Case: EEOC v. Jack In The Box Inc.

2:03-cv-00814 | U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington

Filed Date: April 8, 2003

Closed Date: June 7, 2006

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In April 2003, the EEOC district office in Seattle, Washington brought this suit against Jack in the Box, Inc., an international fast food restaurant, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. Five women intervened in the suit. The complaint states that five female employees alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the women alleged that a manager at the Everett, Washington facility continuously subjected them to sexual harassmen…

In April 2003, the EEOC district office in Seattle, Washington brought this suit against Jack in the Box, Inc., an international fast food restaurant, in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Washington. Five women intervened in the suit. The complaint states that five female employees alleged violations of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. Specifically, the women alleged that a manager at the Everett, Washington facility continuously subjected them to sexual harassment. Two women claimed to have been victims of retaliation when they complained about the harassment. Without any discovery or substantive motions, the parties settled and a consent decree was entered in June 2004.

In the consent decree, the parties agreed that the defendant would pay the complainants $300,000, refrain from retaliating or discriminating on the basis of sex, expunge all employment records making reference to this litigation, issue neutral references that state only title and dates of employment, implement a nondiscrimination policy, implement a complaint procedure, implement a policy ensuring supervisor accountability, provide EEO training, post EEO notices, and make semiannual compliance reports to the EEOC. No costs or fees were awarded. The terms of the agreement ran for two years with the possibility of a one year extension if there was a breach.

Summary Authors

Joel Pettit (6/17/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

2:03-cv-00814

Docket

EEOC v. Jack In The Box, Inc.

June 17, 2004

June 17, 2004

Docket
1

2:03-cv-00814

Complaint

EEOC v. Jack in the Box, Inc.

April 8, 2003

April 8, 2003

Complaint
10

2:03-cv-00814

Complaint by Plaintiffs in Intervention

EEOC v. Jack in the Box, Inc.

July 2, 2003

July 2, 2003

Complaint
24-1

2:03-cv-00814

Consent Decree and (Proposed) Order

EEOC v. Jack in the Box, Inc.

June 3, 2004

June 3, 2004

Settlement Agreement

2:03-cv-00814

EEOC Litigation Settlement Report

EEOC v. Jack in the Box, Inc.

No Court

June 30, 2004

June 30, 2004

Press Release

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 27, 2024, 3:22 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT and JURY DEMAND (Summons(es) issued) Receipt # fee waived (USA) (PM) (Entered: 04/14/2003)

April 8, 2003

April 8, 2003

Clearinghouse
2

RETURN OF SERVICE of summons and complaint executed upon defendant Jack In The Box Inc on 4/10/03 (MD) (Entered: 04/15/2003)

April 14, 2003

April 14, 2003

3

ATTORNEY APPEARANCE for defendant by Wayne W Hansen, Laurie L Johnston (LS) (Entered: 05/01/2003)

April 29, 2003

April 29, 2003

4

ORDER RE: INITIAL DISCLOSURES, JOINT STATUS REPORT AND EARLY SETTLEMENT. Joint Status Report due 6/17/03 (cc: counsel, Judge) (MD) (Entered: 05/07/2003)

May 6, 2003

May 6, 2003

5

ANSWER to complaint [1-1] by defendant Jack In The Box Inc (MD) (Entered: 05/13/2003)

May 12, 2003

May 12, 2003

Clearinghouse
6

MOTION to intervene Amber Gallardo, Linda Gallardo, Michelle Grannis, Romita Prasad and Ena Williams as pltfs NOTED FOR 6/6/03 (MD) (Entered: 05/19/2003)

May 16, 2003

May 16, 2003

LODGED ORDER: re: motion to intervene Amber Gallardo, Linda Gallardo, Michelle Grannis, Romita Prasad and Ena Williams as pltfs [6- 1] (MD) (Entered: 05/19/2003)

May 16, 2003

May 16, 2003

7

JOINT STATUS REPORT filed by all parties. Est. Trial Days: 8-10 (MD) (Entered: 06/18/2003)

June 17, 2003

June 17, 2003

8

ORDER by Judge Marsha J. Pechman GRANTING motion to intervene Amber Gallardo, Linda Gallardo, Michelle Grannis, Romita Prasad and Ena Williams as pltfs [6-1] intervenor-plaintiff Amber Gallardo, Linda Gallardo', Michelle Grannis, Romita Prasad, Ena Williams (cc: counsel, Judge) (MD) (Entered: 06/20/2003)

June 19, 2003

June 19, 2003

9

ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES; Length of Trial: 8-10 days. Jury Trial set for/will resume 6/28/2004 09:00 AM before Hon. Marsha J. Pechman. Joinder of Parties due by 7/23/2003.Expert Witness Disclosure due by 12/30/2003. Discovery due by 2/27/2004. Motions due by 3/30/2004.39.1 Settlement Report due by 5/29/2004.Motions in Limine due by 6/1/2004. Pretrial Order due by 6/16/2004. Pretrial Conference set for 6/18/2004 10:00 AM before Hon. Marsha J. Pechman. Trial briefs and exhibits to be submitted by 6/23/2004. Voir dire/jury instructions due by 6/23/2004. Signed by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD, ) (Entered: 06/27/2003)

June 25, 2003

June 25, 2003

11

INITIAL DISCLOSURES by Intervenor Plaintiffs Amber Gallardo, Linda Gallardo', Michelle Grannis, Romita Prasad, Ena Williams.(MD, ) (Entered: 07/09/2003)

July 1, 2003

July 1, 2003

10

Intervenor COMPLAINT and jury demand, filed by Amber Gallardo, Linda Gallardo', Michelle Grannis, Romita Prasad, Ena Williams.(MD, ) (Entered: 07/09/2003)

July 2, 2003

July 2, 2003

Clearinghouse
12

SERVICE OF SUMMONS and Complaint returned executed upon defendant Jack In The Box Inc on 7/7/2003. (KERR, ) (Entered: 07/16/2003)

July 9, 2003

July 9, 2003

13

Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 9 Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates,, addressed to Stephen K Monro (MD, ) (Entered: 07/22/2003)

July 15, 2003

July 15, 2003

14

NOTICE of Change of Address by Wayne W Hansen, Laurie L Johnston (MD, ) (Entered: 09/09/2003)

Sept. 4, 2003

Sept. 4, 2003

15

ORDER regarding CM/ECF system by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (JS) (Entered: 12/23/2003)

Dec. 23, 2003

Dec. 23, 2003

16

ORDER denying stipulation and order regarding case schedule without prejudice. by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (JS) (Entered: 12/30/2003)

Dec. 30, 2003

Dec. 30, 2003

17

Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 15 Order addressed to Stephen K Monro (MD, ) (Entered: 01/12/2004)

Jan. 3, 2004

Jan. 3, 2004

18

Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 16 Order addressed to Stephen K Monro (MD, ) (Entered: 01/21/2004)

Jan. 10, 2004

Jan. 10, 2004

19

AMENDED ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES; Length of Trial: 8-10. Jury Trial set for/will resume 10/4/2004 before Hon. Marsha J. Pechman. Joinder of Parties due by 3/2/2004; Expert Witness Disclosure due by 4/7/2004; Motions due by 5/7/2004; Discovery due by 6/7/2004; Dispositive motions due by 7/6/2004; Settlement conference to be held by 8/5/2004; 39.1 Settlement Report due by 9/3/2004. Motions in Limine due by 9/7/2004; Pretrial Order due by 9/22/2004; Pretrial Conference set for 9/24/2004 09:00 AM before Hon. Marsha J. Pechman. Trial briefs to be submitted by 9/29/2004; Voir dire/jury instructions due by 9/29/2004; by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD, ) (Entered: 02/04/2004)

Feb. 3, 2004

Feb. 3, 2004

20

AMENDED ORDER SETTING TRIAL DATE AND RELATED DATES; Length of Trial: 8-10. Jury Trial set for/will resume 10/4/2004 09:00 AM before Hon. Marsha J. Pechman. Joinder of Parties due by 3/2/2004; Expert Witness Disclosure due by 4/7/2004; Motions due by 5/7/2004; Discovery due by 6/7/2004; Dispositive motions due by 7/6/2004; Settlement conference to be held by 8/5/2004; 39.1 Settlement Report due by 9/3/2004. Motions in Limine due by 9/7/2004; Pretrial Order due by 9/22/2004; Pretrial Conference set for 9/24/2004 09:00 AM before Hon. Marsha J. Pechman. Trial briefs to be submitted by 9/29/2004; Voir dire/jury instructions due by 9/29/2004; by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD, ) (Entered: 02/05/2004)

Feb. 4, 2004

Feb. 4, 2004

21

Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 19 Amended Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates, addressed to Stephen Kenneth Monro (AF, ) (Entered: 02/18/2004)

Feb. 12, 2004

Feb. 12, 2004

22

Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 19 Order Setting Trial Date and Related Dates,, addressed to Stephen Kenneth Monro (Temp1, ) (Entered: 02/18/2004)

Feb. 13, 2004

Feb. 13, 2004

23

NOTICE of Association of Attorney by Stephen Kenneth Monro on behalf of Plaintiff Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Intervenor Plaintiffs Amber Gallardo, Linda Gallardo', Michelle Grannis, Romita Prasad, Ena Williams W/ATTORNEY THEODORE R WILLHITE (MD, ) (Entered: 02/25/2004)

Feb. 23, 2004

Feb. 23, 2004

24

STIPULATION of parties Consent Decree and Proposed Order . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Notice 8438# 2 Exhibit A- Aviso 8438# 3 Exhibit A- Notice for other stores# 4 Exhibit A- Aviso for other stores) (Healy, Teri) (Entered: 06/03/2004)

June 3, 2004

June 3, 2004

25

CONSENT DECREE- this lawsuit is hereby dismissed with prejudice and without costs or attorneys' fees to any party. Court retains jurisdiction of this matter for purposes of enforcing the Consent Decree approved herein by Judge Marsha J. Pechman. (MD, ) (Entered: 06/08/2004)

June 7, 2004

June 7, 2004

Clearinghouse
26

Mail Returned as Undeliverable re 25 Decree,, Terminated Case, addressed to Stephen K Monro (MD, ) (Entered: 06/18/2004)

June 17, 2004

June 17, 2004

Case Details

State / Territory: Washington

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

IWPR/Wage Project Consent Decree Study

Multi-LexSum (in sample)

Key Dates

Filing Date: April 8, 2003

Closing Date: June 7, 2006

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: No

Class Action Outcome: Not sought

Defendants

Jack in the Box, Inc. (Everett, Washington), Private Entity/Person

Jack in the Box, Inc., Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Causes of Action:

Title VII (including PDA), 42 U.S.C. § 2000e

State Anti-Discrimination Law

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Complaint (any)

Monetary Relief

Injunctive (or Injunctive-like) Relief

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Injunction / Injunctive-like Settlement

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 300000

Order Duration: 2004 - 2006

Content of Injunction:

Expungement of Employment Record

Neutral/Positive Reference

Discrimination Prohibition

Retaliation Prohibition

Develop anti-discrimination policy

Post/Distribute Notice of Rights / EE Law

Provide antidiscrimination training

Implement complaint/dispute resolution process

Reporting

Recordkeeping

Monitoring

Issues

General:

Retaliation

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

Harassment / Hostile Work Environment

Discrimination-basis:

Sex discrimination

Affected Sex or Gender:

Female

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

EEOC Intervened in Private Suit

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit