Case: EEOC v. The Reed Group, Inc.

1:02-cv-00396 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan

Filed Date: June 3, 2002

Closed Date: Jan. 30, 2003

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In June 2002, the Detroit District Office of the EEOC brought this lawsuit against The Reed Group, Inc. in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Michigan alleging discrimination on the basis of sex in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the complaint alleged that the defendant subjected the charging party, a female employee, to a sexually hostile work environment consisting of unwelcome sexual comments, offensive remarks with sexual overtones, unwanted touching, sexually explicit phone calls on cell and house phone, and constructive discharged from employment. The defendant did not appear in the case, and the EEOC received entry of a default judgment in November 2002. The default judgment, made in January of 2003, required the defendant to pay $73,878.04 plus costs.

Summary Authors

David Friedman (10/8/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

1:02-cv-00396

Docket [PACER]

Jan. 30, 2003

Jan. 30, 2003

Docket
1

1:02-cv-00396

Complaint and Jury Demand

June 3, 2002

June 3, 2002

Complaint
13

1:02-cv-00396

Default Judgment

Jan. 30, 2003

Jan. 30, 2003

Order/Opinion

Resources

Docket

Last updated April 2, 2024, 3:10 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT and jury demand against Reed Group Inc., The ; filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (cmi, ) (Entered: 06/04/2002)

June 3, 2002

June 3, 2002

SUMMONS ISSUED as to Reed Group Inc., The (cmi, ) (Entered: 06/04/2002)

June 3, 2002

June 3, 2002

2

PROPOSED STIPULATION and ORDER to extend time to file answer or other responsive pleading by Reed Group Inc., The (mdr, ) (Entered: 07/03/2002)

July 2, 2002

July 2, 2002

3

STIPULATION AND ORDER granting extention of time to file answer or other responsive pleading; signed by Chief Judge Bell.(Chief Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb) (Entered: 07/09/2002)

July 9, 2002

July 9, 2002

Copies of stipulation and order 3 sent via U.S. Mail to attorney Rapport (mdr, ) (Entered: 07/09/2002)

July 9, 2002

July 9, 2002

SERVICE EXECUTED (IMPLIED) on defendant Reed Group Inc., The, through the filing of stipulation and order (mdr, ) (Entered: 07/10/2002)

July 9, 2002

July 9, 2002

4

NOTICE REGARDING PUBLIC ACCESS directed to Adele Rapport and Gary A. Chamberlin (mdr, ) (Entered: 09/10/2002)

Sept. 10, 2002

Sept. 10, 2002

5

NOTICE OF IMPENDING DEFAULT as to Defendant The Reed Group, Inc.; plaintiff to file a request for entry of default or advise the court that a responsive pleading has been filed by 11/6/2002 or the Court will enter default; signed by Judge Bell (Chief Judge Robert Holmes Bell, ymc) (Entered: 10/25/2002)

Oct. 24, 2002

Oct. 24, 2002

Copy of notice 5 sent via U.S. Mail to attorney Adele Rapport (mj) (Entered: 10/25/2002)

Oct. 25, 2002

Oct. 25, 2002

6

AMENDED COMPLAINT (1st) against Reed Group Inc., The ; filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Klein, Tammy) THIS DOCUMENT WAS FILED IN ERROR - PLEASE DISREGARD. Modified on 10/31/2002 (dpj). (Entered: 10/30/2002)

Oct. 30, 2002

Oct. 30, 2002

7

MOTION for Default Judgment as to defendant The Reed Group by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (gjf, ) (Entered: 11/05/2002)

Oct. 31, 2002

Oct. 31, 2002

8

BRIEF in Support of 7 filed by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (Attachments:, # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D, # 5 Exhibit E, # 6 Exhibit F, # 7 Exhibit G, # 8 Exhibit H)(gjf, ) (Entered: 11/05/2002)

Oct. 31, 2002

Oct. 31, 2002

9

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Equal Employment Opportunity Commission re 7, 8 (gjf, ) (Entered: 11/05/2002)

Oct. 31, 2002

Oct. 31, 2002

10

ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to Defendant Reed Group Inc.; signed by Chief Judge Bell.(Chief Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb) (Entered: 11/08/2002)

Nov. 8, 2002

Nov. 8, 2002

Copy of default 10 sent via U.S. Mail to attorney Adele Rapport (mj) (Entered: 11/08/2002)

Nov. 8, 2002

Nov. 8, 2002

12

Minute Entry: Motion Hearing re 7 Motion for Default Judgment held before Chief Judge Bell; Judgment granted for Plaintiff in the amount of $73,878.04 plus costs (Chief Judge Robert Holmes Bell, ymc) (Entered: 01/29/2003)

Jan. 29, 2003

Jan. 29, 2003

13

DEFAULT JUDGMENT in favor of Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission on behalf of the charging party Mary VanderWeele, and against Defendant The Reed Group in the total amount of $73,878.04 plus costs. This amount represents $23,878.04 in back pay, $20,000.00 in compensatory damages, and $30,000.00 in punitive damages; signed by Chief Judge Bell.(Chief Judge Robert Holmes Bell, kcb) (Entered: 01/30/2003)

Jan. 30, 2003

Jan. 30, 2003

Case Details

State / Territory: Michigan

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: June 3, 2002

Closing Date: Jan. 30, 2003

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

The Reed Group Inc. (Spring Lake), Private Entity/Person

The Reed Group Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Amount Defendant Pays: 73,878.04 plus costs

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Discharge / Constructive Discharge / Layoff

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex or Gender:

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits