Case: Ramos v. Ashcroft

1:02-cv-08266 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois

Filed Date: Nov. 15, 2002

Closed Date: 2007

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On November 15, 2002, eleven immigrant plaintiffs filed this class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the Chicago office of the INS violated laws, regulations, and INS procedures by accepting prematurely-filed applications for residence between January 29, 1997 and April 30, 2001. Plaintiffs alleged that after processing the applications, the INS kept the application filing fees and then used information in the applications to inves…

On November 15, 2002, eleven immigrant plaintiffs filed this class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, alleging that the Chicago office of the INS violated laws, regulations, and INS procedures by accepting prematurely-filed applications for residence between January 29, 1997 and April 30, 2001. Plaintiffs alleged that after processing the applications, the INS kept the application filing fees and then used information in the applications to investigate and institute removal proceedings against the applicants, in violation of the Administrative Procedures Act, 5 U.S.C. § 706; procedural and substantive due process; and equal protection. Attorneys with the Mexican American Legal Defense & Educational Fund, the Midwest Immigrant & Human Rights Center and private firms represented plaintiffs. They sought declaratory and equitable relief.

A different group of plaintiffs had previously challenged the same conduct in a 2001 lawsuit which asserted a different legal theory. That case, Ramos v. Ashcroft, No. 01-CV-2633, was dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. See Ramos v. Ashcroft, 2002 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 1918 (Feb. 2, 2002) Three of the plaintiffs in the 2001 suit, along with 8 new plaintiffs filed the 2002 case.

Defendants again moved to dismiss the complaint for lack of jurisdiction. The District Court (Judge David H. Coar) denied that motion. See Ramos v. Ashcroft, 2003 F.Supp.2d, 2004 WL 161520 (N.D.Ill. Feb. 14, 2003). Defendants then moved to dismiss for failure to state a claim. Judge Coar denied the motion as to plaintiffs' Administrative Procedures Act but granted it as to plaintiffs' other claim. Ramos v. Ashcroft, F.Supp.2d, 2004 WL 22282521 (N.D.Ill., Jan. 16, 2004). The case was then transferred to Judge Mark Filip.

Extensive and lengthy settlement negotiations followed, and the parties ultimately reached a resolution. The Court (Judge Filip) preliminarily approved the settlement, pending a fairness hearing on June 10, 2005. Final approval was granted by an order dated August 11, 2005.

Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the government stipulated to certification of the case as a class action, with the class consisting of: "all persons who applied for permanent residence (a green card) pursuant to Section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act between 1/29/97 and 4/30/01 in the Chicago Office of the former INS, but who were not then eligible to be approved, because (1) a visa petition was filed before April 30, 2001, but was not yet "current" when the residence application was filed (Class 1); or (2) a visa petition had not been filed for the applicant (Class 2)." The Agreement provided that class members (1) could apply for a credit for application fees for their residence applications; (2) if they were in removal proceedings, could seek the government's agreement to terminate those proceedings for humanitarian reasons within six months of the agreement; and (3) if were not then in removal proceedings, could benefit from a decision not to begin removal proceedings on the basis of their applications. The government also agreed to pay $90,000 in fees to the class counsel for plaintiffs.

Summary Authors

Dan Dalton (11/18/2007)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5301974/parties/ramos-v-ashcroft/


Judge(s)

Coar, David H. (Illinois)

Filip, Mark R. (Illinois)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Albiol, Sioban L. (Illinois)

McCarthy, Mary Margaret (Illinois)

Attorney for Defendant

McNulty, Sheila (Illinois)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:02-cv-08266

Docket [PACER]

Aug. 12, 2005

Aug. 12, 2005

Docket

01-02633

Memorandum Opinion and Order [Re: Dismiss]

Feb. 7, 2002

Feb. 7, 2002

Order/Opinion

2002 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 2002

1

1:02-cv-08266

Complaint

Nov. 15, 2002

Nov. 15, 2002

Complaint
11

1:02-cv-08266

Class Action Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Feb. 14, 2003

Feb. 14, 2003

Complaint
24

1:02-cv-08266

Memorandum Opinion and Order [Re: Motion to Dismiss]

Sept. 30, 2003

Sept. 30, 2003

Order/Opinion

2003 U.S.Dist.LEXIS 2003

31

1:02-cv-08266

Memorandum Opinion and Order [Re: Dismiss]

Jan. 16, 2004

Jan. 16, 2004

Order/Opinion

2004 WL 2004

34

1:02-cv-08266

Second Amended Complaint

Jan. 26, 2004

Jan. 26, 2004

Complaint

1:02-cv-08266

Summary Notice of Pendency of Class Action and Settlement

Ramos v. Chertoff

Jan. 1, 2005

Jan. 1, 2005

Notice Letter
65

1:02-cv-08266

Parties' Agreed Motion for Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement

March 30, 2005

March 30, 2005

Settlement Agreement

1:02-cv-08266

Notice of Class Action Settlement

Ramos v. Chertoff

No Court

April 29, 2005

April 29, 2005

Press Release

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/5301974/ramos-v-ashcroft/

Last updated April 11, 2024, 3:16 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT (Attachments) - Civil cover sheet - Appearance(s) of Patricia Mendoza, Steven I. Saltzman, Mary Margaret McCarthy, Charles G Roth, Alonzo Rivas as attorney(s) for plaintiffs (Four original and four copies summons(es) issued.) (Documents: 1-1 through 1-4) (hp) (Entered: 11/15/2002)

Nov. 14, 2002

Nov. 14, 2002

RECEIPT regarding payment of filing fee paid; on 11/14/02 in the amount of $150.00, receipt # 10316982. (hp) (Entered: 11/15/2002)

Nov. 14, 2002

Nov. 14, 2002

2

DESIGNATION OF ATTORNEY Sheila McNulty Entenman as US Attorney. (yp) (Entered: 11/20/2002)

Nov. 18, 2002

Nov. 18, 2002

3

MOTION by plaintiff for reassignment ; Memorandum in support (Attachments); Notice. (jmp) (Entered: 11/25/2002)

Nov. 22, 2002

Nov. 22, 2002

4

MINUTE ORDER of 11/23/02 by Hon. George W. Lindberg : Plaintiff's motion for reassignment is granted [3-1]. This action will be reassigned to the calendar of Judge David H. Coar. Mailed notice (jmp) (Entered: 11/25/2002)

Nov. 23, 2002

Nov. 23, 2002

5

REASSIGNMENT ORDER of 11/25/02 This case is reassigned to the Hon. David H. Coar from Hon. George W. Lindberg pursuant to 40.3(B) (2); this case appears to involve the same parties and subject matter as case number 01 C 2633 assigned to the calendar of Judge David H. Coar and dismissed prior to the filing of this case. (For further detail see order.) Mailed notice (jmp) (Entered: 11/26/2002)

Nov. 25, 2002

Nov. 25, 2002

SCHEDULE set on 1/15/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Status hearing set to 9:00 1/28/03 . Mailed notice (pm) (Entered: 01/15/2003)

Jan. 15, 2003

Jan. 15, 2003

6

MOTION by plaintiffS for class certification , and to stay briefing schedule ; Notice (rmm) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

Jan. 16, 2003

Jan. 16, 2003

7

MOTION by plaintiffs for preliminary injunction , and to stay briefing schedule (rmm) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

Jan. 16, 2003

Jan. 16, 2003

8

MINUTE ORDER of 1/22/03 by Hon. David H. Coar: Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction [7-1] and to stay briefing schedule [7-2] and Motion for class certification [6-1] and to stay briefing schedule [6-2] are entered and continued to 9:00 1/28/03. No notice (rmm) (Entered: 01/27/2003)

Jan. 22, 2003

Jan. 22, 2003

9

MOTION by defendants to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction (Attachments); Memorandum in support; Notice. (air) (Entered: 01/29/2003)

Jan. 24, 2003

Jan. 24, 2003

10

MINUTE ORDER of 1/28/03 by Hon. David H. Coar: Answer brief to defendants' motion to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction [9-1] due 2/18/03. Reply to answer brief due 2/28/03. Ruling on defendants' motion to dismiss will be by mail. Status hearing held. The briefing for the motion to dismiss is regarding the issue of jurisdiction. The briefing on the motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim will not proceed. Discovery is stayed pending ruling on jurisdiction. The motions for preliminary injunction [7-1] and motion for class certification [6-1] are continued until after the ruling on the jurisdictional issues. Mailed notice (air) Modified on 08/14/2003 (Entered: 01/29/2003)

Jan. 28, 2003

Jan. 28, 2003

11

FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT [1-1] by plaintiffs (Attachments); Notice. (fce) (Entered: 02/20/2003)

Feb. 14, 2003

Feb. 14, 2003

12

MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction [9-1]; Notice. (fce) (Entered: 02/20/2003)

Feb. 18, 2003

Feb. 18, 2003

13

REPLY MEMORANDUM by government defendants in support of motion to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction [9-1]; Declaration of Shirley Roberts. (jmp) (Entered: 04/30/2003)

Feb. 28, 2003

Feb. 28, 2003

14

MOTION by plaintiff for leave to conduct limited discovery Memorandum in support (Attachments); Notice. (jmp) Modified on 06/11/2003 (Entered: 06/11/2003)

June 10, 2003

June 10, 2003

15

MINUTE ORDER of 6/10/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Plaintiffs' motion for leave to conduct limited discovery is granted to the extend that this Court will allow the taking of a one and half hour deposition of Shirley J. Roberts, said deposition is limited to what's in her declaration, the remainder of the motion is denied at this time[14-1]. Mailed notice (jmp) (Entered: 06/11/2003)

June 10, 2003

June 10, 2003

16

MOTION by plaintiffs' attorney, Patricia Mendoza to withdraw ; Notice (las) (Entered: 07/02/2003)

June 23, 2003

June 23, 2003

17

MINUTE ORDER of 7/1/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Motion of Patricia Mendoza to withdraw is granted [16-1]. Leave granted Patricia Mendoza to withdraw as one of the attorneys for the plaintiffs. Mailed notice (las) (Entered: 07/02/2003)

July 1, 2003

July 1, 2003

18

MOTION by plaintiffs for leave to file a surreply in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss ; Notice (hp) (Entered: 08/14/2003)

Aug. 7, 2003

Aug. 7, 2003

19

MINUTE ORDER of 8/13/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a surreply in opposition to motion to dismiss is denied [18-1]. All briefs that are currently on file as to the motion to dismiss are stricken. Plaintiff to re-file an answer brief to the motion to dismiss within seven days; Defendants to re-file a reply brief sueven days thereafter. Mailed notice (hp) Modified on 08/14/2003 (Entered: 08/14/2003)

Aug. 13, 2003

Aug. 13, 2003

20

STATEMENT by parties regarding compliance with Court's August 13, 2003 order; Notice. (hp) (Entered: 08/27/2003)

Aug. 20, 2003

Aug. 20, 2003

21

MOTION by defendants to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction ; Memorandum in support (Attachment). (hp) (Entered: 08/27/2003)

Aug. 20, 2003

Aug. 20, 2003

22

MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss case for lack of jurisdiction [9-1] [21-1] (Attachments); Notice. (hp) (Entered: 08/29/2003)

Aug. 27, 2003

Aug. 27, 2003

23

REPLY BRIEF by defendants in support of its motion to dismiss [21-1] (hp) (Entered: 09/08/2003)

Sept. 3, 2003

Sept. 3, 2003

24

MINUTE ORDER of 9/29/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : For the reasons given in the attached memorandum opinion, defendants' motion to dismiss [Doc. 21] is denied in its entirly. (Entered Memorandum Opinion and Order.) Mailed notice (hp)

Sept. 29, 2003

Sept. 29, 2003

RECAP
25

REPORT by parties of planning conference; Notice (hp) (Entered: 11/20/2003)

Nov. 19, 2003

Nov. 19, 2003

26

MOTION by defendants to dismiss case ; Memorandum in support (hp) (Entered: 11/21/2003)

Nov. 19, 2003

Nov. 19, 2003

SCHEDULE set on 11/24/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Status hearing held. Rule 16(b) scheduling conference held. All disclosures required by Rule 26(a)(1) have been made. Any amendments to pleadings or actions to join other parties shall be filed on or before 1/5/04. Motion Dispositive - Rule 56 Motions due on or before 6/15/04. Discovery ordered closed on 5/17/04. Final pretrial order to be submitted on 9/23/04 . Pretrial conference set to 11:00 10/1/04. If necessary, Jury trial set to 10:00 10/4/04. The parties are directed to review this court's standing orders. Copies are available in chambers or through the court's web page. Mailed notice (pm) (Entered: 11/24/2003)

Nov. 24, 2003

Nov. 24, 2003

27

MINUTE ORDER of 11/24/03 by Hon. David H. Coar : Filed defendants motion to dismiss. [26-1] Answer brief to motion due 12/15/03. Reply to answer brief due 01/05/04. Ruling on motion to dismiss by defendants [26-1] set for 01/14/04 at 9:00 a.m. The Court will enter the discovery and trial schedule as stated on the record. Notices mailed by judge's staff (hp) (Entered: 11/25/2003)

Nov. 24, 2003

Nov. 24, 2003

28

MEMORANDUM by plaintiffs in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim [26-1] (Attachment); Notice (hp) (Entered: 12/16/2003)

Dec. 15, 2003

Dec. 15, 2003

29

REPLY brief by defendants in support of motion to dismiss case [26-1]. (jmm) Modified on 01/13/2004 (Entered: 01/07/2004)

Jan. 5, 2004

Jan. 5, 2004

32

MOTION by plaintiffs for leave to file second amended complaint (Attachments); Notice (ntf) (Entered: 01/16/2004)

Jan. 5, 2004

Jan. 5, 2004

30

MINUTE ORDER of 1/12/04 by Hon. David H. Coar : Ruling on the motion to dismiss is reset to 01/15/04 at 9:00 a.m. [26-1] The date of 01/14/04 is stricken. Telephoned notice (hp) (Entered: 01/13/2004)

Jan. 12, 2004

Jan. 12, 2004

33

MINUTE ORDER of 1/15/04 by Hon. David H. Coar : Plaintiffs motion for leave to file second amended complaint is granted [32-1]. Second Amended Complaint to be filed on or before 01/26/04. No notice (ntf) (Entered: 01/16/2004)

Jan. 15, 2004

Jan. 15, 2004

31

MINUTE ORDER of 1/15/04 by Hon. David H. Coar : For the reasons given in the attached memorandum opinion and order, defendants' motion to dismiss case Doc. [26-1] is granted in part and denied in part; the motion is granted as to Count II, Count III, and Count IV, but it is denied as to Count I. Entered Memorandum Opinion and Order. No notice (eav)

Jan. 15, 2004

Jan. 15, 2004

RECAP
34

SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT [11-1] by plaintiffs (Attachments); Notice (hp) (Entered: 01/27/2004)

Jan. 26, 2004

Jan. 26, 2004

35

TRANSCRIPT of proceedings for the following date(s): 01/27/04 Before Honorable David H. Coar (hp) (Entered: 02/09/2004)

Feb. 6, 2004

Feb. 6, 2004

EXECUTIVE committee 3/3/04 This case is reassigned to the Hon. Mark Filip Mailed notice (amb) (Entered: 03/05/2004)

March 3, 2004

March 3, 2004

36

MINUTE ORDER of 3/8/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : This matter is set for a status conference on 3/25/04 at 4:00 p.m. (Entered Order Requiring Status Report and Setting Status Hearing for Cases Newly Assigned to Judge Filip). Mailed notice (las) (Entered: 03/08/2004)

March 8, 2004

March 8, 2004

39

MOTION by defendants' to extend time to answer or otherwise plead to the second amended complaint ; Notice. (vmj) (Entered: 03/26/2004)

March 19, 2004

March 19, 2004

37

JOINT STATUS REPORT by parties; Notice. (hp) (Entered: 03/24/2004)

March 22, 2004

March 22, 2004

38

RESPONSE by plaintiffs to defendants motion to extend time to answer or otherwise plead; Notice. (hp) (Entered: 03/25/2004)

March 24, 2004

March 24, 2004

40

MINUTE ORDER of 3/25/04 by Hon. Mark Filip: Status hearing held and continued to 10:00 a.m. on 5/13/04. Defendants' motion to extend time to answer or otherwise plead to the second amended complaint, to and including 4/5/04, is granted [39-1]. Plaintiffs are given to and including 4/9/04 in which to file their motion for class certification. Defendants are given until 5/10/04 to file response to class certification motion and plaintiffs are given until 6/7/04 to file reply. Ruling will be by mail. Settlement conference set for 11:00 a.m. on 5/11/04. Mailed notice (vmj) (Entered: 03/26/2004)

March 25, 2004

March 25, 2004

41

MOTION by defendants to dismiss the second amended complaint ; Memorandum in support (Attachment). (hp) (Entered: 04/06/2004)

April 5, 2004

April 5, 2004

43

NOTICE by defendants of motion regarding motion to dismiss the second amended complaint [41-1] (Attachments). (cem) (Entered: 04/13/2004)

April 7, 2004

April 7, 2004

42

MOTION by plaintiffs for class certification ; Memorandum in support (Attachments); Notice (hp) (Entered: 04/12/2004)

April 9, 2004

April 9, 2004

44

MINUTE ORDER of 4/12/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Plaintiffs to respond to defendants' motion to dismiss second amended complaint [41-1] on or before 4/27/04; defendants reply due by 5/11/04. Ruling on motion to dismiss will be by mail. Telephoned notice (cem) (Entered: 04/13/2004)

April 12, 2004

April 12, 2004

45

MEMORANDUM of law by plaintiffs in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss the second amended complaint [41-1]; Notice. (hp) (Entered: 04/28/2004)

April 27, 2004

April 27, 2004

46

MOTION by plaintiffs for a protective order ; Memorandum in support (Attachments); Notice. (hp) (Entered: 05/06/2004)

May 3, 2004

May 3, 2004

ORAL MOTION by plaintiffs to continue motion for a protective order . (hp) (Entered: 05/06/2004)

May 4, 2004

May 4, 2004

47

MINUTE ORDER of 5/4/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : On plaintiffs' oral motion, [0-0] motion for a protective order [46-1] is entered and continued to 05/10/04 at 11:00 a.m. Telephoned notice (hp) (Entered: 05/06/2004)

May 4, 2004

May 4, 2004

48

AMENDED motion by plaintiffs for a protective order [46-1]; Notice. (hp) (Entered: 05/11/2004)

May 5, 2004

May 5, 2004

ORAL MOTION by plaintiffs for Jorge Sanchez for leave to file his appearance as additional counsel (hp) (Entered: 05/11/2004)

May 10, 2004

May 10, 2004

49

MINUTE ORDER of 5/10/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Filed plaintiff's amended motion for a protective order. [48-1] Answer brief to motion due 05/24/04. Reply to answer brief due 05/31/04. Ruling on plaintiffs' amended motion for a protective order set for 06/07/04 at 11:00 a.m. Oral motion of Jorge Sanchez for leave to file his appearance as addition counsel for plaintiffs is granted. [0-1] Briefing on motion for class certification is held in abeyance pending ruling on amended motion for protective order. [42-1] Mailed notice (hp) Modified on 05/11/2004 (Entered: 05/11/2004)

May 10, 2004

May 10, 2004

51

MOTION by plaintiffs for leave to conduct limited discovery (hp) (Entered: 05/12/2004)

May 10, 2004

May 10, 2004

52

MEMORANDUM of law by plaintiffs in opposition to defendants' motion to dismiss second amended complaint [41-1] (Attachments). (hp) (Entered: 05/12/2004)

May 10, 2004

May 10, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 5/11/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Settlement conference set for 11:00 6/3/04 . No notice (tbk) (Entered: 05/11/2004)

May 11, 2004

May 11, 2004

53

MINUTE ORDER of 5/11/04 by Hon. Mark Filip: Plaintiffs' motion to supplement the record is stricken without prejudice to refiling at an appropriate juncture in the case. Mailed notice (hp) (Entered: 05/12/2004)

May 11, 2004

May 11, 2004

54

MINUTE ORDER of 6/3/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Settlement conference held and continued to 07/06/04 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (hp) (Entered: 06/04/2004)

June 3, 2004

June 3, 2004

55

MINUTE ORDER of 7/6/04 by Hon. Mark Filip: Settlement conference held. All pending motions are withdrawn without prejudice to reinstatement. Settlement conference continued to 08/20/04 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (ntf) (Entered: 07/07/2004)

July 6, 2004

July 6, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 8/17/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Settlement conference re- set for 11:00 9/9/04 . Mailed notice (tbk) (Entered: 08/17/2004)

Aug. 17, 2004

Aug. 17, 2004

56

MINUTE ORDER of 9/9/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Settlement conference held and continued to 9/23/04 at 11:00 a.m. Mailed notice (cem) (Entered: 09/10/2004)

Sept. 9, 2004

Sept. 9, 2004

57

MINUTE ORDER of 9/24/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Settlement conference held and continued to 09/27/04 at 11:00 a.m. No notice (hp) (Entered: 09/27/2004)

Sept. 24, 2004

Sept. 24, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 9/27/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Settlement conference held. No notice (tbk) (Entered: 09/27/2004)

Sept. 27, 2004

Sept. 27, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 9/27/04 by Hon. David H. Coar : Pretrial conference scheduled for 10/1/04 before Judge Coar is stricken. Mailed notice (pm) (Entered: 09/27/2004)

Sept. 27, 2004

Sept. 27, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 9/28/04 by Hon. David H. Coar : Trial scheduled for 10/4/04 before Judge Coar is stricken, as this case is now before Judge Filip. No notice (pm) (Entered: 09/28/2004)

Sept. 28, 2004

Sept. 28, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 11/17/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Status hearing set to 9:30 11/30/04 . Mailed notice (tbk) (Entered: 11/17/2004)

Nov. 17, 2004

Nov. 17, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 11/30/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : Status hearing held. Settlement conference set for 11:00 12/14/04 . No notice (tbk) (Entered: 11/30/2004)

Nov. 30, 2004

Nov. 30, 2004

58

MINUTE ORDER of 12/22/04 by Hon. Mark Filip : The settlement conference is rescheduled for 01/06/05 at 10:00 a.m. The government is requested to bring someone from C.I.S. to the conference with settlement authority. Mailed notice (hp) (Entered: 12/27/2004)

Dec. 22, 2004

Dec. 22, 2004

SCHEDULE set on 1/6/05 by Hon. Mark Filip : Status hearing set to 9:45 1/20/05 . Settlement conference held. No notice (tbk) (Entered: 01/06/2005)

Jan. 6, 2005

Jan. 6, 2005

59

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Status hearing reset for 1/28/2005 at 09:30 AM. (No notices, notified counsel by phone) (tbk, ) (Entered: 01/19/2005)

Jan. 19, 2005

Jan. 19, 2005

60

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Status hearing held on 1/28/2005 Status hearing set for 2/9/2005 at 09:30 AM. (No notices, advised in open court) (tbk, ) (Entered: 01/28/2005)

Jan. 28, 2005

Jan. 28, 2005

61

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Status hearing reset for 2/16/2005 at 09:30 AM. (Notified counsel by telephone) (tbk, ) (Entered: 02/03/2005)

Feb. 3, 2005

Feb. 3, 2005

62

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Status hearing held on 2/16/2005. Status hearing set for 2/25/2005 at 09:30 AM. (no notices, advised in open court) (tbk, ) (Entered: 02/16/2005)

Feb. 16, 2005

Feb. 16, 2005

63

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Status hearing held on 2/25/2005 Status hearing set for 3/4/2005 at 09:30 AM. No notice (tbk, ) (Entered: 02/25/2005)

Feb. 25, 2005

Feb. 25, 2005

64

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Status hearing held on 3/4/2005; No notice (tbk, ) (Entered: 03/04/2005)

March 4, 2005

March 4, 2005

65

AGREED MOTION by Plaintiffs for preliminary approval of settlement agreement. (rbf, ) Additional attachment(s) added on 10/27/2006 (cdy, ). (Entered: 03/31/2005)

March 30, 2005

March 30, 2005

66

NOTICE of Motion by Alonzo Rivas for presentment of motion for preliminary approval of settlement agreement 65 before Honorable Mark Filip on 4/5/2005 at 10:30 AM. (rbf, ) (Entered: 03/31/2005)

March 30, 2005

March 30, 2005

67

AGREED MOTION by parties for approval of attorney's fees and cost pursuant to settlement agreement.(rbf, ) (Entered: 03/31/2005)

March 30, 2005

March 30, 2005

68

NOTICE of Motion by Alonzo Rivas for presentment of motion for approval of attorney's fees and costs pursuant to the settlement agreement 67 before Honorable Mark Filip on 4/5/2005 at 10:30 AM. (rbf, ) (Entered: 03/31/2005)

March 30, 2005

March 30, 2005

69

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : MOTION by Plaintiffs Justino Castaneda, Efren de la Torre, Maria Rosa Ramos, Apolinar Ochoa, Argmira Ochoa, Nicolas Olivares, Fermin Gutierrez, Fernando Carranza, Gabriel Torres, Juan Rodriguez, Hector Diaz65,for Preliminary Approval of Settlement Agreement is Granted. MOTION by Plaintiffs Justino Castaneda, Efren de la Torre, Maria Rosa Ramos, Apolinar Ochoa, Argmira Ochoa, Nicolas Olivares, Fermin Gutierrez, Fernando Carranza, Gabriel Torres, Juan Rodriguez, Hector Diaz67for Approval of Attorneys Fees is entered and continued generally. Fairness hearing set for 6/10/2005 at 10:00 AM. Judicial staff mailed notice (tbk, ) (Entered: 04/05/2005)

April 5, 2005

April 5, 2005

70

OBJECTION by Cristano Leyva to proposed settlement agreement (gma, ) Modified on 3/1/2007 (lcw) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

May 27, 2005

May 27, 2005

71

NOTICE of Motion by Crisanto Leyva for presentment of OBJECTION to proposed settlement agreement before Honorable Mark Filip on 6/10/2005 at 09:00 AM. (gma, ) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

May 27, 2005

May 27, 2005

72

MOTION by F.C. and L.O. requesting clarification of the proposed settlement agreement (gma, ) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

May 27, 2005

May 27, 2005

73

NOTICE of Motion by F.C., L.O. for presentment of MOTION by F.C. and L.O. requesting clarification of the proposed settlement agreement 72 before Honorable Mark Filip on 6/10/2005 at 10:00 AM. (gma, ) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

May 27, 2005

May 27, 2005

74

OBJECTION by Martin Barrios to proposed settlement agreement (gma, ) Modified on 3/1/2007 (lcw, ). (Entered: 05/31/2005)

May 27, 2005

May 27, 2005

75

NOTICE of Motion by Martin Barrios for presentment of OBJECTION to proposed settlement agreement before Honorable Mark Filip on 6/10/2005 at 09:00 AM. (gma, ) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

May 27, 2005

May 27, 2005

76

NOTICE of Motion by Leonor Garcia for presentment of OBJECTION to proposed settlement agreement before Honorable Mark Filip on 6/10/2005 at 09:00 AM. (gma, ) (Entered: 05/31/2005)

May 27, 2005

May 27, 2005

83

OBJECTION by Leonor Garcia to proposed settlement agreemant. (Previously Misplaced Document) (Document Not Scanned) (lcw, ) (Entered: 03/01/2007)

May 27, 2005

May 27, 2005

77

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : Fairness hearing held. This Court overrules the objections of Leonor Garcia, Crisanto Leyva, and Martin Barrios. Attorney Steven Saltzman appointed as class counsel. MOTION by Plaintiffs Justino Castaneda, Efren de la Torre, Maria Rosa Ramos, Apolinar Ochoa, Argmira Ochoa, Nicolas Olivares, Fermin Gutierrez, Fernando Carranza, Gabriel Torres, Juan Rodriguez, Hector Diaz67,for approval of attorneys' fees and costs is granted. MOTION to clarify72is denied for reasons stated on the record. No notice (tbk, ) (Entered: 06/10/2005)

June 10, 2005

June 10, 2005

78

AGREED PROPOSED FINDINGS of fact and conclusions of law on the issue of attorneys fees and costs 67 by Plaintiffs ; Notice of filing. (hp, ) (Entered: 07/01/2005)

June 28, 2005

June 28, 2005

79

AGREED MOTION by parties to adopt the parties' proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law (Exhibits) (las, ) (Entered: 07/22/2005)

July 21, 2005

July 21, 2005

80

NOTICE of Motion by parties for presentment of their agreed motion to adopt the parties' proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law79 before Honorable Mark Filip on 8/1/2005 at 09:30 AM. (las, ) (Entered: 07/22/2005)

July 21, 2005

July 21, 2005

81

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : The Parties' Agreed Motion to adopt their Proposed Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law on the Issue of Attorneys' Fees and Costs, and the Parties' Agreed Motion for Approval of Attorneys' Fees and Costs Pursuant to the Settlement Agreement (D.E. 79), are granted 79. The findings of fact and conclusions of law are entered, as modified and as stated below, and Plaintiffs are awarded $90,000.00 in fees and costs, which consist of $87,554.00 in fees and $2,446.00 in costs ($150.00 in filing fees; $1,075.45 for deposition transcripts; and $1,220.55 in copying costs). As explained further below, the Court commends all counsel for their efforts in the case. Mailed notice (rmm, ) (Entered: 08/15/2005)

Aug. 11, 2005

Aug. 11, 2005

82

MINUTE entry before Judge Mark Filip : All matters in controversy having been settled, the above-entitled case is hereby dismissed. Any and all pending motions are dismissed as moot. Civil case terminated. Mailed notice (hp, ) (Entered: 08/16/2005)

Aug. 12, 2005

Aug. 12, 2005

Case Details

State / Territory: Illinois

Case Type(s):

Immigration and/or the Border

Special Collection(s):

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 15, 2002

Closing Date: 2007

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

All persons who applied for permanent residence (a green card) pursuant to Section 245(i) of the Immigration and Nationality Act between 1/29/97 and 4/30/01 in the Chicago Office of the former INS, but who were not then eligible to be approved.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

MALDEF

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS), Federal

Department of Homeland Security, Federal

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Ex Parte Young (Federal) or Bivens

Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.

Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Order Duration: 2005 - 2007

Issues

General:

Search policies

Immigration/Border:

Constitutional rights

Deportation - criteria

Deportation - judicial review

Deportation - procedure

Status/Classification