University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Wang v. Reno IM-NY-0029
Docket / Court CV-93-5523 (CPS) ( E.D.N.Y. )
State/Territory New York
Case Type(s) Immigration and/or the Border
Case Summary
On December 7, 1993, numerous citizens of the People's Republic of China who were detained pending deportation after being denied asylum, brought suit in the Eastern District of New York, challenging the standard used by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") to evaluate asylum applications based ... read more >
On December 7, 1993, numerous citizens of the People's Republic of China who were detained pending deportation after being denied asylum, brought suit in the Eastern District of New York, challenging the standard used by the Board of Immigration Appeals ("BIA") to evaluate asylum applications based on coercive family planning practices in China. Plaintiffs sought declaratory, injunctive, mandamus, and habeas relief. Plaintiffs also sought a TRO, a preliminary injunction and class certification. The original plaintiffs also sought leave to add additional parties to the action.

The government opposed the relief plaintiffs sought and moved to dismiss the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction.

On September 8, 1994, the District Court (Senior Judge Charles P. Sifton) granted defendants' motion to dismiss, except for the claims of two plaintiffs, for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and for lack of jurisdiction. Plaintiffs' motions for a TRO, a preliminary injunction, class certification and leave to amend the pleadings were denied. Wang v. Reno, 862 F.Supp. 801 (E.D.N.Y. 1994). One plaintiff appealed, but the appeal was subsequently withdrawn.

We have no further information on the case.

Dan Dalton - 10/23/2007


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
General
Habeas Corpus
Immigration
Asylum - criteria
Asylum - procedure
Deportation - judicial review
Family
Refugees
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action Immigration and Nationality Act (INA), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101 et seq.
Administrative Procedure Act, 5 U.S.C. §§ 551 et seq.
Defendant(s) Immigration and Naturalization Service
Plaintiff Description Citizens of the People's Republic of China who were detained pending deportation after being denied asylum and who asserted coercive family planning practices in China.
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Defendant
Public Int. Lawyer Unknown
Nature of Relief None
Source of Relief None
Case Closing Year 1997
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
  Memorandum on Rescission Of Deferred Action For Childhood Arrivals (DACA)
www.dhs.gov
Date: Sep. 5, 2017
By: Department of Homeland Security (Department of Homeland Security)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
1:93-cv-05523-CPS (E.D.N.Y.)
IM-NY-0029-9000.pdf | Detail
Date: 03/25/1997
Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Memorandum and Order (862 F.Supp. 801) (E.D.N.Y.)
IM-NY-0029-0001.pdf | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Date: 09/06/1994
Source: Google Scholar
Judges Sifton, Charles Proctor Court not on record
IM-NY-0029-0001 | IM-NY-0029-9000
Plaintiff's Lawyers Bembi, Bruno Joseph (New York)
IM-NY-0029-0001 | IM-NY-0029-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Dunn, Scott (New York)
IM-NY-0029-0001 | IM-NY-0029-9000

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -