University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name Rodney v. Murphy JC-MD-0011
Docket / Court 24-C05-004405 ( State Court )
State/Territory Maryland
Case Type(s) Jail Conditions
Case Summary
This case, Rodney v. Murphy, 24-C-05004405, was the first of three recent cases alleging mistreatment of persons arrested and taken to Baltimore Central Booking and Intake Center ("Central Booking" or "CBIC") for booking and processing. (The other cases were JC-MD-0007: Jones v. Murphy, Case No. 1 ... read more >
This case, Rodney v. Murphy, 24-C-05004405, was the first of three recent cases alleging mistreatment of persons arrested and taken to Baltimore Central Booking and Intake Center ("Central Booking" or "CBIC") for booking and processing. (The other cases were JC-MD-0007: Jones v. Murphy, Case No. 1:05-cv-01287-CCB (D. Md. 2005) and JC-MD-0008: Maryland NAACP v. Baltimore City Police Department 1:06-cv-01863-CCB (D. Md. 2006).) Central Booking was opened in 1995 as the central location for booking and processing arrestees in Baltimore City. Operated by the Maryland Division of Pretrial Detention and Services, part of the Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, CBIC processed approximately 100,000 arrestees annually.

In Rodney v. Murphy, the Maryland Office of the Public Defender filed a petition for habeas corpus on April 22, 2005, in the Circuit Court for Baltimore City, on behalf of over 50 named persons who were Public Defender's clients detained in Central Booking and not taken before a Court Commissioner within 24 hours, as required by state law. On April 25, 2005 the Circuit Court (Judge John M. Glynn) certified the case as a class action, defining the class as all individuals arrested and detained in Central Booking and waiting to see a judicial officer as required by Maryland law. That same day, Judge Glynn also issued a temporary restraining order requiring Central Booking to bring each detainee before a judicial officer within 24 hours or release the individual.

In an unusual move, the City of Baltimore moved to intervene in the case on June 29, 2005, describing Central Booking as "dysfunctional" and lacking "appropriate or adequate management systems and practices to assure performance and accountability." The City claimed that, in its current state, Central Booking threatened the health, welfare and safety of the citizens of Baltimore and interfered with the operation of the Police Department. Judge Glynn allowed the City to participate as amicus curiae, but reserved ruling on intervention.

The TRO was later extended to February 9, 2006, and thereafter extended again. The ultimate disposition of the case is not clear from the Court's docket, but the docket does indicate the case was dismissed by Court on September 15, 2006.

We have no further information on this matter.

Dan Dalton - 02/12/2008


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
Male
General
Over/Unlawful Detention
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action State law
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Defendant(s) Maryland Division of Pretrial Detention and Services
Plaintiff Description All individuals arrested and detained in Central Booking and waiting to see a judicial officer as required by Maryland law.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations None on record
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted Yes
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Litigation
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration 2005 - n/a
Case Closing Year n/a
Case Ongoing Unknown
Case Listing JC-MD-0007 : Jones v. Murphy (D. Md.)
JC-MD-0008 : Maryland NAACP v. Baltimore City Police Department (D. Md.)
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies After Decision: Implementation of Judicial Decrees in Correctional Settings
Written: Oct. 01, 1977
By: M. Kay Harris & Dudley P. Spiller (Temple University)
Citation: (1977)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ]

Docket(s)
24C05004405 (State Trial Court) 09/15/2006
JC-MD-0011-9000.pdf | Detail
General Documents
Temporary Restraining Order 04/26/2005
JC-MD-0011-0001.pdf | Detail
Extension of Temporary Restraining Order and Postponement of Further Hearings 05/26/2005
JC-MD-0011-0002.pdf | Detail
Opinion [regarding motion to intervene] 09/25/2005
JC-MD-0011-0004.pdf | Detail
Order [regarding motion to intervene] 09/29/2005
JC-MD-0011-0005.pdf | Detail
Order 11/17/2005
JC-MD-0011-0003.pdf | Detail
Judges Glynn, John M. (State Trial Court)
JC-MD-0011-0001 | JC-MD-0011-0002 | JC-MD-0011-0003 | JC-MD-0011-0004 | JC-MD-0011-0005
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Finegar, Natalie McKeown (Maryland)
JC-MD-0011-9000
Hess, Wendy Noel (Maryland)
JC-MD-0011-9000
Tyler, Ralph S. (Maryland)
JC-MD-0011-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Barr, Judith (Maryland)
JC-MD-0011-9000
Brockman, William F. (Maryland)
JC-MD-0011-9000
Marrow, Glenn Todd (Maryland)
JC-MD-0011-9000
Pothier, Karl Aram (Maryland)
JC-MD-0011-9000
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -