Case: EEOC v. JOHN PICKLE COMPANY

4:02-cv-00979 | U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma

Filed Date: Dec. 30, 2002

Closed Date: Oct. 16, 2006

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

The Oklahoma City and Dallas District Offices of the EEOC brought this suit against John Pickle Company, Inc in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma in December 2002. The complaint alleged discrimination on the basis of national origin (East Indian) and race (Asian) and disparate terms and conditions of employment, pay, and harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The complainants, 52 East Indians, brought suit against John Pickle…

The Oklahoma City and Dallas District Offices of the EEOC brought this suit against John Pickle Company, Inc in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma in December 2002. The complaint alleged discrimination on the basis of national origin (East Indian) and race (Asian) and disparate terms and conditions of employment, pay, and harassment in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The complainants, 52 East Indians, brought suit against John Pickle Company, Inc and John Pickle, Jr in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Oklahoma in February 2002. Their complaint alleged violations of Title VII, the Fair Labor Standards Act, the Immigration Reform and Control Act, ß1981, and state tort law for false imprisonment, deceit and intentional infliction of emotional distress. The EEOC moved for consolidation the same day it filed its complaint, which was granted in January 2003. In the private plaintiffs' case, prior to consolidation the court denied two motions to dismiss by the defendant, granted in part two motions to dismiss by the defendant, and held several status conferences. Subsequent to consolidation, several more status conferences were held, and two non-jury trial phases were held in September 2003 and March 2005. After the second phase of bench trial in March 2005, judgment was granted for the plaintiffs in October 2006. The complainants were awarded a total of $1,240,000.

Summary Authors

Daisy Manning (10/21/2008)

Related Cases

Chellen v. John Pickle Company, Northern District of Oklahoma (2002)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

4:02-cv-00979

Docket (PACER)

EEOC, et al v. John Pickle Company

Sept. 22, 2006

Sept. 22, 2006

Docket
1

4:02-cv-00979

Complaint

EEOC v. John Pickle Company

Dec. 30, 2002

Dec. 30, 2002

Complaint
2

4:02-cv-00979

Plaintiff EEOC's Motion to Consolidate

EEOC v. John Pickle Company

Dec. 30, 2002

Dec. 30, 2002

Pleading / Motion / Brief

EEOC Press Release: "EEOC Sues Pickle Manufacturing Company for Discrimination Against Workers from India"

EEOC v. John Pickle Company

No Court

Jan. 2, 2003

Jan. 2, 2003

Press Release
8

4:02-cv-00979

Minute Sheet [Granting Motion to Consolidate]

EEOC v. John Pickle Company

Jan. 10, 2003

Jan. 10, 2003

Order/Opinion

4:02-cv-00085

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Phase One)

Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc.

Aug. 26, 2004

Aug. 26, 2004

Order/Opinion

344 F.Supp.2d 344

4:02-cv-00979

4:02-cv-00085

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Phase Two)

Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc.

May 24, 2006

May 24, 2006

Order/Opinion

434 F.Supp.2d 434

EEOC Press Release: "Judge Orders John Pickle Co. to Pay $1.24 Million to 52 Foreign Workers in 'Human Trafficking' Case"

Chellen and EEOC v. John Pickle Company, Inc.

No Court

May 26, 2006

May 26, 2006

Press Release

4:02-cv-00979

4:02-cv-00085

Amended Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law (Phase Two)

Chellen v. John Pickle Co., Inc.

Aug. 22, 2006

Aug. 22, 2006

Order/Opinion

446 F.Supp.2d 446

4:02-cv-00979

4:02-cv-00085

Final Judgment

Chellen v. John Pickle Co, Inc.; EEOC v. John Pickle Co, Inc.

Oct. 16, 2006

Oct. 16, 2006

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated April 15, 2024, 3:02 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
2

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC to consolidate case with case # 02-CV-85-EA(M) , and request for hearing (O/J) (tjc, Dpty Clk) Modified on 01/03/2003 (Entered: 12/30/2002)

Dec. 30, 2002

Dec. 30, 2002

3

BRIEF by plaintiff EEOC in support of motion to consolidate case with case # 02-CV-85-EA(M) [2-1], of motion request for hearing (O/J) [2-2] (tjc, Dpty Clk) Modified on 01/03/2003 (Entered: 12/30/2002)

Dec. 30, 2002

Dec. 30, 2002

4

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff EEOC by Michelle M. Robertson (tjc, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 12/30/2002)

Dec. 30, 2002

Dec. 30, 2002

5

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for plaintiff EEOC by Robert Canino (tjc, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 12/30/2002)

Dec. 30, 2002

Dec. 30, 2002

SUMMONS issued as to defendant John Pickle Company (tjc, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 12/30/2002)

Dec. 30, 2002

Dec. 30, 2002

REMARK: possible related cases are 02-CV-85-EA(M) and 02-CV-794-EA-(J) (tjc, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 12/30/2002)

Dec. 30, 2002

Dec. 30, 2002

6

MINUTE ORDER by Court Clerk : This case is hereby reassigned to Judge Claire V. Eagan, as this case is related to case no. 02-C-85-EA(M). The new case number is 02-C-979-EA(C), and all files should be marked accordingly. (cc: all counsel) (crp, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 01/08/2003)

Jan. 7, 2003

Jan. 7, 2003

7

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V. Eagan : setting motion to consolidate case with case # 02-CV-85-EA(M) [2-1], HRG set for 10:30 1/10/02; granting motion request for hearing [2-2] (cc: all counsel) (sac, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 01/09/2003)

Jan. 8, 2003

Jan. 8, 2003

8

MINUTES: by Judge Claire V. Eagan; ptys appear and hrg held; ct grants motion to consolidate case with case # 02-CV-85-EA(M) [2-1]; depos of Mr. Ray Murzello to be held today at 2:30; disc conf between Canino and McGowan to be held to review personnel files; 2/3/03 NJT stricken; ptys to submit proposed sched order. c/r Aaron LaDuke (sjm, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 01/10/2003)

Jan. 10, 2003

Jan. 10, 2003

8

MINUTES: by Judge Claire V. Eagan consolidating case 4:02-cv-85 with member cases 4:02-cv-979 (dcap, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 01/21/2003)

Jan. 10, 2003

Jan. 10, 2003

9

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V. Eagan : ; STATUS HRG set for 1:00 9/13/04 (cc: all counsel) (sac, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 09/13/2004)

Sept. 10, 2004

Sept. 10, 2004

10

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V. Eagan directing ptys to file simultaneous brfs by 11/30/04 (cc: all counsel) (sac, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 10/18/2004)

Oct. 15, 2004

Oct. 15, 2004

11

MOTION by plaintiff EEOC in 4:02-cv-00979, Chellen Plaintiffs in 4:02-cv-0085 for addtl time to desgn repr witns (o/j) (sac, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/22/2004)

Nov. 19, 2004

Nov. 19, 2004

12

WITNESS (DESIGNATION OF REPRESENTATIVE WITNESSES FOR PHASE II TRIAL PROCEEDINGS) list by plaintiff EEOC, Chellen Plaintiffs (sac, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 11/29/2004)

Nov. 24, 2004

Nov. 24, 2004

PROPOSED PRETRIAL ORDER by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, John Pickle Company, Inc., Chellen Plaintiffs (tjc, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 02/16/2005)

Feb. 16, 2005

Feb. 16, 2005

14

MINUTE ORDER by Judge Claire V Eagan that pursuant to Dkt. # 8, this case was consolidated with and entries are to be made in designated BASE FILE Case No. 02-CV-0085-CVE-FHM; NO FURTHER ENTRIES IN THIS CASE (Re: 8 Minutes - Miscellaneous, ) (RGG, Chambers) (Entered: 02/22/2006)

Feb. 22, 2006

Feb. 22, 2006

***Civil Case Terminated (see document number [213 in 02-CV-85-CVE-FHM]) (lml, Dpty Clk) (Entered: 09/25/2006)

Sept. 22, 2006

Sept. 22, 2006

Case Details

State / Territory: Oklahoma

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: Dec. 30, 2002

Closing Date: Oct. 16, 2006

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

John Pickle Company, Inc (Tulsa), Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1981

State law

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Amount Defendant Pays: 1240000

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Other Conditions of Employment (including assignment, transfer, hours, working conditions, etc)

Pay / Benefits

Discrimination-basis:

National origin discrimination

Race discrimination

Race:

Asian/Pacific Islander

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

National Origin/Ethnicity:

Indian