University of Michigan Law School
Civil Rights Litigation Clearinghouse
new search
page permalink
Case Name EEOC v. Incat Systems EE-MI-0088
Docket / Court 01-73461 ( E.D. Mich. )
State/Territory Michigan
Case Type(s) Equal Employment
Special Collection EEOC Study -- in sample
Attorney Organization EEOC
Case Summary
The EEOC's Detroit office filed this suit on September 10, 2001 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit). The EEOC alleged that defendant Incat Systems, Incorporated violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by discharging an employee because of her age, 65. ... read more >
The EEOC's Detroit office filed this suit on September 10, 2001 in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan (Detroit). The EEOC alleged that defendant Incat Systems, Incorporated violated the Age Discrimination in Employment Act by discharging an employee because of her age, 65. The defendant filed a motion for summary judgment on August 22, 2002. The motion was granted, after a hearing, on October 31, 2002. The EEOC appealed the judgment but voluntarily stipulated to dismissal of the appeal on December 5, 2003.

Jason Chester - 03/08/2008


compress summary

- click to show/hide ALL -
Issues and Causes of Action
click to show/hide detail
Issues
Discrimination-area
Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff
Discrimination-basis
Age discrimination
EEOC-centric
Direct Suit on Merits
General
Disparate Treatment
Plaintiff Type
EEOC Plaintiff
Causes of Action Age Discrimination in Employment Act (ADEA), 29 U.S.C. ยงยง 621 et seq.
Defendant(s) Incat Systems, Incorporated
Plaintiff Description Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.
Indexed Lawyer Organizations EEOC
Class action status sought No
Class action status granted No
Prevailing Party Defendant
Public Int. Lawyer Yes
Nature of Relief None
Source of Relief None
Form of Settlement None on record
Order Duration not on record
Case Closing Year 2002
Case Ongoing No
Additional Resources
click to show/hide detail
Case Studies Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform
Written: Mar. 01, 2008
By: Nancy Levit (University of Missouri-Kansas City School of Law)
Citation: 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

  Second Generation Employment Discrimination: A Structural Approach
By: Susan Sturm (Columbia Law School)
Citation: 101 Colum. L. Rev. 458 (2001)
[ Detail ] [ External Link ]

Docket(s)
2:01-cv-73461-RHC (E.D. Mich.) 12/05/2003
EE-MI-0088-9000.pdf | Detail
PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
General Documents
Order Granting Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment 10/31/2002 (E.D. Mich.)
EE-MI-0088-0001.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judgment 10/31/2002 (E.D. Mich.)
EE-MI-0088-0002.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Stipulation and Order Dismissing Plaintiff's Motion to Compel Discovery 11/13/2002 (E.D. Mich.)
EE-MI-0088-0003.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Order [USCA] 12/05/2003
EE-MI-0088-0004.pdf | Detail
Document Source: PACER [Public Access to Court Electronic Records]
Judges None on record
Monitors/Masters None on record
Plaintiff's Lawyers None on record
Defendant's Lawyers None on record
Other Lawyers None on record

- click to show/hide ALL -

new search
page permalink

- top of page -