Case: Hawkins v. Groot Industries, Inc.

1:01-cv-01731 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: March 12, 2001

Closed Date: 2004

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On March 12, 2001, two African-Americans who were former employees of Groot Industries filed a lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for monetary and injunctive relief, alleging racial and national origin harassment and discrimination. Specifically, they alleged that defendants subjected A…

On March 12, 2001, two African-Americans who were former employees of Groot Industries filed a lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and 42 U.S.C. § 1981 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division. Plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, asked the court for monetary and injunctive relief, alleging racial and national origin harassment and discrimination. Specifically, they alleged that defendants subjected African Americans and Hispanics to inferior terms and conditions of employment due to their race and national origin, and also discriminated against them in connection with promotions, work assignments, compensation, transfers, discipline and terms and conditions of employment.

Following the filing of complaint, plaintiffs moved to add two more Hispanic plaintiffs as class members and class representatives. On August 5, 2002, the Court (Judge Joan B. Gottschall) granted plaintiffs' motion to add Hispanic plaintiffs with respect to the § 1981 claims, but denied their motion to add under the Title VII claim, because the two Hispanic plaintiffs did not file timely charges of discrimination with the EEOC and their claims did not arise out of sufficiently similarly discriminatory treatment as those allegations found in the African American plaintiffs' EEOC charges.

On March 31, 2003, the Court (Judge Joan B. Gottschall) partly granted defendants' motion for summary judgment against the two African-American plaintiffs, because plaintiffs did not show enough evidence with regard to discriminatory discharge and retaliatory discharge.

The case seemed to develop in favor of defendants. On September 2, 2003, the Court (Judge Gottschall) denied plaintiffs' motion for class certification and on the same day, granted defendants' motion for summary judgment against the two Hispanic plaintiffs, because the two plaintiffs did not present enough evidence to support their discriminatory discharge and hostile work environment claims.

In light of this, on September 29, 2004, the parties agreed to a tentative settlement on an individual basis, and the plaintiffs' counsel moved to dismiss the case with leave to reinstate within 60 days. The Court granted plaintiffs' motion.

Summary Authors

Kunyi Zhang (10/30/2010)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5271483/parties/hawkins-v-groot-ind-inc/


Judge(s)

Gottschall, Joan B. (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Asonye, Uche O. (Illinois)

Molina, Nydia (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

Dugan, William Francis (Illinois)

Metz, David Elliot (Illinois)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:01-cv-01731

Docket

Dec. 6, 2004

Dec. 6, 2004

Docket
1

1:01-cv-01731

Class Action Complaint

March 12, 2001

March 12, 2001

Complaint
35

1:01-cv-01731

Order (plaintiffs' motion to amend complaint is granted in part and denied in part)

Aug. 5, 2002

Aug. 5, 2002

Order/Opinion

210 F.R.D. 210

119

1:01-cv-01731

Memorandum Opinion and Order (defendants' motion for summary judgment against plaintiff Anderson Hawkins and Larry Woodfork is granted in part and denied in part)

March 31, 2003

March 31, 2003

Order/Opinion

2003 WL 2003

130

1:01-cv-01731

Second Amended Class Action Complaint

Aug. 12, 2003

Aug. 12, 2003

Complaint
134

1:01-cv-01731

Memorandum Opinion and Order (defendants' motion for summary judgment against plaintiffs Enrique Hernandez and Javier Guerrero is granted)

Sept. 2, 2003

Sept. 2, 2003

Order/Opinion

2003 WL 2003

133

1:01-cv-01731

Order (plaintiffs' motion for class certification is denied)

Sept. 2, 2003

Sept. 2, 2003

Order/Opinion

2003 WL 2003

160

1:01-cv-01731

Order (the case is dismissed with leave to reinstate within 60 days)

Sept. 29, 2004

Sept. 29, 2004

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5271483/hawkins-v-groot-ind-inc/

Last updated April 12, 2024, 3 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT (Attachments); Jury demand − Civil cover sheet − Appearance(s) of Uche O. Asonye as attorney(s) for plaintiffs ( No summons(es) issued.) ( Documents: 1−1 through 1−3) (maf) (Entered: 03/13/2001)

March 12, 2001

March 12, 2001

RECEIPT regarding payment of filing fee paid; on 3/12/01 in the amount of $ 150.00, receipt # 1023515. (maf) (Entered: 03/13/2001)

March 12, 2001

March 12, 2001

SCHEDULE set on 5/21/01 by Hon. James B. Moran : Status hearing set to 9:45 6/6/01 pursuant to rule l6 of the F.R.C.P. Mailed notice (wah) (Entered: 05/21/2001)

May 21, 2001

May 21, 2001

2

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendants Groot Industries, Inc., Groot Recycling and Waste Mgt Svc, Inc. by David Elliot Metz, Jeffrey Kenneth Ross. (maf) (Entered: 05/25/2001)

May 25, 2001

May 25, 2001

3

ANSWER by defendants to complaint [1−1]; Notice. (maf) (Entered: 05/25/2001)

May 25, 2001

May 25, 2001

SCHEDULE set on 6/6/01 by Hon. James B. Moran : Status hearing held. No notice (wah) (Entered: 06/06/2001)

June 6, 2001

June 6, 2001

4

REASSIGNMENT ORDER of 6/8/01 Case reassigned to Hon. Joan B. Gottschall from the Hon. James B. Moran . (For further detail see order.) Mailed notice (maf) (Entered: 06/11/2001)

June 8, 2001

June 8, 2001

5

MOTION by plaintiffs to set a briefing schedule for motion for class certification ; Notice (yap) (Entered: 07/26/2001)

July 20, 2001

July 20, 2001

6

MINUTE ORDER of 7/25/01 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Status hearing set to 8/2/01 at 9:30 a.m. Plaintiff's motion to set a briefing schedule for motion for class certification [5−1] is granted. Motion for class certification is due by 11/23/01. Response by 12/21/01. Reply to 1/4/02. Mailed notice (yap) (Entered: 07/26/2001)

July 25, 2001

July 25, 2001

SCHEDULE set on 8/2/01 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Status hearing held. Status hearing date will be set with ruling on class certification motion by mail. In court notice (rj) (Entered: 08/02/2001)

Aug. 2, 2001

Aug. 2, 2001

7

AGREED MOTION by parties to extend the briefing schedule for motion for class certification by ninety(90)days, or until 2/21/02 ; Notice (las) (Entered: 11/15/2001)

Nov. 2, 2001

Nov. 2, 2001

8

MINUTE ORDER of 11/14/01 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Agreed motion by the parties to extend the briefing schedule for motion for class certification by ninety(90)days,or until 2/21/02 is granted [7−1]. Motion for class certification is due 2/21/02. Response is due by 3/22/02. Reply is due by 4/5/02. Mailed notice. (las) (Entered: 11/15/2001)

Nov. 14, 2001

Nov. 14, 2001

9

MOTION by plaintiffs for leave to file their first amended class action complaint pursuant to Rule 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to add parties and to include additional allegations of discrimination ; Brief in support (Attachments); Notice. (lc) (Entered: 12/20/2001)

Dec. 5, 2001

Dec. 5, 2001

10

MINUTE ORDER of 12/19/01 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall: Answer breif to motion due 01/09/02. Reply to answer breif due 01/23/02. Ruling on plaintiffs' motion for leave to file their first amended complaint [9−1] will be by mail. Mailed notice. (fce) (Entered: 12/20/2001)

Dec. 19, 2001

Dec. 19, 2001

11

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendants Groot Industries, Inc. and Groot Recycling and Waste Services, Inc. by John M. Vande Walle. (cem) (Entered:

Jan. 10, 2002

Jan. 10, 2002

13

REPLY by plaintiffs to defendants' response to plaintiffs' motion to amend [12−1] (Attachments). (mw) (Entered: 01/25/2002)

Jan. 23, 2002

Jan. 23, 2002

14

EXPEDITED REFERRAL ORDER: Case referred to Hon. Martin C. Ashman for settlement conference Mailed notice. (rj) (Entered: 02/27/2002)

Feb. 27, 2002

Feb. 27, 2002

SCHEDULE set on 3/13/02 by Hon. Martin C. Ashman : Settlement conference set for 2:00 4/10/02 in chambers 1366. All clients and parties with full authority to settle are to be physically present. Failure to have parties with full authority to settle present may result in the imposition of severe sanctions. (For further details see attached standing order.) Mailed notice (is) (Entered: 03/13/2002)

March 13, 2002

March 13, 2002

15

AGREED MOTION by parties to reset the date of the settlement conference ; Notice. (yp) (Entered: 04/09/2002)

March 29, 2002

March 29, 2002

16

MINUTE ORDER of 4/8/02 by Hon. Martin C. Ashman : Agreed motion to reset the date of the settlement conference is granted [15−1]. Settlement conference is reset to 6/19/02 at 2:00 p.m. Mailed notice (yp) (Entered: 04/09/2002)

April 8, 2002

April 8, 2002

SCHEDULE set on 6/21/02 by Hon. Martin C. Ashman : Settlement conference reset to 11:00 7/18/02. Mailed notice (is) (Entered: 06/21/2002)

June 21, 2002

June 21, 2002

CITATION to Discover Assets Issued as to Patrick Botica and Michael Tarelco (2 original &2 copies). (hmb) (Entered: 07/02/2002)

July 1, 2002

July 1, 2002

17

MEMORANDUM by defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment re plaintiff Hawkins. (gcy) (Entered: 07/16/2002)

July 15, 2002

July 15, 2002

18

EXHIBITS list by defendants [17−1] (Attachments). (gcy) (Entered: 07/16/2002)

July 15, 2002

July 15, 2002

19

MEMORANDUM by defendants in support of their motion for summary judgment re plaintiff Woodfork. (gcy) (Entered: 07/16/2002)

July 15, 2002

July 15, 2002

20

EXHIBITS list by defendant [19−1] (Attachments). (gcy) (Entered: 07/16/2002)

July 15, 2002

July 15, 2002

24

MOTION by defendants' for summary judgment re plaintiff Woodfork ; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

July 15, 2002

July 15, 2002

25

STATEMENT by defendants' of undisputed material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff Woodfork [24−1]. (hmb) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

July 15, 2002

July 15, 2002

26

MOTION by defendants' for summary judgment re plaintiff Hawkins ; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

July 15, 2002

July 15, 2002

27

STATEMENT by defendants' of undisputed material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff Hawkins [26−1]. (hmb) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

July 15, 2002

July 15, 2002

28

MOTION by plaintiffs' to continue defendants' summary judgment motion in order to complete discovery and briefing on plaintiffs' motion for class certification ; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

July 16, 2002

July 16, 2002

29

MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs' in support of their motion to continue defendants' summary judgment motion in order to complete discovery and briefing on plaintiffs' motion for class certification [28−1] (Attachments). (hmb) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

July 16, 2002

July 16, 2002

30

AFFIDAVIT of Uche O. Asonye, attorney for plaintiffs'. (hmb) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

July 16, 2002

July 16, 2002

31

AMENDED NOTICE by defendants' of motion for summary judgment re plaintiff Woodfork [24−1] (hmb) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

July 17, 2002

July 17, 2002

21

MINUTE ORDER of 7/18/02 by Hon. Martin C. Ashman : Settlement conference held − unsuccessful. All matters relating to the referral of this action having been resolved, the case is returned to the assigned judge. Terminating the case referral to Hon. Martin C. Ashman regarding [9−1] . No notice (hmb) (Entered: 07/19/2002)

July 18, 2002

July 18, 2002

33

MOTION by plaintiffs' pursuant to rule 30(d) to direct counsel for defendants' to permit a fair deposition examination of defendants' division manager, Craig Phillips , and for sanctions (Attachments); Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

July 25, 2002

July 25, 2002

22

RESPONSE by defendants' to plaintiffs' motion to continue Groot's motions for summary judgment. (hmb) (Entered: 07/29/2002)

July 26, 2002

July 26, 2002

23

REPLY by plaintiffs' to Groot's response to plaintiffs' motion to continue Groot's motion for summary judgment. (hmb) (Entered: 07/31/2002)

July 30, 2002

July 30, 2002

34

MINUTE ORDER of 7/31/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Plaintiff's motion to continue defendants' summary judgment motion in order to complete discovery and briefing on plaintiffs' motion for class certification is denied for reasons stated on the record [28−1]. Plaintiffs' motion pursuant to rule 30(d) to direct counsel for defendants' to permit a fair deposition examination of defendants' division manager, Craig Phillips [33−1] and for sanctions [33−2] is entered and continued to 8/30/02 at 9:30 a.m. Response is due by 8/21/02. Answer brief to defendants' motions for summary judgment re: plaintiffs' Woodfork and Hawkins [26−1], [24−1] due 10/9/02. Reply to answer brief due 10/30/02. Mailed notice (hmb) (Entered: 08/05/2002)

July 31, 2002

July 31, 2002

35

MINUTE ORDER of 8/5/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall: Status hearing set for 8/29/02 at 9:30 a.m. Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file their first amended class action complaint is granted in part and denied in part [9−1]. (Entered Order) Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 08/07/2002)

Aug. 5, 2002

Aug. 5, 2002

36

DECLARATION of Georgine Wendell regarding motions for summary judgment re plaintiff Hawkins [26−1] re plaintiff Woodfork [24−1]; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 08/19/2002)

Aug. 16, 2002

Aug. 16, 2002

37

DECLARATION of Jim Dowling regarding motions for summary judgment re plaintiff Hawkins [26−1], re plaintiff Woodfork [24−1]; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 08/19/2002)

Aug. 16, 2002

Aug. 16, 2002

38

DECLARATION of Craig Phillips regarding motions for summary judgment re plaintiff Hawkins [26−1], re plaintiff Woodfork [24−1]; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 08/19/2002)

Aug. 16, 2002

Aug. 16, 2002

39

DECLARATION of C.J. Sturwold regarding motions for summary judgment re plaintiff Hawkins [26−1], re plaintiff Woodfork [24−1]; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 08/19/2002)

Aug. 16, 2002

Aug. 16, 2002

40

RESPONSE by Groot Ind Inc and Groot Recycling to plaintiffs' motion re Phillips deposition [33−1] (Attachments). (hmb) (Entered: 08/22/2002)

Aug. 21, 2002

Aug. 21, 2002

41

MOTION by plaintiffs' for leave to file their second amended class action complaint (Attachments); Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 09/03/2002)

Aug. 27, 2002

Aug. 27, 2002

42

MINUTE ORDER of 8/30/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Answer brief to plaintiffs' motion for leave to file their second amended class action complaint due 9/13/02 [41−1]. Reply to answer brief due 9/27/02. Ruling on motion [41−1] will be by mail. Plaintiffs' motion pursuant to Rule 30(d) to direct counsel for defendants' to permit a fair deposition examination of defendants' division manager, Craig Phillips is granted [33−1], and for sanctions is granted in part and denied in part [33−2]. Oral motion by plaintiffs' counsel for an extra hour beyond 7 hour limit to take deposition is granted. Mailed notice (hmb) (Entered: 09/03/2002)

Aug. 30, 2002

Aug. 30, 2002

44

MOTION by plaintiffs' for class certification ; Memorandum in support; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 09/17/2002)

Sept. 4, 2002

Sept. 4, 2002

46

MOTION by plaintiffs' to file memorandum in support of motion for class certification in excess of 15 pages . (hmb) (Entered: 09/17/2002)

Sept. 4, 2002

Sept. 4, 2002

43

RESPONSE by defendants' to plaintiffs' motion for leave to file their second amended class action complaint [41−1] (Attachments). (hmb) (Entered: 09/16/2002)

Sept. 13, 2002

Sept. 13, 2002

47

MINUTE ORDER of 9/13/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Answer brief to plaintiffs' motion for class certification [44−1] due 10/15/02. Reply to answer brief due 10/29/02. Ruling on plaintiff's motion for class certification will be by mail. Plaintiff's motion for leave to file memorandum in support of motion for class certification in excess of 15 pages is granted [46−1]. Mailed notice (hmb) (Entered: 09/17/2002)

Sept. 13, 2002

Sept. 13, 2002

48

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendants' by William Francis Dugan (hmb) (Entered: 09/18/2002)

Sept. 13, 2002

Sept. 13, 2002

49

REPLY by plaintiffs' to defendants' response to plaintiff's motion for leave to file their second amended class action complaint [41−1] (Attachments). (hmb) (Entered: 09/27/2002)

Sept. 26, 2002

Sept. 26, 2002

52

MOTION by plaintiffs' to modify the briefing schedule for defendants' summary judgment motions by 12 days (Attachments); Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

Oct. 3, 2002

Oct. 3, 2002

50

STATEMENT by defendant of undisputed material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment re plaintiff Guerrero (hmb) (Entered: 10/07/2002)

Oct. 4, 2002

Oct. 4, 2002

51

COMPENDIUM OF DOCUMENTS by defendants' in support of their motion for summary judgment re plaintiff Guerrero (Attachments). (hmb) (Entered: 10/07/2002)

Oct. 4, 2002

Oct. 4, 2002

55

MOTION by defendant for summary judgment re: plaintiff Guerrero ; (hmb) (Entered: 10/10/2002)

Oct. 4, 2002

Oct. 4, 2002

56

MEMORANDUM of law by defendants' in support of their motion for summary judgment re: plaintiff Guerrero [55−1] (hmb) (Entered: 10/10/2002)

Oct. 4, 2002

Oct. 4, 2002

54

ENTERED ORDER regarding the briefing schedule for defendants' motions for summary judgment and plaintiffs' motion for class certification. (hmb) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

Oct. 7, 2002

Oct. 7, 2002

53

MINUTE ORDER of 10/8/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Enter agreed order. Plaintiff's motion to modify the briefing schedule for defendants' summary judgment motions by 12 days is granted [52−1]. Regarding defendants' motion for summary judgment in connection with plaintiffs', Hawkins [26−1] and Woodfork [24−1]: plaintiffs' responses to defendants' motions for summary judgment are due 10/23/02. Defendants' reply by 11/13/02. Regarding defendants' motion for summary judgment in connection with plaintiff, Guerrero: Plaintiff's response to defendants' motion for summary judgment are due 11/14/02. Defendants' reply by 11/25/02. Defendants' response to plaintiffs' motion for class certification is due by 11/4/02 [44−1]. Plaintiffs' reply is due by 11/18/02. Mailed notice (hmb) (Entered: 10/09/2002)

Oct. 8, 2002

Oct. 8, 2002

58

MOTION by defendants' for summary judgment re: plaintiff Hernandez ; Memorandum of law in support; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 10/21/2002)

Oct. 15, 2002

Oct. 15, 2002

59

STATEMENT by defendants' of undisputed material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment re: plaintiff Hernandez [58−1] (hmb) (Entered: 10/21/2002)

Oct. 15, 2002

Oct. 15, 2002

60

COMPENDIUM of documents by defendants' in support ot their motion for summary judgment re: plaintff Hernandez (Attachments). (hmb) (Entered: 10/21/2002)

Oct. 15, 2002

Oct. 15, 2002

61

MOTION by defendants' to correct 8/30/02 order (Attachments); Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 10/21/2002)

Oct. 16, 2002

Oct. 16, 2002

62

MINUTE ORDER of 10/18/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Answer brief to defendants' motion for summary judgment re: plaintiff Hernandez [58−1] due on 11/18/02. Reply to answer brief due 12/2/02. Ruling on motion [58−1] will be by mail. Mailed notice (hmb) (Entered: 10/21/2002)

Oct. 18, 2002

Oct. 18, 2002

63

MINUTE ORDER of 10/18/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Defendants' motion to correct 8/30/02 order is granted as follows: [61−1] The court did not intend to sanction anyone in its 8/30/02 order. The court sees no reason to correct the order beyond this clarification. No appearance is required 10/23/02 at 9:30 a.m. Mailed notice (hmb) (Entered: 10/21/2002)

Oct. 18, 2002

Oct. 18, 2002

64

MINUTE ORDER of 10/18/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Briefing schedule as to defendants' motion for summary judgment in connection with plaintiff, Hernandez [58−1] is extended as follows: response is due by 12/9/02. Reply is due 1/10/03. (Entered Order.) Mailed notice (hmb) (Entered: 10/24/2002)

Oct. 18, 2002

Oct. 18, 2002

SCHEDULE set on 10/23/02 by Hon. Martin C. Ashman : Status hearing set to 10:00 11/1/02 in courtroom 1386. Mailed notice (is) (Entered: 10/23/2002)

Oct. 23, 2002

Oct. 23, 2002

67

MOTION by plaintiffs' for leave to file briefs in response to defendants' motion for summary judgment in excess of 15 pages ; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 10/31/2002)

Oct. 23, 2002

Oct. 23, 2002

69

SUMMARY JUDGMENT EXHIBITS by plaintiffs' [58−1], [55−1], [26−1], [24−1] (hmb) (Entered: 10/31/2002)

Oct. 23, 2002

Oct. 23, 2002

65

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 7/31/02 Before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall (hmb) (Entered: 10/25/2002)

Oct. 24, 2002

Oct. 24, 2002

66

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 8/30/02 Before the Honorable Joan B. Gottschall (hmb) (Entered: 10/25/2002)

Oct. 24, 2002

Oct. 24, 2002

68

MINUTE ORDER of 10/30/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Plaintiffs' motion for leave to file briefs in response to defendants' motion for summary judgment in excess of 15 pages is granted [67−1]. Mailed notice (hmb) (Entered: 10/31/2002)

Oct. 30, 2002

Oct. 30, 2002

70

RESPONSE by plaintiff Woodfork to defendants' statement of undisputed material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff Woodfork [24−1] (hmb) (Entered: 10/31/2002)

Oct. 30, 2002

Oct. 30, 2002

71

RESPONSE by plaintiff Hawkins to defendants' statement of undisputed material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff Hawkins [26−1] (hmb) (Entered: 10/31/2002)

Oct. 30, 2002

Oct. 30, 2002

72

STATEMENT by plaintiffs' of additional facts which require the denial of defendants' summary judgment motion pursuant to Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B) (hmb) (Entered: 10/31/2002)

Oct. 30, 2002

Oct. 30, 2002

73

BRIEF by plaintiff Hawkins in response to defendants' motion for summary judgment (Attachments). (hmb) (Entered: 10/31/2002)

Oct. 30, 2002

Oct. 30, 2002

74

BRIEF by plaintiff Woodfork in response to defendants' motion for summary judgment (Attachments). (hmb) (Entered: 10/31/2002)

Oct. 30, 2002

Oct. 30, 2002

75

MINUTE ORDER of 10/30/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Enter agreed order. Defendants' response to plaintiffs' motion for class certification is due by 12/5/02 [44−1]. Plaintiffs' reply is due by 1/10/03. Defendants' replies to plaintiffs' responses to defendants' summary judgment motions related to Hawkins and Woodfork are due by 11/25/02. Plaintiffs responses to defendants' summary judgment motion related to Javier Guerrero are due by 11/14/02. Defendants' reply is due by 12/15/02. Plaintiffs' response to defendants' summary judgment motion related to Enrique Hernandez is due by 12/9/02. defendants' reply is due 1/10/03. (Entered Agreed Order Regarding the Briefing Schedules for Plaintiffs' Class Certification Motion and Defendants' Summary Judgment Motions.) Mailed notice (hmb) (Entered: 10/31/2002)

Oct. 30, 2002

Oct. 30, 2002

76

LETTER from John Vande Walle, attorney for defendants' to the clerk of court dated 10/30/02. (hmb) (Entered: 11/05/2002)

Oct. 31, 2002

Oct. 31, 2002

77

MOTION by Javier Guerrero for leave to file his brief in response to defendants' motion for summary judgment in excess of 15 pages ; Notice. (air) (Entered: 11/25/2002)

Nov. 14, 2002

Nov. 14, 2002

SCHEDULE set on 11/19/02 by Hon. Martin C. Ashman : Status hearing held and continued to 10:00 2/13/03 . Mailed notice (is) (Entered: 11/19/2002)

Nov. 19, 2002

Nov. 19, 2002

78

MINUTE ORDER of 11/22/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall: Plaintiff Guerrero's motion for leave to file his brief in response to defendants' motion for summary judgment in excess of 15 pages is granted [77−1]. Mailed notice (air) (Entered: 11/25/2002)

Nov. 22, 2002

Nov. 22, 2002

79

STATEMENT by Javier Guerrero of additional facts which require the denial of defendants' summary judgment motion pursuant to Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B). (air) (Entered: 11/25/2002)

Nov. 22, 2002

Nov. 22, 2002

80

BRIEF IN RESPONSE by Javier Guerrero to defendants' motion for summary judgment re: plaintiff Hernandez [58−1] re: plaintiff Guerrero [55−1] re plaintiff Hawkins [26−1], re plaintiff Woodfork [24−1] (Attachments). (air) (Entered: 11/25/2002)

Nov. 22, 2002

Nov. 22, 2002

81

RESPONSE by Javier Guerrero to defendants' statement of undisputed material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment re: plaintiff Guerrero [55−1]. (air) (Entered: 11/25/2002)

Nov. 22, 2002

Nov. 22, 2002

82

SUMMARY JUDGEMENT EXHIBITS by Javier Guerrero. (air) (Entered: 11/25/2002)

Nov. 22, 2002

Nov. 22, 2002

87

CONSOLIDATED AGREED MOTION by defendants' to exceed 15 page limitation , and for extension of time to file response ; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 12/06/2002)

Nov. 27, 2002

Nov. 27, 2002

88

MINUTE ORDER of 12/4/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Consolidated agreed motion by defendants to exceed 15 page limitation for their summary judgment reply briefs concerning Anderson Hawkins and Larry Woodfork [87−1], and for extension of time to file response is granted [87−2]. Defendants' responses to plaintiff's motion for class certification is due by 12/12/02 [44−1]. Plaintiff's reply is due by 1/20/03. Mailed notice (hmb) (Entered: 12/06/2002)

Dec. 4, 2002

Dec. 4, 2002

83

RESPONSE by defendants' to Hawkins and Woodfork's Rule 56.1 (3)(B) statement [72−1] (hmb) (Entered: 12/06/2002)

Dec. 5, 2002

Dec. 5, 2002

84

APPENDIX by defendants' to their responses to plaintiffs' statement of additional facts [72−1]. (hmb) (Entered: 12/06/2002)

Dec. 5, 2002

Dec. 5, 2002

85

REPLY brief by defendants' in support of its motion for summary judgment regarding Woodfork [24−1]. (hmb) (Entered: 12/06/2002)

Dec. 5, 2002

Dec. 5, 2002

86

REPLY brief by defendants' in support of its motion for summary judgment regarding Hawkins [26−1]. (hmb) (Entered: 12/06/2002)

Dec. 5, 2002

Dec. 5, 2002

89

MOTION by plaintiff Enrique Hernandez for leave to to file his brief in response to defendants' motion for summary judgment in excess of 15 pages ; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 12/16/2002)

Dec. 9, 2002

Dec. 9, 2002

90

RESPONSE by plaintiff Hernandez to defendants' statement of undisputed material facts in support of their motion for summary judgment as to plaintiff Hernandez [58−1] (hmb) (Entered: 12/16/2002)

Dec. 9, 2002

Dec. 9, 2002

91

STATEMENT by plaintiff Hernandez of additional facts which require the denial of defendants' summary judgment motion pursuant to Rule 56.1(b)(3)(B). (hmb) (Entered: 12/16/2002)

Dec. 9, 2002

Dec. 9, 2002

93

MINUTE ORDER of 12/13/02 by Hon. Joan B. Gottschall : Plaintiff, Hernandez's motion for leave to to file his brief in response to defendants' motion for summary judgment in excess of 15 pages is granted [89−1]. Mailed notice (hmb) (Entered: 12/16/2002)

Dec. 13, 2002

Dec. 13, 2002

94

BRIEF by plaintiff Hernandez in response to defendants' motion for summary judgment (Attachments). (hmb) (Entered: 12/16/2002)

Dec. 13, 2002

Dec. 13, 2002

97

MOTION instanter by defendant for extension of time to file response brief , and motion insanter for leave to file briefs in excess of 15 pages ; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 12/24/2002)

Dec. 17, 2002

Dec. 17, 2002

103

MOTION by plaintiff for leave to file an additional appearance ; Notice. (hmb) (Entered: 01/10/2003)

Dec. 19, 2002

Dec. 19, 2002

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

Private Employment Class Actions

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: March 12, 2001

Closing Date: 2004

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiffs are former Black and Hispanic employees of defendants.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Denied

Defendants

Groot Industries, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Groot Recycling and Waste Services, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Private Settlement Agreement

Voluntary Dismissal

Amount Defendant Pays: Unknown

Issues

General:

Pattern or Practice

Discrimination-area:

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Discipline

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Other Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc)

Pay / Benefits

Promotion

Discrimination-basis:

National origin discrimination

Race:

Black

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

National Origin/Ethnicity:

Hispanic