Case: Yapp v. Union Pacific RR. Co.

4:02-cv-00615 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri

Filed Date: April 29, 2002

Closed Date: 2007

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On April 29, 2002, six employees filed a lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Missouri Human Rights Act in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri against their employer, the Union Pacific Railroad Company ("UPRR"). The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, alleged racial discrimination and asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged systemic racial discri…

On April 29, 2002, six employees filed a lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., and the Missouri Human Rights Act in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri against their employer, the Union Pacific Railroad Company ("UPRR"). The plaintiffs, represented by private counsel, alleged racial discrimination and asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief. Specifically, the plaintiffs alleged systemic racial discrimination in UPRR's employee selection, training and compensation policies, practices and procedures, including claims of disparate impact and disparate treatment.

According to the PACER docket, on August 29, 2003, the plaintiffs filed a motion for class certification and on November 15, 2004, a hearing on the plaintiffs' motion for class certification began. The plaintiffs sought to certify a class of all African-Americans, who, from July 18, 2000 to the present, were adversely impacted by one or more aspects of the UPRR's policies, practices and procedures related to selections for non-agreement job vacancies. On August 5, 2005, the court (Judge Stephen Limbaugh) denied the plaintiffs' motion for class certification, holding that plaintiffs had failed to satisfy numerosity, commonality, typicality, and adequacy of representation requirements. Yapp v. Union Pacific Ry. Co., 229 F.R.D. 608 (E.D. Mo. 2005).

According to the PACER docket, on July 24, 2006, the defendant filed a motion for summary judgment. On September 26, 2006, the court (Judge Limbaugh) referred the case to alternative dispute resolution in the form of mediation, yet the parties failed to reach a settlement. On March 29, 2007, the court (Judge Limbaugh) granted in part the defendant's motion for summary judgment, dismissing majority of the plaintiffs' claims. On November 9, 2007, the plaintiffs issued a stipulation of dismissal with prejudice, and on November 13, 2007, the court (Judge Limbaugh) dismissed the case with prejudice. No further details regarding the settlement are available.

Summary Authors

Emily Kuznick (4/14/2008)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5478666/parties/yapp-v-union-pacific-rr-co/


Judge(s)
Attorney for Plaintiff

Calamusa, Rocco Jr. (Alabama)

Childs, Robert F. Jr. (Alabama)

Attorney for Defendant

Burke, Michael P. (Missouri)

Donnelly, Dennis C (Missouri)

Herbert, Douglas C. (District of Columbia)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

4:02-cv-00615

Docket

Yapp v. Union Pacific

March 28, 2008

March 28, 2008

Docket
33

4:02-cv-00615

Protective Order

Yapp v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Dec. 27, 2002

Dec. 27, 2002

Order/Opinion
124

4:02-cv-00615

Class Certification Denied

Yapp v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Aug. 5, 2005

Aug. 5, 2005

Order/Opinion

229 F.R.D. 229

172

4:02-cv-00615

Order Referring Case to Alternative Dispute Resolution

Yapp v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

Sept. 26, 2006

Sept. 26, 2006

Order/Opinion
179

4:02-cv-00615

Order

Yapp v. Union Pacific Railroad Co.

March 29, 2007

March 29, 2007

Order/Opinion

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5478666/yapp-v-union-pacific-rr-co/

Last updated Feb. 15, 2024, 3:03 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
124

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Pltfs' Motion for Class Certification 41 be and hereby is DENIED; Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 8/5/05 (CMA)

Aug. 5, 2005

Aug. 5, 2005

Clearinghouse
127

ORDER re 125 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that "Plaintiffs' motion to Alter, or Amend, Memorandum and Order Regarding Class Certification" is DENIED. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 10/7/05. (ARL)

Oct. 7, 2005

Oct. 7, 2005

RECAP
140

ORDER - IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiffs may select which of the cases are to be tried first and the remaining two cases in the order of their preference. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the three cases to be tried, if plaintiffs prefer, can be tried in sequence in that one may be tried first and when that case is submitted to a jury the second case can be tried and when that case is submitted to a jury, the third case can be tried so that the casescan be tried sequentially if desired. Otherwise , the cases can be tried on different dates. For the selection process, the Court offers the following dates as available: August 7, 2006; September 18, 2006; October 30, 2006.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall notify the Court if a Rule 16 Scheduling Order would be preferred. If so, the Court should be notified and a scheduling order will be issued; otherwise the Court suggests that the parties agree on one of the suggested trial dates and the methodology for conducting the trial, or if preferred, a telephone conference can be held between the Court and counsel for the purpose of resolving the trial date and any scheduling issues that need to be considered. In this connection, defendant has moved to amend the case management order but it would appear that the parties response to this order would be more appropriate before ruling on the motion to amend.re 134 , 137 . Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 4/19/06. (ARL)

April 19, 2006

April 19, 2006

RECAP
148

ORDER 142 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that for the foregoing reasons, the motion of plaintiffs for leave to file a second amended complaint is DENIED. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 6/19/06. (ARL) (Entered: 06/19/2006)

June 19, 2006

June 19, 2006

RECAP
149

MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' expert testimony and reports by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 07/06/2006)

July 6, 2006

July 6, 2006

PACER
150

RESPONSE in Opposition re 149 MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' expert testimony and reports filed by Plaintiffs Karen Yapp, Rodney C. Grady, Mollie Jones, Cynthia Byas. (Johnson, Herman) (Entered: 07/17/2006)

July 17, 2006

July 17, 2006

PACER
151

MOTION for Summary Judgment by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 07/24/2006)

July 24, 2006

July 24, 2006

PACER
152

MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re 151 MOTION for Summary Judgment filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4)(Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 07/24/2006)

July 24, 2006

July 24, 2006

PACER
153

MOTION for Summary Judgment against Karen Yapp and Mollie Jones by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 07/24/2006)

July 24, 2006

July 24, 2006

PACER
154

MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re 153 MOTION for Summary Judgment against Karen Yapp and Mollie Jones filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6)(Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 07/24/2006)

July 24, 2006

July 24, 2006

PACER
155

MOTION for Summary Judgment against Rodney Grady by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 07/24/2006)

July 24, 2006

July 24, 2006

PACER
156

MEMORANDUM in Support of Motion re 155 MOTION for Summary Judgment against Rodney Grady filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7)(Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 07/24/2006)

July 24, 2006

July 24, 2006

PACER
157

REPLY to Response to Motion re 149 MOTION to Strike Plaintiffs' expert testimony and reports of Dr. Ewin Bradley filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 07/27/2006)

July 27, 2006

July 27, 2006

PACER
158

Joint MOTION for Ruling on Appointment of Mediator by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 07/28/2006)

July 28, 2006

July 28, 2006

PACER
159

RESPONSE in Opposition re 153 MOTION for Summary Judgment against Karen Yapp and Mollie Jones filed by Plaintiffs Karen Yapp, Mollie Jones. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A -- Statement of Facts# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 24# 4 Exhibit 25# 5 Exhibit 70# 6 Exhibit 71# 7 Exhibit 72# 8 Exhibit 75# 9 Exhibit 77# 10 Exhibit 78# 11 Exhibit 79# 12 Exhibit 80# 13 Exhibit 81# 14 Exhibit 82# 15 Exhibit 83# 16 Exhibit 84# 17 Exhibit 85# 18 Exhibit 86# 19 Exhibit 87# 20 Exhibit 88# 21 Exhibit 89# 22 Exhibit 90# 23 Exhibit 91# 24 Exhibit 92# 25 Exhibit 93# 26 Exhibit 94# 27 Exhibit 95# 28 Exhibit 96# 29 Exhibit 116# 30 Exhibit 117# 31 Exhibit 119)(Johnson, Herman) (Entered: 08/23/2006)

Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

PACER
160

RESPONSE in Opposition re 151 MOTION for Summary Judgment Against Plaintiff Cynthia Byas filed by Plaintiff Cynthia Byas. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A -- Statement of Facts# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 70# 4 Exhibit 71# 5 Exhibit 72# 6 Exhibit 97# 7 Exhibit 98# 8 Exhibit 99# 9 Exhibit 100# 10 Exhibit 101# 11 Exhibit 102# 12 Exhibit 103# 13 Exhibit 104# 14 Exhibit 119# 15 Exhibit 120# 16 Exhibit 121)(Johnson, Herman) (Entered: 08/23/2006)

Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

PACER
161

RESPONSE in Opposition re 155 MOTION for Summary Judgment against Rodney Grady filed by Plaintiff Rodney C. Grady. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A -- Statement of Facts# 2 Exhibit 2# 3 Exhibit 70# 4 Exhibit 71# 5 Exhibit 72# 6 Exhibit 105# 7 Exhibit 106# 8 Exhibit 107# 9 Exhibit 108# 10 Exhibit 109# 11 Exhibit 110# 12 Exhibit 111# 13 Exhibit 112# 14 Exhibit 113# 15 Exhibit 114# 16 Exhibit 115# 17 Exhibit 118# 18 Exhibit 119# 19 Exhibit 121)(Johnson, Herman) (Entered: 08/23/2006)

Aug. 23, 2006

Aug. 23, 2006

PACER
162

MOTION for Extension of Time to File ;Extension to file the following: Reply Memorandum in Support of Motions for Sumary Judgment ;Proposed extension date September 6, 2006 by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 09/05/2006)

Sept. 5, 2006

Sept. 5, 2006

PACER
163

REPLY to Response to Motion re 151 MOTION for Summary Judgment Directed to Cynthia Byas filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4)(Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 09/06/2006)

Sept. 6, 2006

Sept. 6, 2006

PACER
164

REPLY to Response to Motion re 155 MOTION for Summary Judgment against Rodney Grady filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4)(Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 09/06/2006)

Sept. 6, 2006

Sept. 6, 2006

PACER
165

REPLY to Response to Motion re 153 MOTION for Summary Judgment against Karen Yapp and Mollie Jones filed by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: # 1 # 2 # 3 # 4 # 5 # 6 # 7 # 8 # 9)(Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 09/06/2006)

Sept. 6, 2006

Sept. 6, 2006

PACER

Docket Text ORDER re 162 MOTION for Extension of Time to File ;Extension to file the following: Reply Memorandum in Support of Motions for Sumary Judgment ;Proposed extension date September 6, 2006 by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Mooney, Timothy) filed by Union Pacific Railroad Company, ; ADDITIONAL TIME GRANTED. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 9/7/06. (ARL)

Sept. 7, 2006

Sept. 7, 2006

PACER
166

MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney ;attorney/firm Timothy C. Mooney, Jr. by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Mooney, Timothy) (Entered: 09/08/2006)

Sept. 8, 2006

Sept. 8, 2006

PACER

Docket Text ORDER re 166 MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney (attorney/firm Timothy C. Mooney, Jr.) by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company; ORDERED Granted - SNL; Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 9/15/06 (CMA)

Sept. 15, 2006

Sept. 15, 2006

PACER
167

MOTION for Leave to File a Supplemental Opposition to Defendant?s Motion for Summary Judgment Directed to Plaintiffs Karen Yapp and Mollie Jones by Plaintiffs Karen Yapp, Mollie Jones. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A# 2 Attachment B# 3 Exhibit 122# 4 Exhibit 123# 5 Exhibit 124# 6 Exhibit 126# 7 Exhibit 126# 8 Exhibit 127# 9 Exhibit 128# 10 Exhibit 129)(Johnson, Herman) (Entered: 09/20/2006)

Sept. 20, 2006

Sept. 20, 2006

PACER
168

MOTION for Leave to File a Supplemental Opposition to Defendant?s Motion for Summary Judgment Directed to Plaintiff Cynthia Byas by Plaintiff Cynthia Byas. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A# 2 Attachment B# 3 Exhibit 130)(Johnson, Herman) (Entered: 09/20/2006)

Sept. 20, 2006

Sept. 20, 2006

PACER
169

MOTION for Leave to File a Supplemental Opposition to Defendant?s Motion for Summary Judgment Directed to Plaintiff Rodney Grady by Plaintiff Rodney C. Grady. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A)(Johnson, Herman) (Entered: 09/20/2006)

Sept. 20, 2006

Sept. 20, 2006

PACER

Docket Text ORDER re 167 MOTION for Leave to File a Supplemental Opposition to Defendant?s Motion for Summary Judgment Directed to Plaintiffs Karen Yapp and Mollie Jones by Plaintiffs Karen Yapp, Mollie Jones. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A# 2 Attachment B# 3 Exhibit 122# 4 Exhibit 123# 5 Exhibit 124# 6 Exhibit 126# 7 Exhibit 126# 8 Exhibit 127# 9 Exhibit 128# 10 Exhibit 129)(Johnson, Herman) filed by Karen Yapp, Mollie Jones; ORDERED LEAVE TO FILE GRANTED. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 9/21/06. (ARL)

Sept. 21, 2006

Sept. 21, 2006

PACER

Docket Text ORDER re 168 MOTION for Leave to File a Supplemental Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Directed to Plaintiff Cynthia Byas by Plaintiff Cynthia Byas. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A# 2 Attachment B# 3 Exhibit 130)(Johnson, Herman) filed by Cynthia Byas, ; ORDERED LEAVE TO FILE GRANTED. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 9/21/06. (ARL)

Sept. 21, 2006

Sept. 21, 2006

PACER

Docket Text ORDER re 169 MOTION for Leave to File a Supplemental Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment Directed to Plaintiff Rodney Grady by Plaintiff Rodney C. Grady. (Attachments: # 1 Attachment A)(Johnson, Herman) filed by Rodney C. Grady; ORDERED LEAVE TO FILE GRANTED. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 9/21/06. (ARL)

Sept. 21, 2006

Sept. 21, 2006

PACER
170

ORDER - IT IS ORDERED that the parties will submit the name of a mediator agreed on by the parties no later than September 28, 2006. If a name is not submitted by agreement, the Court on its own, will appoint a mediator. In the interim, the Court will wait about ruling on existing motions. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 9/22/06. (LAH, ) (Entered: 09/25/2006)

Sept. 22, 2006

Sept. 22, 2006

PACER
171

NOTICE by Plaintiffs Karen Yapp, Rodney C. Grady, Mollie Jones, Cynthia Byas, Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company of Mediator Selection and Mediation Date: (Burke, Michael) (Entered: 09/25/2006)

Sept. 25, 2006

Sept. 25, 2006

PACER
172

ORDER REFERRING CASE to Alternative Dispute Resolution: This case is referred to: Mediation; Designation of Lead Counsel: Mary Anne Sedey; ADR Completion Deadline due by 10/27/2006; Designation of Neutral due by 10/2/2006; ADR Conference Schedule due by 10/2/2006; Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 9/26/06 (CMA) (Entered: 09/26/2006)

Sept. 26, 2006

Sept. 26, 2006

Clearinghouse
173

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is REMOVED from the trial docket of 10/30/06 pending further order of this Court; Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 9/26/06 (CMA) (Entered: 09/26/2006)

Sept. 26, 2006

Sept. 26, 2006

PACER
174

MOTION for Leave to File Response to Plaintiffs' Supplemental Oppositions to Defendant's Motions for Summary Judgment by Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Attachments: # 1)(Burke, Michael) (Entered: 11/06/2006)

Nov. 6, 2006

Nov. 6, 2006

PACER
175

Letter to Counsel from SNL Re: Mediation (ARL) (Entered: 11/13/2006)

Nov. 13, 2006

Nov. 13, 2006

PACER
176

ADR COMPLIANCE REPORT by Neutral: Richard Sher. Date of Conference: October 25, 2006. The parties participated in good faith, and the parties DID NOT achieve a settlement.(SAC, ) (Entered: 11/15/2006)

Nov. 15, 2006

Nov. 15, 2006

PACER
177

Letter to Counsel from SNL Re: Case Status (ARL) (Entered: 11/21/2006)

Nov. 21, 2006

Nov. 21, 2006

PACER
178

ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Deft's Motion to Strike 149 be and is DENIED; denying 149 Motion to Strike; Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 2/15/07 (CMA) (Entered: 02/15/2007)

Feb. 15, 2007

Feb. 15, 2007

PACER
179

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Union Pacific Railroad's Motion for Summary Judgment 151 as to Plaintiffs Karen Yapp and Mollie Jones is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Karen Yapp and Mollie Jones' claims of disparate treatment discrimination are DISMISSED in part, in accordance with this Order. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs Karen Yapp and Mollie Jones' claims for disparate impact discrimination are DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 3/29/07. (ARL) (Entered: 03/29/2007)

March 29, 2007

March 29, 2007

Clearinghouse
180

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Union Pacific Railroad's Motion for Summary Judgment 155 as to Plaintiff Rodney Grady be and is GRANTED.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Rodney Grady's cause of action be and is DISMISSED.Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 3/29/07. (ARL) (Entered: 03/29/2007)

March 29, 2007

March 29, 2007

PACER
181

ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendant Union Pacific Railroad's Motion for Summary Judgment 151 as to Plaintiff Cynthia Byas is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff Cynthia Byas' claim for disparate impact discrimination is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 3/29/07. (ARL) (Entered: 03/29/2007)

March 29, 2007

March 29, 2007

PACER
182

Letter to Counsel from Judge Limbaugh; Re: Status of case for trial. (KJF, ) (Entered: 05/08/2007)

May 8, 2007

May 8, 2007

PACER
183

SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for 11/12/2007 09:30 AM before Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh.. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 6/8/07. (LGK, ) (Entered: 06/08/2007)

June 8, 2007

June 8, 2007

PACER
184

SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial for plaintiff, Cynthia Byas, set for 11/12/2007 09:30 AM before Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh.. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 6/8/07. (LGK, ) (Entered: 06/08/2007)

June 8, 2007

June 8, 2007

PACER
185

SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial on plaintiffs, Karen Yapp and Mollie Jones, set for 11/12/2007 09:30 AM before Honorable Stephen N. Limbaugh.. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 6/8/07. (LGK, ) (Entered: 06/08/2007)

June 8, 2007

June 8, 2007

PACER
186

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Plaintiffs Karen Yapp, Rodney C. Grady, Mollie Jones, Cynthia Byas, Defendant Union Pacific Railroad Company. (Johnson, Herman) (Entered: 11/09/2007)

Nov. 9, 2007

Nov. 9, 2007

PACER
187

ORDER OF DISMISSAL - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED with prejudice in accordance with the document filed by plaintiffs on November 9, 2007 (# 186 ).IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all outstanding motions are moot. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 11/13/07. (KJF, ) (Entered: 11/13/2007)

Nov. 13, 2007

Nov. 13, 2007

PACER
188

JUDGMENT - IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the order of dismissal entered November13, 2007 is denominated a Judgment. Signed by Judge Stephen N. Limbaugh on 11/15/07. (LAH, ) (Entered: 11/15/2007)

Nov. 15, 2007

Nov. 15, 2007

PACER
189

Letter to Counsel from Judge Limbaugh Re: exhibit pickup (LAH, ) (Entered: 03/28/2008)

March 28, 2008

March 28, 2008

PACER

Case Details

State / Territory: Missouri

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 29, 2002

Closing Date: 2007

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

African-Americans, who, from July 18, 2000, to the present were adversely impacted by one or more aspects of the UPRR’s policies, practices and procedures related to selections for non-agreement job vacancies

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: No

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Denied

Defendants

Union Pacific Railroad Co., Private Entity/Person

Defendant Type(s):

Transportation

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Defendant

Nature of Relief:

None

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Form of Settlement:

Confession of Judgment

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Other Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc)

Pay / Benefits

Training

Discrimination-basis:

Race discrimination

Race:

Black

Affected Sex or Gender:

Female

Male