Case: U.S. ex rel. Hoss v. Cuyler

2:74-02148 | U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

Filed Date: Aug. 19, 1974

Closed Date: 1978

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In 1974, an inmate in the State Correctional Institution at Graterford filed a Section 1983 suit, pro se, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against prison officials. Plaintiff contended that, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, he had been subjected to cruel and unusual punishment and denied procedural due process. The factual basis of the claim was his continued confinement in the "Behavior Adjustment Unit" of the prison. The court appointed law student coun…

In 1974, an inmate in the State Correctional Institution at Graterford filed a Section 1983 suit, pro se, in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against prison officials. Plaintiff contended that, in violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's Due Process Clause, he had been subjected to cruel and unusual punishment and denied procedural due process. The factual basis of the claim was his continued confinement in the "Behavior Adjustment Unit" of the prison. The court appointed law student counsel from the Indigent Prisoner Litigation Program.

Between 1976 and 1978, the parties unsuccessfully attempted to settle the case. During this period, plaintiff also underwent several psychiatric evaluations. After reviewing the record, the District Court (Judge Alfred Leopold Luongo) held that plaintiff had not been subjected to cruel and unusual punishment, but had been deprived of his right to due process by defendants' administrative segregation procedures. United States ex rel. Hoss v. Cuyler, 452 F. Supp. 256 (E.D. Pa. 1978). The court issued a permanent injunction ordering defendants to remedy the constitutional defects in BAU confinement procedures.

In August 1978, the court approved new administrative segregation criteria for use by officials of the State Correctional Institution at Graterford in a final judgment and decree. United States ex rel. Hoss v. Cuyler, 454 F. Supp. 51 (E.D. Pa. 1978). The new criteria established several factors to be considered by the Program Review Committee in determining whether an inmate warranted continued administrative confinement as a security risk.

The docket for this case is not available on PACER, and therefore our information ends with the last reported decision, dated August 2, 1978.

Summary Authors

Eoghan Keenan (6/10/2005)

People


Judge(s)

Luongo, Alfred Leopold (Pennsylvania)

Attorney for Plaintiff

Backstrom, James A. Jr. (Pennsylvania)

McKnight, H. Vincent Jr. (Pennsylvania)

Rifkin, Roy G. (Pennsylvania)

Attorney for Defendant

Goldberg, Joseph (Pennsylvania)

show all people

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:74-02148

Reported Opinion

May 1, 1978

May 1, 1978

Order/Opinion

452 F.Supp. 452

2:74-02148

Final Judgment and Decree

Aug. 2, 1978

Aug. 2, 1978

Order/Opinion

454 F.Supp. 454

Docket

Last updated April 16, 2024, 3:13 a.m.

Docket sheet not available via the Clearinghouse.

Case Details

State / Territory: Pennsylvania

Case Type(s):

Prison Conditions

Key Dates

Filing Date: Aug. 19, 1974

Closing Date: 1978

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

State prison inmate who was confined to prison's "Behavior Adjustment Unit"

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: Yes

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

State Correctional Institution (Graterford), State

Case Details

Causes of Action:

42 U.S.C. § 1983

Constitutional Clause(s):

Due Process

Cruel and Unusual Punishment

Available Documents:

Any published opinion

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Mixed

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Source of Relief:

Litigation

Order Duration: 1978 - 0

Issues

General:

Disciplinary procedures

Jails, Prisons, Detention Centers, and Other Institutions:

Administrative segregation

Medical/Mental Health:

Mental health care, general

Type of Facility:

Government-run