University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name King v. Walker CJ-IL-0001
Docket / Court 1:06-CV-00204 ( N.D. Ill. )
State/Territory Illinois
Case Type(s) Criminal Justice (Other)
Attorney Organization Uptown People's Law Center
Case Summary
On January 13, 2006, Illinois parolees who were re-arrested for alleged parole violations filed this class action complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Represented by private counsel, the plaintiffs sued the Illinois Department of ... read more >
On January 13, 2006, Illinois parolees who were re-arrested for alleged parole violations filed this class action complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois. Represented by private counsel, the plaintiffs sued the Illinois Department of Corrections (IDOC) arguing that they had been unconstitutionally denied a timely parole revocation hearing. For violations of their constitutional rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, the plaintiffs asked the Court for preliminary and permanent injunctions.

On May 8, 2006, the court (Judge Robert W. Gettleman) certified a class consisting of individuals held for more than 10 business days without a preliminary parole revocation hearing. The court also granted the plaintiffs' motion for a preliminary injunction. The court found that the parolees had a constitutional right to a prompt, preliminary parole revocation hearing and a limited constitutional right to confront and cross examine persons who had provided testimony or evidence which could be used to revoke parole.

On November 2, 2006, the parties reached a settlement and submitted the proposed agreement to the court, which approved the consent decree on January 26, 2007. The consent decree set specific timelines, notice provisions, and guidelines for inspections for revocation hearings. and prohibits the assignment of any DOC employee or agent from serving as Hearing Officers. The Court also appointed a monitor to assess progress for one year after entry of the consent decree, to be paid for his services by the defendant. On January 23, 2008, the monitor reported that the defendants had achieved substantial compliance with the provisions of the consent decree. The Court approved the final report and discharged the monitor.

In 2012, new lawyers appeared for the plaintiff class, from the Roderick Macarthur Justice Center, at Northwestern University law school, and the Uptown People's Law Center. On November 30, 2012, the plaintiffs moved for a rule to show cause alleging that the defendants were no longer complying with the consent decree. On October 30 and 31, 2013, the court conducted an evidentiary hearing on the allegations. After the hearing, the parties stated they wanted to resolve the matter via settlement, so the court reserved ruling on the motion to show cause. The parties did reach a second settlement agreement, and on April 24, 2014, the court approved an amended consent decree. For one year and 90 days following the entry of the amended consent decree, the plaintiffs' counsel had the opportunity to observe 15 parole hearings. The parties reserved the determination of attorneys' fees and costs for the Court.

After proceedings regarding attorneys' fees and costs, the court awarded the plaintiffs $140,000 for attorneys' fees and costs on October 31, 2014. As of April 8, 2016, monitoring is ongoing regarding the implementation of the amended consent decree.

Xin Chen - 01/31/2011
Jessica Kincaid - 04/08/2016


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Constitutional Clause
Due Process
Equal Protection
Content of Injunction
Monitor/Master
Monitoring
Preliminary relief granted
Defendant-type
Corrections
Jurisdiction-wide
General
Over/Unlawful Detention
Plaintiff Type
Private Plaintiff
Causes of Action 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Defendant(s) Illinois Department of Corrections
Plaintiff Description Former inmates whose parole was revoked without a timely revocation hearing.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations Uptown People's Law Center
Class action status sought Yes
Class action status granted Yes
Prevailing Party Plaintiff
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief Preliminary injunction / Temp. restraining order
Attorneys fees
Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement
Source of Relief Litigation
Settlement
Form of Settlement Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree
Order Duration 2006 - n/a
Case Closing Year n/a
Case Ongoing Yes
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Links Philadelphia Forfeiture
http://ij.org/case/philadelphia-forfeiture/
By: Institute for Justice (Institute for Justice)
[ Detail ]

Docket(s)
1:06-cv-00204 (N.D. Ill.) 02/18/2015
CJ-IL-0001-9000.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Class Action Complaint for Injunctive Relief 01/13/2006
CJ-IL-0001-0001.pdf | Detail
Memorandum in Support of Plaintiff's Motion for Class Certification 01/13/2006
CJ-IL-0001-0005.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Amended Class Action Complaint for Injunctive Relief 02/13/2006
CJ-IL-0001-0007.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Memorandum Opinion and Order 05/08/2006 (N.D. Ill.)
CJ-IL-0001-0006.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order Approving Consent Decree 11/02/2006 (N.D. Ill.)
CJ-IL-0001-0002.pdf | Detail
Final Consent Decree 01/26/2007
CJ-IL-0001-0003.pdf | Detail
Court Monitor's Report 01/23/2008
CJ-IL-0001-0004.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Motion by the Plaintiff Class for a Rule to Show Cause 11/30/2012
CJ-IL-0001-0011.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Plaintiffs' Pre-Hearing Brief in Support of Their Motion for a Rule to Show Cause 10/22/2013
CJ-IL-0001-0008.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Defendants' Outline of the Case 10/22/2013
CJ-IL-0001-0009.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Amended Final Consent Decree 04/24/2014 (N.D. Ill.)
CJ-IL-0001-0010.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges Gettleman, Robert William (N.D. Ill.)
CJ-IL-0001-0002 | CJ-IL-0001-0003 | CJ-IL-0001-0006 | CJ-IL-0001-0010 | CJ-IL-0001-9000
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers Bedi, Sheila A. (Illinois)
CJ-IL-0001-0008 | CJ-IL-0001-0010 | CJ-IL-0001-0011 | CJ-IL-0001-9000
Bowman, Locke E. III (Illinois)
CJ-IL-0001-0011
Mills, Alan S. (Illinois)
CJ-IL-0001-0011 | CJ-IL-0001-9000
Peters, Thomas M. (Illinois)
CJ-IL-0001-9000
Peters, Kevin R (Illinois)
CJ-IL-0001-9000
Peters, Thomas R. (Illinois)
CJ-IL-0001-0001 | CJ-IL-0001-0003 | CJ-IL-0001-0005 | CJ-IL-0001-0007 | CJ-IL-0001-9000
Van Brunt, Alexa A. (Illinois)
CJ-IL-0001-0008 | CJ-IL-0001-0010 | CJ-IL-0001-0011 | CJ-IL-0001-9000
Defendant's Lawyers Barnes, William (Illinois)
CJ-IL-0001-0010
Henretty, Lyle Kevin (Illinois)
CJ-IL-0001-9000
Lambertson, Andrew W. (Illinois)
CJ-IL-0001-9000
Lovellette, Kevin R. (Illinois)
CJ-IL-0001-0009 | CJ-IL-0001-9000
Seward, Edward (Illinois)
CJ-IL-0001-0001
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -