Case: EEOC v. JACK IN THE BOX

3:01-cv-00190 | U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona

Filed Date: Jan. 31, 2001

Closed Date: Aug. 6, 2002

Clearinghouse coding complete

Case Summary

In January 2001, the Phoenix Office of the EEOC brought this lawsuit against Jack in the Box in the U.S. District Court for the District of Arizona. We do not have a copy for the complaint; therefore, the exact allegations involved are unknown. The charging party intervened in the lawsuit in May 2001. Following extensive discovery, the parties settled the case in August 2002 through a consent decree. We do not have a copy of the consent decree; therefore, the exact terms of the arrangement are unknown.

Summary Authors

David Friedman (10/24/2007)

Documents in the Clearinghouse

Document

3:01-cv-00190

Docket [PACER]

EEOC v. Jack In The Box

Aug. 6, 2002

Aug. 6, 2002

Docket

Resources

Docket

Last updated March 31, 2024, 3:07 a.m.

ECF Number Description Date Link Date / Link
1

COMPLAINT FILED (LSP) (Entered: 02/01/2001)

Jan. 31, 2001

Jan. 31, 2001

2

RETURN OF SERVICE EXECUTED by personal service of summons and compliant upon Statutory Agent, C.T. Corporation System for dft Jack In The Box on 2/1/01 (KMG) (Entered: 02/08/2001)

Feb. 5, 2001

Feb. 5, 2001

3

STIPULATION to extend time to answer or file responsive pleading by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box [3-1] (KMG) (Entered: 02/23/2001)

Feb. 22, 2001

Feb. 22, 2001

5

ANSWER by dft Jack In The Box (MAP) (Entered: 03/12/2001)

March 9, 2001

March 9, 2001

6

ORDER SETTING RULE 16 SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Susan R. Bolton prel scheduling conf set for 4:00 4/23/01 (cc: all counsel) (MAP) (Entered: 03/14/2001)

March 14, 2001

March 14, 2001

7

MOTION to strike Dft's Affirmative Defenses by pla EEOC [7-1] (MAP) (Entered: 03/29/2001)

March 28, 2001

March 28, 2001

8

STIPULATION re Exchange of Initial Disclosures by pla, dft (MAP) (Entered: 04/10/2001)

April 6, 2001

April 6, 2001

9

MOTION to intervene as party plaintiff by Aubrey Barker [9-1] (MAP) (Entered: 04/10/2001)

April 9, 2001

April 9, 2001

10

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton granting stipulation that parties shall serve their Rule 26(a) Initial Dislcosure Stmts nlt 4/16/01 (cc: all counsel) (MAP) (Entered: 04/10/2001)

April 10, 2001

April 10, 2001

12

STIPULATION to Dismiss Affirmative Defenses and Withdraw Pla EEOC's Motion to Strike by pla, dft (MAP) (Entered: 04/16/2001)

April 10, 2001

April 10, 2001

11

MINUTE ORDER Pursuant to the stipulation of counsel and Order entered by the Court on 4/11/01, IT IS ORDERED finding the motion to strike Dft's Affirmative Defenses by pla EEOC [7-1] as moot. (cc: all counsel; SRB) [11-1] (MAW) (Entered: 04/12/2001)

April 12, 2001

April 12, 2001

15

PROPOSED Case Management Plan (MAP) (Entered: 04/18/2001)

April 16, 2001

April 16, 2001

16

NOTICE of compliance of initial disclosure statement pursuant to FRCivP 26(a) by dft Jack In The Box (MAP) (Entered: 04/18/2001)

April 16, 2001

April 16, 2001

13

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton granting stipulation dismissing Dft Jack in the Bos Inc's Affirmative Defenses and Withdrawing Pla EEOC's Motion to Strike Dft's Affirmative Defenses (cc: all counsel) (MAP) (Entered: 04/17/2001)

April 17, 2001

April 17, 2001

14

NOTICE of compliance of initial disclosure statement pursuant to FRCivP 26(a) by pla EEOC (former emp) (Entered: 04/18/2001)

April 17, 2001

April 17, 2001

17

MINUTE ENTRY before Judge Susan R. Bolton Crt Rptr: Kim Myrick Appearances: Michelle Marshall and Mary O'Neill for pla; John Ogden and Mary Jo Foster for dft. Prel scheduling conf held. The Court enters the following deadlines: discovery ddl set for 3/1/02; dispositive motions due 4/4/02; PTO ddl set for 7/22/02; motions in limine to be filed by 7/22/02 w/ Responses due by 7/31/02 - no Reply. IT IS ORDERED setting Pretrial conference on 8/5/02 at 9:30 a.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED setting jury trial on 8/13/02 at 9:00 a.m. Estimated length: 4 days. Rule 16 Scheduling Order to follow. Counsel are provided a copy of the Joint Proposed Pretrial Order this date. [cc: SRB] [17-2] (MAW) (Entered: 04/23/2001)

April 23, 2001

April 23, 2001

18

JOINDER by pla EEOC to [9-1] mtn to intervene by Ms. Barker (former emp) (Entered: 04/24/2001)

April 23, 2001

April 23, 2001

20

STIPULATION re motion to intervene by dft, intervenor (MAP) (Entered: 04/30/2001)

April 26, 2001

April 26, 2001

21

MINUTE ORDER There being no opposition, IT IS ORDERED granting motion to intervene as party plaintiff by Aubrey Barker [9-1] (cc: all counsel; SRB) [21-1] (MAW) (Entered: 05/01/2001)

May 1, 2001

May 1, 2001

22

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton granting stipulation that Pla Intervenor's claims for negligent hiring and supervision and intentional infliction of emotional distress set forth in her (Proposed) Complaint are hereby withdrawn w/out prejudice [9-1] terminating party Aubrey Barker , (cc: all counsel) (MAP) (Entered: 05/01/2001)

May 1, 2001

May 1, 2001

23

NOTICE by dft Jack In The Box of change of address for J Mark Ogden (MAP) (Entered: 05/30/2001)

May 29, 2001

May 29, 2001

24

STIPULATION to dismiss case by pla, dft (MAP) (Entered: 06/26/2001)

June 22, 2001

June 22, 2001

25

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton granting stipulation to dismiss the pla's claims under Section 707 of Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-6 by pla, dft (cc: all counsel) (KMG) (Entered: 06/27/2001)

June 27, 2001

June 27, 2001

26

COMPLAINT IN INTERVENTION FILED by Intervnor Aubrey Barker against Jack in the Box, Inc. and William Freedle (KMG) Modified on 08/15/2001 (Entered: 08/15/2001)

July 25, 2001

July 25, 2001

27

WAIVER of Service of summons and complaint upon dft Jack In The Box; waiver sent on 8/24/01 (MAP) (Entered: 09/01/2001)

Aug. 30, 2001

Aug. 30, 2001

28

ANSWER to Complaint [26-1] by dft Jack In The Box (KMG) (Entered: 10/30/2001)

Oct. 23, 2001

Oct. 23, 2001

29

JOINT MOTION to extend time for Disclosing Expert Witnesses by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box [29-1] (KMG) (Entered: 11/05/2001)

Nov. 1, 2001

Nov. 1, 2001

30

MOTION to Extend Time as to Discovery Deadlines by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box [30-1] (KMG) (Entered: 11/19/2001)

Nov. 16, 2001

Nov. 16, 2001

31

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton granting motion to extend time for Disclosing Expert Witnesses by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box [29-1] Plaintiff EEOC may have an extension of time to/including 1/15/02; Dft Jack in the Box may have thru 2/15/02 (cc: all counsel) (MAP) (Entered: 11/20/2001)

Nov. 20, 2001

Nov. 20, 2001

32

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton granting joint motion to Extend Time as to Discovery Deadlines by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box [30-1] ; Discovery ddl reset for 1/31/02 ; Dispositive motions now due 2/28/02 (cc: all counsel) (KMG) (Entered: 11/21/2001)

Nov. 21, 2001

Nov. 21, 2001

33

NOTICE of service of discovery by pla EEOC serving: First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories, First Request for Production of documents and First Request for Admissions. (KMG) (Entered: 12/05/2001)

Dec. 3, 2001

Dec. 3, 2001

35

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton granting stipulation to Extend Time until 1/18/02 for dft to Respond to pla's First Set of Requests for Admission, First Set of Requests for Production, and First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories. by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box (cc: all counsel) (KMG) (Entered: 01/03/2002)

Jan. 3, 2002

Jan. 3, 2002

36

STIPULATION for Order to Designate as a Prescott Case by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box, intervenor Aubrey Barker (KMG) (Entered: 01/08/2002)

Jan. 7, 2002

Jan. 7, 2002

37

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton granting stipulation for Order to Designate this case as a Prescott Case by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box, intervenor Aubrey Barker (cc: all counsel) (KMG) (Entered: 01/09/2002)

Jan. 9, 2002

Jan. 9, 2002

38

NOTICE of service of discovery by dft Jack In The Box serving; First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories to pla Intervenor. (KMG) (Entered: 01/24/2002)

Jan. 22, 2002

Jan. 22, 2002

39

NOTICE of service of discovery by dft Jack In The Box serving; Responses to pla's First Set of Non-Unifrom Interrogatories; Responses to pla's First Request for Admissions; and dft's Responses to pla's First Request for Production of documents. (KMG) (Entered: 01/28/2002)

Jan. 25, 2002

Jan. 25, 2002

40

NOTICE of service of discovery by dft Jack In The Box serving First Set of Requests for Prodcution of documents and dft's First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories to pla. (KMG) (Entered: 02/04/2002)

Jan. 29, 2002

Jan. 29, 2002

41

STIPULATION (Stipulated Motion) to Extend Time/Deadlines by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box, intervenor Aubrey Barker (KMG) (Entered: 02/04/2002)

Jan. 30, 2002

Jan. 30, 2002

42

MINUTE ORDER The Court being in receipt of the Stipulated Motion for Extension of Deadlines, IT IS ORDERED resetting PTO ddl to 11/25/02; motions in limine to be filed by 11/18/02 w/ Responses due 11/27/02 - no Reply. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED continuing Pretrial conference to 12/2/02 at 9:30 a.m. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED continuing jury trial to 12/10/02 at 9:00 a.m. Estimated length: 4 days. (cc: all counsel; SRB) [42-2] (MAW) (Entered: 02/04/2002)

Feb. 4, 2002

Feb. 4, 2002

43

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton granting stipulation (Stipulated Motion) to Extend Time/Deadlines by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box, intervenor Aubrey Barker ; Discovery ddl reset for 4/29/02; Final supplementation of discovery us extended to 5/31/02; Dispositive motions now due 6/3/02 (cc: all counsel) (KMG) (Entered: 02/13/2002)

Feb. 13, 2002

Feb. 13, 2002

44

STIPULATION to Extend Time for Pla Intervenor's Response to Requests for Production and Interrogatories by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box (KMG) (Entered: 02/27/2002)

Feb. 26, 2002

Feb. 26, 2002

45

STIPULATION to Extend Time for pla to Respond to dft's First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box (KMG) (Entered: 02/28/2002)

Feb. 27, 2002

Feb. 27, 2002

46

MINUTE ENTRY before Judge Susan R. Bolton . Crt Rptr: Kim Myrick. Appearances: Michelle Marshall (telephonically) for pla; Mary Jo Foster (telephonically) for dft. Discovery dispute hearing held at the request of pla's counsel re: request for 5 personnel files and request for documentation of Jack In the Box's internal investigation of sexual harassment. Discussion held. IT IS ORDERED sustaining dft's objection to production of personnel files with the exception of Ms. Sebert. She may authorize the release of her file to the EEOC if she so wishes. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED sustaining dft's objection to production of the internal investigation. [cc: SRB] [46-1] re: minute entry [46-1] (MAW) (Entered: 03/06/2002)

March 5, 2002

March 5, 2002

47

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton granting stipulation to Extend Time until 3/13/02 for pla to Respond to dft's First Set of Non-Uniform Interrogatories and First Set of Requests for Production by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box (cc: all counsel) (KMG) (Entered: 03/07/2002)

March 7, 2002

March 7, 2002

48

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton granting stipulation to Extend Time until 3/11/02 in which for Pla Intervenor's Response to Requests for Production and Interrogatories by pla EEOC, dft Jack In The Box (cc: all counsel) (KMG) (Entered: 03/07/2002)

March 7, 2002

March 7, 2002

49

NOTICE by pla EEOC OF TAKING DEPO OF William Freedle on the following date(s): 3/28/02 (MAP) (Entered: 03/14/2002)

March 14, 2002

March 14, 2002

50

NOTICE of service of discovery by pla EEOC . (MAP) (Entered: 03/14/2002)

March 14, 2002

March 14, 2002

51

RULE 33(C) MOTION for permission to Supplement Interrogatories after the close of Discovery by pla EEOC [51-1] (MAP) (Entered: 03/14/2002)

March 14, 2002

March 14, 2002

52

NOTICE by pla EEOC OF TAKING DEPO OF Robert Vranas, II on the following date(s): 3/22/02 (MAP) (Entered: 03/15/2002)

March 14, 2002

March 14, 2002

53

AMENDED NOTICE by pla EEOC OF TAKING VIDEO DEPO OF William Freedle on the following date(s): 3/28/02 (KMG) (Entered: 03/18/2002)

March 15, 2002

March 15, 2002

54

NOTICE by pla EEOC OF TAKING DEPO(S) OF Kim Gallen; David Portugal; Tim Bisbocci on the following date(s): 4/3; 4/4; 4/4 (KMG) (Entered: 03/18/2002)

March 15, 2002

March 15, 2002

55

NOTICE by pla EEOC OF TAKING VIDEO DEPO OF Jeff Middleton on the following date(s): 4/19/02 (KMG) (Entered: 03/18/2002)

March 15, 2002

March 15, 2002

56

NOTICE of compliance of initial disclosure statement pursuant to FRCivP 26(a) by dft Jack In The Box (MAP) (Entered: 03/25/2002)

March 21, 2002

March 21, 2002

57

RESPONSE (OPPOSITION) by dft Jack In The Box to motion for permission to Supplement Interrogatories after the close of Discovery by pla EEOC [51-1] (MAP) (Entered: 03/25/2002)

March 21, 2002

March 21, 2002

58

NOTICE of service of discovery by dft Jack In The Box . (MAP) (Entered: 03/25/2002)

March 21, 2002

March 21, 2002

59

NOTICE of service of discovery by dft Jack In The Box . (MAP) (Entered: 03/25/2002)

March 21, 2002

March 21, 2002

60

STIPULATION to Stay and Extend Time regarding Discovery Deadline to allow the parties time to engage in a private mediation of this case by plas, dfts (KMG) (Entered: 04/01/2002)

March 28, 2002

March 28, 2002

62

REPLY by pla EEOC to response to motion for permission to Supplement Interrogatories after the close of Discovery by pla EEOC [51-1] (KMG) (Entered: 04/02/2002)

April 1, 2002

April 1, 2002

63

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton granting in part and denying in part pla's Motion for permission to Supplement Interrogatories after the close of Discovery by pla EEOC [51-1] (cc: all counsel) (KMG) (Entered: 04/08/2002)

April 8, 2002

April 8, 2002

64

NOTICE of compliance of second supplemental disclosure statement pursuant to FRCivP 26(a) by dft Jack In The Box (KMG) (Entered: 04/18/2002)

April 17, 2002

April 17, 2002

65

NOTICE of compliance of third supplemental disclosure statement pursuant to FRCivP 26(a) by dft Jack In The Box (KMG) (Entered: 05/02/2002)

May 1, 2002

May 1, 2002

66

NOTICE of compliance of first supplemental disclosure statement pursuant to FRCivP 26(a) by pla EEOC (KMG) (Entered: 05/08/2002)

May 7, 2002

May 7, 2002

67

ORDER by Judge Susan R. Bolton that this matter will be dismissed with prejudice (due to settlement) within 30 days of the date of this order unless a stipulation to dismiss is filed prior to the dismissal date. FURTHER ORDERED vacating the pretrial conference and trial date. ; possbl dsm ddl set for 6/17/02 (cc: all counsel) (KMG) Modified on 05/17/2002 (Entered: 05/17/2002)

May 17, 2002

May 17, 2002

68

CONSENT DECREE/JUDGMENT by Judge Susan R. Bolton: That this Decree resolves all claims of the Commission, Intervenor Aubrey Barker and all class members identified in Attachment A to this Decree against dft Jack in the Box, Inc., including back pay, compensatory and punitive damages, interest, injunctive relief, attorney's fees and costs arising out of the issues in this lawsuit. Jack in the Box, and its officers, agents...are permanently enjoined for the duration of the Decree from: a) sexually harassing any employee; b) retaliating against any employee because he or she: i) opposes or opposed discriminatory practices made unlawful by Title VII; ii) files or filed a charge of dismcrimination or is assisting or has assisted or participated or is participating in the filing of a charge of discrimination; or iii) assists, assisted, participates or participated in an investigation or proceeding brought under the Federal or State laws prohibiting discrimination or retaliation. Without admitting liability, Jack in the Box shall pay the gross sum of $92,500.00 to be distributed to the aggrieved persons listed in Attachment A. To be paid within ten business days from the date of the entry of this Decree. to dismiss case (cc: all counsel) (KMG) (Entered: 08/06/2002)

Aug. 6, 2002

Aug. 6, 2002

Case Details

State / Territory: Arizona

Case Type(s):

Equal Employment

Special Collection(s):

EEOC Study — in sample

Key Dates

Filing Date: Jan. 31, 2001

Closing Date: Aug. 6, 2002

Case Ongoing: No

Plaintiffs

Plaintiff Description:

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, on behalf of one or more workers.

Plaintiff Type(s):

Private Plaintiff

EEOC Plaintiff

Attorney Organizations:

EEOC

Public Interest Lawyer: Yes

Filed Pro Se: No

Class Action Sought: Unknown

Class Action Outcome: Unknown

Defendants

William Freedle, Private Entity/Person

Jack in the Box, Private Entity/Person

Case Details

Available Documents:

Trial Court Docket

Outcome

Prevailing Party: Plaintiff

Nature of Relief:

Damages

Source of Relief:

Settlement

Form of Settlement:

Court Approved Settlement or Consent Decree

Amount Defendant Pays: 92500

Issues

Discrimination-area:

Disparate Treatment

EEOC-centric:

Direct Suit on Merits

Private Party intervened in EEOC suit