University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name John L. v. Adams PC-TN-0006
Docket / Court 88-924 ( M.D. Tenn. )
State/Territory Tennessee
Case Type(s) Juvenile Institution
Case Summary
John L., a juvenile whose last name is unknown, brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 through his next friend Andrew J. Shookhoff of the Vanderbilt Legal Clinic on November 7, 1988. Legal Services of South Central Tennessee also provided counsel for the plaintiff. The plaintiff ... read more >
John L., a juvenile whose last name is unknown, brought this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 through his next friend Andrew J. Shookhoff of the Vanderbilt Legal Clinic on November 7, 1988. Legal Services of South Central Tennessee also provided counsel for the plaintiff. The plaintiff was 17 years old when he filed the suit alleging that he was being denied the right of access to the courts. At the time, plaintiff was incarcerated in the Taft Youth Center in Pikeville, Tennessee, a secure juvenile institution operated by the Tennessee Department of Youth Development (Department). Plaintiff was granted class certification on June 16, 1989, creating a class of plaintiffs that consists of those persons who are confined or will be confined in the four secure institutions operated by the Department. On February 28, 1990, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee (Magistrate Judge Kent Sandidge, III) granted summary judgment in favor of the juvenile plaintiff class. Judge Sandidge held that incarcerated juveniles have a right of access to the courts comparable to incarcerated adults and ordered the Department to submit a plan to remedy this constitutional violation. John L. v. Adams, 750 F.Supp. 288 (M.D.Tenn. 1990). The court's remedial order required the Department to establish contracts with private attorneys to provide part-time legal assistance to those held at juvenile institutions in Tennessee. The Department appealed, and the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the District Court's finding that incarcerated juveniles have a right of access to courts, including meaningful access to an attorney. John L. v. Adams, 969 F.2d 228 (6th Cir. 1992). The court relied on the Supreme Court's decision in Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817 (1977), which found an affirmative obligation upon states to provide all prisoners meaningful access to the courts. However, the court limited the juveniles' right of access in civil rights litigation under Section 1983 to only those actions related to incarceration. Also, the right of access did not require the Department to provide assistance to juvenile detainees for civil matters involving only state law. In accordance with the Sixth Circuit opinion, on October 30, 1992, Judge Sandidge modified the remedial order to remove the requirement that the state provide legal assistance in claims not related to detention and matters of state law. The case was dismissed on October 30, 1992, although subsequent litigation over attorneys' fees followed.

John L. v. Adams, 750 F.Supp. 288 (M.D.Tenn. Feb 28, 1990) (NO. 3:88-0924)

Affirmed in Part, Reversed in Part by

2 John L. v. Adams, 969 F.2d 228 (6th Cir.(Tenn.) Jul 17, 1992) (NO. 91-6241), rehearing denied

Tom Madison - 01/16/2006


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Affected Gender
Female
Male
General
Access to lawyers or judicial system
Law library access
Type of Facility
Government-run
Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Defendant(s) Youth Services of TDOC
Plaintiff Description Persons who are confined or will be confined in secure institutions operated by Tennessee Department of Youth Development alleging that they were denied a right of access to the courts.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations None on record
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted Yes
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer No
Nature of Relief Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Litigation
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration 1991 - 1992
Case Closing Year 1997
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies Civil Rights Injunctions Over Time: A Case Study of Jail and Prison Court Orders
N.Y.U. Law Review
By: Margo Schlanger (Washington University)
Citation: 81 N.Y.U. L. Rev. 550 (2006)
[ Detail ] [ PDF ] [ External Link ]

  Judicial Policy Making and the Modern State: How the Courts Reformed America's Prisons
By: Malcolm M. Feeley & Edward Rubin (UC Berkeley Boalt Hall School of Law & Vanderbilt School of Law Faculty)
Citation: (1998)
[ Detail ]

Docket(s)
88-924 (M.D. Tenn.) 08/29/2008
PC-TN-0006-9000 PDF | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Memorandum 02/28/1990 (750 F.Supp. 288) (M.D. Tenn.)
PC-TN-0006-0001 PDF | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Google Scholar
Reported Opinion 07/17/1992 (969 F.2d 228)
PC-TN-0006-0002 PDF | WESTLAW| LEXIS | Detail
Document Source: Google Scholar
Judges Batchelder, Alice Moore (N.D. Ohio, Sixth Circuit)
PC-TN-0006-0002
Haynes, William Joseph Jr. (M.D. Tenn.) [Magistrate]
PC-TN-0006-9000
Sandidge, Kent III (M.D. Tenn.) [Magistrate]
PC-TN-0006-0001
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Kay, Susan Laurie (Tennessee)
PC-TN-0006-0002 | PC-TN-0006-9000
Kozlowski, David Arthur (Tennessee)
PC-TN-0006-0001 | PC-TN-0006-0002 | PC-TN-0006-9000
Shookhoff, Andrew Joseph (Tennessee)
PC-TN-0006-0001 | PC-TN-0006-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Burson, Charles W. (Tennessee)
PC-TN-0006-0002
Dean, Kimberly Jennings (Tennessee)
PC-TN-0006-0001 | PC-TN-0006-0002 | PC-TN-0006-9000
Moody, Mary G. (Tennessee)
PC-TN-0006-0002
Ross, Heather Cairns (Tennessee)
PC-TN-0006-9000
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -