Case: NYSARC & Parisi v. Carey

1:72-cv-00356 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York

Filed Date: Jan. 1, 1972

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

On January 1, 1972, residents at the Willowbrook State School for the Mentally Retarded filed a class action lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the State of New York in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The plaintiffs, represented by the New York Civil Liberties Union and the Legal Aid Society of Staten Island, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that their constitutional rights had been violated by overcrowding, failure to protect th…

On January 1, 1972, residents at the Willowbrook State School for the Mentally Retarded filed a class action lawsuit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the State of New York in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York. The plaintiffs, represented by the New York Civil Liberties Union and the Legal Aid Society of Staten Island, asked the court for declaratory and injunctive relief, alleging that their constitutional rights had been violated by overcrowding, failure to protect the physical safety of inmates, inadequate staffing, inadequate medical care, inadequate mental healthcare, and lack of sanitation.

On July 28, 1972, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Judge Orrin Grimmell Judd) certified the plaintiffs as a class. On April 10, 1973, the court denied the plaintiffs' requests for the immediate release of residents and the closing of the institution, but granted the plaintiffs' request for a preliminary injunction to protect the physical safety of the inmates. NYSARC v. Rockefeller, 357 F.Supp. 752 (E.D.N.Y. 1973).

In 1975, the parties entered into a consent decree, which they submitted to the court for approval. The consent decree provided for changes in the areas of physical environment, staffing, programs, and therapy for residents. On May 5, 1975, the district court approved the consent decree. NYSARC v. Carey, 393 F.Supp. 716, (E.D.N.Y. 1975).

Several years later, the plaintiffs asked the court to hold the defendants in contempt for violations of the consent decree. The defendants simultaneously asked the court to modify the consent decree. On July 13, 1982, the district court (Judge John Ries Bartels) denied the defendants' motion to modify the decree and held that they had violated the terms of the agreement. The court ordered the appointment of a special master to monitor compliance with the decree. NYSARC v. Carey, 551 F.Supp. 1165 (E.D.N.Y. 1982). The defendants appealed.

On March 31, 1983, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the portion of the district court's order for the appointment of a special master, but reversed the district court's denial of the defendants' motion to modify the decree. The Second Circuit remanded the case to the district court. NYSARC v. Carey, 706 F.2d 956 (2nd Cir. 1983). Both parties appealed. On October 17, 1983, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to grant certiorari. NYSARC v. Carey, 464 U.S. 915 (1983).

As of April 18, 2007, the parties continue to litigate about enforcement of the order and about attorneys fees.

Summary Authors

Kristen Sagar (4/18/2007)

Related Cases

Society for Good Will to Retarded Children Inc. v. Cuomo, Eastern District of New York (1978)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8231287/parties/nys-assoc-for-retar-v-pataki/


Judge(s)

Bartels, John Ries (New York)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Barrett, Anita Fisher (New York)

Beslity, James M. (New York)

Attorney for Defendant

Abrams, Robert W. (New York)

Briggs, Taylor R. (New York)

Expert/Monitor/Master/Other

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:72-cv-00356

Docket (PACER)

NYSARC v. Carey

June 26, 2007

June 26, 2007

Docket

1:73-00055

1:73-00113

Memorandum

NYSARC v. Rockefeller

April 10, 1973

April 10, 1973

Order/Opinion

357 F.Supp. 752

1:72-cv-00356

1:72-cv-00357

Memorandum

NYSARC v. Carey

May 5, 1975

May 5, 1975

Order/Opinion

393 F.Supp. 715

1:72-cv-00356

1:72-cv-00357

Opinion

NYSARC v. Carey

July 13, 1982

July 13, 1982

Order/Opinion

551 F.Supp. 1165

82-07441

82-07591

Opinion

NYSARC v. Carey

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

March 31, 1983

March 31, 1983

Order/Opinion

706 F.2d 956

83-00213

Memorandum Decision

NYSARC v. Carey

Supreme Court of the United States

Oct. 17, 1983

Oct. 17, 1983

Order/Opinion

464 U.S. 915

1:72-cv-00356

Final Judgment

NYSARC v. Parisi

April 30, 1985

April 30, 1985

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/8231287/nys-assoc-for-retar-v-pataki/

Last updated Oct. 10, 2025, 10:02 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
91

Stipulation

Dec. 22, 2015

Dec. 22, 2015

92

Stipulation and Order

March 8, 2016

March 8, 2016

93

Letter

May 6, 2016

May 6, 2016

Scheduling Order

May 10, 2016

May 10, 2016

94

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

May 11, 2016

May 11, 2016

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

May 13, 2016

May 13, 2016

95

Adjourn Conference

May 19, 2016

May 19, 2016

96

Reply in Opposition

May 20, 2016

May 20, 2016

97

Letter

May 20, 2016

May 20, 2016

Order on Motion to Adjourn Conference

May 23, 2016

May 23, 2016

Order(Other)

May 23, 2016

May 23, 2016

98

Adjourn Conference

June 17, 2016

June 17, 2016

Order on Motion to Adjourn Conference

June 20, 2016

June 20, 2016

99

Adjourn Conference

July 25, 2016

July 25, 2016

Order on Motion to Adjourn Conference

July 26, 2016

July 26, 2016

100

Amend/Correct/Supplement

Aug. 1, 2016

Aug. 1, 2016

101

Order on Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement

Aug. 17, 2016

Aug. 17, 2016

102

Adjourn Conference

Sept. 27, 2016

Sept. 27, 2016

Order on Motion to Adjourn Conference

Sept. 29, 2016

Sept. 29, 2016

103

Adjourn Conference

Nov. 8, 2016

Nov. 8, 2016

Order on Motion to Adjourn Conference

Nov. 9, 2016

Nov. 9, 2016

104

Adjourn Conference

Jan. 3, 2017

Jan. 3, 2017

Order on Motion to Adjourn Conference

Jan. 3, 2017

Jan. 3, 2017

105

Letter

Jan. 18, 2017

Jan. 18, 2017

Order(Other)

Jan. 20, 2017

Jan. 20, 2017

107

Order on Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement

Nov. 29, 2017

Nov. 29, 2017

Order AND Order(Other)

March 16, 2018

March 16, 2018

111

Pre Motion Conference

Nov. 26, 2018

Nov. 26, 2018

112

Letter

Nov. 27, 2018

Nov. 27, 2018

113

Notice of Appearance

Dec. 11, 2018

Dec. 11, 2018

Order on Motion for Pre Motion Conference

Dec. 11, 2018

Dec. 11, 2018

Status Conference

Dec. 13, 2018

Dec. 13, 2018

122

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

March 6, 2019

March 6, 2019

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

March 6, 2019

March 6, 2019

Order

March 6, 2019

March 6, 2019

123

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

April 1, 2019

April 1, 2019

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

April 2, 2019

April 2, 2019

124

Letter

April 24, 2019

April 24, 2019

125

Attorney Fees

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

RECAP
126

Order

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

RECAP
127

Order

1

View on RECAP

3

View on RECAP

4

View on RECAP

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

128

Order

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

129

Order

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

130

Order

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

131

Order

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

132

Order

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

133

Order

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

134

Order

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

135

Order

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

136

Order

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

137

Order

May 31, 2019

May 31, 2019

138

Letter

July 1, 2019

July 1, 2019

139

Letter

July 2, 2019

July 2, 2019

140

MEMORANDUM & ORDER, Plaintiffs' 125 motion for attorneys' fees is granted, subject to the modifications discussed above and reflected in Appendix A. NYCLU counsel is awarded $2,791,737.90 and NYLPI counsel is awarded $110,763 for monitoring and enforcement work as well as the time spent preparing this fee application. NYCLU may recover $3,587.13 in costs. The Kasowitz firm is awarded $30,293.75 for its work preparing the fee application. Moving forward, with the assistance of OPWDD, class members must be provided notice of any fee application pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(h), and Plaintiffs' counsel is required to submit fee requests on an annual basis. So Ordered by Judge Raymond J. Dearie on 7/22/2019. (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A) (Lee, Tiffeny)

