Case: Bibb v. Montgomery County Jail

2:76-cv-00380 | U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Alabama

Filed Date: Nov. 19, 1976

Closed Date: Feb. 21, 1992

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In 1976 (according to the docket number), inmates of the Montgomery County Jail in Alabama filed a series of lawsuits under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama against state and county officials for constitutional violations in conditions at the jail, including overcrowding. The suits were consolidated and the parties entered into a consent decree that mostly vindicated the plaintiffs' claims. The district court (Judge Robert E. Varner) fou…

In 1976 (according to the docket number), inmates of the Montgomery County Jail in Alabama filed a series of lawsuits under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama against state and county officials for constitutional violations in conditions at the jail, including overcrowding. The suits were consolidated and the parties entered into a consent decree that mostly vindicated the plaintiffs' claims. The district court (Judge Robert E. Varner) found for plaintiffs and awarded them attorneys' fees that were taxed against state defendants alone because the court deemed the state's failure to provide adequate facilities the primary cause of the conditions complained of. (No decision is available). The defendants appealed.

The United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit (per curiam) reversed and remanded, finding that the inmates' complaints in the consent decree and pre-trial order referred to numerous violations independent of overcrowding, for which the state could not be held solely responsible. Bibb v. Montgomery County Jail, 622 F.2d 116 (5th. Cir. 1980). In February 1992, the district court (Judge Varner) ordered the case dismissed upon consideration of a Joint Motion to Dismiss, which noted that the overcrowding at the Montgomery County detention facility had decreased considerably, solving the problem. The Justice Department closed its file on the case shortly thereafter.

No further information is provided.

Summary Authors

Rebecca Bloch (3/25/2006)

People


Judge(s)

Godbold, John Cooper (Louisiana)

Attorney for Plaintiff
Attorney for Defendant

Barnes, William Scears Jr. (Alabama)

Dempsey, Harry Young III (Alabama)

Gallion, Thomas T. III (Alabama)

Grant, James W. Jr. (Alabama)

Judge(s)

Godbold, John Cooper (Louisiana)

Johnson, Samuel D. Jr. (Texas)

Tjoflat, Gerald Bard (Florida)

Varner, Robert Edward (Alabama)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

78-02982

Opinion

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

July 21, 1980

July 21, 1980

Order/Opinion

622 F.2d 622

2:76-cv-00380

Joint Motion to Dismiss

Feb. 19, 1991

Feb. 19, 1991

Pleading / Motion / Brief

2:76-cv-00380

Order

Feb. 21, 1992

Feb. 21, 1992

Order/Opinion

2:76-cv-00380

Memorandum: Bibb v. Montgomery Co. Jail

Feb. 25, 1992

Feb. 25, 1992

Internal memorandum

Docket

Last updated March 29, 2024, 3:04 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Alabama

Case Type(s):

Jail Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: Nov. 19, 1976

Closing Date: Feb. 21, 1992

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Inmates incarcerated in the Montgomery County (Alabama) jail alleging unconstitutional conditions of confinement

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Unknown

Filed Pro Se: Unknown

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

Montgomery County Jail (Montgomery), County

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Issues

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Crowding / caseload