D.C. Department of Corrections was not accepting transfer applications from women who had first met with the federal parole authorities and had received from them a presumptive parole date.

A hearing was held on H.R. 2050, a proposed bill to transfer parole authority to the D.C. parole board, and other bills before the Subcommittee on Judiciary and Education and the Committee on the District of Columbia House of Representatives. The bill did not pass, but on July 1, 1982, a new agreement was signed between the Federal Prison System and the D.C. Department of Corrections. The agreement was designed more precisely to carry out what Garnes had ordered. L. Steinitz, The Garnes Decree in Reality: Parole Eligibility and Determination for D.C. Women in Federal Correctional Institutions (1981).

Summary Authors

Jessica Kincaid (3/21/2014)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:72-00159

Hearing from meeting of Committee on the District of Columbia, Subcommittee on the Judiciary and Education

April 13, 1987

April 13, 1987

Transcript

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 17, 2024, 3:15 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 25, 1972

Closing Date: 1976

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Female inmates from D.C. in the federal prison system

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown

Filed Pro Se: Unknown

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

The District of Columbia Department of Correction, State

Defendant Type(s):

Corrections

Case Details

Constitutional Clause(s):

Equal Protection

Available Documents:

None of the above

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

General:

Classification / placement

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex or Gender:

Female

Type of Facility:

Government-run