1 Appendix A

View on PACER

July 22, 2019

July 22, 2019

RECAP
142

Attorney Fees

July 23, 2020

July 23, 2020

143

Attorney Fees

July 23, 2020

July 23, 2020

144

Order on Motion for Attorney Fees

Sept. 21, 2020

Sept. 21, 2020

Order on Motion for Attorney Fees

Sept. 21, 2020

Sept. 21, 2020

145

Attorney Fees

July 29, 2021

July 29, 2021

146

Letter

Sept. 8, 2021

Sept. 8, 2021

147

Stipulation

Sept. 14, 2021

Sept. 14, 2021

148

Letter

Sept. 14, 2021

Sept. 14, 2021

149

Order of Settlement

Sept. 14, 2021

Sept. 14, 2021

Order on Motion for Attorney Fees

Sept. 16, 2021

Sept. 16, 2021

150

Pre Motion Conference

Sept. 20, 2021

Sept. 20, 2021

151

Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

Sept. 22, 2021

Sept. 22, 2021

Order(Other)

Sept. 22, 2021

Sept. 22, 2021

Order on Motion for Pre Motion Conference

Sept. 23, 2021

Sept. 23, 2021

Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply

Sept. 23, 2021

Sept. 23, 2021

152

Letter

Oct. 1, 2021

Oct. 1, 2021

Pre Motion Conference

Oct. 6, 2021

Oct. 6, 2021

Scheduling Order AND ~Util - Set Hearings

Oct. 7, 2021

Oct. 7, 2021

153

Notice of Appearance

Oct. 12, 2021

Oct. 12, 2021

154

Hearing

Oct. 18, 2021

Oct. 18, 2021

Order on Motion for Hearing

Oct. 18, 2021

Oct. 18, 2021

Telephone Conference

Oct. 18, 2021

Oct. 18, 2021

155

Status Report

Nov. 1, 2021

Nov. 1, 2021

156

Status Report

Nov. 23, 2021

Nov. 23, 2021

157

Withdraw as Attorney

Dec. 14, 2021

Dec. 14, 2021

158

Amend/Correct/Supplement

July 27, 2022

July 27, 2022

159

Order on Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement

July 28, 2022

July 28, 2022

160

Attorney Fees

Aug. 5, 2022

Aug. 5, 2022

Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney

Aug. 19, 2022

Aug. 19, 2022

161

Letter

Sept. 17, 2022

Sept. 17, 2022

162

Order on Motion for Attorney Fees

Sept. 20, 2022

Sept. 20, 2022

163

Attorney Fees

Sept. 15, 2023

Sept. 15, 2023

164

Notice of Appearance

Sept. 15, 2023

Sept. 15, 2023

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Sept. 19, 2023

Sept. 19, 2023

165

Order on Motion for Attorney Fees

Sept. 21, 2023

Sept. 21, 2023

166

Withdraw

Sept. 22, 2023

Sept. 22, 2023

Order on Motion to Withdraw

Sept. 25, 2023

Sept. 25, 2023

167

Withdraw as Attorney

Sept. 29, 2023

Sept. 29, 2023

Order on Motion to Withdraw as Attorney

Oct. 3, 2023

Oct. 3, 2023

168

Notice of Appearance

Oct. 27, 2023

Oct. 27, 2023

169

Letter

Oct. 30, 2023

Oct. 30, 2023

170

Order on Motion for Attorney Fees

Nov. 2, 2023

Nov. 2, 2023

172

Attorney Fees

Sept. 4, 2024

Sept. 4, 2024

173

Amend/Correct/Supplement

Oct. 2, 2024

Oct. 2, 2024

174

Order on Motion to Amend/Correct/Supplement

Oct. 9, 2024

Oct. 9, 2024

175

Order on Motion for Attorney Fees

Oct. 17, 2024

Oct. 17, 2024

Case Details

State / Territory:

New York

Case Type(s):

Intellectual Disability (Facility)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 1, 1972

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

residents at the Willowbrook State School for the Mentally Retarded

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Yes

Class Action Outcome: Granted

Defendants

Willowbrook Developmental Center, State

Facility Type(s):

Government-run

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Equal Protection

Other Dockets:

Eastern District of New York 1:72-cv-00356

Eastern District of New York 1:72-cv-00357

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 82-07441

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit 82-07591

Supreme Court of the United States 83-00213

Eastern District of New York 1:73-00055

Eastern District of New York 1:73-00113

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Relief Granted:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Content of Injunction:

Preliminary relief granted

Issues

General/Misc.:

Aggressive behavior

Bathing and hygiene

Classification / placement

Sanitation / living conditions

Disability and Disability Rights:

Intellectual/developmental disability, unspecified

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Confinement/isolation

Crowding (General)

Habilitation (training/treatment)

Medical/Mental Health Care:

Intellectual disability/mental illness dual diagnosis