Case: National Weather Service Employees Organization v. Trump

1:25-cv-02947 | U.S. District Court for the District of District of Columbia

Filed Date: Sept. 2, 2025

Case Ongoing

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

This case challenged the legality of President Trump’s Executive Order Nos. 14343 and 14251, which terminated the collective bargaining rights of certain federal employees on national security grounds.  On September 2, 2025, two federal unions, the National Weather Service Employees Organization (“NWSEO”) and the Patent Office Professional Association (“POPA”) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The two unions represent about 4000 employees of the National Oceani…

This case challenged the legality of President Trump’s Executive Order Nos. 14343 and 14251, which terminated the collective bargaining rights of certain federal employees on national security grounds. 

On September 2, 2025, two federal unions, the National Weather Service Employees Organization (“NWSEO”) and the Patent Office Professional Association (“POPA”) filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. The two unions represent about 4000 employees of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (“NOAA”)--primarily employees of the National Weather Service, and about 9,000 professional employees of U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”), a component of the Department of Commerce. They sued President Trump, and lead officials for the Department of Commerce, NOAA, and USPTO.

Plaintiffs brought suit under the Federal Service Labor Management Relations Statute (“FSLMRS”), 5 U.S.C. § 7103(b), the First Amendment, and the Fifth Amendment’s equal protection guarantee. They sought both injunctive and declaratory relief, alleging Section 2(b) of Executive Order No. 14343 is unlawful as applied to the Office of the Commissioner of Patents and subordinate units, the National Environmental, Satellite, Data, and Information Service, and the National Weather Service. 

They argued that those offices do not play a national security role, and therefore the national security rationale used to justify withdrawing federal recognition of the plaintiff unions was a pretense - the real reason was political retribution because the unions had criticized President Trump’s policies. Plaintiffs cited White House “fact sheets” which admitted the orders targeted unions filing grievances against President Trump’s policies to bolster their argument that the exclusions were retaliatory, not security-based. Plaintiffs also sought declaratory relief that Section 2(b) of Executive Order No. 14251 is unlawful as applied to the USPTO’s Office of Chief Information Officer. 

The case was assigned to District Judge Paul L. Friedman.

This case is ongoing.

Summary Authors

Nick Martire (9/30/2025)

Related Cases

National Treasury Employees Union v. Trump, District of District of Columbia (2025)

American Foreign Service Association v. Trump, District of District of Columbia (2025)

Federal Education Association v. Trump, District of District of Columbia (2025)

American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. Trump, District of District of Columbia (2025)

National Association of Agriculture Employees v. Trump, District of District of Columbia (2025)

National Treasury Employees Union v. Trump, District of District of Columbia (2025)

American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL-CIO v. Trump, District of District of Columbia (2025)

People

For PACER's information on parties and their attorneys, see: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71251722/parties/national-weather-service-employees-organization-v-trump/


Judge(s)

Friedman, Paul L. (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Bolek, Keith R. (District of Columbia)

Hirn, Richard J (District of Columbia)

Pullium, April H. (District of Columbia)

Attorney for Defendant

Simon, Jeremy S. (District of Columbia)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document
1

1:25-cv-02947

Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief

Sept. 2, 2025

Sept. 2, 2025

Complaint

Resources

Docket

See docket on RECAP: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/71251722/national-weather-service-employees-organization-v-trump/

Last updated Oct. 25, 2025, 10:55 p.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief against LAURA GRIMM, HOWARD W. LUTNICK, COKE MORGAN STEWART, DONALD J. TRUMP ( Filing fee $ 405 receipt number ADCDC-11926149) filed by NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION, PATENT OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Summons Donald Trump, # 3 Summons Howard Lutnick, # 4 Summons Laura Grimm, # 5 Summons Coke Morgan Stewart, # 6 Summons Pamela Bondi, # 7 Summons Jeanne Pirro)(Bolek, Keith) (Attachment 1 replaced on 9/3/2025) (zmtm). (Entered: 09/02/2025)

1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet

View on PACER

2 Summons Donald Trump

View on PACER

3 Summons Howard Lutnick

View on PACER

4 Summons Laura Grimm

View on PACER

5 Summons Coke Morgan Stewart

View on PACER

6 Summons Pamela Bondi

View on PACER

7 Summons Jeanne Pirro

View on PACER

Sept. 2, 2025

Sept. 2, 2025

Clearinghouse
2

NOTICE OF RELATED CASE by NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION, PATENT OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION. Case related to Case No. 25-cv-00935-PLF, 25-cv-01030-PLF, 25-cv-01362-PLF, 25-cv-02445-PLF, 25-cv-02657-PLF. (Bolek, Keith) (Entered: 09/02/2025)

Sept. 2, 2025

Sept. 2, 2025

PACER
3

NOTICE of Appearance by Richard J Hirn on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Hirn, Richard) (Entered: 09/02/2025)

Sept. 2, 2025

Sept. 2, 2025

PACER
4

SUMMONS (6)Issued Electronically as to All Defendants, U.S. Attorney and U.S. Attorney General (Attachments: # 1 Notice and Consent)(zmtm) (Entered: 09/03/2025)

1 Notice and Consent

View on PACER

Sept. 3, 2025

Sept. 3, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned/Reassigned

Sept. 3, 2025

Sept. 3, 2025

PACER

Case Assigned to Judge Paul L. Friedman. (zmtm)

Sept. 3, 2025

Sept. 3, 2025

PACER
5

NOTICE of Appearance by April H. Pullium on behalf of All Plaintiffs (Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/11/2025)

Sept. 11, 2025

Sept. 11, 2025

RECAP
10

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. COKE MORGAN STEWART served on 9/8/2025 (Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/19/2025)

Sept. 19, 2025

Sept. 19, 2025

PACER
11

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. DONALD J. TRUMP served on 9/16/2025 (Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/19/2025)

Sept. 19, 2025

Sept. 19, 2025

PACER
6

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed as to the United States Attorney. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney on 9/3/2025. Answer due for ALL FEDERAL DEFENDANTS by 11/2/2025. (Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/19/2025)

Sept. 19, 2025

Sept. 19, 2025

PACER
7

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed on United States Attorney General. Date of Service Upon United States Attorney General 9/10/2025. (Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/19/2025)

Sept. 19, 2025

Sept. 19, 2025

PACER
8

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. LAURA GRIMM served on 9/9/2025 (Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/19/2025)

Sept. 19, 2025

Sept. 19, 2025

PACER
9

RETURN OF SERVICE/AFFIDAVIT of Summons and Complaint Executed. HOWARD W. LUTNICK served on 9/9/2025 (Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/19/2025)

Sept. 19, 2025

Sept. 19, 2025

PACER
12

RESPONSE re 2 Notice of Related Case (Defendants' Objection to Notice of Relatedness) filed by LAURA GRIMM, HOWARD W. LUTNICK, COKE MORGAN STEWART, DONALD J. TRUMP. (Simon, Jeremy) (Entered: 09/24/2025)

Sept. 24, 2025

Sept. 24, 2025

RECAP
13

RESPONSE in Opposition to Defendants' Objection to Notice of Relatedness filed by NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE EMPLOYEES ORGANIZATION, PATENT OFFICE PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A (August 29 Notice to POPA of Exclusions))(Pullium, April) (Entered: 09/26/2025)

1 Exhibit A (August 29 Notice to POPA of Exclusions)

View on PACER

Sept. 26, 2025

Sept. 26, 2025

PACER
14

OPINION AND ORDER overruling defendants' 12 Objection to Notice of Relatedness. See Opinion and Order for details. Signed by Judge Paul L. Friedman on 10/7/2025. (lczl) (Entered: 10/07/2025)

Oct. 7, 2025

Oct. 7, 2025

RECAP
15

Preliminary Injunction

1 Memorandum in Support

View on RECAP

2 Declaration of Patricia Duffy

View on RECAP

3 Declaration of JoAnn Becker

View on RECAP

4 Declaration of Robert Stoll

View on RECAP

5 Declaration of Richard Spinrad

View on RECAP

6 Declaration of Gabriel Chu

View on RECAP

7 Text of Proposed Order

View on RECAP

Oct. 24, 2025

Oct. 24, 2025

RECAP

Case Details

State / Territory: District of Columbia

Case Type(s):

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority

Labor Rights

Special Collection(s):

Trump Administration 2.0: Challenges to the Government

Key Dates

Filing Date: Sept. 2, 2025

Case Ongoing: Yes

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Plaintiffs are the National Weather Service Employees Organization, which is a union representing the National Weather Service and certain offices within the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the Patent Office Professional Association, which is a labor organization representing nearly 9,000 employees of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office of the U.S. Department of Commerce.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Department of Commerce, Federal

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute, 5 U.S.C. §7101

Constitutional Clause(s):

Freedom of speech/association

Equal Protection

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Outcome

Prevailing Party: None Yet / None

Nature of Relief:

None yet

Source of Relief:

None yet

Issues

Presidential/Gubernatorial Authority:

Civil Service